Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/64385
題名: 宗教節目與觀眾之接收和反應~以大愛電視《人間菩提》證嚴法師開示為例
Religious Programs and the Reception and Reaction of the Audience~Case of “Life Wisdom”on DaAi TV, Master Cheng Yen’s Practical Interpretations
作者: 葉育鎏
Yeh, Yu Liu
貢獻者: 蘇蘅
Su, Herng
葉育鎏
Yeh, Yu Liu
關鍵詞: 宗教傳播
宗教節目接收分析
資訊處理理論
感動反應
religious broadcasting
religious program
reception analysis
information processing theory
moving reactions
日期: 2005
上傳時間: 3-三月-2014
摘要: 臺灣目前共有七家宗教頻道,而慈濟所屬的大愛電視,自1998年成立後,透過衛星播出,遍及全球,現已成為全球華人世界第二大電視臺(僅次於大陸中央電視臺)。不過到底是宗教臺?或是公益頻道?證嚴法師言明大愛電視不是以宗教立場為出發點的電視媒體經營。因為在她的解讀中,每個人都須要有宗教的依靠;「宗」是生活的宗旨,「教」是生活的教育。慈濟號稱有五百萬以上的會員,志業範圍遍及全世界近50個國家,其組織與義工型態發展,點點滴滴都在累積社會信任的資本。\n 大愛電視有四套關於證嚴法師的節目,本研究以即時性最強,且兼具紀實教育功能的《人間菩提》節目收視作為研究對象;運用接收分析理論,採取質化方法研究,先抽選《人間菩提》兩集主題進行分析;接著以深度訪談方式,訪問八位觀眾。這些觀眾對慈濟事務,有高涉入和低涉入的差異;觀看節目也有高收視和低收視之不同,藉以瞭解不同背景的觀眾如何透過《人間菩提》這樣的節目,去建構日常生活中對社會真實的解讀與詮釋;並瞭解當觀看《人間菩提》節目,出現感動反應後,如何產生收視之後續行動。\n 本研究發現,《人間菩提》節目對觀眾而言,確實具有其宗教價值與行善助人雙重元素,但不會讓觀眾認為它是傳統印象中的宗教節目,反倒能連結至受眾個人的情感與生活體驗,帶動出一股慈善力量的動能。
In Taiwan, there are seven local religious channels, DaAi TV is owned by the Tzuchi Foundation. DaAi TV was established in 1998. Through satellite broadcasting, it has already become the second largest television station among the global Chinese population. (next to the Central Committee Television in the mainland China). The Tzu Chi Foundation is a volunteer-based, nonprofit, spiritual and welfare organization that was founded in 1966 by Dharma Master Cheng Yen. For over 40 years, the Foundation has been contributing to improved social and community services, medical care, education, and humanism in Taiwan. Tzu Chi is an international organization with over 5 million supporters. Today, Master Cheng Yen`s influence on the world is revealed through inspiring stories. There are four different programs about Master Cheng Yen on DaAi TV. The change Cheng Yen attempts to initiate in society begins with the individual.\n Among the four programs, the content of “Life Wisdom" is the most direct. Master Cheng Yen provides “living wisdom" daily for 12 minutes. The wisdom is a record of actual events and it is updated daily. \n This research adopts reception analysis, thorough interviews to understand how the audience watches this type of religious program. Further, it studies the manner in which the audience interprets the content and applies it in their daily lives, in order to construct a perspective of the real world. The present research also examines the reactions of the audience upon watching the program and the manner in which the act of watching Life Wisdom influences the larger community to work toward the betterment of society.
參考文獻: 中文部份\n中時電子報,(民國94年6月16日) 。<世新調查 大愛台 影響力冠全台 論\n  收視率 則民視、TVBS、三立台灣台領先〉。上網日期: 2005年6月21\n 日,取自:   http://news.chinatimes.com/Chinatimes/newslist/newslist-content-forprint/0,4066.130106+132005061600756.00.html \n尤克強(2000年12月)。〈先心後術,網路正途〉,(數位時代)。 2006年7  月15日,取自:\nhttp://www.bnext.com.tw/mag/2000_12/2000_12_1080.html\n王泰俐(2004)。〈電視新聞節目「感宮主義」之初探研究〉,《新聞學研\n 究》,81: 1-41。\n王泰俐(2006)。〈電視新聞「感官主義」對閱聽人接收新聞的影響〉,《新\n 聞學研究》,86: 91-133。\n玉順民(1999)。《宗教福利》。台北:亞太。\n司徒達賢(1999)。《非營利組織的經營管理》。台北:天下。\n印順(1971)。《佛在人間》。台北:正聞。\n印順(1976)。《從現實的世界說到佛教的理想世界》。1976年講於台北國\n 立藝術館。\n早坂泰次郎、北林才知(1997)。生命潛能編輯部譯,《電視心理學一兼談人\n 際關係的感情表現》。台北:生命潛能文化。\n北京科技報(2006)。〈心理探秘參考:災難新聞因何最受關〉。2006年2月4\n 日,取自:\nhttp://64.233.179.104/search?q=cache:TTm3PCIXx18J:bigS.xinhuanet.com/gate /big5/news.xinhuanet.com/newmedia/2005-01/12/content_2449651.htm+%ES %BF%83%E7%90%86%ES%AD%B8%E7%9C%8B%E7%81 %BD%E9%9B%A 3&hl=zh-TW &gl=tw &ct=clnk&cd=4&lr=lang_zh- W\n李天任、藍莘譯(1995)。《大眾媒體研究:導論》。〈原書Wimmer & \n  Dominick[ 1991 ] . Mass media research: An \n Introduction.〉。台北:亞太。\n李幼蒸(1997)。《哲學符號學:記號的普遍理論》。台北:唐山。\n李俊傑(1997)。《演講技巧大全》。台北:尚宇。\n吳宛倫(民90)。《宗教性節目之意義再現:以慈濟大愛劇場為例》。世新大\n 學傳播研究所碩士論文。\n吳宗儒(民95)。《音樂的時空感與視覺的連結一電視中音樂的完形作用初\n 探》。國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。\n吳雯雯(民80)。《議題涉入感對資訊處理策略影響之研究》。國立政治大學\n  新聞研究所碩士論文。\n沈清松(2001)。《台灣精神與文化發展》。台北:商務。\n林本炫(1996)。〈宗教運動的社會基礎一以慈濟功德會為例〉,《台灣佛教\n 學術研討會論文集》,229-243。\n林淑娟(2006年4月28日)〈台灣人物誌,見證證嚴大愛傳奇〉,《自由電子\n  報》2006年7月19日,取自:\nhttp://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2006/new/apr/28/today-show7.htm \n林敬祐(2002)。《善惡新論》。台北:富春。\n林照真(2006)。《信任一人們為何不再相信媒體?》。台北:天下。\n林靜伶譯(1996)。《當代語藝觀點》。Sonja, k. Foss, Karen A. \n Foss, & Robert Trapp著。台北:五南。 \n周怡君、張存華、林敏雄(2004)。《社會的宗教》。〈原書Niklas \n Luhmann〔2000〕. Die religion dergesellschaft〉。台北:商\n 周。 \n邵正宏(民89)。《非營利電視台之行銷策略研究一以慈濟大愛與好消息頻道\n  為例》。台灣師範大學大眾傳播研究所碩士論文。\n胡幼慧編(2005)。《質性研究》。台北:巨流。\n畢盈(2001)。《台灣地區佛教信眾電視宗教頻道收視行為調查》。南華大學\n 傳播管理研究所碩士論文。\n徐敏雄(2000)。〈從慈濟的社會服務看台灣基督教會的宣教〉。《信望愛-\n 徐敏雄專欄》。 2005年11月13日,取自:http://www.fhl.net/sms/2k0423.htm。\n唐維敏(1998)。《英國文化研究導論》。Graeme Turner著。台北:亞\n 太。\n夏俊輝(1991)。《宗教服務之研究一以佛教慈濟功德會為例》。銘傳大學管\n 理科學研究所碩士論文。\n粘嫦鈺(2006年1月9日)〈阿桃愛賭觀眾不愛〉,《聯合晚報》。2006年1月\n  25日,取自:\n http://news.sina.com/udn/201-104-103-109/2006-01-09/0022532338.html \n梁欣如(1991)。《影響閱聽人解讀型態之因素研究一電視新聞之神話敘事體\n 為例》。輔仁大學大眾傳播研究所碩士論文。\n郭小平、翟燦譯(1994))《藝術心理學新論》。台北:商務。\n張淑綺(2000)。《我是誰?青少年的再現一以平面媒體為例》。輔仁大學大\n 眾傳播研究所碩士論文。\n張錦華、劉容玫譯(2001)。《女性主義媒介研究》。L.Van Zoonen著。台\n 北:遠流。\n陳玉箴譯(2005)。《媒介與傳播研究法指南》。〈原書Klaus Bruhn \n Jensen〔2002〕 . A handbook of media and communication \n Research)。台北:韋伯。 \n陳向明(2005)。《社會科學質的研究》。台北:五南。\n陳延昇(2000)。《台灣宗教衛星頻道經營管理之研究》。國立政治大學廣播\n 電視研究所論文。\n陳昭郎(1992)。《傳播社會學》。台北:黎明。\n陳淑珠、張玉佩譯(1998)。《演說傳播原理》。Bruce E. Gronbeck等\n 著。台北:五南。\n陳智文譯(2004)。《說故事的力量》。Simmons, A.著。台北:臉譜。\n陳慧劍(2004)。《證嚴法師和她的慈濟世界》。台北:慈濟文化出版。\n陳錦玉(2003)。《閱聽眾對情感訴求節目的『感動』反應研究:以三個名人\n 專訪電視節目為例》。世新大學傳播研究所碩士論文。\n陳曉林譯(1996)。《歷史研究》。Toynbee, Arnold Joseph著。台北:\n 遠流。\n陳觀勝、李培茱譯(1989b)。《宗教學導論》。Max Muller著。上海:人\n 民出版社。\n張君玫譯(2001)。《文化消費與日常生活》。John Storey著。台北:巨\n 流。\n張錦華譯(1995)。《傳播符號學理論》。John Fiske著。台北:遠流。\n彭邦順譯(1997)。《大眾傳播理論(下冊)》。〈原書D. McQuail\n 〔1994〕〉。台北:風雲論壇。\n馮建三譯(1995)。《電視、觀眾與文化研究》。〈原書David Morley \n 〔1992〕, Television, audience & culture study〉。台北:遠\n 流。 \n黃心慈(民94年8月1日)。〈頻道卡位戰〉,《中時電子報》。2006年1月7\n 日,取自:\nhttp://news.chinatimes.com.tw/Chinatimes/newslistlnewslist-content-forprintlO,4 066、130502+132005080100718βO.html \n黃葳威(1998)。〈非商業廣播電視節目走向分析一以好消息頻道為例〉。發\n 表於一九九八年世界心理衛生與輔導會議。中華心理衛生學會。\n黃葳威(2004)。《閱聽人與媒體文化》。台北:揚智。\n程之行譯(1993)。《傳播理論》。S. W. Littlejohn著。台北:遠流。\n楊志強編著(2006)。《說故事的力量》。台北:羚羊。\n游梓翔(1999)。《演講學原理:公眾傳播的理論與實際》。台北:五南。\n葉育鎏(2004)。〈台灣電視宗教傳播之影響力初探一以大愛台《人間菩提》\n (證嚴法師開示)為例〉。發表於第五屆台灣媒介生態與環境研討會。\n維基百科(2006),〈大愛電視台〉,2006年1月25日,取自:\nhttp://zh. wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%A4%A7%E6%84%9B%E9%9B%BB%E8% A6%96%E5%8F%BO \n趙雅麗(2003)。〈符號版圖的迷思:影像化趨勢下語言的未來發展〉,《新\n 聞學研究》,77: 187-215。\n趙賢明(2006)。《台灣最美的女人一證嚴法師與慈濟人》。台北:印刻。\n潘煊(2004)。《琉璃同心圓》。台北:天下。\n劉安雲譯(1999)。《人的宗教》。Huston Smith著。台北:立緒。\n劉思量(1992)。《藝術心理學一藝術與創造》。台北:藝術家。\n蔣金龍(1981)。《演講修辭學》。台北:黎明文化。\n鄭志明(1998)。〈由宗教學觀點談台灣近年來的宗教現象〉,《一九九八年\n 世界心理衛生與輔導會議論文集》。\n鄭明椿譯(1993)。《解讀電視》。〈原書J.Fiske & J.Hartley \n 〔1978〕. Reading television)。台北:遠流。 \n蔡坤鴻譯(1997)。《宗教的創生》。Whitehad, A. N.著。台北:桂冠。\n蔡琰(2000)。《電視劇:戲劇傳播的敘事理論》。台北:三民。\n蔡琰、臧國仁(民92)。〈由災難報導檢討新聞美學的「感性認識」:兼談新\n  聞研究向美學轉向的幾個想法〉,《新聞學研究》,74: 95-119。\n蔡筱穎譯(2000)。《布赫迪厄論電視》。Bourdier, Pierre著。台北:\n 麥田。\n勝淑芬(1999年3月)。〈台灣電視第一章一光啟社的故事〉,《光華雜\n 誌》。2006年3月21日,取自:\nhttp://www.taiwan-panorama.com/ch/show_issue.php3?id=199938803098C.TX T&page=l \n謝旭洲(1998)。《電視福音節目的傳播效果研究一以基督教褔音節目700俱\n 樂部為例》。輔仁大學傳播研究所。\n蕭錦綿(2006)。《信任一心室效應、他你我》。台北:天下。\n鍾麗華(2006年2月2日)。〈證嚴法師濟貧教富,一做四十年〉,《自由電\n  子報》。2006年7月19日,取自:\nhttp://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2006/new/feb/2/today-fo12.htm\n瞿海源(1997)。《台灣宗教變遷的社會分析》。台北:桂冠。\n瞿海源(2002)。〈台灣的新興宗教〉,《二十一世紀雙月刊》,73: 103-\n 113。\n瞿海源、章英華(2002)。〈台灣外來新興宗教發展的比較研究〉。《台灣新\n 興宗教研討會》。台北:中央研究院社會學研究所。\n證嚴法師(1992)。《歡喜自在》。台北:慈濟文化出版。\n證嚴法師(1999)。〈用愛心做就對了〉。《證嚴法師對全國中小學校長靜思\n 語研習營開示語錄》。\n蘇燕輝(2005)。《認識媒體概況》。2006年1月3日,取自:\nhttp://www.ccpct.org.tw/data/course_050901s.doc \n蘇蘅譯(1993)。《大眾傳播與日常生活》。〈原書D. K. Davis & \n S.T.Baran [ 1981] . Mass communication and everyday \n life〉。台北:遠流。 \n英文部份\nAbelman, R. (1987). Religion television uses and \n gratification. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic \n Media, 31(3), 293-307.\nAnderson, P. A., & Guerrero, L. K. (1998). Handbook of \n communication and emotion: Research, \n theory,applications, and contexts. New York: Academic \n Press. \nAng. I. (1985). Watching Dallas: Soap opera and the \n melodramatic imagination. London: Methuen.\nArnheim, R. (1969). Visual thinking. Berkely, CA: \n University of California Press. \nAltman, R., (1987). Television sound, in H. Newcomb(ed.), \n Television: The Critical View. New York: Oxford \n University Press.\nBabbie, E. (1992). The Practice of Social Research (6th \n ed.). CA : Wadsworth. \nBarrow, R. (1993). The Philosophy of Schooling. Brighon, \n Sussex: Wheatsheaf Books.\nBatson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a \n social-psychological answer. Alabama: Hillsdale NJ. \nBausinger, H. (1984). Media, technology and everyday life. \n Media, Culture and Society, 6(4), 342-351. \nBavelas, J. B., Black, A.,Lemery, C. R., & Mullett, J. \n (1987). Motormimicry as primitive empathy. In N. Esisenberg & J. Strayer (Eds.), Empathy and its \n development, pp. 317-338. New York: Cambridge \n University Press. \nBird, S. E. (2003). The audience in everyday live. Living \n in a media world. New York: Routledge. \nBogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (1982). Qualitative research \n for education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.\nBransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual \n prerequisities for understanding: Some investigations \n of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning \n & Verbal Behavior, 11, 17-726.\nBryman, Alan (1992). Charisma and leadership in \n organization. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. \nBouson, J. B. (1989). The empathic reader: A study of the \n narcissistic character and the drama of the self. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press. \nCampbell, C. (1987). The romantic ethic and the spirit of \n modem consumerism. Oxford, UK : Basil Blackwell. \nCarey, J. W. (1988). Media, myth, and narratives. CA: Sage. \nCarey, J. W. (1989). Communicton as Culture. Boston, MA: \n Unwin Hyman. \nChatman, S. (1978). Story and discourse: Narrative \n structure in fiction and film. Ithaca, NY: Cornell \n University Press.\nCoke, J. S., Batson, C. D., & McDavis, K. (1978). Empathic \n mediation of helping: A two-stage model. Journal of \n Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 752-766.\nCreswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research \n design. CA: Sage. \nDahlgren, P. (1988). What`s the meaning of this? \n Viewers`plural sense-making of TV news. Media, Culture \n and Society, 10, 285-301. \nDavis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in \n emphy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. \n Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113-\n 126. \nDeutsch,F, & Madle, R. A. (1975). Empathy: Historic and \n current conceptualizations, measurements, and a \n cognitive theoretical approach. Human Development, 18, \n 267-287. \nDewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: \n Collier. \nDooling, D. J., & Mullet, R. L. (1973). Locus of thematic \n effects in retention of prose. Journal of Experimental \n Psychology, 97, 404-406. \nErnest, R. H. (1962). Introduction to psychology. New York: \n Harcourt Brace. \nEntman (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured \n Paradigm. Northwestern University. \nFairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. Harlow: \n Longman. \nFayol, M. (1991). Text typologies: A cognitive approach. In \n G. Denhiere & J. P. Rossi (Eds.), Text and text \n processing. (pp. 61-76). Amsterdam & New York: North-\n Holland. \nFerre,J.P. (1990). Channels of belief Ames, IA: Iowa State \n University Press. \nFish,S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The \n authority of interpretative communities. Cambridge, MA: \n Harvard University Press. \nFiske, J. (1991). Television culture. London: Routledge. \nFowler, J. (1984). Becoming adult, becoming Christian. New \n York: Harper & Row. \nGadamer, H. G.(1979). Truth and method. London: Sheed & \n Ward. \nGunther, A. C. (1992). Biased press or biased public? \n Attitudes toward media \n coverage of social groups. Public Opinion Quarterly, \n 56, 147-167.\nGunter, B., & Viney, R. (1994). Seeing is believing: \n Religion and television in the 1990s. London: John \n Libbey. \nHall, S. (1994). Encoding /decoding. In D. Graddol & O. \n Boyd-Barret (Eds.), Media texts, author and readers: A \n reader. Clevedon: Multilingual \nHall, S. (1997). Representation: Culture representation and \n signifying practices. London: Sage. \nHatfield, E., Cacipoppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). \n Emotional contagion. England: Cambridge University \n Press. \nHawkins, D. I., Kenneth A. C., & Best, R. J. (1980). \n Consummer behavior: Implication for marketing strategy. \n Dallas, TX: Business Publication,Inc. \nHermes, J. (1995). Reading women`s magazines. Cambridge, \n UK: Polity Press. \nHobson, D. (1982). Crossroads: The drama of a soap opera. \n London: Methuen. \nHoffman, M. L. (1978). Empathy, its development and \n prosocial implications. In C. B. Keasey (Ed.), Nebraska \n symposium on motivation, 25, 169-218. Lincoln, NA: \n University of Nebraska Press. \nHoijer, B. (1990). Studing viewers` reception of television \n programmes: Theoretical and methodological \n consideration. European Journal of Communication. 5, 29-\n 56. \nHoijer, B. (1992). Reception of television narration as \n socio-co gniti ve process : A schema-theoretical \n outline. Poetics: Journal of Empirical Reserch on \n Literature, the Media and the Arts, 21(4), 283-304. \nHoijer, B. (1998). Social psychological perspectives in \n reception analysis. In R. Dickinson, R. Harindrunath & \n O. Linne` (Eds.), Approaches to audiences: A Reader, \n 166-183 . New York: Oxford University Press. \nHovland, C.I., Jains. O. L., & Kelly, H. H.(1953). \n Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale \n University Press. \nHoover, S. M. (1988). Mass media religion. Newbury Park, \n CA: Sage. \nHuck, F. O. (1997). Visual communication: An information \n theory approach. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.\n Iser, W.(1978). The act of reading: A theory of \n aestbetic Response. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.\nJensen, K. B., & Rosengren, K. E. (1990). Five traditions \n in search of the audience. European Journal of \n communication, 5, 207-238. \nJorgensen, P. F. (1998). Affect, persuasion, and \n communication process.In P. A. Andersen & L. K. Guerrero (Eds.), Handbook of communicationαnd emotion: \n Research, theory,αpplicαtions, and contexts, 403-422. \n San Diego, CA: Academic Press. \nKramer, Ralph M., (1981). Voluntary agencies in the welfare \n state. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. \n Lang, A., Dhillon, K., & Dong, Q. (1995). The effects \n of emotional arousal and valence on television \n viewers`congnitive capacity and memory. Journal of \n Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 39(3), 313-327. \nLazarus, R. S. (1991). Cognition and motivation in emotion. \n American Psychologist, 46, 352-367.\nLeiby, James (1985). Moral foundations of social welfare \n and social work: A Historical View, Social Work, 30(4), \n 323-330. \nLiebes,T., & Katz, K. (1984). Decoding Dallas: Notes from a \n cross-culture study. In H. Newcomb (Eds.). (1984). \n Television: The critical view. 419-432 .New York & \n Oxford: Oxford University Press. \nLiebes, T., & Katz, K. (1993). The export of meaning: Cross-\n cultural readings of Dallas, 2nd, edn. Cambridge: \n Polity Press. \nLindlof, T.R.(1991). The qualitative study of media \n audience. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 35\n (1), 23-42. \nLivingstone, S. M. (1990). Interpreting a television \n narrative: How different viewers see a story. Joumal of \n Communication, 40(1), 72-85. \nLivingstone, S. M. (1992). The resourceful \n reader:Interpreting television characters 157 and \n narratives. Communication Yearbook, 15, 58-90. \nLivingstone, S. M. (2004). The challenge of changing \n audiences. European Journal of Communication. London: \n Sage. \nLowney, K. S. (1999). Baring our souls: TV talk shows and \n the religion of recovery. NY: Aldine de Gruyter. \nMacIntyre.A. (1981). After virtue: A study in moral theory. \n Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. \nMaletzke, G. (1963). Psychologie der massenkommuniktion. \n Hamberg: Verlag Hans Bredow-Institute. \nMcQuail, D. (1997). Audience analysis. London: Sage. \nMetallinos, N. (1996). Television aesthetics: Perceptual, \n cognitive, and compositional bases. NJ: Lawrences \n Erlbaum. \nMeyer, B. J., & Freedle, R. O.(1984). Effects of discourse \n type on recall. American Educational Research Journal, \n 21(1), 121-143. \nMiles, M.B, & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data \n analysis (2nd ed.). Beverly Hill, CA: Sage. \nMink, L.O.(1978). Narrative Form as Cognitive Instrument. \n In: R. H. Canary (ed.), The writing of history. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press. \nMoores, S. (1993). Interpreting audiences: The ethnography \n of media consumption. London, CA : Sage.\nMorley, D. (1980). The“Nationwide audience. London: \n British FilmInstitute. \nMorley, D. (1986). Family television. London: Comedia. \nMorley, D. (1992). Television, audience & cultural studies. \n London: Routledge. \nNewman, J. (1996). Religion vs. television: Competitors in \n culture context. London: Greenwood. \nNewman, B. & Smith, M.C. (2007). Fanning the flames: \n Religious media \n consumption and American politics. American Politics \n Research, 35(6), 846-877.\nNeuwirth, K., Salmon, C. T., & Neff, M. (1989). Community \n orientation and media use. Journalism Quarterly, 66, 31-\n 39. \nParkin, F. (1972). Class inequality and political order. \n London: Paladin. \nPetterson, T. (1986). The audience`s use and gratifications \n of TV worship services. Scientific Study of Religion, 25\n (4), 391-409. \nPetty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1998). Attitude change: \n Multiple roles for persuasion \n variables. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey \n (Eds.), Handbook of social \n psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 323-390). New York: \n McGraw-Hill.\nPhenix, P. H. (1964), Realms of Meaning. NY: McGraw Hill. \nPhilo,G. (1990). Seeing and believing: The influence of \n television. London: Routledge. \nPotter,D., & Lang, A. (1999). Making TV news memorable: The \n seven habits of highly effective storytellers. \n from_http://www.newslab.org/habits-1.htm (2004/12/27 ) \nRadway, J. (1993). Reading the Romance. In A. Gray & J. \n McGuigan (Eds.), Studying culture: An introduction \n reader. London: Edward Arnold. \nRowland. R. C. (1989). On limiting the narrative paradigm: \n Three case study. Communication Mongraphs. 56: 39-54. \n Silverstone, R. (1994). Television and everyday life. \n London: Routledge. \nShapiro, B. P. (1985). Marketing for nonprofit \n organization. Havard Business Review, Sep/Oct, 223-232. \nStanley J. Baran & Dennis K. Davis (2000). Mass \n communication theory. New York: Thomson Learning, Inc.\nStern,D.N. (1985).The interpersonal world of The Infant: A \n view from psychoandlysis and developmental psychology. \n New York: Basic Books.\nStiff, J. B., Dillard, J. P., L. Kin, H., & Sleight, C. \n (1988). Empthy,communication,and prosocial behavior. \n Communication Monographs, 55, 198-213. \nTamborimi. R. (1996). Emphy and emotional reactions to \n horror. In J. Weaver & R. \nTamborini (Eds.). NJ: Erlbaum. \nThompson, K. (1998). Moral panics. London: Routledge. \nThompson, K. (2000). Watching television audiences: Culture \n theories and methods. London: Arnold. \nWebster J. G. & Wakshlag, J. J. (1983) . A theory of \n Television Program Choice. Communication Research, 10: \n 430-446. \nZillmann, D. (2000). Exemplification in communication : the \n influence of case reports on the perception of issues. \n NJ: L. Erlbaum. \nZwaan, R. A. (1991). Some parameters of literary and news \n comprehension: Effects of discourse-type perspective on \n reading rate and surface structure representation. \n Poetics, 20, 139-156.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
傳播學院碩士在職專班
92941003
94
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0929410031
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
003101.pdf1.23 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.