Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67603
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor林建秀zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorLin, Chien Hsiuen_US
dc.contributor.author紀筌惟zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorChi, Chuan Weien_US
dc.creator紀筌惟zh_TW
dc.creatorChi, Chuan Weien_US
dc.date2013en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-21T07:38:48Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-21T07:38:48Z-
dc.date.issued2014-07-21T07:38:48Z-
dc.identifierG0101352033en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67603-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description金融研究所zh_TW
dc.description101352033zh_TW
dc.description102zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本研究以新台幣兌美元之匯率日資料作為主要研究標的,同時加入台灣加權股價指數及金融業隔夜拆借利率之日資料作為股價與利率之代理變數,利用Beveridge-Nelson分解趨勢的方法將變數資料拆解成趨勢項與循環項之時間序列資料,藉此捕捉匯率資料具有景氣循環的特性。在循環項的序列資料,以向量自我迴歸模型來分析並予以估計,趨勢項的部分,利用共整合檢定來探討趨勢項變數間長期的均衡關係,再以向量誤差修正模型予以估計,得到未來30天期之匯率走勢。接著,再以RMSE與MAE指標來衡量不同模型之匯率預測績效,以期能找出最適之匯率預測模型。\n實證研究結果發現,將匯率資料先透過Beveridge-Nelson分解趨勢的方法予以拆解後,再利用時間序列模型進行分析及預測,時間序列模型的預測能力都比原始匯率利用時間序列模型進行預測或透過ARIMA模型進行預測還要來的好。因此,根據實證研究的結果,若企業與政府在進行匯率預測的分析時,能夠考慮先將匯率資料透過Beveridge-Nelson分解方法予以處理,便能更有效提升模型的預測能力,除了企業能夠降低避險成本來提高公司整體績效,對於國家而言,有效的掌握匯率的趨勢便能夠迅速且正確的制定政策,提升國家的經濟發展。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents摘要 I\n目錄 II\n表次 IV\n圖次 V\n第壹章 緒論 1\n第一節 研究背景與動機 1\n第二節 研究目的 2\n第貳章 文獻回顧 6\n第一節 匯率預測相關文獻 6\n第二節 匯率、股價及利率之關聯性探討之相關文獻 9\n第三節 Beveridge-Nelson分解 11\n第參章 研究方法 13\n第一節 單根檢定(Unit Root Test) 13\n第二節 ARMA(p,q)/ARIMA(p,d,q) 15\n第三節 最適落後期之選取 17\n第四節 預測績效指標 18\n第五節 向量自我迴歸模型(Vector Autoregression,VAR) 19\n第六節 共整合與向量誤差修正模型 20\n第七節 Beveridge-Nelson分解(B-N 分解) 25\n第肆章 實證分析 28\n第一節 資料來源及分析 28\n第二節 ADF單根檢定 28\n第三節 匯率預測─ARIMA模型 30\n第四節 匯率預測─向量誤差修正模型 31\n第五節 匯率預測─Beveridge-Nelson之應用 34\n第六節 績效比較 43\n第伍章 結論與建議 45\n第一節 結論 45\n第二節 研究建議 46\n第陸章 附表 48\n參考文獻 55zh_TW
dc.format.extent1077532 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101352033en_US
dc.subject匯率預測zh_TW
dc.subject向量誤差修正模型zh_TW
dc.subjectBN分解zh_TW
dc.subjectExchange rate forecastingen_US
dc.subjectVector error correction modelen_US
dc.subjectBeveridge-Nelson decompostionen_US
dc.titleBeveridge-Nelson分解趨勢方法對匯率預測模型績效之影響 -以新台幣兌美元匯率為例zh_TW
dc.titleThe Influence of Exchange Rate Forecasting Model Performance on Beveridge-Nelson Decomposition Method-The Case of NTD/USD exchange rate.en_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.referenceAliber, R. H., 1973. The Interest Parity Theorem: A Reinterpretation. Journal of Political Economy, 81(6), 1451-1459.\n\nAttfield, C. L. F. and B. Silverstone, 1998. Okun’s Law, Cointegration and Gap Variables. Journal of Macroeconomics, 20(3), 625–637.\n\nBenigno, G, P. Benigno, and F. Ghironi, 2007. Interest Rate Rules for Fixed Exchange Rate Regimes, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 31(7), 2196-2211.\n\nBeveridge, S., and C. Nelson, 1981. A New Approach to Decomposition of Economic Time Series into Permanent and Transitory Components with Particular Attention to Measurement of Business Cycle. Journal of Monetary Economics, 7(2), 151-174.\n\nBilson, J. F. O., 1978. The Monetary Approach to Exchange: Some Empirical Evidence. International Monetary Fund Staff Papers, 25(1), 48-75.\n\nBranson, W. H., 1969. The Minimum Covered Interest Differential Needed for International Arbitrage Activity. Journal of Political Economy, 77(6), 1028-1035.\n\nBranson, W. H., 1983. Macroeconomic Determinants of Real Exchange Rate Risks, in R. J. Herring, ed.: Managing Foreign Exchange Risk (Cambridge University \nPress, Cambridge, MA).\n\nByun, Jong-Cook, Chen Son-Nan, 1996. International Real Interest Rate Parity with Error Correction Models. Global Finance Journal, Fall/Winter96, 7(2), 129-151.\n\nDornbusch, R., and S. Fischer, 1980. Exchange Rates and Current Account. American Economic Review, 70(5), 960-971.\n\nEdison, H. J., and E. O. Fisher, 1991. A Long-run View of the European Monetary System. Journal of International Money and Finance, 10(1), 53-70.\n\nFang, H., and K. K. Kwong, 1991. Forecasting Foreign Exchange Rate. The Journal of Business Forecasting, Winter, 10(4), 16-19.\n\nFrankel, J., and R. Levich, 1975. Covered Interest Arbitrage: Unexploited Profit? Journal of Political Economy, 83(2), 325-338.\n\nFrankel, J. A., 1976a. A Monetary Approach to Exchange Rate: Doctrinal Aspects and Empirical Evidence. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 78(2), 200-224.\n\nFrankel, J., and R. Levich, 1977. Transaction Costs and Interest Arbitrage: Tranquil versus Turbulent Periods. Journal of Political Economy, 96(2), 358-370.\n\nFrankel, J. A., 1979. On the Mark: A Theory of Floating Exchange Rate Based on Real Interest Differentials. American Economic Review, 69(4), 610-622.\n\nGarratt, A., D. Robertson, and S. Wright, 2004. Permanent vs Transitory Components and Economic Fundamentals. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 21(4), 521-542.\n\nHatemi-J,A., and M. Irandoust 2000. Exchange Rates and Interest Rates: Can Their Causality Explain International Capital Mobility? International Trade Journal, 4(3), 299-314.\n\nKim, K. H., 2003. Dollar Exchange Rate and Stock Price: Evidence from Multivariate Cointegration and Error Correction Model. Review of Financial Economics, 12(3), 301-313.\n\nLee, J., 2000. The Robustness of Okun’s Law: Evidence from OECD Countries. Journal of Macroeconomics, 22, 331–356.\n\nMacdonald, R., and M. P. Taylor, 1994. The Monetary Model of the Exchange Rate: Long-Run Relationships, Short-Run Dynamics and How to Beat a Random Walk. Journal of International Money and Finance, 13(3), 276-290.\n\nMacDonald, R. and I. W. Marsh, 1997. On Fundamentals and Exchange Rate: A Casselian Perspective. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(4), 655-664.\n\nMacDonald, R.,1999. Exchange Rate Behavior: Are Fundamentals Important? Economics Journal, 109(459), 673-691.\n\nMehran, J., and M. Shahrokhi, 1997. An Application of Four Foreign Currency Forecasting Models to the U.S. Dollar and Mexican Peso. Global Finance Journal, Fall, 8(2), 211-220.\n\nPan, M. S., Fok, R. C. W., and Liu, Y. A, 2007. Dynamic Linkages Between Exchange Rates and Stock Prices: Evidence from East Asian Markets. International Review of Economics and Finance, 16(4), 503-520.\n\n王裕仁,2009。〈匯率、油價、金價、利率之關聯性探討與預測〉,國立成功大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。\n\n朱清貴,2008。〈物價、利率、股價與匯率關聯性探討〉,南華大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。\n\n沈中華,1992。〈用「無拋補利率平價說」解釋台灣利率與美元匯率的變動〉,《企銀季刊》,第16卷第1期,頁1-13。\n\n林家卉,2008。〈匯率預測研究-ARIMA模式之應用〉,國立高雄第一科技大學金融營運研究所碩士論文。\n\n徐志宏,2009。〈台灣景氣指標長期趨勢估計法之研析〉,《經濟研究年刊》,第十一期,行政院經濟建設委員會經濟研究處。\n\n張鳳貞,1999。〈台灣地區利率、匯率與股價互動關係之研究〉,中興大學統計學系研究所碩士論文。\n\n張小彤,2003。〈匯率預測研究──時間數列分析法之應用〉,大葉大學事業經營研究所碩士論文。\n\n陳翊鏵,2001。〈台灣利率、匯率互動之實證研究〉,國立東華大學國際經濟研究所碩士論文。\n\n陳秀香,2006。〈貨幣模型能否解釋匯率的波動行為?台灣與韓國的實證研究〉,東海大學經濟學系研究所碩士論文。\n\n彭惠琴,2003。〈通貨膨脹、就業及貨幣政策與景氣循環之關聯性〉,中原大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文。\n\n楊凱文,2001。〈貨幣學派匯率決定理論之新臺幣對美元匯率實證研究〉。\n\n楊士慶,2001。〈台灣偏離利率平價理論之成因探討〉,國立中山大學財務管理學系研究所碩士論文。\n\n管相柔,2007。〈匯率預測模型之研究─ARIMA之應用〉,中原大學國際貿易學系研究所碩士論文。\n\n黎明淵,2002。〈購買力平價說對匯率動態有解釋能力嗎﹖-台幣與美元匯率實證結果〉,《亞太經濟合作評論第九期》,頁50~71。\n\n蔡佳玲,2004。〈台灣景氣循環特性之實證研究〉,輔仁大學經濟學系研究所碩士論文。\n\n蔡火蓮,2006。〈新台幣匯率預測之探討〉,國立中山大學財務管理學系研究所碩士論文。\n\n楊亦農(2009),《時間序列分析─經濟與財務上之應用》,雙葉書廊有限公司。zh_TW
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
203301.pdf1.05 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.