Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/60378
題名: 特展體驗模組之研究:以天才達文西為例
The exhibition study of sems – the case study of genius Da Vinci
作者: 鄭秀姬
貢獻者: 祝鳳岡
鄭秀姬
關鍵詞: 體驗模組
體驗價值
顧客滿意度
顧客忠誠度
日期: 2009
上傳時間: 5-Sep-2013
摘要: 國內藝文市場發展熱絡,各式特展紛紛來台展出,如何透過行銷創造人潮,在市場中勝出,是重要課題。本研究發現「臺北天才達文西特展」展示品特色多元,具備執行體驗行銷之完整條件,因此引發本研究動機。\n本研究利用質化深度訪談方式,訪問六位特展志工以及問卷發放的量化研究方式,共計379份有效問卷,進行統計分析後獲得以下發現。本研究發現如下:\n1.體驗行銷策略體驗模組的思考關聯、感官情感及行動體驗對體驗價值的美感趣味有顯著影響。\n2.體驗行銷策略體驗模組的思考關聯、感官情感及行動體驗對體驗價值的參觀者投資報酬有顯著影響。\n3.體驗價值的美感趣味及參觀者投資報酬對顧客滿意度有顯著影響。\n4.體驗價值的美感趣味及參觀者投資報酬對顧客忠誠度有顯著影響。\n5.顧客滿意度對顧客忠誠度有顯著影響。\n根據以上發現,對臺北天才達文西特展提出發展體驗行銷的建議:\n1. 注意體驗模組跟每一項體驗媒介之間的相互銜接或補強,以創造價值\n2. 展場的環境面向將牽動體驗模組的每一個環節\n3. 廣宣策略應視參觀者預期的心理調整建議\n4. 加強優質服務以提昇顧客滿意度。\n5. 加強空間大小適當性、人數控制與定時導覽密度以提昇體驗價值中的服務優越性價值。\n6. 改善畫作區與解剖區展示物說明與空調問題。\n7. 增加志工培訓專業度與人數。
When arts began to develop and expand in various directions and more exhibitions are hosted in Taiwan, using effective marketing strategy to attract visitors has become a significant factor for achieving market success. Da Vince – The Genius Exhibition in Taipei, offers comprehensive collections to the audience, and by having these elements, makes it a perfect case study for experiential marketing research which became the initial motivation of this research. \nIn-depth interview method with qualitative approach and survey method with quantitative approach were used in the research. In-depth interviews were performed among six exhibition volunteers. As for surveys, 379 were returned. After analyzing all statistics, results are listed as follows.\nThe research concluded as follow: \n1. It’s confirmed that experiential marketing with the SEMs (Strategic experiences modules) of think, relate, sense and action has a significant positive effect on experiential value of aesthetics and playfulness. \n2. It’s confirmed that experiential marketing with SEMs of think, relate, sense and action has a significant positive effect on experiential value of consumer return on investment(CROI).\n3. It’s confirmed that experiential marketing with SEMs of playfulness and consumer return on investment has a significant positive effect on customer satisfaction.\n4. It’s confirmed that experiential marketing with SEMs of playfulness and visitor return on investment has a significant positive effect on customer loyalty.\n5. It’s confirmed that customer satisfaction has a significant positive effect on customer loyalty.\nBased on the above findings, the following are the marketing strategy advices for Da Vinci - The Genius:\n1. Value creation is enhanced by emphasizing the connection and collaboration between experiential modules and experience providers.\n2. Experiential modules are influenced by exhibition vicinity.\n3. Publicity strategies need to be adjusted based on visitor expectations.\n4. Improve customer satisfaction by enhancing customer services.\n5. Improve experiential value of service excellence by enhancing the appropriate room space, capacity control of visitors, and availability of guided tours.\n6. Improve exhibit description and air conditioning in painting and anatomy sections.\n7. Increase volunteers as well as improving their skills and knowledge.
參考文獻: 一、 中文\n1. 王雅玲(2002)。《從超級特展探討博物館與傳播之互動以「黃金印象-奧塞美術館名作」與「兵馬俑‧秦文化」特展為例》。南華大學美學與藝術管理研究所碩士論文。\n2. 王育英、梁曉鶯譯(2000)。Schmitt,B.H.著《體驗模組》。台北:經典傳訊文化。\n3. 王嵩山(2003)。《差異:多樣性與博物館》。台北:稻鄉出版社。\n4. 李金銓,《大眾傳播理論》,台北:三民,1996。\n5. 邱媞(2003)。《體驗模組模式與其參觀者行為之實證研究》。中國文化大學觀光事業研究所碩士論文。\n6. 吳凡星(2006)。《以體驗模組的觀點探討消費情境因素與消費者體驗之關聯性》。靜宜大學觀光事業學系研究所碩士論文。\n7. 吳語心(2004)。《博物館展示與電影之敘事比較:以「西仔反-清法戰爭與台灣」特展與「怒海爭鋒-極地征伐」為例》。臺南藝術學院博物館學研究所碩士論文。\n8. 吳淑華(2001)。〈博物館展示淺論〉,《科技博物》,國立科學工藝博物館,5(3):5-13。\n9. 吳麗玲(2000)。《博物館導覽與觀眾涉入程度之研究-以達文西特展為例》。臺北市立師範學院視覺藝術研究所碩士論文。\n10. 林怡安(2001)。《以參觀者滿意度探討博物館服務品質之研究-以國立自然科學博物館為例》。南華大學旅遊事業管理研究所碩士論文。\n11. 洪瑞英(2004)。《顧客導向、服務品質、顧客價值與顧客滿意度之關連性研究-以花蓮地區國際觀光旅館為例》。東華大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。\n12. 夏業良、魯煒譯PineⅡ,B.J.&Gilmore,J.H.著(2003)。《體驗經濟時代》。台北:經濟新潮社。\n13. 許泓祺(2009)。《體驗模組策略研究-以好市多(Costco)為例》。國立政治大學管理碩士學程碩士論文。\n14. 陳媛(1995)。《博物館三論》。台北:國家出版社。\n15. 陳鈞坤(2001)。《國立海洋生物博物館觀眾參觀行為之研究》。朝楊科技大學休閒事業管理學系研究所碩士論文。\n16. 陳育慧(2001)。《體驗模組之探索性研究-以StarBucks為例》。中國文化大學碩士論文。\n17. 陳簾予(2003)。《體驗品質對情緒、價值、體驗滿意度、承諾及行為意圖影響之研究-以台灣現代戲劇演出為例》。輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文。\n18. 黃光男(1994)。《美術館廣角鏡》。台北:台北市立美術館。\n19. 黃明政(2003)。《銀行業的服務品質 企業形象與顧客忠誠度之研究》。南華大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。\n20. 黃映瑀(2005)。《體驗模組、體驗價值、顧客滿意、品牌形象與行為意向關係之研究》。大葉大學事業經營研究所碩士論文。\n21. 陸定邦譯(1991)。〈教學設計之依據─博物館中的學習與展示〉,《博物館學季刊》,台中市:國立自然科學博物館,5(4):37-44。\n22. 陸定邦(1997)。〈展示策略與方法之分析〉,《博物館學季刊》,台中市:國立自然科學博物館,11(2):11-22。\n23. 張瑜倩(2002)。《以博物館行銷觀點探討博物館形象建立》。國立政治大學圖書資訊研究所碩士論文。\n24. 張慶珍(2002)。《從體驗模組的觀點探討廣告的視覺符號-以女性雜誌服飾廣告為例》。銘傳大學設計管理研究所碩士論文。\n25. 程之碩(2004)。《從體驗經濟之觀點探討線上氛圍與互動性設計對體驗元素與學習滿意度影響之研究─以線上學習為例》。輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文。\n26. 揚蕙如(2003)。《博物館展示策略的影響因素探究-以國科會科學週特展為例》。國立台南藝術學院博物館學研究所碩士論文。\n27. 漢寶德(2000)。《展示規劃:理論與實務》。台北市:田園城市文化。\n28. 蔡寶元(2009)。《體驗模組策略研究-以國立歷史博物館梵谷特展為例》。國立政治大學館理碩士學程碩士論文。\n29. 劉慶宗(2000)。《博物館觀眾參觀經驗之研究--以國立海洋生物博物館為例》。國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。\n30. 劉蘊芳譯(1999)。Michael Gelb著。《Brains:怎樣擁有達文西的七種天才》。台北市:大塊文化。\n31. 謝文雀譯Bl"ckweld,R.D.,Miniard,P.W.&Engel,J.F.(2001)著《消費者行為》。台北:華泰。\n\n二、英文\n1 Anderson, W. O., & Sullivan, W. M. (1993). The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firm. Marketing Sciences. 12(2), 125-143\n2 Babin. Darden.W. R. and Griffin, M. (1994).“Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value“Journal of Consumer Research. Vol.20, March, pp.644-656\n3 Batra R. & Olli T. A. (1991).“Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Sources of Consumer Attitudes“.Marketing Letters, Vol. 2, 159-170. \n4 Bearden, W. & Jesse E.T. (1983).“Selected Determinants of Consumer Satisfaction and Complaint Reports“Journal of Marketing Letters, Vol. 20, 21-28. \n5 Bolton R. N. & Drew J. H. (1991).“A Longitudinal Analysis of the Impacts of Service Changes on Customer Attitudes“Journal of Marketing, Vol. 55, 1-9. \n6 Churchill, G. A. & Surprenant C. (1982).“An Investigation into the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction.“Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 19, 133-147. \n7 Day, G.S.&R. Wensley. (1988).“Assessing Advantage: A Framework for Diagnosing Competitive Superiority“Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52, 1-20. \n8 Dodds W. B. & Monroe K. B. (1985).The Effect of Brand and Price Information on Subjective ProductEvaluations. Advances in \n9 Engel J.F., Blackwell, R. D & Miniard, P.W.(1990).Cunsumer Behavior, The Dryden Press, NY. \n10 Engel J. F., Blackwell R. D., & Miniard P. W. (1995). Consumer Behavior. 8th. Forth Worth. Dryden Press. Texas.\n11 E.Hooper-Greenhill,“A new communication model for museum“,in Gaynor Kavanagh,(ed.)Museum Languages:Objects and texts(London and New York:Leicester University.1991),p.56-57 \n12 Fornell C. (1992).“A National Customer Satisfaction Barometer: The Swedish Experience“. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 56, 6-21. \n13 Gronholdt, L., Martensen, A. and Kristensen. K.“The Relationship between Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty: Cross-Industry Differences.“Total Quality Management. Vol. 11, pp. 509-514,(2000). \n14 Holbrook M. B. & Corfman K. P. (1985). Quality and Value in the Consumption Experience: Phaedrus Rides Again, 31–57 in Perceived Quality: How Consumers View Stores and Merchandise, Jacob Jacobyand Jerry C. Olson (Eds.), Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. \n15 Holbrook M. B. (1994). The Nature of Customer Value: An Axiology of Service in the Consumption Experience, Service Quality: New Direction in Theory and Practice, by Roland t. Rust and Richard L. Oliver, eds. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.\n16 Jones, T. O. & Sasser, W. E. (1995). Why satisfied Customers Defect. Harvard Business Review, 73, 88-9\n17 Kotler P. (1991). Marketing Management: Analysis. Planning, Implementation and Control.7th ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 246-249.\n18 Kotler P. (1997). Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control. 9th ed., Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey.\n19 Oliver, R. (1999). Value as Excellence in the Consumption Experience, 43-62, London and New York: Routledge.\n20 O’Sullivan, E. L., & Spangler, K. J. (1998). Experience Marketing: Strategies for the NewMillenium. State College Pa: Venture Pub.\n21 Park, C. W., Joworski, B. J., & Machinnis D. J. (1986).“Strategic Brand Concept-Image Management”.Journal of Marketing, Vol. 50, 135-145.\n22 Pine, B. J., & Gilmore J. H. (1998).“Welcome to the Experience Economy“.Harvard Business Review. Vol. 76, 97, Boston.\n23 Sheth, J. N. Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991).“Why We Buy What We Buy: A Theory of Consumption Values“.Journal of Business Research.Vol. 22, 159-170.\n24 Sheth, J. N., Newman B. I., & Gorss B. L. (1991). Consumption Values and Market Choices-Theory and Applications., OH: South-Western Publishing Co., Cincinnati.\n25 Singh, J. (1991).“Understanding the Structure of Consumers Satisfaction Evaluation of Service Delivery”.Journal of Academy of Marketing Sciences. Vol. 19, 223-234.\n26 Shearer West,“The Devaluation of Cultural Capital“Post – Modern Democracy and the Art Blockbuster, in Susan Pearce(ed.),Art in museums (London:The Athlone,1995),pp.74-93.\n27 Schmitt, B. H.(1999).“Experiential marketing. Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice“Marketing Science. Vol. 4, 199–214.\n28 Westbrook, R. A. (1981).“Sources of Consumer Satisfaction with Retail“.Outlets.Journal of Marketing. Vol. 44, 68-72.\n29 Woodruff, R. B., Schumann, D. W., & Gardial, S. F. (1993). “Understanding Value and Satisfaction from the Customer’s Point of view“.Survey of Business.Vol. 29, 33-40.\n30 Woodside. A.G.& Daly R. T. (1989). Linking Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction, and Behavioral Intertion. Journal of Care Marketing, 5-7.\n31 Yadav, M. S. & Monroe K. B. (1993).“How buyers perceive savings in a bundle price: an examination of a bundle’s transaction value“. Journal of Marketing Research. Vol. 30, 350–358.\n32 Zeithaml, V. A. (1988).“Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence“.Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52, 2-22.\n33 Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996). The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 60, 31-46.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
傳播學院碩士在職專班
95941014
98
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095941014
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
101401.pdf789.93 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.