荷治時期臺灣土地倫理之分析-以赤崁一帶原住民土地利用與地權型態變遷為例

Abstract

土地倫理或人地關係的內涵，可由人類歷史中對於自然資源的利用、生活型態的形成以及文化價值的建立等過程中表現出來。本文從荷治時期（1624-1662）赤崁一帶原住民土地利用與地權型態變遷的研究發現，土地倫理所關心的人地利用關係，受到吾人風俗習慣、主政者強加之規定、教化措施，政治權益和產權的配置等正式與非正式制度因素，及其與技術、經濟、文化之交互影響至深且巨。相對於吾人對於荷蘭人治臺進行掠奪式經濟之指摘，我們現今人和土地的對待關係，宜超越經濟上或政治上之利益，以更寬廣的價值觀並嘗試兼顧臺灣各地區土地不同的歷史、風俗及文化的脈絡等，考量土地倫理形成過程中相互關連體系之各種面向，來建構屬於這塊土地的倫理，以避免持續對土地造成不可逆之傷害。 The connotation in land ethic or man-and-land relationship, can be manifested by various facets in human history, such as natural resources use, ways to sustain livelihood, formulation of values and culture, etc. Through the Study of the Taiwan land ethic in Dutch Era（1624-1662）—changes of indigenous land use and land right in Saccams area as an example, the relationships of man and land use which the land ethic deeply concerned are interacted by formal and informal institutions, such as ordinances, customs, moralization, Dutch autocracy, allocation of political power and land entitlements, that have mutual effects on technology, economy and culture. In order to avoid the irreversible situations on land use and man-and-land relationship, it would be better to trace back the context of history, customs and culture on land use, rather than only have an eye to the advantage of politics or economy.