Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/62010| 題名: | 不同立委選制下民眾課責行為之研究 A Study of Citizen`s Electoral Accountability under Different Legislative Electoral Systems |
作者: | 范惕維 | 貢獻者: | 游清鑫 Yu, Ching Hsin 范惕維 |
關鍵詞: | 立委選舉 選舉課責 政治課責 選舉制度 施政滿意度 |
日期: | 2012 | 上傳時間: | 2-十二月-2013 | 摘要: | 推究民主政治的源頭來講，民主政治根源希臘兩個文字：demo及kratica，前者意味平民，後者代表統治，兩者合一便是平民統治的政府。而在代議政治之下，要實現主權在民的方式就是透過定期選舉來決定政治領袖的去留，此種決定政治人物去留的過程也是一個簡單的課責行為。既然民主政治的內涵包括實現人民主權以及強調領導者的責任時，政府理所當然應為其所表現負起責任，並透過選舉接受人民的檢驗，這也帶出了政治課責「political accountability」在民主運作過程中的必要性。\n過去學界在討論臺灣選民是否有選舉課責之行為時，多在探討投票抉擇與施政表現或經濟表現之間的關聯性，忽略了制度的重要性，從選舉制度的觀點上，不同的選舉制度會形塑出不同的政治效果，選民對於投票的對象也受限於選制差異的影響，課責行為當然也會有不同程度的差異，本文探討臺灣選舉是否存在選舉課責？而影響選民進行課責的選制差異有何不同？透過過去十年來的選舉經驗，瞭解選舉課責在臺灣現有的立委選舉制度之下的發展狀況。\n本研究透過「二元勝算對數模型」來理解不同的選制之下民眾的課責行為之差異，研究發現根據選舉課責之定義，三種不同的立委選制都有明顯選舉課責之行為，且以政黨作為課責連結的投票方式，PR選制比SMD的課責強度更是明顯，在2008及2012都可以得到驗證；SNTV雖較不強調政黨間的競爭，但仍有明顯之選舉課責行為，但礙於資料限制無法與其他選制進行比較。換句話說，選制因素在課責表現上所造成的差異並不是「有無之分」，而是「強弱之別」。一致政府責任歸屬問題雖較分立政府明顯，但因台灣並無共治之經驗，課責的區分依然不明顯。 | 參考文獻: | 中文部分\n王柏燿，2004，〈經濟評估與投票抉擇：以2001年立委選舉為例〉，《選舉研究》，11(1): 171-195。\n何思因，1991，〈影響我國選民投票抉擇的因素〉，《東亞季刊》，23(2): 39-50。\n吳皇昇，2010，〈政黨認同與施政評價對選民投票行為的影響：「情義相挺」還是「拂袖而去」？〉，國立政治大學政治學系碩士學位論文。\n吳重禮、李世宏，2003，〈總統施政表現對於國會選舉影響之初探：以2001年立法委員選舉為例〉，《理論與政策》，17(1): 27-52。\n吳重禮、李世宏，2004，〈政府施政表現與選民投票行為：以2002年北高市長選舉為例〉，《理論與政策》，17(4): 1-24。\n林啟耀，2011〈票房良藥或毒藥？探討馬政府施政滿意度對立委補選之影響〉，《選舉研究》，18(2): 31-57。\n周育仁、詹富堯、張敦程，2008，〈從課責與監督概念探討美國政府負責機制〉，2008年TASPAA年會暨「夥伴關係與永續發展」國際學術研討會，5月24日，台中：東海大學行政管理暨政策學系。\n周育仁、詹富堯、傅澤民，2008d，〈從政治課責觀點探討雙首長制下之政府負責機制：以法國與俄羅斯為例〉，2008年臺灣政治學會年會暨「全球競爭，民主鞏固，與治理再造－2008臺灣新課題」學術研討會，11月22日，南投：國立暨南大學公共行政與政策學系。\n俞振華， 2012，〈 探討總統施政評價如何影響地方選舉：以2009年縣市長選舉為例〉，《選舉研究》，19(1)：69-95\n陳敦源， 2000，〈誰掌控官僚體系？：從代理人理論看臺灣官僚體系的政治控制問題〉，《公共行政學報》，4: 99-130。\n陳志瑋，2003，〈政策課責的設計與管理〉，臺灣大學政治學博士學位論文。\n張傳賢、張佑宗，2006，〈選舉課責：拉丁美洲國家政府經濟施政表現與選舉得票相關性之研究〉，《臺灣政治學刊》，10(2): 101-147。\n張佑宗，2009，〈搜尋臺灣民粹式民主的群眾基礎〉，《臺灣社會研究季刊》，75: 85-113。\n張政亮，2011，〈從民主憲政體制的變革中論我國的總統課責〉，國立臺灣大學政治學系碩士學位論文。\n黃秀端，1994，〈經濟情況與選民投票抉擇〉，《東吳政治學報》，3: 97-123。\n劉嘉薇，2008，〈2005年縣市長選舉選民投票決定之影響因素：台北縣、台中市、雲林縣以及高雄縣的分析〉，《臺灣民主季刊》，5(1): 1-43。\n蕭怡靖、游清鑫，2008，〈施政表現與投票抉擇的南北差異—2006年北高市長選舉的探討〉，《臺灣民主季刊》，5(2): 1-25。\n蕭怡靖、黃紀，2010，〈2008年立委選舉候選人票之分析：選民個體與選區總體的多層模型〉，《臺灣政治學刊》，14(1): 3-53。\n蕭怡靖，2013，〈臺灣民眾的政治課責觀：認知、評價與影響〉，《臺灣民主季刊》，10(2): 73-104。\n\n\n英文部分\nBerle, A., and G. Means. 1932. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: MacMillan.\nBovens, M. 1998 The Quest for Responsibility: Accountability and Citizenship in Complex Organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\nBudge, Ian and Richard I. Hofferbert 1990.”Mandates and Policy Outputs: U.S.Party Platforms and Federal Expenditures”. The American Political Science Review, 84(1): 111-131.\nCampbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald Stokes, 1960, The American Voter. N. Y.: John Willey & Sons, Inc.\nCrespi, Irving. 1980. “The Case of Presidential Popularity.” In Polling on the Issues, ed. Albert H. Cantril. Washington D.C.: Seven Locks Press.\nCutt, J. , & Murray, V. 2000. Accountability and Effectiveness Evaluation in Non-Profit Organizations. London: Routledge.\nDay, Patricaia and Rudolf Klein. 1987. Accountability: Five Pubic Services. London and New York: Tavistock.\nDowns, Anthony 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.\nEisenhardt, Kathleen M. 1989 “Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review,” Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 57-74.\nFiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Election. New Haven: Yale University Press.\nFisher Stephen D, Lessard-Phillips Laurence, Hobolt Sara and Curtice John. 2007. ”Accountability and Representation: How do Voters Approach Election?” Presented at Voters, Coalitions, and Democratic Accountability, University of Exeter. \nHendry, John 2002 “The Principle’s Other Problems: Honest Incompetence and the Specification of Objectives,” Academy of Management Review, 27(1): 98-113.\nHuntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.\nJohnson, G. B. and B. F. Crisp. 2003. “Mandates, Powers and Policies.” American Journal of Political Science. 47(1): 128-142.\nKearns, Kerin P. 1996 Managing for Accountability: Preserving the Public Trust in Public and Nonprofit Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.\nKeohane, R. O. 2002. Political Accountability. Paper Prepared for Conference on Delegation to International Organization. Park City, Utah: 28.\nKeys, V. O. Jr. 1966. The Responsible Electorate. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.\nKiewiet, D. Roderick. 1983. Marco-Economics and Micro-Politics: The Electoral Effects of Economic Issues. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.\nKlingemann, Hans-Dieter Richard I. Hofferbert, and Ian Budge 1994. Parties,Policies, and Democracy. In Parties Policies, and Democracy,eds..Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Richard I. Hofferbert,and Ian Budge with Torbjorn Bergman, Hans Keman, Francois Petry, and KaareStrom, Boulder: Westview, 240-270.\nLazarsfeld, Paul F., Bernard P. Berelson, and H. Gaudet, 1944, The People’s Choice: How the Voter Make Up His Mind in Presidential Campaign. N. Y.: Columbia University Press.\nLewis-Beck, Michael S. 1988. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.\nLight, P. C. 1994. Federal Inspectors General and the Paths to Accountability. In Philanthropy and Law in Asia: A Comparative Study of Nonprofit Legal Systems in Ten Asia Pacific Societies, eds. T. L. Cooper.. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.\nLinz, Juan. 1994. “Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy: Does It Make a Difference?” In The Failure of Presidential Democracy, eds. Juan J. Linz and Arturo Valenzuela. Baltimore: John Hopkins University.\nLinz, Juan J. and Alfred Stepan. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.\nMainwaring, Scott. 2003.”Introduction: Democratic Accountability in Latin America.” In Democratic Accountability in Latin America,eds. Scott Mainwaring and Christoper Welna. New York: Oxford University Press.\nMainwaring, Scott and Christoper Welna,eds. 2003. Democratic Accountability in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press.\nMulgan, R. 2000. Accountability: An Ever-Expanding Concept? Publlic Adminstration, 78(3): 555-573.\nNadeau, Richard, Richard G. Niemi and Antoine Yoshinaka 2002.”A Cross-NationalAnalysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context Across Timeand Nations.” Electoral Studies, 21(3): 403-423.\nO’Donnell, Guillermo. 1999. “Horizontal Accountability in New Democracy.”In The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies, eds. Andreas Schedler, Larry Diamond and Marc F. Plattner. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.\nPowell, G. Bingham Jr. and Guy D. Whitten 1993. “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context.” American Journal of Political Science, 37(2): 391-414.\nPowell, G. Bingham, Jr. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven: Yale University Press:.\nPrzeworski, Adam, Susan C. Stokes and Bernard Manin, 1999. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\nPual, Samuel. 1992. “Accountability in Public Services: Exit, Voice, and Control.”World Develpoment 29(7): 1047-1060.\nRoss, S. A., “The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principals Problem,” American Economic Review LXII, May 1973: pp 134–139\nSchedler, Andreas. 1999. ”Conceptualizing Accountability.”In The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies, eds. Andreas Schedler, Larry Diamind and Marc F. Plattner. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers..\nSchedler, Andreas, Larry Diamind and Marc F. Plattner, eds. 1999. The Self-restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.\nSchumpeter, Joseph A. 1975: Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.\nShafritz J. M. ed. 1998. International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Administration, v. 1. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.\nShank, J. Merrill and Warren E. Miller. 1990. “Policy Direction and Performance Evaluation: Complementary Explanations of the Reagan Elections” British Journal of Political Science, 20(2): 143-235.\nSlomczynski, Kazimierz, Goldie Shabad, and Jakub Zielinski. 2008. “Fluid Party Systems, Electoral Rules and Accountability of Legislators in Emerging Democracies: The Case of Ukraine.” Party Politics, 14(1): 91-112.\nSpiro, Herbert J. 1969. Responsibility in Government: Theory and Practice. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.\nStone, Deborah 1997 Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.\n\nThompson, D. F. 1987 Political Ethics and Public Office. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.\nTsai, Chia-hung. 2008. “Making Sense of Issue Position, Party Image, Party Performance, and Voting Choice: A Case Study of Taiwan’s 2004 Legislative Election.”Journal of Social Science and Philosophy《人文及社會科學集刊》, 20(1): 1-24.\nTsebelis, G. 1995. “Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Player in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicammeralism and Multipartyism.” British Journal of Political Science. 25(3): 289-325.\nWang, Ding-ming. 2001.”The Impacts of Policy Issues on Voting Behavior in Taiwan: A Mixed Logit Approach.”Journal of Electoral Studies《選舉研究》, 8(2): 95-123. | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 政治研究所 98252011 101 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098252011 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 201101.pdf | 1.15 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.