Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/71768| 題名: | 高學歷、低收入？ ─高教擴張前後大學學歷影響薪資及職業聲望的因果分析 Does college degree still pay? ─A Causal Analysis of College Expansion on Earning and Occupational Prestige in Taiwan |
作者: | 李昇璋 Li, Sheng Jang |
貢獻者: | 關秉寅 Kuan, Ping Yin 李昇璋 Li, Sheng Jang |
關鍵詞: | 高教擴張 教育擴張 反事實分析 職業聲望 因果分析 College Expansion Educational Expansion Counterfactual Occupational Prestige Causal analysis |
日期: | 2013 | 上傳時間: | 1-十二月-2014 | 摘要: | 本研究利用華人家庭動態資料庫(Panel Study of Family Dynamics，PSFD)蒐集到之兩世代樣本，以反事實分析（Counterfactual Causal Analysis）的角度及方法，觀察台灣高教擴張前後，大學學歷對於收入，及其職業聲望的因果影響。\n本研究將高教擴張的影響視為一種處遇（treatment），並將高教擴張前後的兩個世代，分成三種族群：「always-takers」（不管是否高教擴張都會上大學者，以下簡稱「必為者」）、「compliers」（沒有高教擴張的幫助，無法上大學，但因受到高教擴張影響而上大學者，以下簡稱「順勢而為者」），以及「never-takers」（不管高教是否擴張都不會上大學者，以下簡稱「必不為者」）。本研究企圖透過比較三者在現職與初職收入及職業聲望上的差異，並探討高等教育擴張在教育與勞動力市場連結上所扮演的角色。\n研究結果發現（一）不管是初職，抑或是現職，高教擴張對於個人未來的薪資利益並無幫助，甚至對「必為者」還產生負面影響，但從另一角度來看，它確實也讓「必不為者」在擴張前所展現的弱勢，在擴張後與其他群體轉趨公平。（二）高教擴張的效果會隨著年資的增加而減弱甚至消失，由「必為者」在擴張後初職與現職薪資的影響由負向效果轉為無影響中可以得出此結果。其三，男性與女性勞動力市場在面對擴張時所產生的改變也有相當大的不同，如女性「順勢而為者」在擴張後上大學者，在初職薪資上產生了比男性更多的負面影響，證明女性勞動力市場對於大學文憑的敏感度是高於男性的。\n 薪資成長幅度方面，「必為者」與「順勢而為者」和「必不為者」在薪資收入上的差異並不明顯。而教育擴張並未替男性的「必不為者」帶來薪資成長的好處，反而是給了女性「必不為者」向上爬升的機會，但也僅限於不需學歷門檻的工作。\n在職業聲望方面，其一，高教擴張的同樣對「必為者」產生了負面的 \n影響，而這項負面影響會隨著年資的增加而慢慢消失；其二，「必不為者」雖在薪資上取得利益，但在職業聲望上卻沒有得到好處，反而受到傷害；其三，女性的職業聲望雖在初職及現職都高過於男性，但是在薪資的收入及成長上卻都不如男性。 | 參考文獻: | 王昭蓉，2000，《台灣地區民眾失業率與高教低就之研究》。台東：國立台東師院教育研究所碩士論文。\n朱敬一，2003，《華人家庭動態資料庫：華人家庭動態資料庫的建立：第五年計畫（RI2003）》。台北：中央研究院經濟所。\n吳乃德，2013，〈高等教育成就的族群差異：學費補貼、職業情境、與世代差異〉。臺灣社會學刊，52，1-30。\n范雲、張晉芬，2010，〈再探台灣高教育成就的省籍差異〉。台灣社會研究季刊，79， 259-290。\n孫清山、黃毅志，1995，〈教育、收入與社會資源和階級取得過程之關連〉。收錄於林松齡主編，《臺灣社會學研究的回顧與前瞻》，151-182。臺中：東海大學。\n符碧真，2000，〈教育擴張對入學機會均等影響之研究〉。教育研究集刊，44，201-223。\n陳建志，2001，〈台灣地區就業市場收入性別差異之探討〉。教育與社會研究，2，123-154。\n陳建志，2000，〈台灣地區科系、職業性別隔離與收入性別差異之變遷〉。教育與心理研究，23，285-312。\n陳建州，2005，教育機會的性別限制、差異與演變。發表於「台灣的教育制度、勞力市場與產業組織發展研討會」。台中：東海大學。\n陳伯璋，2003，〈大學整併的條件與策略〉。國政分析。\n陳婉琪，2005，〈族群、性別與階級：再探教育成就的省籍差異〉。台灣社會學，10，1-40。\n張英華、薛承泰、黃毅志，1996，〈教育分流與社會經濟地位：兼論對技職教育改革的政策意涵〉。台北：行政院教育改革審議委員會。\n張峯彬、關秉寅，2012，〈高教擴張、失業與主觀社會地位變遷〉。63-92，收錄於謝雨生、傅仰止編，《台灣社會變遷1985-2005：社會階層與勞動篇》。台北：中央研究院社會學研究所。\n張晉芬，2013，《勞動社會學》。台北︰政大出版社。\n黃毅志，2005，〈臺灣地區教育機會不平等性之變遷〉。中國社會學刊，18，243-273。\n蔡瑞明、林大森，2000，〈教育與勞力市場的連結：以台灣教育分流為例〉。143-190，收錄於劉兆佳等主編，《市場、階級與政治：變遷中的華人社會》。香港：香港中文大學香港亞太研究所。\n蔡瑞明、莊致嘉、葉秀珍，2005，〈「教育與職業不相稱」對薪資的影響：「標準差法」與「自我評量法」兩種不相稱測度方法之比較〉。人口學刊，30，65-95。\n蔡淑鈴，2004，〈高等教育的擴張對教育機會分配的影響〉。台灣社會學，7，47-88。\n蔡淑鈴、瞿海源，1989，〈主客觀職業量表之初步建構〉。477-516，收錄於伊慶春、朱瑞玲編，《台灣社會現象的分析》。台北：中央研究院三民主義研究所。\n駱明慶，2004，〈升學機會與家庭背景〉。經濟論文叢刊，32:4，417-445。\n關秉寅，2013，〈誰上研究所？ 2009年TEPS-B電訪資料之分析〉。發表於「2013年台灣社會學年會」。台北：政治大學。\n簡錦漢，2009，《華人家庭動態資料庫：華人家庭動態資料庫的建立：第十一年計畫（RI2009）》。台北：中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心。\n顧燕翎、鄭至慧，1999，《女性主義經典》。台北：女書文化。\nAlon, Sigal. 2009, “The evolution of class inequality in higher education: Competition, exclusion, and adaptation. ” American Sociological Review, 72, 478-511.\nArum, Richard ,Yossi Shavit, and Adam Gamoran. 2007, “More Inclusion Than Diversion: Expansion, Differentation, and Market Structure in higher Education.” Pp.1-35, in Stratification in Higher Education: A Comparative Study, edited by Yossi Shavit, Richard Arum, and Adam Gamoran. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.\nBeaulieu, L. J. and D. Mulkey. 1995, “Human Capital in Rural America: A Review of Theoretical Perspectives. ” Pp.3-22, In Investing in People, edited by Beaulieu, L. J. and D. Mulkey, Boulder: Westview Press.\nBeblo, Miriam and Charlotte Lauer. 2004, “ Do Family Resources Matter? Educational Attainment During Transition in Poland. ” The Economics of Transition 12, 537-558.\nBecker, Gary. 1962, “Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis” Journal of Political Economy. 70, 9-49.\nBecker, Gary., 1964, “Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis ,with Special Reference to Education.” Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.\nBell, Daniel., 1974, “The coming of post-industrial society.” London: Heinemann.\nBerg, Ivar., 1969, “Education and Jobs: The Great Training Robbery”. New York: Praeger.\nBrinton, Mary., 2011. “ Lost in Transition: Youth, Work, and Instability in Postindustrial Japan. ” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\nBrand, Jennie E., and Yu Xie. 2010, “Who Benefits Most from College? Evidence for Negative Selection in Heterogeneous Economic Returns to Higher Education.” American Sociological Review ,75,273-302.\nCard, David and Thomas Lemieux .2001, “Can Falling Supply Explain the Rising Return to College for Younger Men? A Cohort-Based Analysis.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 705-746. \nChoi, Seongsoo., 2013, “When Everyone Goes to College:The Causal Effect of College Expansion on Earnings”. Under review.\nCollins, Randall. 2002, “Credential Inflation and the Future of Universities.” Pp.23-46, in TheFuture of the City of Intellect: The Changing American University, edited by Steven G.Brint. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.\nDore Ronald ., 1976, “The Diploma Disease：Education, Qualification and Development.” Berkeley：University of California Press.\nDuncan, Otis Dudley., 1961, “A Socioeconomic Index for All Occupations.” Pp. 109-38, in Occupations and Social Status, edited by Albert J. Reiss, Jr. New York: Free Press.\nEngels, Friederich., 1970, The Origins of the Family, Private Property and the State. New York: International Publishers.\nGebel, Michael, and Friedhelm Pfeiffer. 2010, “Educational Expansion and Its HeterogeneousReturns for Wage Workers.” Schmollers Jahrbuch 130,19-42.\nGoldin, Claudia Dale, and Lawrence F Katz., 2008, “The Race between Education andTechnology ”. Harvard University Press.\nGuo, Shenyan and Mark W. Fraser., 2010, “Propensity Score Analysis: Statistical Methods and Applications. ” Los Angeles, CA: Sage.\nHerbert R. Barringer, David T. Takeuchi, and Peter Xenos., 2014, “Education, Occupational Prestige, and Income of Asian Americans.” Sociology of Education, 63, 27-43.\nHollan, Paul W., 1986, “Statistic and Causal Inference.” Journal of Educational Psychology ,77, 3-11.\nIshida, Hiroshi, Seymour Spilerman, and Kuo-Hsien Su., 1997, “Educational Credentials and Promotion Chances in a Japanese and American Organizations.” American Sociological Review ,62, 866-882.\nIshida, Hiroshi., 2007, “Japan: Educational Expansion and Inequality in Access to Higher Education.” Pp.63-86, in Stratification in Higher Education: A Comparative Study, edited by Yossi Shavit, Richard Arum, and Adam Gamoran. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.\nKatz, Lawrence F., and Kevin M. Murphy., 1992, “Changes in Relative Wages,1963-1987:Supply and Demand Factors.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 107,35-78.\nKerckhoff, Alan C., 2000, “Transition from School to Work in Comparative Perspective. ” Pp.453-474, in Handbook of the Sociology of Education, edited by Maureen T. Hallinan. NY: Kluwer Academic.\nKerckhoff, Alan C., 2001, “Education and stratification processes in comparative perspective.” Sociology of Education, 74 ,3-18.\nKerr, C., Dunlop, J.T., Harbison, F., and Myers, C.A., 1960, “Industrialism and industrial man.” Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.\nLucas, Samuel R., 2001, “Effectively maintained inequality: Education transitions, track mobility, and social background effects”. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1642-1690.\nMare, Robert D., 1980, “Social Background and School Continuation Decisions.” Journal of the American Statistical Association ,75,295-309.\nMare, Robert D., 1981, “Change and Stability in Educational Stratification.” American Sociological Review, 46,72-87.\nMorgan, Stephen L. and Christopher Winship., 2007, “Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\nRaftery, A., and M. Hout., 1993, “Maximally Maintained Inequality: Expansion, Reform, and Opportunity in Irish Education, 1921-75.” Sociology of Education,\n66, 41-62\nParkin, Frank., 1971, “Class Inequality and Political Order. ” London, UK: Paladin.\nPark, Hyunjoon. 2007. “South Korea: Educational Expansion and Inequality of Opportunity for Higher Education.” Pp.87-112, in Stratification in Higher Education: A Comparative Study, edited by Yossi Shavit, Richard Arum, and Adam Gamoran. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.\nPope, Denise C. and Richard Simon., 2005, “Help for Stressed-Out Students.” Educational Leadership. 62, 7: 33-37.\nReich, R. B.,1991,“The Work of Nations: A Blueprint for the Future.” London: Simon and Schuster.\nRosenbaum, P.R., and Rubin, D.B., 1983,The Central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70,41-55.\nRubin, Donald B., 1986, “Which Ifs Have Causal Answers” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 961-962.\nSchofer, Evan, and John W. Meyer., 2005, “The Worldwide Expansion of Higher Education inthe Twentieth Century.” American Sociological Review 70,898-920.\nShavit, Yossi and Hans-Peter Blossfeld., 1993, “Persistent Inequality: Changing \nEducational Attainment in Thirteen Countries.” Boulder: Westview Press. \nShavit, Yossi, Richard Arum, Adam Gamoran, and Gila Menahem., 2007, “Stratification in Higher Education: A Comparative Study. ” Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.\nSpence, A. M., 1974, “Market Signaling: Information Transfer in Hiring and Related Processes.” Cambridge, MA: Harvard university Press.\nSwirski, Shlomo, and Barbara Swirski., 1997, “Higher Education in Israel.” Adva Center Series on Equality. Tel Aviv: Adva Center.\nTurner, Ralph H., 1960, Sponsored and Contest Mobility and the School System. \nAmerican Sociological Review.25,855-867.\nTsai, Shu-Ling .1998.“The Transition from School to Work in Taiwan”, edited by Yossi Shavit andWalter Mueller, Pp.443-470, From School to Work: A Comparative Study of Educational Qualifications and Occupational Destinations, Oxford: Clarendon Press.\nTsai, Shu-Ling and Yossi Shavit., 2007, “Taiwan: Higher Education-Expansion and Equality of Educational Opportunity.” Pp.140-164, In Stratification in Higher Education: A Comparative Study, edited by Yossi Shavit, Richard Arum, and Adam Gamoran. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.\nTsay, Ruey-Ming, Hsiu-Jen Jennifer Yeh and Chih-Chia Chuang., 2005, “The Effects of Human Capital on Career Mobility: A Comparison of Schooling, Job Tenure and On-the-Job Training.” Paper presented at Los Angeles Meeting of the Research Committee on Social Stratification and Social Mobility (RC28), International Sociological Association. Los Angeles, California: University of California, Los Angeles, United States.\nTrow, M., 2000, “From mass higher education to universal access: The American advantage.” CA: University of California, Berkeley.\nWalters, Pamela Barnhouse and Rubinson, Richard., 1983, “Educational Expansion and Economic Output in the United States, 1890-1969: A ProductionFunction Analysis.” American Sociological Review 48,480-493.\nWalker, Ian, and Yu Zhu., 2008, “The College Wage Premium and the Expansion of HigherEducation in the UK.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 110,695-709.\nWooldridge, Jeffrey M., 2002, “Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data” MIT Press.\nXie, Yu and Kimberlee A. Shauman., 2003, “Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes.” Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.\nYin-Kun Chang .2005. “Diploma Disease: Rethinking the Pursuit of Higher Education as a Mediation for Upward Mobility.” 台北：東吳社會學報 18, 1-42。 | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 社會學研究所 101254016 102 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101254016 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 401601.pdf | 1.36 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.