Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/73344| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 李沃奇 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | William C. Vocke, Jr. | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | 柯沐甯 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Monika Kočiová | en_US |
| dc.creator | 柯沐甯 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator | Kočiová, Monika | en_US |
| dc.date | 2013 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-02-03T02:35:06Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2015-02-03T02:35:06Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2015-02-03T02:35:06Z | - |
| dc.identifier | G1018620041 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/73344 | - |
| dc.description | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 國際研究英語碩士學位學程 (IMPIS) | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 101862004 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 102 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | 廿一世紀的小國與公眾外交興起: 以挪威、斯洛伐克與臺灣為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Diplomacy has been playing a crucial role on the global political scene for many\ncenturies but its importance, character, and role in the 21st century has been changing. The\naftermath of the Cold War and the nature of the developments in the upcoming years brought\nnumerous significant transformations which have tremendous impact on the world politics\nand its disposition. Diplomacy ceded to be a privilege of government to government relations,\npursued mostly behind the closed doors. As a response public diplomacy has emerged.\nPublic diplomacy as a more comprehensive, more open, more accountable and more\nintegrative diplomatic practice has been gaining its importance around the world. The\ncharacter, features and new developments of this era require more and more flexibility,\nrapidity, transparency and skills to handle the international image abroad.\nThe topic of this theses evolves around the question of whether or not and how have\nthe public diplomacy apparatuses of the smaller countries, selected as the case studies reacted\nto the changes of the 21st century and examines what have been the principal features and\ncharacter of these alterations.\nA closer assessment of the three significantly diverse countries illustrates different\ntechniques and tactics to keep up with the contemporary progress or inefficiencies present in\nthe policies and especially public diplomacy of Norway, Taiwan and Slovakia. A compound\nevaluation of the individual reactions to the new millennium changes attempts to bring more\nlight to a compound picture of the 21st century smaller (and wealthier) state’s diplomacy and\nsuggest whether or not these changes have had an impact on their foreign policy conduct and\nhow. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 1.Research Proposal 5\n1.1 Research motivation/Background 5\n1.2 Justification of the research 8\n1.3 Research Questions 10\n1.4 Variables 10\n1.5 Hypothesis 11\n1.6 Research Methods 11\n1.7 Research limitations 12\n1.8 Structure of the Thesis 13\n2. Literature Review 15\n2.1 The New IR environment and Transformation of Traditional Diplomacy in the 21st Century 15\n2.1.1 Geopolitical changes 15\n2.1.2 Democratization, Transparency, Openness 16\n2.1.3 Globalization 17\n2.1.4 New Actors in International Relations 17\n2.1.5 Technological evolution (The Information Age & New Media) 18\n2.1.6 Transformation of Traditional Diplomacy 19\n2.2 The Concept of Public Diplomacy 20\n2.2.1 Soft Power 22\n2.2.2 Listening 23\n2.2.3 Advocacy 23\n2.2.4 Cultural Diplomacy 24\n2.2.5 Exchange diplomacy 24\n2.2.6 International Broadcasting 25\n3. A Paradigm Shift: The (New) Public Diplomacy 26\n3.1 Basic Shifts characterizing the NPD 27\n3.3.1 Increasing number of international actors 27\n3.3.2 New, real-time and global technologies 28\n3.3.3 Blurred lines between domestic and international\nnews 28\n3.3.4 Concepts derived from marketing 29\n3.3.5 New terminology 29\n3.3.6 People‐to‐people contact 29\n3.4 Challenges for the (New) Public Diplomacy 30\n3.4.1 Relationship Building 30\n3.4.2 Tension between the Traditional Diplomacy and New Diplomacy 31\n3.4.3 Institutional Organization 31\n3.4.4 Two Worlds of Public Diplomacy 31\n3.4.5 The network model 32\n4. Concept of empirical study 34\n4.1 Smaller states and (Public)\nDiplomacy 34\n4.2 Case Study 37\n5. The Kingdom of Norway 38\n5.1 Introduction 38\n5.2 Norwegian Foreign Policy & Public Diplomacy 39\n5.3 Niche Diplomacy 41\n5.4 Norwegian Niche Diplomacy 42\n5.4.1 Building the Norwegian Niche 43\n5.4.2 History 44\n5.4.3 Norwegian “Conflict Resolution” Model 46\n5.5 2003 PD Report 48\n5.6 The institutional design 49\n5.7 Norwegian New PD evaluation 51\n5.7.1 Increasing number of international actors 52\n5.7.2 New, real‐time and global technologies 53\n5.7.3 Blurred lines between domestic and international news 53\n5.7.4 New terminology (Branding) 54\n5.7.5 People-to-people contact 55\n5.8 The ambiguity of the Norwegian Diplomacy 56\n5.9 Conclusions 58\n6. The Slovak Republic 63\n6.1 Introduction 63\n6.2 Slovak Public Diplomacy 64\n6.3 History 65\n6.4 Propaganda vs. Public Diplomacy 68\n6.5 Evolution of the Slovak PD 69\n6.5.1 Slovak “pre-accession” PD 69\n6.5.2 Slovak “post-‐accession” PD 72\n6.6 Creating the Slovak Brand 75\n6.6.1 The Current PD 75\n6.6.2 Searching for a brand: “Slovakia, country with potential” 76\n6.6.3 The Future of Slovak PD 78\n6.7 Institutional Design 80\n6.8 New PD evaluation 82\n6.8.1 Increasing number of international players 82\n6.8.2 New Real-‐Time Media 83\n6.8.3 Domestic and International news 84\n6.8.4 New Terminology (Branding) 86\n6.8.5 People to people contact 87\n6.9 Challenges for Slovakia 88\n6.10 Conclusion 91\n7. The case of Republic of China, Taiwan 97\n7.1 Introduction 97\n7.2 History 99\n7.3 Taiwanese PD 99\n7.4 The Non‐Official Diplomacy 102\n7.4.1 Checkbook diplomacy & Foreign Aid 105\n7.4.2 Cultural Diplomacy 105\n7.4.3 Exchange Diplomacy 107\n7.5 Institutional Design 110\n7.6 Evaluation of the New PD 110\n7.6.1 Increasing number of international actors 112\n7.6.2 New, real-‐time and global technologies 112\n7.6.3 Blurred lines between domestic and international news 115\n7.6.4 New terminology (Branding) 116\n7.6.5 People‐to‐people contact 117\n7.7 Challenges for the Taiwanese PD 118\n7.8 Conclusion 119\n8. Conclusion 127\nBibliography 136 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 1923544 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.source.uri | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1018620041 | en_US |
| dc.subject | 公眾外交 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 新公眾外交 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 臺灣 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 斯洛伐克 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 挪威 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 小國 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | public diplomacy | en_US |
| dc.subject | new public diplomacy | en_US |
| dc.subject | taiwan | en_US |
| dc.subject | slovakia | en_US |
| dc.subject | norway | en_US |
| dc.subject | small countries | en_US |
| dc.title | 廿一世紀的小國與公眾外交興起: 以挪威、斯洛伐克與臺灣為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Smaller Powers & the Rise of Public Diplomacy in the 21st Century (Cases of Norway, Slovakia & Taiwan) | en_US |
| dc.type | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference | Books\nAlexander, C., 2012. Taiwan`s Public Diplomacy Towards its Formal Diplomatic Allies, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan\nBerridge, G., 2010. Diplomacy: Theory and Practice. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan\nBortlová, H., 2011. Czechoslovakia and Cuba between 1959-1962. Prague: Charles University Press\nCase, H., 2009. Between States: The Transylvanian Question and the European Idea during WWII. Stanford ed. s.l.:Stanford University Press\nCohen, R., 1999. Reflection on the New Global Diplomacy: Statecraft 2500 BC to 2000 AD. In: J. Melissen, ed. Innovation in Diplomatic Practice. Hampshire: Macmillan Press LTD\nCooper, A. F., 1997. Niche Diplomacy: A conceptual overview. In: A. F. Cooper, ed. Niche Diplomacy: Middle Powers after the Cold War. London: Macmillan Press Ltd\nCooper, A. F., 2007. Celebrity Diplomacy. 1st ed. s.l.:Paradigm Publishers\nCooper, A. F., 2013. Opportunities and risks as diplomacy moves to become more "service"oriented. In: J. H. R. T. Andrew F. Cooper, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy. s.l.:Oxford University Press.\nCooper, R., 2000. Post Modern State and the World Order:Demos\nCostas, . M. C. & Derian, J. D., 2010. Sustainable Diplomacy. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan\nCull, N. J., 2009. How we got here. In: P. Seib, ed. Toward a New Public Diplomacy. New York: Palgrave MacMillan\nCull, N. J., 2009. Public Diplomacy: Lessons from the past, Los Angeles: Figueroa Press.\nDeLisle, J., 2010. Soft Power in a Hard Place: China, Taiwan,: Orbis\nDobinson, K. & Dale, G., 2000. The Norwegian backpack. An analysis of the `Norwegian` peace diplomacy `. In: G. Dale, ed. Limits for everything: Critical Perspectives on Norwegian foreign policy. Oslo: Spartacus\nEast, M. A. & Robertson, J., 2005. Diplomacy and Developing Nations: Post-Cold War Foreign Policy-Making Structures and Positions. Oxon: Routledge\nEgeland, J., 1988. Impotent superpower--potent small state : potentials and limitations of human rights objectives in the foreign policies of the United States and Norway. Oslo: Norwegian University Press\nEgeland, J., 2008. A Billion Lives: An Eyewitness Report from the Frontlines of Humanity. New York: Simon&Schuster\nEvans, G. & Grant, B., 1991. Australia`s Foreing Relations in the World of 1990`s. Melbourne: Melbourne Press\nFrydenlund, K., 1982. Small Country- What Now?. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget\nHamilton, K. & Langhorne, R., 2013. The Practice of Diplomacy: Its Evolution, Theory and Administration. s.l.:Routledge\nHart, J., 2013. Empire of Ideas: The Origins of Public Diplomacy and the Transformation of U.S. Foreign Policy. New York: Oxford University Press\nHeine, J., 2006. On the Manner of Practising the New Diplomacy, s.l.: The Centre for International Governance Innovation\nHeine, J., 2013. From Club to Network Diplomacy. In: The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy. s.l.:Oxford University Press\nHenrikson, A. K., 2004. Niche Diplomacy in he World Public Arena: The Global Corneres of Canda and Norway. In: J. Melissen, ed. The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations. U.K: Palgrave Macmillan\nHey, J.A.K., ed. 2003.,Small States in World Politics: Explaining Foreign Policy Behaviour. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner\nHocking, B., 1999. Catalytic Diplomacy: Beyond "Newness" and "Decline". In: J. Melissen, ed. Innovation in diplomatic practice. Hampshire: MacMillan Press\nHocking, B., 2009. Rethinking the ´New´ Public Diplomacy. In: J. Melissen, ed. The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan\nHoffman, D., 2002. Beyond Public Diplomacy. Foreign Affairs, 81(2)\nHuang, Y. & Ding, S., 2006. Dragon’s belly: An analysis of China’s soft power. East Asia, 24(4)\nGregory B., ‘Public Diplomacy and National Security: Lessons from the U.S. Experience’, Small Wars Journal, 2008\nChitty, N., 2009. Australian Public Diplomacy. In: N. Snow & Taylor Philip, eds. The Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomayc. New York: Routledge\nJönsson, C. & Hall, M., 2005. Essence of Diplomacy. Hanpshire: Palgrave Macmillanv\nKennedy, P., 1987. The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers. s.l.:Random House\nKeohane, R. & Nye, J., 2000. Governance in a Globalizing World. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press\nKinsman, J. & Bassuener, K., 2013. A Diplomat`s Handbook: for Democracy Development Support. 3 ed. Waterloo: The Centre for International Governance Innovation\nKlavins, D., 2011. Understanding the Essence of Modern Diplomacy. Berlin, Institute for Cultural DIplomacy\nKurbalija, J., ed., 1999. In: Knowledge and Diplomacy. Malta: DiploProjects\nKurbalija, J., 1999. In: J. Kurbalija, ed. Knowledge and Diplomacy. Malta: DiploProjects\nKurbalija, J., 2007. Diplomacy in the Age of Information Technology. In: J. Melissen, ed. Innovation in Diplomatic Practice. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan\nKurnalija, J., 2007. Diplomacy in the Age of Information Technology. In: J. Melissen, ed. The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan\nKurucz, M., 2007. Cultural Dimensions of Diplomacy. Bratislava, University of Economics\nLeguey-Feilleux, J.-R., 2009. The Dynamics of Diplomacy. Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.\nLeigh-Phippard, H., 1999. The Influence of Informal groups in Multilateral diplomacy. In: J. Melissen, ed. Innovation in Diplomatic Practice. Hampshire: MacMillan Press LTD\nLeonard, M., 2002. Niche Diplomacy: How Norway uses scarce resources to punch above its weight. In: Public Diplomacy. London: The Foreign Policy Center\nLeonard, M., 2002. How Norway uses scarce resources to punch above its weight. In: M. Leonard, ed. Public Diplomacy. London: The Foreign Policy Centre\nLeonard, M., 2002. Public Diplomacy. London: Foreing Policy Center\nLeonard, M. & Small, A. T., 2005. Norwegian Public Diplomacy. London: Foreign Policy Centre\nLi, M., 2009. Soft Power: China’s Emerging Strategy in International Politics. MD.: Lexington: Lanham\nLunde, E. & Thun, I., 2008. Norwegian interests. Foreign policy in a globalized world. Oslo: Cappelen Damm\nMcClellan, M., 2003. Public Diplomacy in the Context of Traditional Diplomacy, s.l.: U.S Department of State\nMelissen, J., 2005. The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations. Basingstoke: Plagrave Macmillan\nMelissen, J., 2007. The New Public Diplomacy: Between Theory and Practice. In: J. Melissen, ed. The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan\nMelissen, J., 2011. Public Diplomacy and Soft Power in East Asia. Ney York: Palgrave Macmillan.\nMengin, F., 1999. The Substitution of Convntional Diplomatic Relations: The Case of Taiwan. In: J. Melissen, ed. Innovation in Diplomatic Practice. Hampshire: Macmillan Press LTD\nNye, J. S., 1991. Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. s.l.:Basic Books\nNye, J. S., 2004. Soft Power. New York: Public Affairs( Perseus Book Group)\nNye, J. S., 2004. Soft Power:The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs( Perseus Book Group)\nNye, J. S., 2008. Public Diplomacy and Soft Power. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science\nOciepka, B., 2013. New Members’ Public Diplomacy. In: M. K. Davis Cross & J. Melissen, eds. European Public Diplomacy: Soft Power at Work. New York: Palgrave Macmillan\nOciepka, B. & Ryniejska, M., 2005. Public diplomacy and EU enlargement: the case of Poland. Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations „Clingendael\nOrzoff., A., 2009. Battle for the Castle: The Myth of Czechoslovakia in Europe 1914-1948. New York: Oxford University Press\nØsterud, Ø., 1997. Between Realism and "Crusader Diplomacy": The Norwegian Channel to Jericho. In: A. F. Cooper, ed. Niche Diplomacy. London: Macmillan Press LTD\nÖzkan, A., 2014. Role of public diplomacy in establishing nation branding and public. European Journal of Research on Education, 1-5(Special Issue: International Relations)\nPamment, J., 2013. The New Public Diplomacy in the 21st century: A Comparative Study of Policy and Practice. s.l.:Routledge\nPigmann, G. A., 2010. Contemporary Diplomacy. Cambridge: Polty Press\nRawnsley, G., 2007. Selling Democracy: Diplomacy, Propaganda and Democratisalion in Taiwan,. China Perspecliνe, Volume 47\nRawnsley, G., 2012. Approaches to soft power and public diplomacy in China and Taiwan. The Hournal of International Communication, 8(2)\nReinecke, W., 1998. Global Public Policy: Governing without government?. Washington DC: Brookings\nRichmond, Y., 2008. Practicing Public Diplomacy: A Cold War Oddysey. s.l.:Berghahn Books\nRiordan, S., 2003. The New Diplomacy. Cambridge: Polity Press\nRudderham, M., 2008. Middle Power Pull:Can Middle Powers use Public Diplomacy to Ameliorate theI mage of the West?\nScott-Smith, G., 2009. Exchange Programs and Public Diplomacy. In: N. Snow & P. M. Taylor, eds. Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. New York: Routledge\nSeib, P., 2012. Real Time Diplomacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan\nShearman, P. & Sussex, M., 2004. European Security After 9/11. s.l.:Ashgate\nSláviková, E., Bilčík, V. & Duleba, A., 2009. Medium-term strategy for development of public diplomacy within the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of SLovak Republic, Bratislava: Slovak Foreing Policy Association\nSlaughter, A.-M., 2004. A New World Order. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press\nSnow, N., 2009. Rethinking Public Diplomacy. In: Routledge Handbook of Pulic Diplomacy. New York\nStringer, K. D., 2011. Honorary Consuls in an Era of Globalization, Trade and Investment. In: A. M. F. Jan Melissen, ed. Consular Affairs and Diplomacy. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers\nStringer, K. D., 2011. Honorary Consuls in Small States Diplomacy: Through the Lichtenstein`s lens, s.l.: Clingendael ( Netherlands Insttute of International Relations)\nSzondi, G., 2009. Central and Eastern European Public Diplomacy: A Transitional Perspectiveon National Reputation Management. In: N. Snow & P. M. Taylor, eds. Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. New York: Routledge\nTvedt, T., 1997. Norwegian Foreign Policy and NGOs. In: T. KKnudsten, ed. Norway`s Foreign Policy. Oslo: Cappelen\nThorsallson, B., 2000. The Role of the Small States in the EU, Aldershot: UK Ashgate\nVital, D., 1967. The Inequality of States : A Study of the Small Power in International Relations. s.l.:Oxford University Press, Inc.\nWang, S. J., 2010. Public Diplomacy and organizational conflct: Study of Taiwanese Government Information Offices in the United States, La Verne: University of La Verne\nWyne, A. S., 2009. Public Opinion and Power. In: Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. New York: Routledge\nYasushi Watanabe, D. L. M. J. S. N., 2008. Soft Power Superpowers: Cultural and National Assets of Japan and the United States. New York\n\nJournals and Reports\nAgence France-Presse, 2010. Taiwan to Challenge China`s `Soft Power`. Agence France-Presse, 17 2\nAlgayerová, O., 2010. Establishment of Public Diplomacy in SLovakia: An Effective New Approach, s.l.: University of Malta\nAllern, E. & Lorentzen, H., 2002. New Forms of Civic Participation in Norwegian Government Administration: An Exploratory Study, Oslo: NIBR\nBaker, K. & Edmonds, R. L., 2004. Transfer ofTaiwanese ldeas and Technology to the Gambia, West Africa: A Viable Approach to Rural Development?. The Geogaphic Journal, September, 170(3)\nBátora, J., 2005. Public Diplomacy in Small and Medium-sized States, Hague: Clingendael\nBátora , J. & Hozlarova, Z., 2009. Verejná diplomacia: Novy strategicky nastroj MZV. Bratislava, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Slovakia\nBátora, J. & Hozlárová, Z., 2009. Verejná diplomacia: Nový strategický nástroj MZV SR?, Bratislava: Ministry of Forein Affairs, Slovakia\nBaxte, L. & Bishop, J.-A., 2008. Uncharted Ground: Canada, Middle Power Leadership and Public Diplomacy. American Behavioral Scientist, Volume 53\nBřezinová, K., 2013. Turbines and Weapons for Latin America: Czechoslovak Documentary Film Propaganda in the Cold War Context, in the Cold War Context,. Central European Journal of International and Security Studies, Issue 3\nButenschøn, N., 1997. The Oslo Agreement in Norwegian Foreign Policy, (CMEIS occasional paper No. 56, January 1997), 11., s.l.: CMEIS\nCommonwealth Secretariat/World Bank Task, 2010. Small States: Meeting Challengesin the Global Economy, Washington D.C: World Bank\nDeLisle, J., 2010. Soft Power in a Hard Place: China, Taiwan,, s.l.: Orbis\nEast, M. A. & Robertson, J., 2005. Diplomacy and Developing Nations: Post-Cold War Foreign Policy-Making Structures and Positions. Oxon: Routledge\nEytan Gilboa, 2008. Searching for a Theory of Public Diplomacy’. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), pp. 55-77\nFranko, T., 2010. Analysis of Slovak Foreign Policy, Brno: Masaryk University\nGarfinkel I.,Smeeding T., Wealth and Welfare States: What Is the Real Story?, 2010 [Online] Available at: http://www.e-ir.info/2008/08/12/small-state-diplomacy/ [Accessed 7 8 2014]\nGilley, B., 2010. Not So Dire Straits. Foreign Affairs, January-February, 89(1)\nGraffy, C., 2009. The Rise of Public Diplomacy 2.0. The Journal of International Security Affairs, Fall.Issue 17\nGyárfášová, O., Bútora, M. & Bútorová, Z., 2012. The image of Slovakia from the foreign perspective, Bratislava: Institute of European Studies and International Relations, FSEV UK\nHam, P. V., 2002. Branding Territory: Inside the Wonderful Worlds of PR and IR Theory. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 31(March), pp. 249-269\nHam, P. v., 2008. Place Branding: The State of the Art,. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Scientists, 616(March)\nHanssen-Bauer, J., 2005. The Norwegian ”model” for conflict resolution. Lisbon, Miinistry of Foreign Affairs, Norway\nHoffman, D., 2002. Beyond Public Diplomacy. Foreign Affairs, 81(2)\nChan, G., 1997. Taiwan as an emerging foreign aid donor: developments, problems, and prospects. Pacific Affairs, 1(70), pp. 37-56\nIan, T., 2002. Taiwan`s Foreign Policy and Africa: The LimitationS of Dollar Diplomacy,". Journal oJ Contemporary China, 30(11), pp. 125-40\nJakubiak, M. & Kolesar, P., 2010. Car Industry in Slovakia Recent Developments and Impact on Growth, Warsaw: Center for Social and Economic Research\nJie, C., 2001. Burgeoning Transnationalism ofTaiwan`s Social Movement NGOs. Journal of Contemporary China, 10(29), pp. 613-44\nKabir, M., 2007. Diplomacy at Bangladesh’s Missions Abroad: A Practitioner’s View. Journal of Diplomacy, Volume 2, pp. 299-302\nLangmore, J. & Egeland, J., 2011. Learning from Norway: Independent, middle-power foreign policy. The Griffit Review, 31(May)\nLee, C., 2010. Study in Taiwan: All the Rage. Taiwanese Panorama, 35(4), pp. 70-79\nLee, D. & Smith, N., 2010. Small State Discourses in the International Political Economy. Third World Quarterly, 31(7)\nLewis, P., 1988. In Oslo, Blessings for 733 Who Kept the Peace. The New York Times, 12 12\nLu, H.-l., 2003. Soft` Power:A Common Future for the Pacific. Taiwan Review\nLundestad, G., 1985. Nationalism and internationalism in Norwegian foreign policy. Inernatjonal Politikk, Volume 1\nMaass, M., 2009. The elusive definition of the small state. International Politics, Volume 46\nMallicková, E., 2010. Public Diplomacy as a Priority of Slovak Ministry of Foreing Affairs. Bratislava, Ústav európskych štúdií a medzinárodných vzťahov, FSEV UK\nMengin, F., 1997. Taiwan`s non‐official diplomacy. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 8(1), pp. 228-248\nMetzl, J. F., 2001. Network Diplomacy. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, Issue Spring/Summer, pp. 77-87\nMoore, T., 2012. Norway`s Focused Strategic Communication Strategy. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://www.unc.edu/depts/diplomat/item/2010/0912/comm/moore_norway.html\n[Accessed 7 5 2014]\nNeumann, I. B., 1998. Departmental identity: The Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Internasjonal Politikk, 56(1), pp. 75-103\nOECD, 2013. Slovak Republic: Fostering an Inclusive Job Rich-Recovery, Paris: OECD.\nOlson, K. G., 1949. Development of the Czechoslovak Propaganda Administration. Public Opinion Quarterly, 4(13), pp. 607-618\nÖzkan, A., 2014. Role of public diplomacy in establishing nation branding and public. European Journal of Research on Education, 1-5(Special Issue: International Relations)\nPajtinka, E., 2007. Slovak Diplomacy and its dimensions in the 21st century. Bratislava, University of Economics, Bratislava\nPetersen, J., 2003. Peace Mediation and Reconciliation. Joint Belgian-Norwegian Seminar on the occasion of the Norwegian State visit to Brussels, 21 May.\nRawnsley, G., 2000. Selling Taiwan: Diplomacy and Propaganda. Issues and Studies, 36(3)\nRich, T., 2009. Status for Sale: Taiwan and the Competition for Diplomatic Recognition. IsslIes & Studies, 45(4)\nRockower, P. S., 2011. Projecting Taiwan: Taiwan`s Public Diplomacy Outreach. Issues and studies, Issue 47\nRudderham, M., 2008. Middle Power Pull:Can Middle Powers use Public Diplomacy to Ameliorate theI mage of the West?\nScott, B., 2009. The Problem of Definition Revisited. Public Diplomacy 0902, Malta: DiploFoundation\nSnow, N., 2010. Exchange Powe. PDiN Monitor, 1(7)\nSegal, G., 1999. Does China Matter?. Foreign Affairs, Volume September/October\nSperling, J., 2001. Neither Hegemony nor Dominance: Reconsidering German Power in Post Cold-War Europe. British Journal of Political Science, 31(2), pp. 389-425\nThe Anholt-GfK Roper, 2011. Nation Brands Index. Annual Report 2011, New York\nTubilewicz, C. & Guilloux, A., 2011. Does size matter? Foreign aid in Taiwan`s diplomatic strategy, 2000–8. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 65(3), pp. 322-339\nVillanueva Rivas, ‘Cosmopolitan Constructivism: Mapping a Road to the Future of Cultural and Public Diplomacy’, Public Diplomacy Magazine, Winter 2010\nWang, H. & Lu, Y., 2008. ‘The conception of soft power and its policy implications: A comparative study of China and Taiwan. Journal of Contemporary China, 56(17), pp. 425-447\nWidvey, T., 2003. Public diplomacy. Ottawa, Norwegian-American Chamber of Commerce.\nYao, G., Yen-Pi , C. & Chiao-, P. C., 2008. The Quality of Life in Taiwan. The Quality of Life in Confucian Asia: From Physical Welfare to Subjective Well–Being, 6 10\nYu, S., 2008. President Ma explains his new diplomatic approach. [Online] \n[Accessed 9 6 2014]\n\nWeb-Sites\nAgence France-Presse, 2013. Slovakia, World`s Leading Per-Capita Car Maker, Back in Top Gear. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://www.industryweek.com/global-economy/slovakia-worlds-leading-capita-car-maker-back-top-gear [Accessed 15 5 2014].\nBátora, J. & Hozlarova, Z., 2009. Verejná diplomacia: Novy strategicky nastroj MZV. Bratislava, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Slovakia\nBur, M., 2008. Nation Brnding and Slovakia. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://nation-branding.info/2010/04/28/nation-branding-and-slovakia/\n[Accessed 16 1 2014]\nCIA Factbook, 2014. CIA Factbook: Norway. [Online] \nAvailable at: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/no.html\n[Accessed 17 1 2014]\nCIA, 2014. CIA Factbook: Slovakia. [Online] \nAvailable at: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/lo.html\n[Accessed 12 5 2014]\nCIA World Factbook, 2014. Taiwan. [Online] \nAvailable at: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/tw.html\n[Accessed 4 6 2014]\nCommonwealth Secretariat/World Bank Task, 2010. Small States: Meeting Challengesin the Global Economy, Washington D.C: World Bank\nCorgan, M., 2008. Small State Diplomacy. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://www.e-ir.info/2008/08/12/small-state-diplomacy/\n[Accessed 15 2 2014]\nDinh, C., 2012. Hard Look at Soft Power: Global Public Diplomacy. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://publicdiplomacysummer2012au.blogspot.tw/2012/06/taiwans-public-diplomacy-challenges-and.html\n[Accessed 7 6 2014]\nEvans, G., 2011. Middle Power Diplomacy. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://www.gevans.org/speeches/speech441.html\n[Accessed 10 5 2014]\nFakulta masmediálnej komunikácie UCM v Trnave, 2014, Branding Slovenska- O projekte, Available at: http://brandingslovenska.com/zoznam/page/3/, [Accessed 6 12 2014]\nFutureBrand, 2013. Country Brand Index 2012-13. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://www.futurebrand.com/images/uploads/studies/cbi/CBI_2012-Final.pdf\n[Accessed 6 5 2014]\nHoadley, S., 2013. Taiwan update: domestic reform and soft power diplomacy. New Zealand International Review, January/February, 38(1)\nHou, E., 2014. Taiwan launches new youth exchange program with U.S.. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://focustaiwan.tw/news/asoc/201406030032.aspx\n[Accessed 8 6 2014]\nHuang, K.-B., 2012. Taiwan’s Public Diplomacy at a Time of Institutional Change. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2012/05/10-taiwan-diplomacy-huang\n[Accessed 23 1 2014]\nChan, R., 2009. Ma’s State Visits Will Display Taiwan’s Soft Power: FM. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://www.taiwannews.com.tw/etn/news_content.php?id=940984\n[Accessed 8 6 2014]\nInnovation Norway, 2014. About Innovation Norway. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://www.innovasjonnorge.no/no/contact-us/#.U20vfvmSySp\n[Accessed 28 4 2014]\nLondon Metropolitan University, 2012. Niche diplomacy: a key for smaller states to become visible? The example of Norway and peacemaking diplomacy. [Online] Available at: http://publicandculturaldiplomacy1.wordpress.com/2012/03/22/niche-diplomacy-a-key-for-smaller-states-to-become-visible/\n[Accessed 22 2 2014]\nLu, H.-l., 2003. `Soft Power: A Common Future for the Pacific.. [Online] \nAvailable at: http ://taiwanreview.nat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xltem=9 13\n[Accessed 9 6 2014]\nMiller, A. L., 2006. China an Emerging Superpower?. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://www.stanford.edu/group/sjir/6.1.03_miller.html\n[Accessed 13 3 2014]\nOECD, 2008. Norway Development Assistance Comittee Peer Review of Norway. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://www.oecd.org/dac/peer-reviews/norway2008dacpeerreviewofnorway-mainfindingsandrecommendations.htm\n[Accessed 18 1 2014]\nRawnsley, G., 2014. Student protests and Taiwan’s soft power. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://blogs.nottingham.ac.uk/chinapolicyinstitute/2014/03/25/student-protests-and-taiwans-soft-power/\n[Accessed 8 6 2014]\nRawnsley, G. D., 2011. Comparing the Soft Power and Public Diplomacy of China and Taiwan. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://wwwpdic.blogspot.tw/2011/03/taiwans-soft-power-and-public-diplomacy.html\n[Accessed 5 6 2014]\nSmith, P. H., 1998. Public diplomacy. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://www.diplomacy.edu/resources/general/public-diplomacy\n[Accessed 10 2 2014]\nStøre, J. G., 2010. Disarmament as a global challenge. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://www.regjeringen.no/en/archive/Stoltenbergs-2nd-Government/Ministry-of-Foreign-Affairs/taler-og-artikler/2010/disarmament_change.html?id=609548\nTownsend, J., 2011. Branding Peace: Norway`s Identity Put to the Test. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jake-townsend/branding-peace-norways-id_b_918229.html\n[Accessed 17 2 2014]\nTiezzi, S., 2013. Why Taiwan’s Allies are Flocking to Beijing. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://thediplomat.com/2013/11/why-taiwans-allies-are-flocking-to-beijing/\n[Accessed 7 6 2014]\nTupy, M. L., 2010. Slovakia’s Return to the ‘Black Hole’. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/slovakias-return-black-hole\n[Accessed 16 5 2014]\n\nOfficial Documents\nCommonwealth Secretariat/World Bank Task, 2010. Small States: Meeting Challengesin the Global Economy, Washington D.C: World Bank\nEurobarometer, 2001. EUROBAROMETER XI-XII 2000. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb54/eb54_en.pdf\n[Accessed 15 5 2014]\nICDF, 2011. International Cooperation and Development 2011 Annual Report, Taipei: s.n.\nICDF, 2014. Directions in Strategic Planning. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://www.icdf.org.tw/ct.asp?xItem=8110&CtNode=30180&mp=2\n[Accessed 8 6 2014]\nKelly, H., 2010. A Helping Hand in Haitii. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://taiwanreview\n[Accessed 7 6 2014]\nMcClellan, M., 2003. Public Diplomacy in the Context of Traditional Diplomacy, s.l.: U.S Department of State\nMinistry of Education of ROC,, 2012. Overseas Students in ROC: 2012 Statistics, Taipei\nMinistry of Foreign Affairs of the Slovak Republic, 2007. Slovak Foreign Policy in 2007\nMinistry of Foreign Affairs of Slovak Republc, 2007. Foreign Policy Annual Report 2007, Bratislava: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Slovak Republic\nMinistry of Foreign Affairs of Slovak Republic, 2011. Slovakia: Country with Potential, Bratislava: MFEA of Slovak Republic\nMinistry of Foreign Affairs of the Slovak Republic, 2008. The Slovakia`s Foreign Policy Focus 2008. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://www.mzv.sk/App/wcm/media.nsf/vw_ByID/ID_D9A4421B46E3DE5EC125764800421CEF_SK/$File/zameranie%20ZP%202008.pdf.\n[Accessed 18 5 2014]\nMOFA, M. O. F. A., 2012. Public Diplomacy Coordination Council: Structure and Functions, Taipei: s.n.\nNMFA, 2013. Norway and the United Nations:Common Future,Common Solutions, Oslo: Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs\nMoFa ROC, 2014. The Republic of China Yearbook 2013: Forreign Affairs. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://www.ey.gov.tw/en/cp.aspx?n=90586F8A7E5F4397\n[Accessed 9 6 2014]\nROC Ministry of Culture, 2014. Ministry of Culture: About Us. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://english.moc.gov.tw/dir/index.php?sn=85\n[Accessed 3 6 2014]\nROC Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 2014. Structure and Functions. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://www.mofa.gov.tw/en/Organization.aspx?n=71C67D43CEB5EF3F&sms=A8F1FA2030B6089B\n[Accessed 5 6 2014]\nRepublic of China (Taiwan) Ministry of Forcign Affairs, 2011. Foreign Policy Report, 7th Congress of the Legislative Yuan, 5th Session. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://www.mofa.gov.tw/webapp/ct.asp?xltem=45688&ctNodc= 1 877&mp=6\n[Accessed 9 6 2014]\nRepublic of China (Taiwan) Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 2006. "Taiwan NGOS: Reaching out the World,". [Online] \nAvailable at: http://www.mofa.gov.tw/webapp/publiclData/ 7323 1426457 1.pdf\n[Accessed 9 6 2014]\nSACR, 2012. Annual Report 2011. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://www.sacr.sk/sacr/o-nas/vyrocne-spravy/.\n[Accessed 19 5 2014]\nSACR, 2014. About SACR. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://www.sacr.sk/en/slovak-tourist-board/news/\n[Accessed 1 6 2014]\nSAIA, 2014. About SAIA. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://www.saia.sk/sk/pages/o-nas/\n[Accessed 1 6 2014]\nSARIO, 2014. About SARIO. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://www.sario.sk/sk/o-nas/kto-sme\n[Accessed 1 6 2014]\nTaiwan Ministry of Foreign Affairs, May 2009. Partnership for Progress and Sustainable Development: White Paper on Foreign Aid Policy, Taipei\nThe China Post, 2014. NPM hopes exhibits in Japan will highlight the nation`s `soft power`. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://www.chinapost.com.tw/taiwan/national/national-news/2014/05/28/408768/p1/NPM-hopes.htm\n[Accessed 8 6 2014]\nWinter, P., 2006. Taiwan’s Public Diplomacy. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://publicdiplomacy.wikia.com/wiki/Taiwan_(Republic_of_China)\n[Accessed 6 6 2014]\nYan-Chih, M., 2013. Culture minister urges soft power boost. [Online] \nAvailable at: http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2013/04/14/2003559577\n[Accessed 6 6 2014] | zh_TW |
| item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| item.grantfulltext | restricted | - |
| item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec | - |
| item.openairetype | thesis | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004101.pdf | 1.88 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.