1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 社會科學學院
  3. 社會學系
  4. 學位論文
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/70251
題名: å¾žçˆ¶æ¯ç…§é¡§å·¥ä½œå¤–包論子女孝道實踐的意義：以聘僱外籍看護的家庭為例
Understanding the Meanings of Children’s Practice of Filial Piety from Outsourcing Parental Care Work: The Examples of Families Hiring Foreign Caregivers
作者: é™³è‚²ä¼¶
Chen, Yu Ling
貢獻者: é¦¬è—¹è±
Ma, Ai Hsuan
陳育伶
Chen, Yu Ling
關鍵詞: ç…§é¡§å·¥ä½œå¤–包
外籍看護
照顧工作的性別分工
孝道實踐
outsourcing care work
foreign caregiver
gender division in care work
practice of filial piety
日期: 2013
上傳時間: 1-十月-2014
摘要: é«˜é½¡åŒ–社會的來臨，增加了台灣的長期照顧需求。在華人家庭傳統上，照顧一直是女性的責任，社會規範與對性別角色的期待也都將照顧工作賦予女性。但隨著婦女勞參率的增加，許多有經濟能力的女性也開始試圖透過將照顧工作「外包」的方式，來移轉自己的照顧責任。從台灣逐年攀升的外籍看護工人數，即可看出此一趨勢發展。在過往母職外包的文獻中，母親將照顧小孩的責任外包出去的同時，會透過各種手段來維持其原有家庭的完整性，以及合理化這些作為，並重新詮釋這些原本被認為該由自己承擔的責任。而這樣的情況，是否同樣會發生在「孝道外包」的情況中？子女／媳婦會怎麼樣去詮釋自己的行為？他們如何定義照顧工作外包後「孝」的意義？\r\n\r\n本研究發現，家庭成員選擇外包照顧工作的過程中，受到子女輩成員間的經濟能力、角色與長輩的情感關係等各種因素所影響，主要的決策者與執行者會由不同的家庭子女輩成員擔任。對於將奉養工作外包給外籍看護的子女／媳婦來說，他們透過將自己的角色轉換成「監督者」或「主導者」，以確保外籍看護維持高品質照顧的方式，來重新定義自己的孝道實踐。「父母在家終老」以及「主導照顧過程」成為孝的核心條件。此外，透過敘述外籍看護的「專業」與「像對待家人」般的良好照顧，來證明他們將長輩的孝道外包是對長輩「有利的」。同時這個利益並不只是對於長輩，聘請外籍看護還有許多對其他家庭成員有利的外溢效果；例如整理家務，煮飯等等。對子女輩成員來說，聘請外籍看護是一個多方考量後，在現今照顧工作逐漸走向市場化下，對整體家庭最具利益的選擇。
The need for long-term care increases with Taiwan’s aging population. According to the Chinese tradition as well as current social norms and expectations, care work is considered women’s responsibility. However, with women’s increasing participation in the labor force, many financially-abled women started to outsource care work to relieve their responsibility. The rise in the rate of hiring foreign caregivers in Taiwan manifests this trend. Current literature on outsourcing maternal care work has pointed out the ways mothers maintain family intactness and justify their behavior of outsourcing maternal care. Does the same situation happen in outsourcing filial piety? How do sons, daughters and daughter-in-laws justify such behavior? How would they reinterpret the meaning of ‘filial piety’ after sourcing parental care?\r\n\r\nThe study found that the choice of outsourcing parental care work was affected by factors such as children`s financial conditions, roles in the family, and relationship with parents. Sons, daughters and daughters-in-law often played different roles of decision makers and managers in outsourcing parental care. For those who outsourced parental care work to foreign caregivers, their roles were changed from `primary caregiver` to `supervisor` or `manager` to ensure that their parents would obtain high quality care. In this way, the meaning and practice of filial piety were redefined. `Parents living at home till the end of life` and `quality control of parental care` became the core considerations of filial piety. By emphasizing foreign caregivers` professionalism and their family-like relationship with foreign caregivers, those children who outsourced parent care work justified their choice of outsourcing and claimed that such arrangement was beneficial to parents who were cared for. In addition, the care work provided by foreign caregivers often generated `spillover effects` for the whole household; not only parents but other family members could also obtain benefits from hiring foreign caregivers. For example, foreign caregivers helped cleaning house, cooking and so on. Consequently, the choice of outsourcing parental care work to foreign caregiver was considered most appropriate for the whole family.
參考文獻: ã€”中文〕\r\n一般護理之家評鑑專區，2013，計畫內容。 \r\n http://www.webcare-twaea.org.tw/about.php，取用日期2013å¹´\r\n 12月18日。\r\n內政部，2008，97年老人狀況調查性別統計分析。\r\n http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/gender.aspx，取用日期：2013å¹´06\r\n 月25日。\r\n內政部，2009，民國98年老人狀況調查結果摘要分析。\r\n http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/gender.aspx，取用日期：2013å¹´06\r\n 月26日。\r\n內政部，2011，100年婦女生活狀況調查統計結果摘要分析。\r\n http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/gender.aspx，取用日期：2013å¹´05\r\n 月30日。\r\n內政部，2013，102年第11週內政部統計通報（101年底我國老人長期照顧及安\r\n 養機構概況）。http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/week/list.htm，取\r\n 用日期：2013å¹´05月30日。\r\n主計處，2010，婦女婚育與就業調查。http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?\r\n xItem=11661&CtNode=3304&mp=1，取用日期：2013å¹´12月11日。\r\n呂寶靜，1999，〈性別與家庭照顧：一個女性主義的觀點〉。頁101-134，收錄\r\n 於王雅各編，《性屬關係上─性別社會、建構》。台北：心理。\r\n呂寶靜與陳景寧，1997，〈女性家屬照顧者之處境與福利建構〉。頁57-92，收\r\n 錄於劉毓秀編，《女性‧國家‧照顧工作》。台北：女書文化。\r\n邱怡玟，2004，〈家庭變遷下老年人之長期照顧何去何從〉。《社區發展季刊》 \r\n 106：176-186。\r\n李逸、周汎澔、陳彰惠，2011，〈家庭照顧者議題─從性別、私領域到公共政策\r\n 的觀點〉。《護理雜誌》58(2)：57-62。\r\n林松麟，1993，〈老人社會支持來源與老人社會需求：兼論四個社會支持模\r\n 式〉。頁265-289，收錄於王國羽編，《社會安全問題之探討》。嘉義：中\r\n 正大學。\r\n怡和專業安護中心，2014，\r\n http://www.0921847832.tw/p.asplan=C&id=2，取用日期：2014å¹´\r\n 6月23日。\r\n爸媽HOME-全國最大安養護機構推薦平台，2014，\r\n http://www.bamahome.com.tw/，取用日期：2014å¹´6月23日。\r\n胡幼慧，1997，〈解讀台灣長期照護體系的神話：「家」與「國」的性別剖析與\r\n 另類思考〉。頁161-183，收錄於劉毓秀編，《女性‧國家‧照顧工作》。台\r\n 北：女書文化。\r\n洪慧頻，2010，《家務●「雇」事─中產階級家庭家事外包經驗之探究》。高雄師\r\n 範大學教育學研究所碩士論文。\r\n屏東縣照護管理中心，2014a，居家服務：最高補助服務時數。\r\n http://www.pthg.gov.tw/care/CP.aspxs=6071&n=14978&cp=5，\r\n 取用日期：2014å¹´5月22日。\r\n屏東縣照護管理中心，2014b，日間照顧：照顧服務費用。\r\n http://www.pthg.gov.tw/care/CP.aspx? \r\n s=9176&n=14982&cp=2，取用日期：2014å¹´5月22日。\r\n屏東縣政府社會處，2014，機構歷年評鑑等第1030718復評後。\r\n http://www.pthg.gov.tw/planjdp/CP.aspx?\r\n s=9098&n=16755&cp=1，取用日期：2014å¹´8月18日。 \r\n涂斐珊，2004，《女兒照顧者角色形成與照顧經驗之初探》。國立政治大學社會\r\n 學研究所碩士論文。\r\n高雄市長期照顧管理中心，2014，照顧服務（居家服務，日間照顧，家庭托\r\n 顧）。http://khd.kcg.gov.tw/Main.aspx?sn=784，取用日期：\r\n 2014å¹´5月22日。\r\n高雄市政府社會局，2014，新版老人福利機構名冊103.01.22。\r\n http://socbu.kcg.gov.tw/?\r\n prog=2&b_id=4&m_id=160&s_id=660，取用日期：2014å¹´8月18日。\r\n陳奎如，1997，《男性家庭照顧者之研究》。國立政治大學社會學研究所碩士論\r\n 文。\r\n陳向明，2002，《社會科學質的研究》。台北：五南。\r\n教育部統計處，2013，學生年齡統計。\r\n http://www1.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?\r\n xItem=15423&CtNode=4708&mp=3，取用日期：2013å¹´12月11日。\r\n勞動部，2005，外籍看護工申請流程新制95å¹´1月1日實施，巴氏量表評分將\r\n 僅供參考。\r\n http://www.mol.gov.tw/cht/index.php?\r\n code=list&flag=detail&ids=24&article_id=2945，取用日期：\r\n 2014å¹´5月22日。\r\n順康福看護中心，2014，看護中心服務項目。\r\n http://www.care.url.tw/p02.html，取用日期：2014å¹´5月22日。\r\n博茂人力顧問有限公司，2014，外籍人士幫傭費用表。\r\n http://www.promao.com.tw/aboutus.asp?\r\n channelid=107&lang=tw&id=181，取用日期：2014å¹´5月22日。\r\n溫秀珠，1996，《家庭中婦女照顧者角色形成因素與照顧過程之探討─以失能老 \r\n 人之照顧為例》。國立台灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。\r\n趙小瑜，2006，《家庭照顧體系與家庭協商過程之初探：以失能老人照顧為\r\n 例》。國立台灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。\r\n葉光輝，1998，〈孝道概念的心理學探討：雙層次笑到認知特徵的發展歷程〉。\r\n 《本土心理學研究》9：53-117。\r\n葉光輝，2009，〈台灣民眾的代間交換行為：孝道觀點的探討〉。《本土心理學\r\n 研究》31：97-141。\r\n劉梅君，1997，〈建構「性別敏感」的公民權：從女性照顧工作本質之探析出\r\n 發〉。頁185-226，收錄於劉毓秀編，《女性‧國家‧照顧工作》。台北：女\r\n 書文化。\r\n臺北市政府社會局，2014，97至102年度臺北市老人安養暨長期照顧機構評鑑\r\n 結果一覽表(103.7.8更新)。\r\n http://www.dosw.taipei.gov.tw/i/i0300.asp?\r\n fix_code=0408092&l1_code=04&l2_code=08，取用日期：2014å¹´8\r\n 月18日。\r\n寰宇人力仲介有限公司，2014，申請外勞費用說明。\r\n http://www.vnzpo.url.tw/cost.htm，取用日期：2014å¹´5月22\r\n 日。\r\n鍾雨恩，2011，《失能老人使用雙重照顧資源之探討─以機構式照顧與聘僱外籍\r\n 看護工為例》。中國文化大學社會福利學系碩士論文。\r\n藍佩嘉，2008，《跨國灰姑娘：當東南亞幫傭遇上台灣新富家庭》。台北：行\r\n 人。\r\n\r\n〔英文〕\r\nBaines, Carol T., Patricia M. Evans, and Sheila M. \r\n Neysmith, 1991, “Caring: Its Impact on the Lives of \r\n Women.” Pp.11-35 in Women’s Caring: Feminist \r\n Perspectives on Social Welfare, edited by Carol T. \r\n Baines, Patricia M. Evans and Sheila M. Neysmith. \r\n Toronto, Ont. : McClelland & Stewart.\r\nBrewer, Loretta, 2001, “Gender Socialization and the \r\n Cultural Construction of Elder Caregivers.” Journal of \r\n Aging Studies 15(3): 217-235. \r\nCalasanti, T. and King, M., 2007, “Taking ‘Women’s Work’ \r\n Like a Man’: Husbands’ Experiences of Care Work.” The \r\n Gerontologist 47(4): 516-527.\r\nCox, Carole B., 2005, “Chapter 6 The Role of the Family in \r\n Providing Care.” Pp.110-133 in Community Care for an \r\n Aging Society: Issues, Policies and Services, edited by \r\n Carole B Cox. New York : Springer Pub. Co.\r\nCheng, Shu-Ju Ada, 2006, “Chapter 4 Facing Aliens at Home: \r\n Space of Intimacy, Space of Power.” Pp.99-141 in \r\n Serving the Household and the Nation, edited by \r\n Shu-Ju Ada Cheng. Lanham, Md. : Lexington Books.\r\nDepartment of Health and Human Service, 2011, “A \r\n Profile of Older Americans: 2011.” In \r\n http://www.aoa.gov/AoARoot/Aging_Statistics/Profile/2011\r\n /docs/2011profile.pdf (Date visited: Dec. 18, 2013).\r\nEdward, A. M. and Vincent, M., 2008, “Trends and Challenges \r\n in Building a Twenty-First Century Long-term Care \r\n Workforce.” Pp.133-156 in Handbook of Long-Tern Care \r\n Administration and Policy, edited by C.M. Mara and L.K. \r\n Olson. Boca Raton: CRC Press.\r\nFink, Janet, 2004, “Chapter1 Questions of Care.” Pp.2-42 in \r\n Care: Personal Lives and Social Policy, edited by Janet \r\n Fink. Bristol, U.K.: Policy Press in association with \r\n Open University.\r\nFu, Tsung-hsi and Lu, Pau-Ching, 2009, “Population ageing \r\n and social policy in Taiwan.” Pp.89-104 in Ageing in \r\n East Asia: Challenges and Policies for the Twenty-first \r\n Century, edited by Tsung-hsi Fu & Rhidian Hughes, \r\n London & New York: Routledge.\r\nGreenhalgh, Susan, 1985,”Sexual Stratification: The Other \r\n Side of “Growth with Equity” in East Asia.” Population \r\n and Development Review 11:265-314.\r\nHill, Michael, 2009, “Foreword.” Pp.xiv-xvi in Ageing in \r\n East Asia: Challenges and Policies for the Twenty-first \r\n Century, edited by Tsung-hsi Fu & Rhidian Hughes, \r\n London & New York: Routledge.\r\nKeigher, S. M, 2008, “chapter 7 Informal Caregivers and \r\n Caregiving: Living at Home with Personal Care.” Pp.105-\r\n 131 in Handbook of Long-Term Care Administration and \r\n Policy, edited byCynthia Massie Mara & Laura Katz \r\n Olson. FL:Taylor & Francis Group.\r\nLee, Yean-Ju, William L. Parish and Robert J. Willis, \r\n 1994, “Sons, Daughters, and Intergenerational Support \r\n in Taiwan.” American Journal of Sociology 99:1010-1041.\r\nMacdonald, Cameron L, 1998, “Manufacturing Motherhood: The \r\n Shadow Work of Nannies and Au Pairs.” Qualitative \r\n Sociology 21(1):25-53.\r\nNational Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), \r\n 2013, “Health, United States, 2012:\r\n With Special Feature on Emergency Care.” In \r\n http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus12.pdf#109 (Date \r\n visited: Dec. 18, 2013).\r\nReitsma-Street, Marge, 1991, “Girls Learn to Care; Girls \r\n Policed to Care.” Pp.106-137 in Women’s Caring: \r\n Feminist Perspectives on Social Welfare, edited by \r\n Carol T. Baines, Patricia M. Evans and Sheila M. \r\n Neysmith. Toronto, Ont. : McClelland & Stewart.\r\nRobert, Dorothy E.,1997, “Spiritual and Menial Housework.” \r\n Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 9:49-80.\r\nThomas, Carol, 1993, “De-Constructing Concepts of Care.” \r\n Sociology 27(4):649-669.\r\nWang, Hong-Zen, 2013, “The Care Deficit and Migrant Workers \r\n in Taiwan” Journal of Intimate and Public Spheres 2\r\n (1):26-38.\r\nYeoh, Brenda S. A. and Shirlena Huang,1999, “Singapore \r\n Women and Foreign Domestic Workers-Negotiating Domestic \r\n Work and Motherhood.” Pp.277-300 in Gender, Migration \r\n and Domestic Service, edited by Janet Henshall Momsen, \r\n London and New York: Routledge.
描述: ç¢©å£«
國立政治大學
社會學研究所
100254003
102
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100254003
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
400301.pdf8.41 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.