Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/6800
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creator孫本初zh_TW
dc.creatorSun, Ben-chu-
dc.date1990en_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-11-12T01:44:50Z-
dc.date.available2008-11-12T01:44:50Z-
dc.date.issued2008-11-12T01:44:50Z-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/6800-
dc.description.abstractYes, quality of work life (QWL) applications do work) and they continue to work over time. Robert Golembiewski and Ben-chu Sun studied 231 applications of QWL (from bibliographies, journals, books, unpublished reports, dissertations, theses, and so on) that were conducted over twenty-two years (1965-1987). The success rates for four major classes of QWL (human processual, sociotechnical systems, technostructural, and combined), which encompass fifteen separate types, were substantial for hard-criteria effects as well as for soft changes, such as those in attitudes, opinions, and self-reports about worksite features. This article explains the outcomes, predictions, limitations, and perhaps the biases of their research. Despite minor inadequacies in design the authors remain adamant about the success of QWL-so much so that they recommend greater reliance on its techniques-
dc.formatapplication/en_US
dc.languageenen_US
dc.languageen-USen_US
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.relationHuman Resources Development Quarterly, 1(1),35-44en_US
dc.titleQWL Improves Worksite Quality: Success Rates in a Large Panel of Studiesen_US
dc.typearticleen
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:期刊論文
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.