Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/60020| 題名: | 英語外語課程中，部落格融入『過程寫作』之教學: 個案研究 The integration of weblogs into the instruction of process writing in an efl classroom: a case study |
作者: | 詹惠玲 Chan, Hui Ling |
貢獻者: | 林啟一 Lin, Chi Yee 詹惠玲 Chan, Hui Ling |
關鍵詞: | 過程寫作 部落格 多次校訂 process writing blog multiple revisions |
日期: | 2009 | 上傳時間: | 4-Sep-2013 | 摘要: | 幾十年來，過程寫作常因為『重內容輕形式』和『輕忽寫作成品』而導致批評聲浪不斷。 近年來，部落格網誌的四大特色 — 自我表達、自我反省、互動和發布 — 吸引學者和語言學習者的注意。本文旨在探討部落格融入『過程寫作』之教學如何影響四名台灣高三學生的寫作表現。文獻探討涵蓋過程寫作，部落格和三項共通因素 — 回饋、自我反省日誌和電子檔案評量。\n本研究的對象是研究者所教授的過程寫作班的四位高三學生。本研究的程序以寫作循環 (writing cycle) 為主軸。資料包括多次校訂 (multiple revisions)、兩篇草稿 (前後測)、學生寫作態度問卷、教師日誌(teacher’s log)和訪談紀錄。首先，以Yagelski’s coding schemes (1995) 和Johnson’s (1994) 內容和組織指標 (indicators of content and organization) 解讀多次校訂，以了解學生的校訂類型 (types of changes in multiple revisions)。接著，分析前後測分數的差距 (score differences)及文章長度 (the length of essay)、探討多次校訂與前後測草稿的關聯性，再找出前後測草稿中的內容與組織指標，以顯示學生在兩篇草稿的進步程度。訪談資料則用於探討部落格的功能、學生遇到的困難和需要何種教師支援。至於學生的寫作態度，則以前後測問卷的分數差距 (score difference) 為主，再以訪談紀錄作為佐證資料或疑點澄清。最後，與教室情境有關的發現，則以教師日誌和訪談資料為主。\n本研究的主要發現如下：\n1. 生有自己偏好的校訂類型 (types of changes in multiple revisions)。\n2. 作班的四位高三學生在內容和組織方面有顯著進步。\n3. 級部落格在過程寫作的每個階段都有不同功能。\n4.多次校訂的枯燥須加以克服，以及建議實施老師與學生間的迷你會議。\n5.在信心、焦慮、實用性與偏好四方面，學生寫作態度改變。 \n6.教室情境所衍生的幾項發現。\n最後，本研究對過程寫作在實際教學上應用與未來研究方向提供建議。 Over the past decades of practice in process writing, criticism over “the stress on content over form” (Badger & White, 2000) and the neglect of final writing product (Barnes, 1983) has never ceased. Considering that blog has attracted scholars and learners for its unique features — self-expression, self-reflection, interactivity, and publication, this researcher integrated blog into the instruction of process writing to investigate the writing performance of the four 12th graders. The literature review covered studies on process writing, blog and three elements commonly found in both process writing and blog— feedback, self-reflection journals and e-portfolio. \nThe participants of this study were four 12th graders of Taiwan’s high school in a blog-mediated process writing class taught by the researcher. The procedure revolved around the process writing cycle, in which these four participants repeated the recursive writing process. Data included multiple revisions, two drafts (pre-test and post-test), questionnaires on students’ writing attitude (pre-test and post-test), the teacher’s logs and interviews. First, to obtain what types of changes students made in multiple revisions, the 48 multiple revisions were coded by Yagelski’s coding schemes (1995) and Johnson’s indicators of content and organization (1994). Second, to investigate if the four participants made progress in content and organization, this researcher touched on four aspects of analysis: 1) the score differences between the pre-test and post-test drafts, 2) the length of essay, 3) a connection analysis between the multiple revisions and the two drafts and 4) a draft analysis using Johnson’s indicators of content and organization (1994). Third, the interview data helped to explore how the blog functioned in each step of process writing model, and to present the challenges students encountered and the teacher support they needed. Fourth, to discover if these students experienced any attitude changes, she also calculated the score differences between the pre-test and post-test questionnaires in students’ writing attitude and verified the questionnaire results or clarified the unclear points with interview data. Finally, some other classroom-context-related findings were also revealed in the analysis of the teachers’ logs and the interview data. \nThe major findings were listed as below: 1) students showed preference for making some types of changes in multiple revisions; 2) the four students in the blog-mediated process writing class gained significant progress in content and organization; 3) the class blog functioned differently in each step of process writing model; 4) the boredom of doing multiple revisions and the teacher-student mini conference were the challenges encountered and the teacher support recommended; 5) there were writing attitude changes in the four categories — confidence, anxiety, usefulness and preference; and 6) several findings were also revealed in the context of classroom.\nSome pedagogical implications and recommendations for future research on process writing were presented at the end of the thesis. |
參考文獻: | Althauser, R., & Darnall, K. (2001). Enhancing critical reading and writing through peer reviews: An exploration of assisted performance. Teaching Sociology 29, 23-25.\nApplebee, A. N. (1986). Problems in process approaches: Toward a reconceptualization of process instruction. In A. R. Petrosky & D. Bartholomae (Eds.), The teaching of writing (pp. 95-113). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education. \nApplebee, A. N., & Langer, J. A. (2009). What is happening in the teaching of writing? English Journal 98(5), 18-28.\nArmstrong, K., & Retterer, O. (2008). Blogging as L2 writing: A case study. AACE Journal, 16(3), 233-251.\nBadger, R., & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal 54(2), 153-160. \nBaines, L., Baines, C., Stanley, G. K., & Kunkel, A. (1999). Losing the product in the process. English Journal 88(5), 67. \nBain, J. D., Ballantyne, R., Packer, J. & Mills, C. (1999). Using journal writing to enhance student teachers’ reflectivity during field experience placements, Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 5, 21-73. \nBarnes, G. A. (1983) Comments on Vivian Zamel, “Writing: the process of discovering meaning”. TESOL Quarterly 17, 137-138.\nBarnett, M. A. (1989). Writing as a process. The French Review 63(1), 31-44.\nBarnett, H. (2005). White paper researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement. The REFLECT Initiative Researching Electronic Portfolios: Learning, Engagement and Collaboration Through Technology. Retrieved from http://electronicportfolios.com/reflect/whitepaper.pdf.\nBatson, T. (2002). The electronic portfolio boom: What’s it all about? Retrieved from http://wwwcampus-technology.com/article.asp?id=6984\nBarrett, H. (2004). Differentiating electronic portfolios and online assessment management systems. Retrieved from http://eletronicportfolios.com/systems/concerns.html\nBartlett-Bragg, A. (2003). Blogging to learn. Knowledge Tree e-journal. Retrieved from http://knowledgetree.flexible-learning.net.au/edition04/pdf/Blogging_to_Learn.pdf\nBelcher, L. (2000). Peer Review and Response: A Failure of the Process Paradigm as Viewed from the Trenches. Reforming College Composition: Writing the Wrongs. Eds. Ray Wallace, Alan Jackson, and Lewis Wallace. Westport, CT: Greenwood P, 2000. 99-111. \nBerg, E.C. (1999). The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 215-241.\nBitchener, J., Young, S. & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 191-205.\nBlake, B. E. (1995). Doing number 5: From process to cultural texts n an urban writing classroom. Language Arts, 72, 396-404.\nBloch, J. (2007). Abdullah’s blogging: A generaton 1.5 student enters the blogosphere. Language Learning & Technology 11(2), 128-141. \nBoling, E., Castek, J., Zawilinski, L., & Barton, K. (2008). Collaborative literacy: Blogs and Internet projects. The Reading Teacher 61(6), 504-506.\nBrown, D. (2000). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (2nd ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.\nBurge, E. (1993). Students’ perceptions of learning in computer conferencing: A qualitative analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Ontario.\nCampbell, A. P. (2003). Weblogs for use with ESL classes. The Internet TESL Journal, IX (2). Retrieved from http://itselj.org/Techniques/Campbell-Weblogs.html\nCampbell, A. P. (2004). Using LiveJournal for authentic communication in EFL classes. The Internet TESL Journal, 10(9). Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Campbell-LiveJournal\nCarroll, M. (1994). Journal writing as a learning and research tool in the adult classroom, TESOL Journal, 4(1), 19-22.\nCarson, J. G., & Nelson, G. L. (1994). Writing groups: Cross-cultural issues. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(1), 17-30. \nCatera, E. & Emigh, R. (2005). Blogs, the virtual soapbox. Essential Teacher, 2(3):46-49.\nChan, K., & Ridgway, J. (2006). Students’ perception of using blogs as a tool for reflection and communication. Poster presented at ALT-C 2006, the 13th International Conference of the Association for Learning Technology. Edinburgh, Scotland. \nChang, P. C. (2002) 張碧珠。The Effects of the Process Writing Instruction on Taiwanese High School Students’ Overall English Writing Ability. 過程取向英文作文教學課程對台灣高中生整體英文寫作能力之成效。碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學英語研究所。\nChang, V. et al. (2004) 張武昌等。「英文寫作能力測驗規劃研究（ VI ）」研究報告。台北：大考中心。\nChang, V. (張武昌) (1996)。 高中英文教師對大學聯考應否廢除「英文作文」及「中譯英」題型的看法。教育研究資訊雙月刊，4(6), 1-12。\nChen, C.H., Cheng, P.S., Chuang, H.Y. & Waris Candra (陳秀慧，鄭佩珊，莊心怡, Waris Candra) (2007)。Classroom Composition for Senior High。台北：課室教材出版有限公司。\nChen, W. C., & Bonk, C. (2008). The use of weblogs in learning and assessment in Chinese hgher education: Possibilities and potential problems. International Journal on ELearning, 7(1), 41-65.\nChuang, K.L. (莊坤良) (2007)。在職教師進修班的過去與未來：以台師大暑期英語教學碩士學位班的經營為例。英語教育電子月刊，第35期。\nConnor-Greene, P. A. (2000). Making connections: Evaluating the effectiveness of journal writing in enhancing student learning, Teaching of Psychology, 27(1), 44-46.\nCouncil of Europe. (2006). European language portfolio. Retrieved from http://www.coe.int/t/dgt/linguistic/Portfolio_EN.asp\nCumming, A. (1989) Writing expertise and second language proficiency. Language learning 39, 81-141. \nCumming, A. & Riazi, A. (2000). Building models of adult second-language writing instruction. Learning and Instruction 10, 55-71. \nDamashek, R. (2003). Six steps process to helping students produce quality writing. ERIC #ED475206 http://eric.edu.gov\nDavie, L. E., & Wells, R. (1991). Empowering the learner through computer-mediated communication. The American Journal of Distance Education, 5(1), 15-23.\nDiamond, C. T. P. (1991). Teacher education as transformation. Milton Keyes, Philadelphia: Open University Press.\nDucate, L. C., & Lomicka, L. L. (2008). Adventures in the blogosphere: from blog readers to blog writers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(1), 9-28.\nDyson, A. H. (1992). Whistle for Willie, lost puppies and cartoon dogs: The sociocultural dimensions of young children’s composing. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24, 433-462. \nEdelsky, C. (1986). Writing in a bilingual program: Habia una vez. Norwoood, NJ: Ablex.\nEdelsky, C. & Smith, K. (1989). Is that writing – or are those marks just a figment of your curriculum. In G. Manning & M. Manning (Eds.), Whole language: Beliefs and practices, K-8 (pp. 183-193). Washington, DC: National Education Association. \nEmig, J. (1971). The composing process of twelfth graders. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.\nFaigley, L., & Witte, S. (1981). Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication, 32, 400-414. \nFerris, D. R. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 315-339. \nFerris, D. R. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.\nFerdig, R., & Trammell, K. (2004). Content delivery in the ‘blogosphere.” The Journal, February, 12-20. \nFlower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365-387. \nGallego De Blibeche, O. (1993). A comparative study of process verus product approach to the instruction of writing in Spanish as a foreign language. Pennsylvania State University.\nGargagliano, A. & Kelly, C. (2001). Writing from Within. Cambridge University Press.\nGleason, B. (2001). Teaching at the crossroads: Choices and challenges in college composition. The writing instructor (online), Retrieved from <http:/www.writinginstructor.com/reflections/gleason/html> \nGodwin-Jones, R. (2003). Emerging technologies: Blogs and wikis: Environments for on-line collaboration. Language, Learning & Technology, 7(2), 12-16.\nGoldstein, A., Carr, P., & National Center for Education Statistics (ED), W. (1996) Can Students Benefit from Process Writing? NAEPfacts, 1(3).\nGraves, D.H. (1984). A researcher learns to write. In M. Rose (Ed.), When a writer can’t write (pp. 1-18). New York: Guilford Press.\nHamp-Lyons, L., & Condon, W. (2000). Assessing the portfolio: Principles for practice, theory, and research. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.\nHanrahan, S. and Isaac, G. (2001). Assessing self-and peer-assessment: The students’ view. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(1): 53-66.\nHarp, B., & Brewer, J. (1996). Reading and writing: Teaching for the connections. Fort worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.\nHarris, M. (1985). Diagnosing writing process problems: A pedagogical application of speaking-aloud protocol analysis. In M. Rose (Ed.).When a writer can’t write (pp. 166-181). New York: Guilford Press.\nHarris, K. R. & Graham, S. (1996). Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation. Cambridge, MS: Brookline Books.\nHeath, M. (2002). Electronic portfolios for reflective self-assessment. Teacher Librarian, 30(1), 19-23.\nHedlund, D. E., Furst, T. C. & Foley, K. T. (1989). A dialogue with self: the journal as an educational tool, Journal of Humanistic Education and Development, 27, 105-113.\nHilton, M. (2001). Writing process and progress: Where do we go from here? English in Education, 35(1), 4-11.\nHirvela, A. & Pierson, H. (2000). Portfolios: Vehicles for authentic self-assessment. In G. Ekbatani & H. Pierson (Eds.), Learner-directed assessment in ESL. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associations.\nHorvath, J. (2009). Hungarian university students’ blogs in EFL; Shaping language and social connections. TESL-EJ 12(4), 1-9.\nHsiao, H. J. (2006) 蕭心茹。EFL Learners’Written Interactions in Blogs: A Case Study of College Students at Tamkang University. 英語為第二外語學生在部落格中的書寫互動之研究：以淡江大學學生為例。碩士論文，淡江大學英文學系碩士班。\nHu, G. (2005). Using peer review with Chinese ESL student writers. Language Teaching Research, 9(3), 321-342. \nHuang, C.H. (黃稽興) (民93)。創意策略教學在高中英文作文上的應用。碩士論文，國立政治大學英語教學碩士在職專班。\nHuang, C.J. (黃瓊如) (民91)。寫作前組織策略在英文作文教學效益之研究。碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學英語研究所。\nHyland, K. (1990). Mistakes corrections. EFL Journal, 42(2), 89-96.\nHyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19, 185-212.\nHyland, K. & Hyalnd, F. (2006). State of the art article: Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39, 81-101.\nJacobs, G. M., Curtis, A., Braine, G., & Huang, S. Y. (1998). Feedback on student writing: Taking the middle path. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(3), 307-317.\nJohnson, B. E. (1994). The reading edge: Thirteen ways to build reading comprehension (2nd ed.). MA: D.C. Heath and Company. \nKeh, C. L. (1990). Feedback in the writing process: A model and methods for implementation. ELT Journal, 44(4), 294-304.\nKlenowski, V. (2002). Developing portfolios for learning and assessment: Processes and principles. London: Routledge Falmer.\nLee, C.T. (李家同) (2009)。英文作文兩萬多顆蛋的背後。台北：聯合報。\nLee, J. S. (2006). Exploring the relationship between electronic literacy and heritage language maintenance. Language Learning & Technology 19(2), 93-113. \nLee, W.L. (李文玲) (2003)。You can write! 寫作導引。台北：三民書局。\nLeki, I. (1990). Coaching from the margins: Issues in written response. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second Language Writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp.57-68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\nLensmire, T. J. (1993). Following the child, socioanalysis, and threats to community: Teacher response to children’s texts. Curriculum Inquiry, 23, 265-299.\nLi, M. M. (2009). Adopting varied feedback modes in the EFL writing class. US-China Foreign language, 7(1), 60-63.\nLin, C.M. (林君美) (2009)。漢堡式大考英文段落寫作。台北：三民書局。\nLin, Y. Y. (林晏宇) (2007)。An Exploratory Study of English Multimedia Writing: Implementing Weblogs in a College Composition Class. 英語多媒體寫作之初探:以大學生部落格寫作表現為例。碩士論文，國立清華大學外國語文學系。\nLiu, Y.H. (劉雲湘) (2005)。高中英文寫作技巧與實例解析。台北：文鶴出版有限公司。\nLiu, Y.H. (劉雲湘) (2009)。英文作文示範。台北：三民書局。\nLiu, N. & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3): 279-290.\nLiu, J., & Sadler, R. 92003). The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(3): 193-227.\nLohm, D (2008). Sometimes it can take two – paired interviews. Conference paper found online. Retrieved April 7, 2010, from http://www.tasa.org.au/conferences/conferencepapers08/Sociology%20as%20Discipline/Lohm,%20Davina,%20Session%2070%20PDF.pdf\nLowe, C., & Williams, T. (2004). Moving to the public: Weblogs in the writing classroom. In L.J. Gurak, S. Antonijevic, L. Johson, C. Ratliff & J. Reyman (Eds.), Into the blogosphere: Rhetoric, community, and culture of weblogs. Retrieved from http://blog.lib.umn.edu/blogosphere/moving_to_the_public.html.\nMin, H. T. (2005). Training students to become successful peer reviewers. System, 33(2), 293-308.\nMiura, A., & Yamashita, K. (2007). Psychological and social influences on blog writing: An online survey of blog authors in Japan. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12, 1452-1471. \nMurray, L, & Hourigan, T. (2008). Blogs for specific purposes: Expressivist or socio-cognitivist approach? ReCALL 20(1), 82-97.\nNCTE Commission on Composition. (1985). Teaching composition: A position statement. Retrieved from http://www.ncte.org/about/over/positions/category/write/107690.htm\nNelson, G. L., & Murphy, J. M. (1993). Peer response groups: Do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts: TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), 745-769.\nNicol, D. & MacFarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2): 199-218. \nNussbaum, E. (2004). My so-called blog. The New York Times. Available: http//www.nytimes.com/2004/01/11/magazine/11BLOG.html.\nO’Brien, T. (2004). Writing in a foreign language: teaching and learning. Language Teaching 37, 1-28.\nOladi, S. (2005). Study of Tehran medical students’ social interaction in cyber blogging environment and its effect on IELTS writing proficiency. Unpublished masters’ thesis. Tehran University, Tehran. \nO’Malley, M. J. & Valdes Pierce, L. (1996). Authentic assessment for English language learners: Practical approaches for teachers. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. \nOravec, J. (2002). Bookmarking the world: Weblog applications in education. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 45(7), 616-621. \nPeng, Z. Y. (2007) 彭中嬿。A Study of Blogging for Enhancement of EFL College Students` Writing. 以部落格提升大學生寫作之研究。碩士論文，國立清華大學外國語文學系。\nPennington, M. & Brock, M. (1992). Process and product approaches at computer-assisted composition. In Pennington, M, & Sevens, V. (eds), Computers in applied linguistics: Aninternatl perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.\nPennington, M., Brock, M. & Yue, F. (1996). Explaining Hong Kong students’ response to process writng: Anexploration of causes and outcomes. Journal of Second Language Writing 5, 227-252. \nPennington, M. & Cheung, M. (1995). Factors shaping the introduction of process writing in Hong Kong secondary schools. Language, Culture and Curriculum 8(1), 15-34. \nPennington, M. C., & So, S. (1993). Comparing writing process and product across two languages: A study of 6 singaporean University student writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2, 41-63. \nPerl, S. (1980). A look at basic writers in the process of composing. In L. N. Kasden and D.R. Hoeber (Eds.), Basic writing. Urbana, IL: National council of Teachers of English.\nPerl, S. (1984). Coding the composing process: A guide for teachers and researchers. Washington, DC.: National Institute of Education (ED)\nPurves, A. C. (1992). Reflections on research and assessment of written composition. Research in the Teaching of English, 26(1), 108-122.\nRaimes, A. (1991). Out of the woods: emerging tradtions in the teaching of writing. TESOL Quarterly 25, 407-430.\nRaimes, A. (1985). What unskilled writers do as they write: A classroom study of composing. TESOL Quarterly 19, 229-258. \nRansdel, D.R. (2001). Class workshops: An alternative to peer-group review. Teaching English in the Two-year College, 29(1):32-43.\nRollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, 59(1), 23-30.\nRoskelly, H. (1992). The Risky Business of Group Work. ATAC Forum 4. Rpt. The Writing Teacher`s Sourcebook. Ed. Gary Tate, Edward P.J. Corbett, and Nancy Myers. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford UP, 1994. 141-148.\nSasaki, M. (2000). Toward an empirical model of EFL writing processes: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing 9(3), 259-291. \nSemke, H. D. (1983). Effects of the Red Pen. Foreign Language Annals 17(1984): 195-202.\nShih, Y.F., Shih, H. W., Chiang, C.J. & Chen, H.H. (施玉鳳，施惠文，姜純仁，陳秀慧)（2004）。Smart Writing for Senior High series (level 1-3)。課室教材出版有限公司。\nSmith, C. C. (2008). Technolgies for transcending a focus on error: Blogs and democratic aspirations in first-year composition. Journal of Basic Writing 27(1), \n35-60.\nSoares, D. A., & Naval, E. (2008). Understanding blass blogs as a tool for language development. Language Teaching Research 12(4), 517-533.\nTompkins, G. E. (1994). Teaching writing: Balancing process and product (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan. \nTsui, A. B. M., & Ng, M. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), 147-170.\nTribble, C. (1996). Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.\nVoss, R. F. (1983). Janet Emig’s composing processes of twelfth graders: A reassessment. College Composition and Communication 34(3), 278-283.\nWall, B. C. & Peltier, R. E. (1996). Going public with electronic portfolio: Audience, community, and the terms of student ownership. Computer and Composition 13, 207-217. \nWang, Y. M. (2006) 王譯民。The Instructional Models, Processes, and Strategies of Using Collaborative Blogs in a Sophomore English Course. 合作型部落格導入大二英文課程之教學策略與模式探討。碩士論文，淡江大學教育科技學系碩士班。\nWard, J. M. (2004). Blog assited language learning (BALL): Push button publishing for the pupils. TEFL Web Journal 3(1), 1-16. \nWarschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning. Theory and practice. Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 470-481.\nWitte, S. (2007). “That’s online writing, not boring school writing”: Writing with blogs and the Talkback project. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(2), 92-96. \nYagelski, R. (1995). The role of classroom context in the revision strategies of student writers. Research in the Teaching of English 29(2), 216-238.\nYang, Y. L. (楊懿麗) (2003)。高中英文寫作教學之我見-- 從大學入學考試英作測驗談起。人文及社會學科教學通訊，14(1)，92-113。\nYinger, R. (1985). Journal writing as a learning tool, Volta Review, 87(5), 21-33.\nZamel, V. (1982). "Writing: the process of discovering meaning." TESOL Quarterly, 16, 195-209.\nZamel, V. (1983). The composing processes of advanced ESL students: Six case studies. TESOL Quarterly 17, 165-187. \nZamel, V. (1985). Responding to students writing. TESOL Quarterly 19, 79-101\nZhang, S. (1995). Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(3), 209-222.\nZhu, W. (2001). Interaction and feedback in mixed peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(4), 251-276. | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 英語教學碩士在職專班 96951006 98 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096951006 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100601.pdf | 1.69 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.