Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/60514| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林柏生 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | 楊鵬達 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator | 楊鵬達 | zh_TW |
| dc.date | 2009 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2013-09-05T08:47:33Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2013-09-05T08:47:33Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2013-09-05T08:47:33Z | - |
| dc.identifier | G0097351006 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/60514 | - |
| dc.description | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 國際經營與貿易研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 97351006 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 98 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | 研發創新活動中，產業標準的設定一直都被視為一種研發的限制條件，本文考慮產業標準的設定是廠商在研發賽局裡的一種策略，使產業標準的設定為研發賽局可以使用的策略，進而討論在哪些情形下，研發賽局的產業標準設定會與當標準化設定作為一種限制條件，研發活動將會相同。\n本文利用產業標準對研發賽局報酬有贏家的報酬上升以及輸家的報酬縮減，將產業標準視為賽局成果面的策略選擇，發現若廠商為齊質，產業標準在固定設置成本時，並且贏家報酬必須超過一定大小，產業標準會在研發賽局之始設定，與作為賽局限制條件的結果相同。在有產業標準為策略下的研發賽局，其均衡的參與賽局廠商數目，與報酬因產業標準變化的大小關係較大，而設置\n標準的固定成本對廠商數目的影響較小。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 1.緒論.......................................3\n1.1.研究目的與動機.............................3\n1.2.章節架構..................................5\n2.文獻回顧....................................6\n2.1.產業標準的設定.............................6\n2.2.R&D競賽的模型..............................7\n2.3.產業標準在模型上的設定.....................14\n3.研究方法與模型設定...........................15\n3.1.研究方法..................................15\n3.2.模型假設..................................15\n3.3.比較與討論................................26\n4.結論與建議..................................27\n4.1.產業標準會在研發之初便訂定..................27\n4.2.產業標準對廠商帶來不利的期望報酬對產業的影響...27\n4.3.研發創新之設定產業標準的研究建議..............28 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 1066511 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097351006 | en_US |
| dc.subject | 產業標準 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 研發競賽 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 賽局 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 連續時間 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 狀態跳躍 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | R&D 競賽中廠商引入產業標準的時機 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The timing of standard-setting in a R&D race | en_US |
| dc.type | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference | Hirshleifer, J. and J. Riley (1979). "The analytics of uncertainty and information-An expository survey." Journal of Economic Literature 17(4): 1375-1421.\n \nJensen, R. and M. Thursby (1996). "Patent races, product standards, and international competition." International Economic Review 37(1): 21-49.\n \nKatz, M. and C. Shapiro (1994). "Systems competition and network effects." The Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(2): 93-115.\n \nLee, H., R. O Keefe, et al. (2003). "The growth of broadband and electronic commerce in South Korea: contributing factors." The Information Society 19(1): 81-93.\n \nLee, T. and L. Wilde (1980). "Market structure and innovation: a reformulation." The Quarterly Journal of Economics 94(2): 429-436.\n \nLemley, M. and C. Shapiro (2007). "Patent hold-up and royalty stacking."\n \nLippman, S. and K. McCardle (1987). "Dropout behavior in R&D races with learning." The Rand Journal of Economics 18(2): 287-295.\n \nLoury, G. (1979). "Market structure and innovation." The Quarterly Journal of Economics 93(3): 395-410.\n \nReinganum, J. (1981). "Market structure and the diffusion of new technology." The Bell Journal of Economics 12(2): 618-624.\n \nReinganum, J. (1989). "The timing of innovation: Research, development, and diffusion." Handbook of industrial organization 1: 849-908.\n \nSchmalensee, R. (2009). "STANDARD-SETTING, INNOVATION SPECIALISTS AND COMPETITION POLICY*." The Journal of Industrial Economics 57(3): 526-552.\n \nSchumpeter, J. (2006). Capitalism, socialism and democracy, Routledge.\n \nStevens, M., J. Hickman, et al. (1987). "Antitumor activity and pharmacokinetics in mice of 8-carbamoyl-3-methyl-imidazo [5, 1-d]-1, 2, 3, 5-tetrazin-4 (3H)-one (CCRG 81045; M & B 39831), a novel drug with potential as an alternative to dacarbazine." Cancer research 47(22): 5846.\n \nSuarez, F. and J. Utterback (1995). "Dominant designs and the survival of firms." Strategic Management Journal 16(6): 415-430.\n \nTegarden, L., D. Hatfield, et al. (1999). "Doomed from the start: What is the value of selecting a future dominant design?" Strategic Management Journal 20(6): 495-518.\n \nVarian, H. (1989). "Price discrimination." Handbook of industrial organization 1: 597-654. | zh_TW |
| item.languageiso639-1 | en_US | - |
| item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| item.openairetype | thesis | - |
| item.grantfulltext | open | - |
| item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100601.pdf | 1.04 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.