Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/68556
題名: 企業主管支持友善育兒政策影響因素之研究
Why managers supporting childcare-friendly policies-An quantitative analysis
作者: 何昭蓉
貢獻者: 謝美娥
何昭蓉
關鍵詞: 友善育兒政策
企業主管
平衡工作與家庭
childcare-friendly policies
managers
balance work and family
日期: 2013
上傳時間: 12-Aug-2014
摘要:   鑑於現今社會對於員工工作與家庭責任平衡議題的關注,無論是社會政策或企業雇主,都越來越重視員工的家庭生活。然而,企業中所提供的友善育兒政策究竟能否確實地被需要的人使用,卻仰賴主管對於員工使用行為的支持態度。因此,本研究希望了解主管對友善育兒政策的態度以及影響主管對友善育兒政策支持態度的因素。\n  本研究以立意抽樣方式,於三所國立大學之EMBA發放問卷,另以滾雪球方式蒐集網路問卷,共獲得227份主管的有效樣本,研究結果為:\n1、在主管個人變項中,僅年齡、婚姻狀況、是否撫養子女與總支持態度或各措施呈現顯著關係。35歲以下者僅對於育嬰假支持態度較高、已婚及未婚者較離婚者更支持公司托兒制度、無撫養子女者的總支持態度也高於有撫養子女者;性別則與支持態度未呈現顯著差異。\n2、企業環境之變項中,包含企業規模、產業類型、是否成立工會、是否實施性騷擾防治政策、員工屬性以及企業中友善家庭文化的氛圍皆與總支持態度或各措施呈現顯著關係。任職於企業規模250人以上、金融業、實施性騷擾教育訓練、專業人員比例高或具備友善家庭文化企業之主管,呈現較高的支持態度。\n3、主管認知與經驗變項中,主管過去對於友善育兒政策的使用經驗、對於政策的功能認知以及主管的性別意識亦與總支持態度或各措施呈現正相關。\n  研究最後針對政策、企業及未來研究提出建議,包含加強輔導中小企業實施友善育兒政策、了解企業未能實施友善育兒政策原因據以對症下藥、加強查察未落實之企業並加以嚴懲、邀請有使用經驗者於輔導講座中分享心得、營造使用者觀點的友善企業環境、對管理階層的家庭關懷再教育、設計創意的工作模式等。
     In accordance with the rising social awareness of work-family balance issue, governmental policies and employers are more concerned with employees’ family life. However, whether the childcare-friendly policy in the firm can be applicable for the employees in need or not depends largely on the attitude of their managers in the workplace. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to understand the managers’ attitude to childcare-friendly policy and the related factors influencing their attitude.\n A total of 227 valid samples from managers were collected through 2 means: (1) Purposive sampling in 3 EMBA classes in national universities and (2) Snowball sampling online. The findings are as follows: \n1. Among all the related factors of the managers, only their age, marital status, and whether they have children on their own are significantly correlated with their supportive attitude towards the childcare friendly policy. Managers aging less than 35 years old only support on parental leave. Managers who are married or not married support on-site childcare more than the divorced ones. As for managers who don’t have children support friendly childcare policies more than those do. There is a not significant correlation between managers’ gender and their supportive attitude.\n2. As for corporate environment factors, significant correlation to supportive attitude on child-care friendly policy exists with the scale of firm, the industrial classification of firm, union in existence, preventing policies of sexual harassment in place, the attribute of employee, and family-friendly culture. Managers who work in firms (1) with more than 250 employees, (2) positioned in finance industry, (3) implanting sexual harassment education (4) with high proportion of professionals and (5) family-friendly culture, have higher supportive attitude.\n3. There are significant positive correlation between manager’s experience of utilizing childcare-friendly policies, their functional awareness of the policies, and their gender consciousness to their total supportive attitude among managers’ cognitive and experience measures.\n Lastly, there are some suggestions provided as follows. First, the government should enforce stronger supervision over small and medium enterprises on the execution of the policy, understand why some enterprises cannot implement the policy to devise solutions, inspect and pose proper punishment on enterprises not fully complying with the policy. Further, government should also invite experienced specialists to share their thoughts in sessions, create friendly corporate environment from user’s perspective, re-educate managers on family care, and design creative working modes and so on.
參考文獻: 一、 中文文獻\n內政部(2008)。《人口政策白皮書》。台北。\n內政部統計處(2012)。《主要國家總生育率》。內政部網頁(sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/national/j026.xls‎)。\n王明聖(2010)。〈育嬰留職停薪政策執行成效之評估-以勞工、公教保險申請留職停薪人員為例〉。載於經建會人力規劃處編著,《人力規劃研究報告第14輯》,頁65-78。台北:經建會。\n王舒芸(1997)。〈奶爸難為-雙薪家庭之父職角色初探〉。《婦女與兩性學刊》,第8期,頁115-149。\n王舒芸(2007)。〈向左走?向右走?兒童照顧政策之「去」或「再」家庭化初探〉。發表於「家庭與工作:變遷現象與多元想像」研討會。台北:教育部訓委會、內政部。\n王麗容(1998)。〈女性勞動參與和企業內家庭政策(上)〉,《勞工行政》,第124期,頁20-35。\n王麗容(2001)。〈婦女政策的女性主義邏輯與政策建構〉,載於詹火生、古允文編著,《社會福利政策的新思維》,頁363-377。台北:厚生基金會。\n立法院(2001)。《性別工作平等法-法條沿革》。全國法規資料庫(http://lis.ly.gov.tw/lgcgi/lglaw?@26:1804289383:f:NO%3DE03616*%20OR%20NO%3DB03616$$10$$$NO-PD)\n行政院(2012)。行政院性別平等委員會成立緣起。行政院網頁(http://www.gec.ey.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=EA49F59ED5EDCFE9)。\n行政院主計總處(2010)。《婦女婚育與就業調查統計結果綜合分析》。行政院網頁(http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Attachment/13159281771.pdf)。\n行政院主計總處(2012)。《歷年年齡組別勞動力參與率》。行政院網頁(http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/data/dgbas04/bc4/year/101/table8.xls)。\n行政院主計總處(2013a)。《人力資源統計月報》。行政院網頁(http://ebook.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Data/310418834GEYI9ZG4.pdf)\n行政院主計總處(2013b)。《歷年世界主要國家(地區)勞動力參與率》。行政院網頁(www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/data/dgbas04/bc4/year/101/table72.xls‎)。\n行政院主計總處(2013c)。《102年人力運用調查報告》。行政院網頁(http://ebook.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Data/4527113848J204GCI5.pdf)\n何明城譯,G. Dessler原著(2003)。《人力資源管理》。台北:智勝。\n吳明隆(2009)。《SPSS操作與應用:問卷統計分析實務》。台北:五南。\n吳雅惠(2008)。《家庭支持方案對懷孕婦女組織承諾及產後復工的影響》。國立政治大學勞工研究所碩士論文。\n李佳俐(2004)。《工作/家庭政策、工作/家庭平衡與員工績效關係之研究》。國立成功大學國際企業研究所。\n李芸慧(2007)。《我國「兩性工作平等法」有關母性保護規定之政策評估》。國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。\n李美玲、楊亞潔、伊慶春(2000)。〈家務分工:就業現實還是平等理念?〉。《台灣社會學刊》,第24期,頁59-88。\n李庭欣(2013)。《「善爸」甘休?「育爸」不能?-與照顧若即若離的育嬰假爸爸》。國立中正大學社會福利研究所碩士論文。\n林震岩(2010)。《多變量分析:SPSS的操作與應用》。台北:智勝。\n邱意玲(2005)。《勞動基準法與兩性工作平等法立法之比較:性別觀點的分析》。國立成功大學政治經濟學研究所碩士論文。\n洪光遠、程淑華、王郁茗譯,S. Kassin, S. Fein, H. R. Markus原著(2012)。《社會心理學》。台北:雙葉。\n徐心怡(2002)。《女性工作者對企業內家庭親善政策需求之研究》。國立中正大學勞工研究所碩士論文。\n涂妙如(2003)。〈影響家庭嬰幼兒照顧方式決策之相關因素研究〉。《家政教育學報》,第5期,頁95-120。\n翁望回、黃俊英、劉水深(1988)。〈企業正當性之實證研究-社會責任的觀點〉。《管理評論》,頁153-172。\n婦女新知基金會(2007)。《婦女新知基金會2006年度執行報告書》。婦女新知基金會網頁(http://www.record.awakening.org.tw/resources/ebooks-yearly/aw_2010_AR_Article_2007_1_136_0008.pdf)。\n婦女新知基金會(2011)。《照顧,不只是個別家庭的責任,總統候選人!請您承諾「一里(村)一中心、校校有課照」》。婦女新知基金會網頁(http://www.awakening.org.tw/chhtml/topics_dtl.asp?id=291&qtagword%A6%AB%A8|)。\n張力、王奕嵐、藍毓莉(2013)。〈人格特質、工作與家庭衝突、職場的家庭福利政策與離職傾向關係之研究-以會計師事務所不同世代女性員工為例〉。《慈濟技術學院學報》,第20期,頁137-162。\n張培新(2009)。〈企業社會責任的理論與實踐:以美體小鋪為例〉。《美容科技學刊》,第6期第2卷,頁85-102。\n張壹鳳(2005)。《以「性別敏感」觀點檢視台灣學前兒童照顧政策》。台灣大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。\n許婷雯(2005)。《我國育嬰假對於母職制度及女性就業處境之影響》。國立政治大學社會學研究所碩士論文。\n陳姣伶(2008)。《就業母親的嬰兒照顧選擇及托育經驗探究》。國立臺灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系碩士論文。\n陳皎眉、王叢桂、孫倩如(2006)。《社會心理學》。台北:雙葉。\n陳惠銛(2004)。《女性工作者對親職假之需求與兒童照顧因應方式之調查研究》。靜宜大學青少年兒童福利研究所碩士論文。\n傅立葉(2010)。〈從性別觀點看台灣的國家福利體制〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》,第80期,頁207-236。\n勞動部(2011a)。《婚育與就業的關係》。勞動部網頁(http://statdb.cla.gov.tw/html/woman/01woanalyze5.doc)。\n勞動部(2011b)。《「育嬰留職停薪」實施現況》。勞動部網頁(http://www.cla.gov.tw/site/business/41761dc1/4250dc44/4d7ec93f/files/10008%A1u%A8%7C%C0%A6%AFd%C2%BE%B0%B1%C1~%A1v%A8%EE%AB%D7%C2X%A4j%B9%EA%ACI%AB%E1%A4%A7%B2%7B%AAp%C4%E5end.doc)。\n勞動部(2012a)。〈「台灣職場雙贏平台」推動計畫〉。《台灣勞工簡訊》,第12期,頁2-3。\n勞動部(2012b)。《第18次性別平等專案小組會議資料》。行政院性別平等會( http://cedaw.gec.ey.gov.tw/Upload1/UserFiles/CEDAW法規檢視填報範例-工會法.xls)\n勞動部(2013)。《工會幹部性別比例》。勞動部網頁(http://statdb.cla.gov.tw/html/sex/8071.htm)\n勞動部(2013)。《性別統計查詢》。勞動部網頁(http://www.cla.gov.tw/cgi-bin/SM_theme?page=4250dc44)。\n勞動部(2014)。《僱用管理性別平等概況調查》。勞動部網頁(http://statdb.mol.gov.tw/html/svy02/0222menu.htm)\n黃志隆(2012)。〈台灣家庭政策的形成:家計承擔與兒童照顧的整合〉。《人文及社會科集刊》,第24期第3卷,頁331-366。\n黃琬玲(2009)。《真正的「自由選擇」?-以婦女部分工時工作者為例》。國立政治大學勞工研究所碩士論文。\n黃源協、蕭文高(2009)。《社會政策與社會立法》。台北:雙葉。\n劉怡伶(2008)。《影響企業提供工作/家庭平衡措施之因素探討》。國立台灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文。\n劉梅君(2008)。〈性別與就業:前瞻與省思~兼檢討部分時問工作、育兒照顧政策及玻璃天花板現象〉。《研考雙月刊》,第32期第4卷,頁54-66。\n劉梅君(2010)。〈部分工時:工作家庭平衡?或性別陷阱?〉。《中華女子學院學報》,第6期,頁29-34。\n劉毓秀(2004)。〈鼓勵婚育,應兼顧托育與就業〉。《婉如之友季刊》,第16期,頁1-2。\n樓玉梅(2009)。《女性勞動力參與率與生育率之關聯性分析》。國家發展委員會網頁(www.ndc.gov.tw)。\n謝美娥(2009)。〈就業母親之母職經驗與就業策略初探〉。《中華心理衛生學刊》,第22期,頁299-334。\n蘇岱崙(2013)。《沒錢,沒時間,沒幫手,媽媽不敢生!》。親子天下雜誌網頁(http://www.parenting.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5050883)。\n蘇郁雅(2008)。《男性公務人員育嬰留職停薪歷程研究》。國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。\n二、 英文文獻\nAjzen, I. (1991). ‘The theory of planned behavior’,Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50: 179-211.\nAllen, T. D. (2001). ‘Family-Supportive Work Environments: The Role of Organizational Perceptions’, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58: 414-435.\nBagger, J., & Li, A.(2011). ‘How does supervisory family support influence employees’ attitudes and behaviors? A social exchange perspective’, Journal of Management, 1-28.\nBatt, R., &Valcour, P. M. (2003).‘Human resource practices as predictors of work-family outcomes and employee turnover’,Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 42(2), 189-220.\nCasper, W. J., Fox, K. E., Sitzmann, T. M., Landy, A. L. (2004). ‘Supervisor referrals to work-family programs’,Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 9(2): 136-151.\nEaton, S. C. (2003). ‘If you can use them: flexibility policies, organizational commitment, and perceived productivity’, Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 42(2), 145-167.\nEvans, J. M. (2001). ‘Firms` Contribution to the Reconciliation between Work and Family Life’, OECD Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers, No. 48, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/344836028454.\nFerrer, A.,& Gagné, L. (2006). The use of family friendly workplace practices in Canada. Montréal: Institute for Research on Public Policy.\nFraser, N. (1994). ‘After the Family Wage: Gender Equity and the Welfare State’, Political Theory, 22(4): 591-618.\nGlass J., & Fujimoto T. (1995). ‘Employer characteristics and the provision of family responsive policies’, Work and occupations, 22(4): 380-411.\nGlass, J. L., & Estes, S. B. (1997).‘The family responsive workplace’, Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 289-313.\nGoodstein, J. D.(1994). ‘Institutional pressure and strategic responsiveness: imployer involvement in work-family issues’, The Academy of Management Journal, 37(2), 350-382.\nGreenhaus, J. H., Ziegert, J. C., Allen, A. D. (2012). ‘When family-supportive supervision matters: Relations between multiple sources of support and work-family balance’, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80” 266-275.\nHammer, L. B., Allen, E., & Grigsby, T. D. (1997). ‘Work-family conflict in dual-earner couples: Within-individual and crossover effect of work and family’, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50, 185-203.\nHammer, L. B., Kossek, E. E.,Yragui, N. L., Bodner, T. E., Hanson, G. C.(2009). ‘Development and validation of a multidimensional measure of family supportive supervisor behaviors’, Journal of Management, 35(4), 837-856.\nHattery, A. (2001).Women, work, and family: Balancing and weaving. London: Sage Publications.\nHeiland, F.,& Macpherson, D. A. (2005). Do family-friendly firms perform better?. Florida State University.\nHoltzman, M.,& Glass, J. (1999). ‘Explaining changes in mothers’ job satisfaction following childbirth’, Work and Occupations, 26(3), 365-404.\nKingston P. W.(1990). ‘Illusions and ignorance about the Family-responsive workplace’, Journal of family issues, 11(4): 438-454.\nKonrad, A. M., & Mangel, R. (2000). ‘The impact of work-life programs on firm productivity’, Strategic Management Journal, 21(12): 25-37.\nLeira, A. (2002). Working parents and the welfare state: Family change and policy reform in Scandinavia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\nMcCarthy, A., Darcy, C., Grady, G. (2010). ‘Work-life balance policy and practice: Understanding line manager attitudes and behaviors’, Human Resource Management Review, 20: 158-167.\nMcCurdy, A. H., Newman, M. A., & Lovrich, N. P. (2002).‘Family-Friendly Workplace Policy Adoption in General and Special Purpose Local Governments: Learning From the Washington State Experience’, Review of Public Personnel Administration, 22(1): 27-51.\nMilliken, F. J., Martins, L. L., Morgan, H.(1998).‘Explaining organizational responsiveness to work-family issues: The role of human resource executives as issue interpreters’, Academy of Management Journal, 41(5): 580-592.\nOrloff, A. S. (1993). ‘Gender and the social rights of citizenship: The comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states’, American Sociological Review, 58(3): 303-328.\nOsterman, P.(1995). ‘Work/Family programs and the employment relationship’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 681-700.\nPleck, E. H., Pleck, J. H. (1997). ‘Fatherhood ideals in the Unites States: Historical dimension’, In M. E. Lamb(Ed.), The role of the father in child development(3rd ed). Pp. 33-48. New York: Wiley.\nPoelmans, S. A. Y., Chinchilla, N., Cardona, P. (2003). ‘The adoption of family-friendly HRM policies Competing for scarce resources in the labour market’, International Journal of Manpower, 24(2): 128-147.\nScheibl, F.,& Dex, S. (1998). ‘Should we have more Family-Friendly Policies?’ ,European Management Journal, 16(5): 586-599.\nSmith, J., & Gardner, D. (2007).‘Factors affecting employee use of work-life balance intiatives’, New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 36(1): 3-12.\nStrachan, G.,& Burgess, J. (1998). ‘The “family friendly” workplace Origins, meaning and application at Australian workplaces’, International Journal of Manpower, 19(4): 250-265.\nThomas, L. T. & Ganster, D. C.(1995). ‘Impact of family-supportive work variables on work-family conflict and strain: a control perspective’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(1), 6-15.\nThompson, C. A., Beauvais, L. L., Lyness, K. S.(1999). ‘When work-family benefits are not enough: The influence of work-family culture on benefit utilization, organizational attachment, and work-family conflict’,Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54: 392-415.\nVaruhas, J.,Fursman, L., Jacobsen, V. (2003). Work and family balance: An economic view (No. 03/26). New Zealand Treasury.\nWarren, J. A., & Johnson, P. J. (1995).‘The Impact of Workplace Support on Work-Family Role Strain’. Family Relations, 44(2): 163-169.\nFrone, M. R., Yardley, J. K., & Markel, K. S. (1997).‘Developing and testing an integrative model of the work–family interface’, Journal of vocational behavior, 50(2), 145-167.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
社會工作研究所
100264015
102
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1002640151
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
015101.pdf2.08 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.