Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67770| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor | 政治系 | en_US |
| dc.creator | Mintz Alex;黃紀 | en_US |
| dc.creator | Huang, Chi | en_US |
| dc.date | 1991 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-07-28T09:25:05Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2014-07-28T09:25:05Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2014-07-28T09:25:05Z | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67770 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Studies of the guns versus butter trade-off found no evidence for the existence of a trade-off in the pre-Reagan era (see Russett 1982; Domke, Eichenberg, and Kelleher 1983; Mintz 1989). This study extends prior research by examining not only the direct, immediate effects of defense spending but also the indirect impact of arms expenditures on education spending. A three-equation model is specified and empirically estimated using data from 1953 to 1987. The results show no negative short-term effects but do show significant indirect long-term trade-offs. | en_US |
| dc.format.extent | 1396651 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.relation | American Journal of Political Science, 35(3), 738-757 | en_US |
| dc.title | Guns versus Butter: The Indirect Link | en_US |
| dc.type | article | en |
| item.grantfulltext | restricted | - |
| item.openairetype | article | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
| item.languageiso639-1 | en_US | - |
| item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 期刊論文 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 738757.pdf | 1.36 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.