Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/59579| 題名: | 國民中學教師心理擁有感、教師工作滿意度對教師組織公民行為影響之研究 Examining the Effect of Psychological Ownership and Job Satisfaction on Organizational Citizenship Behavior of Junior High School Teachers |
作者: | 張雅婷 Chang, Ya Ting |
貢獻者: | 吳政達 張雅婷 Chang, Ya Ting |
關鍵詞: | 心理擁有感 工作滿意度 組織公民行為 phychological ownership job satisfaction organizational citizenship behavior |
日期: | 2012 | 上傳時間: | 2-Sep-2013 | 摘要: | 本研究旨在探討國民中學教師心理擁有感、教師工作滿意度與教師組織公民行為之關係，並探究工作滿意度在心理擁有感與組織公民行為之間是否具有中介變項的效果。研究採用問卷調查法，以臺北市國民中學教師為樣本母群體，採分層隨機抽樣，抽出30所國中共計450位受試者，回收有效問卷384份，所得資料分別以描述性統計、t考驗、單因子變異數分析、迴歸分析Sobel檢定等統計方法進行資料的分析與處理，以了解國中教師心理擁有感、工作滿意度與組織公民行為之現況、差異情形及其預測力。研究結論如下：一、國中教師對學校的心理擁有感現況中上。二、國中教師工作滿意程度屬中上，以「工作環境」滿意度最高。三、當前國中教師組織公民行為之表現屬中上，以「對學生之公民行為」最佳。四、年齡、服務總年資兩個背景變項在教師心理擁有感上有顯著差異。五、年齡、擔任職務兩個背景變項在教師工作滿意度上有顯著差異。六、服務總年資、教育程度及擔任職務等三個背景變項在組織公民行為上有顯著差異。七、心理擁有感與工作滿意度對組織公民行為具顯著正相關及預測效果。八、工作滿意度在教師心理擁有感與組織公民行為間具有部份中介效果。最後依據研究結果與結論，提出具體建議，以作為教育行政機關、國中校長以及未來研究的參考。 The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship among phychological ownership, job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior of junior high school teachers. Furthermore, the mediating effect of phychological ownership and job satisfaction on organizational citizenship behavior was examined. A survey research was conducted using a sample of junior high school teachers in Taipei. 450 teachers from 30 schools were selected by stratified random sampling. 384 valid sample data collected was analyzed and processed with the methods of descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA, multiple-regression analysis and Sobel test. The major findings of this study are as follows: 1.Teacher’s phychological ownership is above average. 2. Teacher’s job satisfaction is above average, “working environment” ranks the top. 3. Teacher’s OCB is above average, “OCB-defending the individual students” ranks the top. 4. Two demographic variables, including age and total serving years show significant differences in phychological ownership. 5. Two demographic variables, including age and position, show significant differences in job satisfaction. 6. Three demographic variables, including total serving years, education and position show significant differences in OCB. 7. Phychological ownership is positively related to job satisfaction and OCB. In addition, phychological ownership has positive direct effect on OCB, job satisfaction has positive direct effect on OCB. Phychological ownership has positive direct effect on job satisfaction. 8. Job satisfaction does have mediating effect on phychological ownership and OCB. Based on the results of the research, suggestions for educational administration authorities, principals and future related study are proposed. |
參考文獻: | 一、中文部分\n王派土（2003）。桃園縣國民小學組織文化與教師工作滿意度相關之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立新竹教育大學學校行政碩士班，新竹市。\n王詩妤（2011）。組織氣候、工作滿意與組織公民行為關係之研究－以Ｃ國民中學為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣海洋大學航運管理學系，基隆市。\n江嘉玲（2009）。員工與組織契合、員工與工作契合、心理擁有感與脈絡性績效之關連研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學勞工研究所，臺北市。\n李雯智（2009）。國小教師自我效能、工作特性、工作滿足、工作倦怠與組織公民行為之關係（未出版之博士論文）。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所，嘉義市。\n余政達（2013）。分布式領導、溝通行為、 教師工作滿意度與學校效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所，屏東市。\n沈緯鈞、廖主民(2011)。運動心理因子之中介模式分析策略─重新審視迴歸分析取向。中華體育季刊，25(1)，91-99。\n林文正（2012）。國小教師正向心理資本與教學效能、工作滿意度及主觀幸福感關聯模式之建構與驗證（未出版之博士論文）。國立高雄師範大學教育學系，高雄市。\n吳政達、湯家偉、羅清水（2007）。心理契約、組織公平、組織信任與組織公民行為結構關係之驗證：以臺北地區國民中學學校組織為例。教育政策論壇，10（1），133-159。\n吳政達（2009）。學校組織中領導者與部屬交換關係、組織公平、組織自尊與工作滿意度對組織公民行為影響之研究。教育政策論壇，12（1），141-161。\n邱嘉品（2009）。國民中學教師工作滿足、組織承諾與組織公民行為之相關研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系，彰化市。\n邱淑芬、韓志翔、林盈君（2002）。員工參與制度與組織公民行為之關係─以臺灣電子產業為例。管理學報，19（6），1009-1043。\n邱皓政（2011）。結構方程模式：LISREL / SIMPLIS的原理與應用（第二版）。臺北市：雙葉書廊。\n洪碩伶（2012）。臺北市國民小學校長知識領導與教師組織公民行為關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所，臺北市。\n洪雅苓（2011）。國民小學長期代理代課教師工作滿意度與組織公民行為關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東教育大學資訊科學系，屏東市。\n胡文字（2010）。程序公平、心理擁有感與工作士氣之關聯性分析──以工作單位行為整合為跨層次干擾變項（未出版之碩士論文）。國立中正大學勞工研究所，嘉義市。\n侯勝宗（2006）。科技心理擁有感、在地知識與科技採：科技意會觀點（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學科技管理研究所，臺北市。\n侯勝宗、黃櫻美、羅育如、李思壯（2005）。心理擁有感與科技採用行為研究：量表發展。科技管理學報，10（4），81-110。\n秦夢群（2005）。教育行政－理論部分（5版）。臺北：五南。\n秦夢群、吳勁甫、濮世緯（2007）。校長轉型、交易領導與教師工作滿意關係之後設分析。教育與心理研究，30（4），27-55。\n秦夢群（2012）。教育行政理論與模式。臺北：五南。\n徐宗盛（2010）。校長真誠領導與教師組織承諾、組織公民行為關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學學校行政碩士在職專班，臺北市。\n高雅曼（2009）。國民中學教師角色定義幅度對組織公民行為影響之研究-質量混合方法之應用（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學教育行政與政策研究所，臺北市。\n教育部（2013）。國民中學校別資料。取自http://www.edu.tw/pages/detail.aspx? Node=3752&Page=17284&Index=8&WID=31d75a44-efff-4c44-a075-15a9eb7aecdf\n許道然（2002）。公部門組織信任與組織公民行為關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學公共行政學系，臺北市。\n張春興（2005）。教育心理學－三化取向的理論與實際。臺北：東華。\n陳玫樺（2011）。領導者—成員交換關係對教師離職傾向影響之研究：以教師工作滿意度為中介變項（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學教育行政與政策研究所，臺北市。\n曾貴珍（2010）。國民中學內部行銷策略 工作滿足與教師組織公民行為之關聯（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學學校行政碩士在職專班，臺北市。\n游肇賢（2003）。國中兼任行政工作教師角色衝突與工作滿意之調查研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所，高雄市。\n湯家偉（2010）。教師組織公民行為前置因素跨層次模式之研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學教育研究所，臺北市。\n廖雅靖（2010）。屏東縣國中教師工作滿意度與教師效能感相關研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系，臺北市。\n蔡雅靜（2011）。探究影響臺北市國小教師工作滿意度之因果模式（未出版之碩士論文）。臺北市立教育大學社會學習領域教學碩士學位班，臺北市。\n黃添利（2012）。國民小學教師職場關係與工作滿意度對組織公民行為影響之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺南大學教育經營與管理研究所，臺南市。\n黃淑娟（2011）。教師組織公民行為前置變項之後設分析（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學教育行政與政策研究所，臺北市。\n黃德信（2008）。國民小學教師知覺的組織公平、工作滿意與組織公民行為的關係：以關係需求為干擾變項（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺南大學教管所教育行政碩士班，臺南市。\n閻自安（2000）。臺灣地區國民小學學校本位決策與校長領導方式、教師工作滿意度之關係研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學教育學系博士論文，臺北市。\n鄭燿男（2002）。國中小教師的組織公民行為及其影響因素之研究─學校組織公民行為模型初構（未出版之博士論文）。國立高雄師範大學教育學系，高雄市。\n劉敏熙、胡汶沁（2010）。心理擁有感、工作滿足及組織公民行為三者間的關係。2010第13屆科際整合管理研討會，158-172。\n\n二、英文部分\nAdams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 2, 267-299. New York, NY: Academic Press.\nAvey, J., Wernsing, T., & Palanski, M. (2012). Exploring the process of ethical leadership: The mediating role of employee voice and psychological ownership. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 21-34.\nBateman, T.S., & Organ, D.W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee citizenship. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 587-595.\nBandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.\nBarnard, C. T. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.\nBeggan, J. K. (1992). On the social nature of nonsocial perception: the mere ownership effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 229-237.\nBelk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Consumer research, 15, 139-168. \nBelogolovsky, E., & Somech, A. (2009). Teachers’ organizational citizenship behavior: Examining the boundary between in-role behavior and extra-role behavior from the perspective of teachers, principals and parents, Teaching and Teacher Education (2009), doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.032.\nBogler, R., & Somech, A. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers’ organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 277-289.\nBernhard, F., & O`Driscoll, M. P. (2011). Psychological ownership in small family-owned businesses: Leadership style and nonfamily-employees’ work attitudes and behaviors. Group & Organization Management, 36(3), 345-384.\nBrayfield, A. H., & Rothe, H. F. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35(5), 307-311.\nBogler, R. (2002). Two profiles of schoolteachers: A discriminant analysis of job satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 665-673.\nBuchko, A. A. (1993). The effects of employee ownership on employee attitudes: An integrated causal model and path analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 30(4), 633–657.\nCaprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers` self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students` academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44(6), 473-490.\nChen, L. Y. (2004). Examining the effect of organization culture and leadership behaviors on organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and job performance at small and middle-sized firms of Taiwan. Journal of American Academy of Business , 5(1), 432-438.\nCheung, Y. L., & Cheung, Y. H. (2013). Effect of emotional dissonance on organizational citizenship behavior: Testing the stressor-strain-outcome model. The Journal of Psychology, 147(1), 89-104.\nCram, R, & Paton, H. (1993). Personal possessions and self-identity: The experiences of elderly women in three residential settings. Australian Journal of Aging, 12, 19-24.\nCockburn, D., & Haydn, T. (2004). Recruiting and retaining teachers: Understading why teachers teach. London: Routledge Falmer.\nCollie, R. J., Shapka, J. D., & Perry, N. E. (2012). School climate and social-emotional learning: predicting teacher stress, job satisfaction, and teaching efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1189-1204.\nCoomber, B., & Barriball, K. L. (2007). Impact of job satisfaction components on intent to leave and turnover for hospital-based nurses: A review of the research literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44, 297-314.\nDittmar, H. (1992). The social psychology of material possessions: To have is to be. New York: St. Martin’s Press.\nDiPaola, M. F., Tatter, C. J., & Hoy, W. K. (2005). Measuring organizational citizenship behavior in schools: The OCBs scale. In W. K. Hoy & C. Miskel (Eds), Leadership and Reform in American Public Schools (pp. 319-342. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.)\nDruskat, V. U., & Pescosolido, A. T. (2002). The content of effective teamwork mental models in self-managing teams: Ownership, learning, and heedful interrelating. Human Relations, 55, 283-314.\nDuncan, N. G. (1981). Home ownership and social theory. In S. Duncan (Ed.), Housing and identity: Crosscultural perspectives. New York: Holmes & Meier.\nElstad, E., Christophersen, K. A., & Turmo, A. (2012). Exploring antecedents of organizational citizenship behaviour among teachers at Norwegian folk high schools. Studies in Continuing Education, 34(2), 175-189.\nFeather, N. T., & Rauter, K. A. (2004). Organizational citizenship behaviours in relation to job status, job insecurity, organizational commitment and identification, job satisfaction and work values. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 81-94.\nFeng, B. -L. (2007). A study of teacher job satisfaction and factors that influence it. Chinese Education and Society, 40(5), 47-64.\nFurby, L. (1978). Possession in humans: An exploratory study of its meaning and motivation. Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 49-65.\nGoris, J. R., Vaught, B. C., & Pettit, J. D. (2003). Effects of trust in superiors and influence of superiors on the association between individual congruence and job performance/satisfaction. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(3), 327-343.\nHall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.\nHøigaard, R., Giske, R., & Sundsli, K. (2012). Newly qualified teachers’ work engagement and teacher efficacy influences on job satisfaction, burnout, and the intention to quit. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(3), 347-357.\nHoneyball, S. E., Pearce, D. (2006). Contract, employment and the contract of employment. The Industrial Law Journal, 35(1), 30-55.\nHyoung K. M., & Yang W. C. (2011). The moderating effects of collectivistic orientation on psychological ownership and constructive deviant behavior. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(12), 65-77. \nJames, B. A., Bruce A., Craig C., & Fred L. (2009). Psychological ownership：Theoretical extension, measurement and relation to work outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(2), 173-191. \nKatz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1966). The Social Psychology of Organizations. New York：John Willy & Sons.\nKatz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The Social Psychology of Organizations (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.\nKinman, G., Wray, S., & Strange, C. (2011). Emotional labour, burnout and job satisfaction in UK teachers: The role of workplace social support. Educational Psychology, 31(7), 843-856.\nKlassen, R. M., & Chiu, M. M. (2010). Effects on teachers` self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 741-758.\nKozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein, & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.\nLambert, S. (2000). Added benefits: The link between work-life benefits and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 801-815.\nLePine, J. A., Erez, A., & Johnson, D. E. (2002). The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 52-65.\nLester, P. E. (1987). Development and factor analysis of the teacher job satisfaction Questionnaire. Educational and psychological Measurement, 47, 223-233.\nLiu, J., Wang, H., Hui, C., & Lee, C. (2012). Psychological ownership: How having control matters. Journal of Management Studies, 49(5), 869-895.\nMacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.\nMayhew, M.G., Ashkanasy, N. M., Bramble, T., & Gardner, J. (2007). A study of the antecedents and consequences of psychological ownership in organizational settings. Journal of Social Psychology, 147(5), 477–500.\nMenon, M. E., & Athanasoula-Reppa, A. (2011). Job satisfaction among secondary school teachers: The role of gender and experience. School Leadership & Management, 31(5), 435-455.\nMeyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61-89.\nMeyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.\nMoè, A., Pazzaglia, F., & Ronconi, L. (2010). When being able is not enough. The combined value of positive affect and self-effecacy for job satisfaction in teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(5), 1145–1153.\nMohammad, J., Habib, F. Q., & Zakaria, S. (2010). Organizational citizenship behavior and commitment: Do age and tenure make any different? Business Management Quarterly Review, 1(3), 28-49.\nNiehoff, B. P., & Moorman (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 327-336.\nNoormala A. I., & Syed S. A. (2009). Leader-member exchange and organizational citizenship behavior: the mediating impact of self-esteem. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(3), 52-61.\nNuttin, J. M. Jr. (1987). Affective consequences of mere ownership: The name letter effect in twelve European languages. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 381-402.\nO’Driscoll, M. P., Pierce J. L., & Coghlan, A. M. (2006). The psychology of ownership. Group and Organization Management, 31(3), 388-416.\nOlckers, C., & Du Plessis, Y. (2012). The role of psychological ownership in retaining talent: A systematic literature review. Journal of Human Resource Management , 10(2), 1-18.\nOlzer, H., Yilmaz, A., & Ozler, A. (2008). Psychological ownership: An empirical study on its antecedents and impacts upon organizational behaviors. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 6(3), 38–47.\nOplatka, I. (2006). Going beyond role expectations: toward an understanding of the determinants and components of teacher organizational citizenship behavior. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(3), 385-423.\nO’Reilly, C. E. (2002). The wrong kind of ownership. Across the board, 39(5), 19-20.\nOrgan, D. W., & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48, 775-802.\nOrgan, D. W. (1988). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books.\nOrgan, D. W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. Research in organizational behavior, 12(1), 43-72.\nOrgan, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 110(2), 85-97.\nOrgan, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents and consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.\nPearson, L. C., & Moomaw, W. (2005). The relationship between teacher autonomy and stress, work satisfaction, empowerment, and professionalism. Educational Research Quarterly, 29(1), 37-53.\nPierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 298-310.\nPierce, J. L., Kostova, T. L., & Dirks, T. K. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7, 84-107\nPierce J. L., Rubenfeld S. A., & Morgan, S. (1991). Employee ownership: A conceptual model of process and effects. Academy of Management Review, 16, 121-144.\nPodsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: A review and suggestions for future Research. Human Performance, 10(2), 133-151.\nPodsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future search. Journal of Management, 26, 513-563.\nPorteous, J. D. (1976). Home: the territorial core. Geographical Review, 66, 383-390.\nPreacher, K. L., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717-731.\nRobbins (Ed.). (2001). Organizational behavior (9th ed.): Englewood Cliffs, NJ.\nRochberg-Halton, E. W. (1980). Cultural signs and urban adaptation: The meaning of cherished possessions. Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago. Dissertation Abstracts International, 40, 4754-4755.\nRousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Rights and Responsibilities Journal, 2, 121-139.\nRupp, D. E., &; Cropanzano, R. (2002). The mediating effects of social exchange relationshops in predicting workplace outcomes from multifoci organizational justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 925-946.\nRunhaar, P., Konermann, J., & Sanders, K. (2013). Teachers` organizational citizenship behaviour: Considering the roles of their work engagement, autonomy and leader–member exchange. Teaching & Teacher Education, 30, 99-108.\nSamsinar M. S., Murali S., & Nanthini M. (2010). Impact of psychological ownership on the performance of business school lecturers. Journal of Education for Business, 85, 50–56.\nSeashore, S. E., & Taber, T. D. (1975), Job satisfaction and their correlation. American Behavior & Scientists, 18(1), 346.\nSmith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 653-663.\nSmith, P. C., Kendall, L., & Hulin, C. L. (1969). The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement. Chicago: Rand McNally.\nSobel, M. E. (1982). A symptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982 (pp. 290-312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.\nSomech, A., & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2000). Understanding extra-role behavior in schools:The relationships between job satisfaction, sense of efficacy, and teachers` extra-role behavior. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 649.\nSomech, A., & Bogler, R. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of teacher organizational and professional commitment. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 555-577.\nSomech, A. & Ron, I. (2007). Promoting organizational citizenship behavior in school: The impact of individual and organizational characteristics. Educational Administration Quarterly,43(1), 38-66.\nSong, H. (2007). Literature review of teacher job satisfaction. Chinese Education and Society, 40(5), 11-16.\nSpector, P. E. (1985). Measurement of human service staff satisfaction: Development of the Job Satisfaction Survey. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13, 693-713.\nSpreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465. \nVan Dyne, L., & Pierce, J. L. (2004). Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 439-459.\nVan Dyne, L., Graham, J., & Dienesch, R. (1994). Organisational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 765-802.\nVandeWalle, D., Van Dyne, L., & Kostova, T. (1995). Psychological ownership: An empirical examination of its consequences. Group and Organization Management, 20(2), 210–226.\nWagner, S. H., Parker, C. P., & Christiansen, N. D. (2003). Employees that think and act like owners: Effects of ownership beliefs and behaviors on organizational effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 56(4), 847-871.\nWeiss, D. J., Dawis, R. V., England, G. W., & Lofquist, L. H. (1967). Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Minnesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation, 22, 1-119.\nWhite, R. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297-330.\nWilpert, B. (1991). Property, ownership, and participation: On the growing contradictions between legal and psychological concepts. In R. Russell, & V. Rus (Eds.), International handbook of participation in organizations: For the study of organizational democracy, co-operation, and self management , 2, 149-164. New York: Oxford University Press.\nWilliams, S., Pitre, R., & Zainuba, M. (2002). Justice and organizational citizenship behavior intentions: Fair rewards versus fair treatment. The Journal of Social Psychology, 142(1), 33-44. | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 教育行政與政策研究所 100171003 101 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100171003 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100301.pdf | 976.86 kB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.