Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/60049
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor陳彩稚zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorChen, Tsai Jyhen_US
dc.contributor.author張舒雲zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorChang, Shu Yunen_US
dc.creator張舒雲zh_TW
dc.creatorChang, Shu Yunen_US
dc.date2010en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-04T07:01:33Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-04T07:01:33Z-
dc.date.issued2013-09-04T07:01:33Z-
dc.identifierG0098358018en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/60049-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description風險管理與保險研究所zh_TW
dc.description98358018zh_TW
dc.description99zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本研究探討台灣企業實施環境風險管理與資金成本及財務績效之關係。以ISO14001環境管理系統認證做為實施環境風險管理的指標,研究實施環境風險管理的企業在資金成本與財務績效上是否具有較佳之表現。本研究以截至2011年4月通過ISO14001認證之上市櫃公司為實驗組,以及未曾通過認證之公司為對照組。並分為三部份進行迴歸分析,其主要研究結果如下:\n(一) 實施環境風險管理對債劵資金成本有負向影響。但對股東權益資金成本是正向顯著的影響。因股東權益占公司資金比重較大,故加權平均資金成本亦為正向顯著影響。\n(二) 在財務績效的部份,大都支持企業實施環境風險管理時,與財務槓桿呈負向關係。並且實驗組均支持通過年數越長對稅盾有負向影響。此外,實驗組全體產業與實驗組非高污染性產業,通過認證時間越長,則對系統性風險有負向顯著影響。但實驗組高污染性產業之環境風險管理與系統性風險則無顯著相關。\n(三) 由實驗組與對照組之研究比較,發現支持實施環境風險管理之公司具有較低之大股東持股比。\n(四) 根據實驗組之研究,發現公司通過環境風險管理之認證,與外資法人投資比率有正向關係。但實驗組與對照組之比較,通過認證與否則對外資呈負向顯著的關係。實驗組高低汙染性產業比較中,高污染性產業僅通過認證年數與外資投資比率呈顯著相關,但非高污染性產業則不論是否通過認證與通過年數,均與外資投資比率呈正向顯著相關。\n\n關鍵字:ISO14001環境管理系統、環境風險管理、資金成本、財務績效。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates the relationship between implementing environmental risk management and cost of capital and financial performance for the public companies in Taiwan. Using the ISO14001 environmental management system certification as the indicator of environmental management, this thesis explores whether the companies implementing the environmental risk management system will possess lower the cost of capital and better financial performance. Among the sample firms, the companies with ISO14001 certification in year 2011 are regarded as the experimental group, and the companies have not been certified as the controlled group. Then this study conducts regression analyses for environmental risk management. The major findings are as follows:\n1. Implementation of environmental risk management and the capital cost of bonds have a significantly negative relationship. However, the capital cost of equity shows a significantly positive relationship. Since shareholders` equity is a greater proportion on the company`s funds in the sample firms, so the weighted average cost of capital also presents a significantly positive relationship.\n2. Regarding the relationship between firm’s financial performance and its environmental risk management, this study finds that financial leverage exhibits a negative relationship. The experimental group supports that the companies with ISO14001 certification for longer years have a negative relationship with their tax shields. Besides, in the entire experimental group and experimental group of non-highly-polluting industries, the systemic risk shows a negative relationship with the longer years of certification. However, environmental risk management and the systemic risk do not present significant correlation in the experimental group of highly-polluting industries.\n3. The comparison between the experimental group compared and the controlled group support the hypothesis that implementation of environmental risk management can have a lower ratio of large shareholdings. \n4. The study of experimental group supports that foreign investors’ shareholdings have a positive relationship with the firms passing the certification. However, the comparison between the experimental group and the controlled group shows certification and foreign investor negatively related. In highly-polluting industries, the number of certified years is the only factor influencing foreign investors’ shareholdings. In non-highly-polluting industries, passing the certification and number of certified years both are positively associated with foreign investors’ shareholdings.\n\nKeywords:ISO14001 environmental management system, environmental risk management, cost of capital, financial performance.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第壹章、緒論 1\n第一節、研究背景 1\n第二節、研究動機 4\n第三節、研究目的 5\n第四節、研究流程 5\n第貳章、文獻回顧 7\n第一節、環境風險管理與資金成本及財務績效 8\n第二節、環境風險管理與其他經營指標 12\n第三節、環境管理衡量指標-ISO14001之介紹 13\n第參章、研究方法 23\n第一節、觀念性架構 23\n第二節、研究假設 25\n第三節、變數定義 30\n第四節、資料來源與範圍 37\n第五節、研究模型 40\n第肆章、實證結果與分析 43\n第一節、敘述性統計 43\n第二節、相關性分析 53\n第三節、迴歸分析 59\n第伍章、結論與建議 85\n第一節、研究結論 85\n第二節、研究限制 89\n第三節、未來研究建議 90\n附錄 92\n參考文獻 101zh_TW
dc.format.extent1440756 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098358018en_US
dc.subjectISO14001環境管理系統zh_TW
dc.subject環境風險管理zh_TW
dc.subject資金成本zh_TW
dc.subject財務績效zh_TW
dc.subjectISO14001 environmental management systemen_US
dc.subjectenvironmental risk managementen_US
dc.subjectcost of capitalen_US
dc.subjectfinancial performanceen_US
dc.title企業實施環境風險管理對資金成本與財務績效影響之實證分析zh_TW
dc.titleThe relationship between environmental risk management and the cost of capital and financial performanceen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference學術論文文獻\n1. 王玉珍(2002),股權結構、董事會組成、資本結構與企業績效關係之研究,國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。\n2. 包佩臻(2008),企業通過環保認證對競爭優勢及財務績效之影響,國立東華大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。\n3. 李昀祐(2008),國內企業融資決策之個案研究,國立臺灣科技大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。\n4. 李秉涵(2006),資金成本與槓桿因子之關聯性研究-考量公司規模因素,逢甲大學會計研究所碩士論文。\n5. 汪怡娟(2003),環保支出資訊揭露及揭露品質決定因素之研究,國立成功大學會計學系研究所碩士論文。\n6. 何相儀(2004),環境管理與公司治理對股價之影響,中原大學國際貿易系研究所碩士論文。\n7. 林志森(1996),國際環境管理標準ISO14000現況及我國因應措施,行政院環保署。\n8. 柯淑茗(2009),環境風險管理對資金成本之影響,輔仁大學會計學系研究所碩士論文。\n9. 施奕暉(2007),歐盟環境立法與環境罰,國政研究報告,財團法人國家政策研究基金會。\n10. 陳怡婷(2008),董事會結構、股權結構與環境污染資訊揭露關聯性之研究,淡江大學會計學系研究所碩士論文。\n11. 張惠菁(2008),環保署推動環境會計之策略發展,行政院環保署。\n12. 黃旭森(2006),環保支出與環境資訊揭露對資金成本的影響,國立成功大學會計學系研究所碩士論文。\n13. 黃莉盈(2003),企業之環境績效執行力與公司價值相關性之實證研究,國立成功大學會計學系研究所碩士論文。\n14. 黃柏舒(2006),資訊透明度與資金成本關聯性之研究,中興大學會計學研究所碩士論文。\n15. 楊致行(2001),ISO 14000環境管理系統。\n16. 湯奕華(2002),ISO14001環境管理系統建置與導入介紹,經濟部工業局環保中心。\n17. 劉子衙(2007),台灣企業建立ISO14001環境管理系統之決定要素與財務績效,國立交通大學管理科學系研究所博士論文。\n18. 盧惠伶(2004),企業財務績效、內部治理與環保績效之研究,彰化師範大學會計學系研究所碩士論文。\n19. Carter, Craig R., Rahul Kale, and Curtis M. Grimm.2000. Environmental purchasing and firm performance: an empirical investigation. Transportation Research Part E 36:219-228.\n20. Feldman, Stanley J, Peter A Soyka, and Paul G Ameer.1997. Does improving a firm`s environmental management system and environmental performance result in a higher stock price? Journal of Investing 6(4):87-97.\n21. Hart, Stuart L. and Gautam Ahuja.1996. Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the environment 5:30-37.\n22. Heinkel, Robert, Alan Kraus, and Josef Zechner.2001. The effect of green Investment on corporate behavior. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 36(4):431-449.\n23. Jaggi, Bikki and Martin Freedman.1992. An examination of the impact of pollution performance on economic and market performance: pulp and paper firms. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 19(5):697-713.\n24. Nakao, Yuriko, Akihiro Amano, Kanichiro Matsumura, Kiminori Genba, and Makiko Nakano.2007. Relationship between environmental performance and financial performance: an empirical analysis of japanese corporations. Business Strategy and the Environment 16:106-118.\n25. Sharfman, Mark P.and Chitru S. Fernando.2008. Environmental risk management and the cost of capital. Strategic Management Journal 29:569-592.\n26. Spicer, Barry H. 1978. Investors, Corporate Social Performance and Information Disclosure:An Empirical Study. The Accounting Review 53(1):94-111.\n政府出版刊物\n1. 環境白皮書,行政院環境保護署出版物,2010年。\n2. 永續產業發展雙月刊,經濟部工業局出版刊物,產業永續發展整合資訊網,2010年12月。\n新聞資料\n1. 朱芳瑤,2009/05/14,華映友達汙水不排霄裡溪 改排老街溪,中國時報。\n2. 陳寧,2010/04/10,友達徵才 青年嗆聲 反中科戰役延燒校園,勞苦網。\n3. 陳世欽,2008/05/13 ,綠色基金夯 嚇壞唱衰者,聯合報。\n4. 黃美寧,2010/3/29,台塑高雄仁武廠汙染 環署重罰千萬,聯合晚報。\n網站\n1. 行政院環保署http://www.epa.gov.tw/\n2. 美國國家環境保護局(U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA) http://www.epa.gov/tri/\n3. 經濟部工業局,產業永續發展整合資訊網http://proj.moeaidb.gov.tw/isdn/Norm/mnorm-more.asp?nplSiV==\n4. 經濟部工業局http://www.moeaidb.gov.tw/\n5. 勞苦網http://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/51469zh_TW
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
801801.pdf1.41 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.