Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/69365
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | 教育學系 | en_US |
dc.creator | 詹志禹 | zh_TW |
dc.date | 1999 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-08-27T09:36:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-08-27T09:36:30Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014-08-27T09:36:30Z | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/69365 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本文順著科學哲學發展的歷史脈落,以各派科學哲學的觀點分析科學思考中的創意來源與創造性歷程;到目前為止,分析的結果發現:第一,傳統所謂的歸納法其實是一種「假設-驗證」的歷程,但對於如何創造假設,卻沒有任何說明;第二,邏輯實證論對「發現之脈落」存而不論,造成許多人將科學創造的歷程視為神祕、非理性的歷程;第三,批判思考與創造思考之間,可能具有互相抑制、也可能具有互相助發的關係,總之兩者之間具有密切而難以分割的互動關係,任何有價值的創造都同時需要這兩者;第四,典範既會束縛創造,也會幫助創造,其創造性可能表現在應用、詮釋和預測,但典範之更新則需要危機的刺激;第五,科學發現與科學創造是兩個難以區分的歷程,新事實的發現通常借助於新理論的發明;第六,科學理論與科學方法的多元化,有助於科學創造與科學革命;第七,領域發展與創新是一個拔靴自助的歷程,科學發現雖無邏輯可尋,卻有理由可尋。 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This article analyze the possible process and context of creativity in scientific thinking according to the viewpoints from historical development of philosophy of science. It was found that: (1) The so called "inductive reasoning" is actually a "hypothesis-testing" process; (2) Logical positivism leave the "context of discovery" in black box and therefore leave a mysticism about scientific discovery; (3) Creative and critical thinking can facilitate and inhibit each other, resulting an intimate relationship and essential tension between the two; (4) Paradigms can constrain as well as facilitate creativity with possible facilitating effects from helping novel prediction, interpretation, and application; (5) Since the discovery of new facts is usually through the invention of new theory, the distinction between so called "scientific discovery" and "scientific creativity" is blurred; (6) Theoretical and methodological pluralism in science can promote the probability of scientific discovery and revolution; (7) The growth and innovation of a knowledge domain is a bootstrapping process, in which there can be no logic but there should be some good reasons. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 135 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | text/html | - |
dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
dc.relation | 行政院國家科學委員會 | en_US |
dc.relation | 計畫編號NSC88-2519-S004-004-C | en_US |
dc.subject | 科學發現;知識成長;科技創造;科學哲學;科學思考;批判思考;創造思考 | en_US |
dc.subject | Scientific discovery;Knowledge growth;Technology creation;Philosophy of science;Scientific thinking;Critical thinking;Creative thinking | en_US |
dc.title | 技術創造力特性與開發研究---各類創意領域之間比較---子計畫IV:科技創造的本質與脈絡 | zh_TW |
dc.title.alternative | The Nature and Context of Creativity in Science & Technology | en_US |
dc.type | report | en |
item.openairetype | report | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.grantfulltext | restricted | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_93fc | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en_US | - |
Appears in Collections: | 國科會研究計畫 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
index.html | 135 B | HTML2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.