1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 社會科學學院
  3. 行政管理碩士學程(MEPA)
  4. 學位論文
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/59865
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor孫本初zh_TW
dc.contributor.author吳靜瑜zh_TW
dc.creator吳靜瑜zh_TW
dc.date2010en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-03T08:09:09Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-03T08:09:09Z-
dc.date.issued2013-09-03T08:09:09Z-
dc.identifierG0098921065en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/59865-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description行政管理碩士學程zh_TW
dc.description989210665zh_TW
dc.description99zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本研究旨在瞭解行政院所屬中央機關公務人員使用網路、組織學習與組織承諾之關係，以及使用網路與組織學習對組織承諾的影響，並探討個人屬性在使用網路、組織學習與組織承諾之認知的差異性，期能提供目前行政院組織變革與發展的參考。\n本研究結果發現使用網路包含依賴程度與使用程度二個衡量構面；組織學習包含學習意願與學習氣候二個衡量構面；組織承諾會包含價值承諾、努力意願、留職傾向三個衡量構面，以上各構面會因個人屬性的差異而有不同的看法，且各衡量構面具有正相關，適合進行多元迴歸分析，經迴歸分析結果，使用網路與組織學習對組織承諾具有正向預測力或解釋力，此表示使用網路與組織學習對提升組織承諾具有正面效果。本研究亦建議可以從電子化政府、組織學習及數位學習等方面來發展最適合的組織發展策略。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 1\n第一節 研究動機與目的 1\n第二節 研究方法 3\n第三節 研究流程與章節安排 4\n第四節 研究範圍 5\n第五節 重要名詞解釋 6\n第二章 文獻探討 8\n第一節 使用網路之意涵與理論 8\n第二節 組織學習之意涵與理論 11\n第三節 組織承諾之意涵與理論 18\n第四節 變數間相關之研究 23\n第三章 研究設計 28\n第一節 研究架構與假設 28\n第二節 各變項之操作型定義及衡量 29\n第三節 問卷設計與抽樣方法 30\n第四節 統計分析方法 36\n第五節 問卷預試分析 37\n第四章 研究結果分析 49\n第一節 問卷回收情形 49\n第二節 基本資料分析 50\n第三節 研究假說檢定 53\n第五章 結論與建議 72\n第一節 研究發現 72\n第二節 建議 74\n\n參考文獻 76\n\n附 錄 一 公務人員使用網路與組織學習對組織承諾影響之研究問卷（預試） 85\n附 錄 二 公務人員使用網路與組織學習對組織承諾影響之研究問卷 88zh_TW
dc.format.extent4323168 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098921065en_US
dc.subject使用網路zh_TW
dc.subject組織學習zh_TW
dc.subject組織承諾zh_TW
dc.title公務人員使用網路與組織學習對組織承諾影響之研究zh_TW
dc.titleResearch on the impact of public servants using internet and organizational learning on the organizational commitmenten_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference中文部分\n王保進(2006)。 視窗版SPSS 與行為科學研究(第三版)。臺北:心理出版社。\n交通部(2005)。臺灣地區民眾使用網際網路狀況調查報告。2010年3月1日，取自：http://www.motc.gov.tw/hypage.cgi?HYPAGE=stat12.asp。\n吳明烈主編（2003）。組織學習與學習型學校。臺北：高等教育出版社。\n吳明隆（2007）。SPSS統計應用學習實務-問卷分析與應用統計。新北市：加樺國際。\n杜佩蘭（1999）。組織承諾、角色衝突與工作滿足及其相關因素之研究-以高雄市政府主計處外派人員為例。未出版碩士論文，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所，高雄市。\n林良楓（1984）。會計師事務所查帳員工作滿足與組織承諾之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立政治大學會計研究所，臺北市。\n林珊如（2002）。網路使用者特性與資訊行為研究趨勢之探討。圖書資訊學刊，17，35-47。\n林愛玲（1997）。知識網路-組織學習提升策略之探討。人力資源發展月刊，122，4-9。\n林義屏（2001）。市場導向、組織學習、組織創新與組織績效間關係之研究－以科學園區資訊電子產業為例。未出版博士論文，國立中山大學企業管理學系，高雄市。\n林麗惠（1999年）。組織學習與學習型組織，載於學習型組織，117-153。臺北：師大書苑。\n孫本初(2001)。公共管理。台北：智勝。\n財團法人臺灣網路資訊中心(2006)。2006年七月「臺灣寬頻網路使用調查」報告。2010年3月5日取自：http://www.財團法人臺灣網路資訊中心.net/NEWS/1085.bin。\n高協聖(1996)。高科技事業組織學習類型與環境回應能耐關聯之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立政治大學企業管理研究所，臺北市。\n許明遠(2005)。國小高年級學童網路使用行為與自我概念、人際關係之研究-以臺北市兩所國小為例。未出版碩士論文，臺北市立師範學院社會科教育研究所，臺北市。\n陳冠名(2004)。青少年網路使用行為及網路沈迷的因素之研究。未出版博士論文，國立高雄師範大學教育學系，高雄市。\n陳惠芳(1998)。組織正當性、組織學習、與組織同形之關係研究—制度理論整合觀點。未出版博士論文，國立臺灣大學商學研究所，臺北市。\n黃英忠(1988)。現代管理學。臺北：華泰書局。\n黃瓊慧(2000)。從沈浸(flow)理論探討台灣大專學生之網路使用行為。未出版碩士論文，國立交通大學傳播研究所，新竹市。\n曾朝聖（2003）。員工對學習型組織特徵的之決與組織承諾關係之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所，高雄市。\n楊國德(1999)。學習型組織的理論與應用。臺北：師大書苑。\n資策會ECER-FIND。FIND：Focus on Internet News & Data。2010年3月5日取自： http://www.find.org.tw/0105/howmany/usage_1.asp。\n蕃薯藤全球資訊網(2006)。小朋友網路使用行為調查。2010年3月5日取自：http://survey.yam.com/index.html。\n蕭伃伶、盧美秀(1996)。臨床護理人員之組織承諾、組織留任與專業留任的相關研究．護理研究，31，37-59。\n英文部分\nAngle, H. L. & Perry, J. L. (1981), An empirical assessment of organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 1-14.\nBaron, I. L., & Kenny, D. (1986), The moderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.\nBecker, H. S. (1960), Notes on the concept of commitment. The American Journal of Sociology, 66,32-40.\nBradford, M. & Florin, J. (2003), Examining the role of innovation diffusion factors on the implementation success of enterprise resource planning systems. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 4(3), 205-25.\nBuchanan (1974), Building organization commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly,19, 533-546.\nCheung, W., Chang, M. K.& Lai, V. S. (2000), Prediction of internet and World Wide Web usage at work: A test of an extended triandis model. Decision Support Systems, 30, 83-100.\nCooper, R. & S. Schindler (1998), Business Research Methods. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill, Inc.\nDavis, F. D. (1989), Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.\nDavis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. & Warshaw, P. R. (1989), User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35（8）, 982-1003.\nDuncan, R. & A. Weiss. (1979), Organizational learning: implications for organizational design. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1, 75-123.\nElena, K., Detmar, W. S. (1999), The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use. Information and Management, 35(4), 237-250.\nFarrell, D.& Rusbult, C.E. (1981), Exchange variable as predictors of job satisfaction, job commitment and turnover: The impact of rewards, costs, alternatives and investment. Organizational Behavior and Performance, 28, 120-126.\nFerris K. R. & Aranya N. A. (1983), Comparison of two organizational commitment scales. Personnel Psychology, 36, 87-99.\nFishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975), Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. MA: Addison-Wesley.\nFulmer, R. M. (1994), A Model for Changing the Way Organizations Learn. Planning Review, 22(3), 20-24.\nGay, L.R. (1992), Educational Research Competencies for Analysis and Application. Macmillan: New York.\nHarvey, M., Palmer, J. & Speier, C. (1998), Implementing intra-organizational learning: a phased-model approach supported by intranet technology. European Management Journal, 16(3), 341–354.\nHerbiniak, L. G. & Alutto, J. A.(1972), Personal and role related factor, in the development of organizational commitment, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 559-560.\nHuber, G. P. (1991), Organizational learning: the contributing process and the literatures .Organization Science: A Journal of the Institute of Management Sciences, 2(1), 88-115.\nJaramilo, F., Mulki, J. P. & Marshall, G. W.(2005), A Meta-analysis of the Relationship between Organizational Commitment and Salesperson Job Performance: 25 Years of Research. Journal of Business Research, 58(6), 705 - 725.\nKaiser, H.F. (1974), Index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.\nKidron, A. (1978), Work values and organizational commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 239-247.\nKlimecki, R. & Lassleben, H., (1998), Modes of Organizational Learning: Indications from an Empirical Study. Management Learning, 29(4): 405-430.\nLandau, J., & Hammer, T.H. (1986), Clerical employees’ perceptions of intraorganizational career opportunities. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 385-404.\nLasar, M. (2009), Personal Internet use at work out of control. March 2, 2011 Retrieved from http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/04/report-users-on-enterprise-networks-out-of-control.ars.\nLederer A.L., Maupin D.J., Sena M.P.& Zhuang Y. (2000), The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web. Decision Support Systems, 29 (3), 269–282.\nLee, C. P., Lee, G. G. & Lin, H. F. (2007), The role of organizational capabilities in successful e-business implementation. Business Process Management Journal, 13(5), 677-693.\nLeicester, M.(1996), Organism and organization: Understanding the learning Organization. Adults Learning, 7(5), 123-125.\nLevitt, B. & March, J.G. (1988), Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319-340.\nMeyer J. P. (1997), Organizational Commitment. In: Cooper CI, Robertson IT, Editors. International review of industrial and organizational psychology, 12, 175-225.\nMeyer, J.P.& Allen, N.J. (1991), A three component conceptualization of organization commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61-89.\nMeyers, P. W. (1990), Non-linear learning in the technological firms. Research Policy, 19, 97-115.\nMichael G. Moore & Greg Kearsley (1996), Distance Education: A Systems View. Belmont, C.A.: Wadsworth Press,.\nMorgan & Rramirez (1983), Action Learning: A Holographic Metaphor for Guideing Change. Human Relations, 37(1), 1-28.\nMorris J. H. & Sherman J. D. (1981), Generalizability of an organizational commitment model. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 512-526.\nMorrow, P. C. (1983), Concept redundancy in organizational research : The case of work commitment. Academy Management Review, 8, 486-500.\nMowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. M. (1979), The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2), 224-247.\nMowday, R., Porter, L. W. & Steers, R. M. (1982), Employee Organization linkage: The Psychology of commitment, Abenteeism, and Turnover. New York：Academic Press.\nNevis, E.C., Dibella, A.J.& Gould, J.M.(1995), Understanding organizations as learning systems. Sloan Management Review, 36, 73-84.\nO’Neil, J. (1995), Four lenses through which to view a learning organization, ASTD.\nO`Reilly, C. & Chatman, J.(1986), Organizational Commitment and Psychological Attachment: The Effects of Compliance, Identification, and Internalization on Prosocial Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 492- 499.\nPorter, L.W., Steers, R. M., & Mowday, R. T. (1974), Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 603-609.\nRanganathan, C., Dhaliwal, J.S. & Teo, T.S.H. (2004), Assimilation and diffusion of web technologies in supply-chain management: an examination of key drivers and performance impact. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9(1), 127-61.\nReichers, Arnon E. (1985), A review and reconceptualization of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 465-476.\nSalancik, G.R. (1977), Commitment and the control of organizational behavior and belief. In B. W. Staw and G. R. Salancik (Eds.), New directions in organizational behavior .Chicago: St Clair.\nSchwepker, C. H. (2001), Ethical Climate’s Relationship to Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment and Turn Over in the Sales Force. Journal of Business Research, 54, 39-52.\nSenge, P. M. (1990), The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of The Learning Organization. NY : Doubleday.\nSewell, W., & Coppock, J. (1997), A perspective on public participation in planning. London: John Wiley and Sons.\nShaw, R. B. & D. Perkins. (1992), Teaching Organizations to Learn: The Power of Productive Failures. in D. A. Nadler, M. S. Gerstein, and R. B. Shaw (eds.), Organizational Architecture, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 175-191.\nSteers, R. M. (1977), Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), 46-56.\nStephen Downes (2005), E-learning .2.0,elearnMagazine , March 5, 2011 Retrieved from http://www.elearnmag.org/subpage.cfm?section= articlesandarticle=29-1.\nStylianou, A.C., Robbins, S.S. & Jackson, P. (2003), Perceptions and attitudes about eCommerce development in China: an exploratory study. Journal of Global Information Management, 11(2), 31-47.\nSudman, S. (1976), Applied sampling. New York: Academic Press.\nTing, Y. & Grant, R. (2010), Influence of Internet Use at Work on Organizational Commitment. Public Personnel Management, 39(2), 133-147.\nW.H. Whyte (1956), The Organization Man. New York: Simon and Schuster.\nWatkins, K.E., & Marsick, V.J. (1993), Sculpting the learning organization: Lessons in the art and science of systemic change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.\nG. Zaltman & P.C. Burger (1985), Marketing research: Fundamentals and dynamics. New York : McGraw-Hill.\nZhu, K. (2004), The complementarily of information technology infrastructure and e-commerce capability: a resource-based assessment of their business value. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(1), 167-202.zh_TW
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
106501.pdf4.22 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.