政大學術集成


Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/65942


Title: Voluntary and involuntary spatial attentions interact differently with awareness
Authors: 徐慎謀
Hsu, Shen-Mou, Nathalie George, Valentin Wyart, Catherine Tallon-Baudry
Contributors: 心腦學中心
Keywords: Spatial attention;Voluntary;Involuntary;Awareness
Date: 2011
Issue Date: 2014-05-12 15:07:44 (UTC+8)
Abstract: Although the nature of the relationship between attention and awareness is actively debated, the possibility that different forms of attention might interact differently with awareness has never been directly tested. We examine here whether voluntary and involuntary spatial attentions, two forms of attention that were distinguished by manipulating the predictability of central arrow cues, interact in the same way with visual awareness. Conscious perception was enhanced by both voluntary and involuntary attentions, and to a similar extent, suggesting volition may not be an essential feature for awareness. However, the influence of attention was dependent on the awareness of the target stimulus: Voluntary attention shortened reaction times and improved discrimination accuracy of cued relative to uncued stimuli, but only when the stimuli were consciously perceived. Involuntary attention shortened reaction times for cued relative to uncued target stimuli, but only when the stimuli were not consciously perceived. Our results imply that the nature of the relationship between attention and awareness is not a simple one but depends on the type of attention involved. More specifically, our results suggest that the aware or unaware status of the stimulus could determine whether attentional facilitation is driven by voluntary or involuntary mechanisms, a proposal that goes in the opposite direction of the classical view that attention controls awareness. Because voluntary attentional benefits were observed in aware trials but involuntary attentional benefits were observed in unaware trials only, our results also argue against the idea that attentional effects on conscious and unconscious processing are fundamentally of the same nature.
Relation: Neuropsychologia, 49, 2465-2474
Data Type: article
DOI link: http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.04.024
Appears in Collections:[Research Center for Mind, Brain & Learning] Periodical Articles

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
24652474.pdf775KbAdobe PDF1172View/Open


All items in 學術集成 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


社群 sharing