Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/68296
題名: 僑外來台投資經營績效的影響因素
The Determinants of Performance of Overseas Chinese and Foreign Nationals in Taiwan
作者: 楊佩詩
Yang, Pei Shih
貢獻者: 翁永和
楊佩詩
Yang, Pei Shih
關鍵詞: 對外直接投資
經營績效
地主國
僑外來台投資
foreign direct investment
performance
Probit Model
overseas Chinese
foreign national
日期: 2013
上傳時間: 6-Aug-2014
摘要: 在全球化浪潮下,廠商為追求利潤極大化,紛紛向外尋找適合的市場,其營運策略已由傳統的國際貿易移轉至全球對外直接投資,並儼然成為各國經濟發展的重要動力。對外直接投資對地主國而言,可帶來經濟成長的動力、創造就業機會、促進技術移轉及創新活動等外溢效果,因此,各國無不積極吸引外商前往投資,台灣亦不例外。由於,僑外來台投資對台灣經濟發展具有重大貢獻,據此,本研究利用經濟部投資審議委員會2008年委外調查之「華僑及外國人投資事業營運狀況調查表(非服務業)」問卷資料,分別由廠商特性、競爭優勢及營運策略等構面,探討僑外來台投資營績效之影響因素,並運用Probit Model進行實證分析。實證結果發現,產業類別、廠商規模、成立時間、租稅負擔、國際化程度及在台設立製造生產部門等,是顯著影響僑外來台投資經營績效的重要因素。因此,政府除鼓勵僑外來台投資非資訊電子工業、擴大公司規模、善用先占優勢、提升國際化程度及設立製造生產部門外,亦應給予租稅優惠,降低其租稅負擔,使其有較佳之經營績效表現,以吸引並提升投資意願。
Corporations in pursuit of profit maximization have to seek out a suitable market under globalization trend and their business strategy has changed from the international trade shifted to the foreign direct investment. This study explores keys of performance of overseas Chinese and foreign nationals in Taiwan. By using Probit Model analysis based on 2008 statistical data from Investment Commission of Ministry of Economic Outsourcing Survey are empirically analyzed. Findings from the research indicate that “industry category, firm scale, set up time, the taxation, internationalization level and the establishment of manufacturing sector in Taiwan,” are significantly factors on firm`s performance. Therefore, in order to have better operating performance and enhance the willingness on investment in Taiwan, the government should encourage overseas Chinese and foreign nations invest in Taiwan on non-information and electronics industry, expand firm scale, use of first mover advantage, enhance the internationalization level and set up manufacturing sector, but should also give tax incentives to reduce their tax burden.
參考文獻: 中文部分\n于卓民(2003),「國際化程度與績效之關聯性-橫斷面與縱斷面分析」,國科會專題研究計畫(編號:NSC 91-2416-H-004-034),未出版。\n王健全、陳厚銘(2000),「政府獎勵措施對廠商績效之影響-LISREL分析方法之應用」,《臺大管理論叢》,10(2),71-96。\n朱博湧、鄧美貞、黃基鴻(2005),「垂直整合與虛擬整合商業模式之績效比較:台灣積體電路產業實證」,《交大管理學報》,25(1),1-27。\n李文瑞、陳世傑、曹為忠、陳律睿、楊靜怡(2010),「地主國特性、CEO特質及策略導向對台商大陸市場進入模式與經營績效之影響」,《北商學報》,18,1-16。\n杜富燕、陳柏丞(2008年12月),「競爭優勢、多角化投資與環境不確定對所有權進入模式與經營績效之影響-以台灣電子製造業在中國大陸之投資為例」,中華亞太經濟與管理學會、財團法人華亞經濟管理教育基金會全球經濟與企業經營策略研討會,高雄。\n吳萬益(1994),「台商赴大陸及東南亞投資策略與經營績效之關係研究」,《輔仁管理評論》,1(1),51-75。\n吳秋樺(2004),《我國上市櫃公司赴大陸投資對經營績效影響之研究》,私立靜宜大學會計學系研究所碩士論文。\n邱魏頌正、黃秋閔(2004),「外人直接投資、貿易與經濟成長-東亞與拉丁美洲實證之研究」,《環境與管理研究》,5(1),41-75。\n邱正仁、吳志正、姚美慧(2003),「台商投資大陸及東南亞的進入模式與經營績效之研究」,《問題與研究》,42(1),101-122。\n林祝英、周冠伶(2005),「赴大陸投資對台灣母公司財務績效之影響」,《東吳經濟商學學報》,51,269-296。\n林彩梅、李嫺柔(2007),「國際化程度、代理成本對經營績效關係之影響-以台灣上市電子業為例」,《中華管理學報》,8(1),71-85。\n林宛瑩、汪瑞芝、游順合(2012),「研發支出、內部董事與經營績效」,《會計審計論叢》,2(1),61-90。\n姚美慧(2000),《臺商對外直接投資進入模式與經營績效之研究-以大陸及東南亞為例》,國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。\n高子荃、方世杰、林楚雄(2006),「技術取得模式與經營績效之實證研究:考慮廠商的決策影響」,《科技管理學刊》,11(4),121-156。\n孫克難(1999),「〈產升條例〉對企業投資國際化之租稅獎勵」,《經濟前瞻》,63,46-49。\n曹為忠、詹雪蘭、李文瑞、陳旭銘(2002),「進入模式、產業環境、以及廠商特性對廠商海外市場經營績效之影響」,《企業管理學報》,54,1-32。\n許恩得、洪震玫、余任芳、林明寬(2010),「商業互補、人力資本與經營績效」,《東海管理評論》,11(1),75-94。\n張淑音(2005),《僑外直接投資台灣的決定因素》,國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文。\n張國忠、蔡明勳(2010),「國際化與公司績效:公司專屬性資產之調節角色,以台灣半導體產業為例」,《多國籍企業管理評論》,4(1),73-94。\n黃智聰、羅光達、陳寶惠(2013),「中小企業薪資不均程度對其經營績效之影響-以台北縣製造業為例」,《管理與系統》,20(3),459-480。\n劉祥熹(1998),「直接外人投資、貿易及其與市場結構、績效之關聯性-臺灣地區製造業之個案分析」,《經濟研究》,35(2),185-213。\n劉碧珍、陳添枝、翁永和(2007),《國際貿易導論》(二版),台北:雙葉書廊有限公司。\n劉榮芳、林益倍、葉怡伶(2013),「研究發展支出增加、股票報酬與經營績效以及資訊內涵」《商管科技季刊》,14(1),63-88。\n趙永祥、李在僑、潘啟華(2012),「中國大陸投資進入模式與績效關聯性之研究」,《華人經濟研究》,10(2),43-57。\n鍾開欽(2008),「對外直接投資、無形資產投資與組織績效之實證研究:以上市電子公司為例」,南亞技術學院教專研成果報告(編號:039),未出版。\n魏文欽、劉佩佳、謝林芳羽(2011),「租稅優惠對政府與高科技產業影響之研究」,《中華理論結構模式LISREL學會》,4(1),29-48。\n顏怡音、鍾開欽、薛富井、黃恆獎(2008年11月),「外人來台進行直接投資對台灣企業績效之影響:以台灣上市公司為例」,台灣科技大學管理新思維學術研討會,台北。\n英文部分\nArtisien, P. F. and P. J. Buckley (1983), “Joint Ventures in Yugoslavia: Comment,” Journal of World Trade Law, 18, 163-172.\nBuckley, P. J. and M. Casson (1976), The Future of Multinational Enterprise, London: Macmillan.\nBeamish, P. W. (1985), Joint Venture Performance in Developing Countries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Western Ontario, Canada.\nBrenner, M. S. and B. M. Rushton (1989), “Sales Growth and R&D in the Chemical Industry,” Research Technology Management, 32(2), 8-15.\nCaves, R. E. (1971), “International Corporations: The Industrial Economics of Foreign Investment,” Economica, 38(1), 1-27.\nChoi, F. D. S. and G. G. Mueller (1992), International Accounting, 2nd ed., London: Prentice-Hall International.\nContractor, F. J., S. K. Kundu and C. C. Hsu (2003), “A Three-Stage Theory of International Expansion: The Link between Multinationality and Performance in the Service Sector,” Journal of International Business Studies, 34(1), 5-18.\nChen, M. Y. (2012), “Entry Mode Choice and Performance: Evidence from Taiwanese FDI in China,” Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 48(3), 31-51.\nDierickx, I. and K. Cool (1989), “Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage,” Management Science, 35, 1505-1511.\nDunning, J. H. (1980), “Toward an Eclectic Theory of International Production: Some Empirical Tests,” Journal of International Business Studies, 11(1), 9-31.\nElston, J. A. and L. G. Goldberg (2003), “Executive Compensation and Agency Costs in Germany,” Journal of Banking & Finance, 27(7), 1391-1410.\nFey, C. F., I. Bjorkman and A. Pavlovskaya (2000), “The Effect of Human Resource Management Practices on Firm Performance in Russia,” International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(1), 1-18.\nGreen, D. H., D. W. Barclay and A. B. Ryans (1995), “Entry Strategy and Long-Term Performance: Conceptualization and Empirical Examination,” The Journal of Marketing, 59(4), 1-16.\nGarcia-Fuentes, P. A., G. F. C. Ferreira and P. L. Kennedy (2013), “Economic Performance of U.S. Multinational Agribusinesses: Foreign Direct Investment and Firm Strategy,” Agribusiness, 29(2), 242-255.\nHymer, S. (1960), The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment, Cambridge: MIT Press.\nIngham, H. and S. Thompson (1994), “Paying for Performance: Efficiency Wages and Mutuality,” Managerial and Decision Economics, 15(4), 279-289.\nKindleberger, C. P. (1969), American Business Abroad, New Haven: Yale University Press. \nKojima, K. (1973), “A Macroeconomic Approach to Foreign Direct Investment,” Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 14(1), 1-21.\nKotabe, M., S. S. Srinivasan and P. S. Aulakh (2002), “Multinationality and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of R&D and Marketing Capabilities,” Journal of International Business Studies, 33(1), 79-97.\nLeiblein, M. J., J. J. Reuer and F. Dalsace (2002), “Do Make or Buy Decisions Matter? The Influence of Organizational Governance on Technological Performance,” Strategic Management Journal, 23(9), 817-833.\nLuo, Y. (1998), “Timing of Investment and International Expansion Performance in China,” Journal of International Business Studies, 29(2), 391-407.\nLu, J. W. and P. W. Beamish (2004), “International Diversification and Firm Performance: The S-Curve Hypothesis,” Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 598-609.\nOrganization for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD (2008), Glossary of Foreign Direct Investment and Definitions, Paris: OECD Press.\nOsland, G. E. (1996), “Performance Issues in US-China Joint Ventures,” California Management Review, 38(2), 106-130.\nPan, Y. and D. K. Tse (2000), “The Hierarchical Model of Market Entry Modes,” Journal of International Business Studies, 31, 535-544.\nPark, Y. S. (2002), “FDI into Korea: Reaching the Next Plateau,” The 13th Annual U.S.-Korea Academic Symposium of the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy (KIEP) and the Korea Economics Institute of America (KEI), in cooperation with the Center for East Asian Studies (CEAS), University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, USA.\nRadices, H. K. (1971), “Control Type, Profitability and Growth in Large Firms: An Empirical Study,” The Economic Journal, 81(323), 547-562.\nRugman, A. M. and R. M. Hodgetts (1995), International Business: A Strategic Management Approach, New York: McGraw-Hill.\nRobinsons, K. C. (1991), “An examination of the influence of industry structure on eight alternative measures of new venture performance for high potential independent new ventures,” Journal of Business Venturing, 14, 165-187.\nSteers, R. M. (1975), “Problems in the Measurement of Organizational Effectiveness,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 20(4), 546-558.\nSamiee, S. and P. G. P. Walters (1990), “Influence of Firm Size on Export Planning and Performance,” Journal of Business Research, 20(3), 235-248.\nTeece, D. J. (1992), “Competition, Cooperation, and Innovation: Organizational Arrangement for Regimes of Rapid Technological Progress,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 18, 1-25.\nVernon, R. (1966), “International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, 190-207.\nVenkatraman, N. and V. Ramanujam (1986), “Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches,” Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801-814.\nWoo, C. Y. and G. Willard (1983), “Performance Representation in Business Policy Research: Discussion and Recommendation,” Paper Presented at the 23nd Annual National Meetings of the Academy of Management, Dallas, USA.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
行政管理碩士學程
101921232
102
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101921232
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
123201.pdf1.16 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.