Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/70324
題名: 台灣綠色電價政策之關鍵因素研究
The Study on Key Factors of the Green Power Pricing Policy in Taiwan
作者: 陳秋伶
Chen, Chiu Ling
貢獻者: 許志義
Hsu, Jyh Yih
陳秋伶
Chen, Chiu Ling
關鍵詞: 再生能源
綠色電價政策
ANOVA檢定
永續發展
Renewable Energy
Green Power Pricing Policy
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Sustainable Development
日期: 2013
上傳時間: 1-Oct-2014
摘要: 為了因應全球暖化,鼓勵再生能源發展,先進國家逐步推動「綠色電價」。由於再生能源發電成本較一般傳統電力成本來得高,故再生能源電能之價格也會高於傳統電能之價格。對於高成本高售價之再生能源電能,多數國家在市場上透過用電戶自願認購方式進行銷售,並收取所謂的綠色電價,以作為綠色電力基金之來源,或作為未來發展再生能源之資金來源。透過這樣的制度,可以讓整體社會共同參與環境保護的工作,也可提高人民的環保意識和各界環境責任感,也可籌措再生能源發展所需的資金。\n本研究透過問卷調查法,以網路問卷-Google Form發放,觀察並探討民眾對於綠色電價政策之購買意願,以及民眾對於當前政策之考量,透過ANOVA檢定,分析民眾填答問卷之結果,了解民眾本身對於環保問題的認知與意識,及民眾對於綠色電價政策之考量因素主要為何。根據問卷分析與檢定結果發現:多數民眾對於綠色電價的概念仍然相當模糊,但是大多會選擇購買綠色電價。\n其次是對於本文所歸納的五個政策因素考量存有疑慮-政府政策宣導、綠色電價的制度設計、相關法規制定、執行單位之效能,以及支付額外的綠色電價對國人經濟上的負擔。五項當中,又以執行單位可能效能不佳之疑慮評分為最高。\n本研究另外發現,民眾對於綠色電價的願付價格,接受度最高的是綠色電價比一般電價貴10%以下,意即在回收的221份問卷中,當綠電價格每度低於3.18元,一般民眾有五成以上會選購,與目前綠電價格設定3.96元存有落差。據此,在綠色電價政策推行上,和實際民眾購買意願之間,應該如何制訂一個合理的綠色電價,是需要仰賴國內產、官、學各界充分討論,以及民眾意見妥善表達,在國家與社會民眾間,取得一個平衡點,並且參考各先進國家發展自願性綠色電價之經驗。如此,方能在國家發展經濟的同時,又能兼顧環境保護和節能減碳,達到國家永續發展之政策目標。
In response to global warming, the development of renewable energy is encouraged. Advanced countries are gradually promoting “green power pricing programs”. Due to the higher generating costs of renewable energy’s electricity than conventional one, therefore renewable energy electricity prices will be definitely higher than traditional electric energy prices. The high cost of renewable energy’s electricity pushes most countries in the market to sell this type of electricity to consumers through a voluntary subscription mode and charge a so-called green power pricing. Using green power as a source of funds or as the future development of renewable energy funding sources and with such a system, you can make the whole society participate in environmental protection work. People from all walks of life will have their environmental awareness and responsibility adequately improved. \nThis study uses an online questionnaire-Google Form to survey, observe and explore the public’s reaction towards green power pricing policy, its willingness to purchase and its considerations for the current policies. Through the ANOVA test and the analysis of the results of the survey to understand the public’s cognition and awareness of environmental issues and the public’s main considerations towards the green power pricing policy, for most people such concept is still quite vague but anyhow they will choose to buy green.\nSecondly, this article summarizes five policy factors for consideration –doubts about government policy and advocacy, the designing of the green power pricing system, the related laws and regulations, the performance of the executive units and the payment of the green power pricing adding to the economic burden of the people. In the above five points, the poor performance of the units will, undoubtedly, carry the highest score.\nThis study also found that the public is willing to pay for green power pricing and there is even a higher acceptance if the price would not exceed more than 10% of conventional electricity price. In other words, according to the response of 221 questionnaires, if the green power price lower than NT$3.18 /kWh, there will be half of people to purchase it. This study conducted a gap analysis between the current green power price-NT$3.96 /kWh and the price people accepted generally. \nAccordingly, the implementation of a policy on green electricity and the real willingness of the people to purchase such electricity depend on how reasonable the green tariff is. The industry, the government , the academia should all express their opinions. The state and the society must seek and strike a balance while referring to the development of green energy voluntary subscription tariffs in advanced countries. In this way, while simultaneously developing the economy of the country and taking into account the environment protection, energy saving and carbon reduction, we can reach our national goals of achieving a sustainable development.
參考文獻: 中文部分\n于振東,2007,《台灣再生能源政策工具之研究--AHP 之分析》,中國文化大學政治學系研究所碩士論文。\n丘昌泰,2006,《公共政策-基礎篇》,台北:巨流圖書公司。\n台大環境規劃研究室(2002),《風力發電基本教材》,臺北市:臺灣環保文教基金會。\n吳錦勳,2010,〈期許台灣參與全球綠能競賽。佛里曼:台灣最強的資源在人民腦力〉,《遠見雜誌》,2010年2月號第284期,取自:http://www.gvm.com.tw/Boardcontent_15777_6.html\n李宜庭,2012,《推動風力再生能源政策之層級分析》,朝陽科技大學環境工程與管理系碩博士論文。\n李政忠,2004,《網路調查所面臨的問題與解決建議》,國立中正大學傳播學系暨電訊傳播研究所碩士論文。\n李遠哲,2014,李遠哲:獲得唐獎者須是開路者,財團法人唐獎教育基金會,檢索:http://www.tang-prize.org/Publish.aspx?cnid=252&p=178\n林生傳,2003,《教育研究法-全方位的統整與分析》,台北:心理。\n林益豪,2007,《再生能源經濟政策工具之研究》,國立政治大學經濟學研究所碩士論文\n林虛白,2013,《以延伸性科技接受模型探討數位電視消費意願之研究》,國立中興大學資訊管理學系碩士論文\n邱秀宇,2009,《政府政策行銷策略成效之研究—以客家桐花祭活動為例》,國立中央大學客家政治經濟研究所碩士論文。\n邱皓政,2002,《量化硏究與統計分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析》,台北市:五南書局。\n徐守正,2007,<4種推廣再生能源發展的作法及其比較>,《能源報導》,2007年6月:30。\n殷莎莎,2010,《綠色電價制度之研究》,國立中山大學高階經營碩士論文。\n涂昶辰,2000,《中華社會福利聯合勸募協會組織績效評估指標建立之研究》,國立臺北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士論文。 \n留程鴻,2012,<主要國家綠色電價政策制度之研析>,台灣綜合研究院101年度之研究成果,取自:http://www.tri.org.tw/page/research.php\n張瑞、高陽,2006,<上海市綠色電力發展現狀及對策思考>,《電力需求側管理》,8(4):14。\n許玉君,<台灣有淺力領導IE到ET>(2010年1月11日)。聯合報,取自:http://only-perception.blogspot.tw/2010/01/blog-post_12.html\n許志義,1995,<我國、日本與美國能源政策及其成效之比較研究>,行政院研究發展考核委員會。\n許志義、陳澤義,1993,《電力經濟學》,台北:華泰書局。\n許禎元,2004,<教師兼任導護工作與適法性析論-1993年教改實施後的觀察>,中華民國學校行政研究學會出版,第32期,頁115-128。\n陳起鳳、劉銘龍、柳中明,2008,<國際綠色電力制度引進之瓶頸與可行性初探>,E-Journal:Global Change and Sustainable Development,2卷1期:1-13。\n楊佳蓁,2011,《能源訂價之探討》,國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文。\n劉瑞斌,2010,《電力產業自由化下合理電價之探討》,國立中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文。\n簡春安、鄒平儀,1998,《社會工作研究方法》,台北市:巨流\n\n\n \n外文部分\nCouper, M. P. (2000),Web surveys: a review of issues and approaches, Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(4), 464-494. \nGerpott, T. J. & I. Mahmudova (2010), Determinants of green electricity adoption among residential customers in Germany. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34, pp. 464-473. See available at http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/indorg/v1y1983i4p365-377.html\nLori Bird and Blair Swezey, (2006), “Green Power Marketing in the United States: A Status Report, 9th ed., ”National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Technical Report\nLittlechild, S. C. (1983), &quot;The structure of telephone tariffs&quot;, International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, 1(4), pp.365-377\n網頁資料\n台灣電力公司網站\nwww.taipower.com.tw\n台電工程月刊http://www.taipower.com.tw/left_bar/45453err/tw_eng_monthly_maganize/tw_eng_monthly_maganize_01.htm\n美國能源部高效能建築網站 http://www.eere.energy.gov/redirects/commercial_initiative.html\n美國國家環境保護局官方網站\nhttp://www.epa.gov/\n經濟部能源局網站\nhttp://www.moeaboe.gov.tw/\n澳洲政府聯合創立的綠色電力官方網站\nhttp://www.greenpower.gov.au/
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
國家發展研究所
99261005
102
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0992610051
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
005101.pdf1.55 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.