Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/7039| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | 顏良恭 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator | Yen,Liang Kung | - |
| dc.date | 1994-03 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2008-11-12T01:58:34Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2008-11-12T01:58:34Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2008-11-12T01:58:34Z | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/7039 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本文由Burrell與Morgan利用主體一客體面向與規則－激進變遷面向發展出四個基本假定截然不同的典範，它們彼此間是不可共量的，Jackson & Carter並起而為之辯護，兩造都希望異於「功能論」的其他三個典範能夠獨立發展，不受吞併，但經過Reed, Donaldson,Hassard與Willmott諸學者的努力，證明典範間其實是可以溝通，有綜合的可能性；Kuhn與這些學者作一對比，可知他是站在「可共量」這一派，作者也同意這個觀點，並於討論部份提出己見，分別為（一）對典範不可共量說之商確；（二）組織理論間彼此溝通的可能性；以及（三）對公共行政研究之意含。 | - |
| dc.format | application/ | en_US |
| dc.language | zh-TW | en_US |
| dc.language | en-US | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.relation | 政治大學學報, 68,143-182 | en_US |
| dc.title | 典範不可共量概念與組織理論研究：環繞Burrell與Morgan觀點的爭辯之評析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title.alternative | The Concept of Paradigm Incommensurability and The Study of Organization Theories | - |
| dc.type | article | en |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
| item.languageiso639-1 | en_US | - |
| item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
| item.grantfulltext | open | - |
| item.openairetype | article | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 期刊論文 期刊論文 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| re-146.pdf | 10.26 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.