Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/73346| 題名: | 團結工聯與波蘭民主化之研究 A Study of Solidarity and Democratization in Poland |
作者: | 林倩宇 | 貢獻者: | 林永芳 林倩宇 |
關鍵詞: | 波蘭民主化 團結工聯 民主轉型 Democratization Solidarity Democratic Transition |
日期: | 2014 | 上傳時間: | 3-Feb-2015 | 摘要: | 團結工聯是波蘭第一個獨立工會，也是數十年一連串反對運動的結晶，並成為撼動波蘭社會，推動波蘭民主轉型主要的變革力量。本研究將波蘭視為東歐民主轉型之代表案例，以民主轉型動態模型為基礎，綜合結構途徑與行為者取向途徑解釋波蘭的民主轉型，分析團結工聯如何藉由公民抗爭影響政府決策，將團結工聯自崛起至執政之間的歷史脈絡，對應波蘭民主化各階段之發展，並以1989年圓桌會議和1989年後多次自由選舉作為其約定轉型和民主奠基選舉時期之重要事件加以論述。\n波蘭反對運動之所以興起，主要是受到波蘭歷史、政治、經濟和社會因素之影響，反對力量不斷從錯誤中學習，進而化整為零匯合形成團結工聯。團結工聯成立後受到戒嚴之影響，試圖透過結構重建，對抗波共之壓迫，以集體抵抗政權之模式存活下來。圓桌會議是波蘭民主化的轉捩點，波共政權與團結工聯雙方終達成共識，共同尋求和平之解決方案，透過協商而非對抗達成約定轉型。透過圓桌會議協議之一系列民主選舉，團結工聯以壓倒性勝利擊敗波共和其傀儡政黨，組成東歐第一個非共政府，之後更贏得總統選舉順利執政，迫使非民主政權垮台，促成波蘭之約定轉型。綜上所述，團結工聯透過各種行動形塑波蘭政治，與波蘭民主化發展各階段息息相關，在波蘭民主化過程中確實具有舉足輕重之地位 Solidarity, the result nurtured by series of opposition movements in decades, is the first independent trade union in Poland. It not only shook Polish society, but also promoted democratic transition in Poland. This study regards Poland as an iconic case of democratic transition in Eastern Europe. The main approach is based on dynamic model of democratic transition, combing structure approach and actor-oriented approach to explain Polish democratic transition pathways and analyze how citizen protests influenced government decisions. To support the theory, I will follow the historical context of Solidarity through its rise to power, corresponding to each stage of democratization development in Poland, and further discuss the significant events, as roundtable talk and free elections. \n The rise of the opposition movements in Poland is greatly influenced by historical, political, economic and social factors. The oppositional trends, who learnt from past mistakes, later converged to form Solidarity. Shortly after establishment, Solidarity attempted to survive under the imposition of martial law by reconstructing into the form of exercising collective resistance against the authority. In Poland’s democratization, Roundtable talk is a turning point, where Communist Government and Solidarity reached a consensus, agreeing on achieving pacted transition through negotiation rather than confrontation. Solidarity beat communist government and pro-communist parties with overwhelming votes of a series of democratic elections. Solidarity formed the first non-communist government in Eastern Europe, won the presidential election and induced the collapse of the non-democratic regime. To sum up, Solidarity indeed shapes Polish politics through various actions and has a pivotal position in the process of democratization in Poland. |
參考文獻: | 一、中文文獻\n專書\nHuntington, Samuel，劉軍寧譯，第三波 : 二十世紀末的民主化浪潮(台北：五南， 1994)。\nPotter, David, David Goldbalt, Margaret Kiloh, Paul Lewis等，王謙等譯，民主化的歷程(台北：韋伯文化，2003)。\n王逸舟、孫紹智，波蘭危機(四川：四川人民出版社，1988)。\n吳玉山，遠離社會主義：中國大陸、蘇聯和波蘭的經濟轉型 (台北：正中書局， 1996)。\n林佳龍、邱澤奇主編，兩岸黨國體制與民主發展：哈佛大學東西方學者的對話(台北：月旦，1999)。\n洪茂雄，東歐變貌(台北：時報出版社，1991)。\n———，波蘭史─譜寫悲壯樂章的民族(台北：三民書局股份有限公司，2010)。\n張紹勳，研究方法(台中：滄海書局，2000)。\n蘇永欽主編，政黨重組：臺灣民主政治的再出發？(台北：新臺灣人文教基金會，2001)。\n\n期刊\n王菁、李想，「民主化、民主轉型與民主鞏固：概念的澄清與辨析」，青島大學師範學院學報，第 28卷第3期 (2011)，頁107-113。\n吳玉山，「半總統制：全球發展與研究議程」，政治科學論叢，第47期 (2011)，頁1-32。\n———，「半總統制下的內閣組成與政治穩定比較俄羅斯、波蘭與中華民國」，俄羅斯學報，第 2期 (2002)，頁229-265。\n———，「制度、結構與政治穩定」，政治學報，第32期 (2001)，頁 1-30。\n———，「政權合法性與憲改模式：比較臺灣與歐洲後共新興民主國家」，問題與研究，第 45卷第1期 (2006)，頁1-28。\n洪茂雄，「中東歐國家和平演變十二年來總評估(1989-2001)」，國科會專題研究計畫(2001)。\n———，「後共產主義波蘭的政治發展：變革與穩定」，問題與研究，第35卷第6期 (1996)，頁53-66。\n陳元、畢英賢等，「波蘭問題學術座談會紀要」，問題與研究，第21卷第4期 (1982)，頁1-22。\n陳學燕，「波蘭團結工會的興衰」，瞭望，第2卷 (1983)，頁30-31。\n楊三億，「波蘭後冷戰時期的認同轉變與安全政策」，問題與研究，第43卷第3期 (2004)，頁49-75。\n劉邦義，「波蘭政局的劇變與團結工會」，世界歷史，第5卷(1995)，頁67-74。\n鄭得興，「中東歐的市民社會與民主發展之比較研究」，台灣國際研究季刊，第4卷第1期 (2008)，頁67-98。\n\n學位論文\n王維芳，「半總統制新興民主國家的制度設計與政治穩定：蒙古及波蘭的比較分析」，台北：國立政治大學中山人文社會科學研究所博士論文(2003)。\n周慧君，「民主化過程中反對黨分裂或團結之比較分析：以波蘭團結工會與台灣民進黨為例」，台北：台灣大學政治研究所碩士論文(1996)。\n張孝評，「轉型、鞏固與深化 : 台灣民主化的分析」，台北：國立政治大學中山人文社會科學研究所碩士論文(2004)。\n張秀珍，「波蘭獨立團結工會之研究」，台北：淡江大學歐洲研究所碩士論文(1983)。\n戴育毅，「波蘭政經體制改革之研究：團結工聯與波共政權互動之背景與演變」， 台北：政治作戰學校政治研究所博士論文(1992)。\n———，「波蘭團結工會自由化運動之研究(1980-1983)」，台北：政治作戰學校政治研究所碩士論文(1984)。\n蘇宏達，「一九八九年波蘭民主運動之研究」，台北：國立政治大學外交研究所碩士論文(1991)。\n\n二、西文文獻\n專書\nAsh, Timothy Garton, The Magic Lantern: The Revolution of `89 Witnessed in Warsaw, Budapest, Berlin, and Prague(New York: Random House, 1990). \n———, The Polish Revolution: Solidarity(New York: Vintage Books, 1985). \n———, The Polish Revolution: Solidarity 3rd Edition(United State: Yale University Press, 2002). \nCalhoun, Craig, The Question of Class Struggle: Social Foundations of Popular Radicalism During the Industrial Revolution(Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1982). \nConnor, Walter, and Piotr Ploszajski, In Escape from Socialism: The Polish Route(Warsaw: IFIS, 1992). \nDawisha, Karen, and Bruce Parrott, The Consolidation of Democracy in East-Central Europe(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997). \nDoorenspleet, Renske, Democratic Transitions: Exploring the Structural Sources of the Fourth Wave(Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2005). \nDziewanowski, M. K., The Communist Party of Poland(Mass: Harvard University Press, 1986). \nEkiert, Grzegorz, The State against Society : Political Crises and Their Aftermath in East Central Europe (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996). \nEkiert, Grzegorz, and Stephen E. Hanson, Capitalism and Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe : Assessing the Legacy of Communist Rule(Cambridge University Press, 2003). \nEkiert, Grzegorz, and Jan Kubik, Rebellious Civil Society : Popular Protest and Democratic Consolidation in Poland 1989-1993(Michigan: The University of Michigan Press, 2001). \nElster, Jon, The Roundtable Talks and the Breakdown of Communism(Chicago University of Chicago Press, 1996). \nHirschman, Albert, Exit, Voice and Loyalty(Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970). \nKaminski, Bartlomiej, The Collapse of State Socialism(Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991). \nKeane, John, Civil Society and the State, New European Perspectives(London: Verso, 1988). \nKolankiewicz, George, and Paul G. Lewis, Poland: Politics, Economics and Society(London: Pinter, 1988). \nLewis, Paul G., Political Authority and Party Secretaries in Poland, 1975-1986(Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres, 1988). \nLinz, Juan, Crisis, Breakdown and Reeguilibration(Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978). \nLinz, Juan J., and Alfred Stepan, Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe(Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1996). \nLipski, Jan J., Kor: A History of the Workers` Defense Committee in Poland(Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985). \nTraugott, Mark (EDT), Charles Tilly, Marc W. Steinberg, Charles D. Brockett, James W. White and Craig Calhoun, Repertoires and Cycles of Collective Action(Duke University Press, 1995). \nMason, David, Public Opinion and Political Change in Poland(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985). \nO`Donnell, Guillermo, and Philippe C. Schmitter, Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions About Uncertain Democracies(Baltimore: ohn Hopkins University Press, 1986). \nPreibisz, Joanna M. edited, Polish Dissident Publications: An Annotated Bibliography(New York: Praeger Publishers, 1982). \nRoberts, Adam, and Timothy Garton Ash, Civil Resistance and Power Politics: The Experience of Non-Violent Action from Gandhi to the Present(Oxford University Press, 2009). \nRupnik, Jacques, Dissent in Poland 1968-1978: The End of Revisionism and the Rebirth of the Civil Society(London: Macmillan, 1979). \nSimon, Maurice D., and Roger E. Kanet, Background to Crisis: Policy and Politics in Gierek`s Poland(Boulder: Westview Press Inc., 1981). \nSorensen, Georg, Democracy and Democratization: Processes and Prospects in a Changing World(Oxford: Westview Press, 1998). \nStaniszkis, Jadwiga, Poland`s Self-Limiting Revolution (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984). \nTaras, Ray, Postcommunist Presidents(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997). \nTaras, Raymond, Consolidating Democracy in Poland(Colorado: Westview Press, 1995). \nTarrow, Sidney, Power in Movement: Social Movement, Collective Action, and Politics(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994). \nTilly, Charles, From Mobilization to Revolution(New York: Random House, 1978). \nTouraine, Alain, Francois Dubet, Michel Wieviorka, and Jan Strzelecki, Solidarity: The Analysis of a Social Movement: Poland, 1980-1981(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983). \nWeydenthal, J.B. de, The Polish Drama: 1980-1982(Mass: Lexington Books, 1983). \nZielonka, Jan, Political Ideas in Contemporary Poland(London: Aldershot, 1989). \n\n期刊論文\nBernhard, Michael, “Civil Society after the First Transition: Dilemmas of Post-Communist Democratization in Poland and Beyond ”, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Vol. 29, No. 3 (1996), pp. 309-330.\n———, “Civil Society and Democratic Transition in East Central Europe”, Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 108, No. 2 (1993), pp. 307-326.\nBielasiak, Jack, “The Paradox of Solidarity`s Legacy: Contested Values in Poland`s Transitional Politics”, Nationalities Papers, Vol. 38, No. 1 (2010), pp. 41-58.\nEkiert, Grzegorz, “Rebellious Poles: Political Crises and Popular Protest under State Socialism, 1945-89”, East European Politics & Societies, Vol. 11, No. 2 (1997), pp. 299-338.\nInglot, Tomasz, “Between High Politics and Civil Society: Polish Trade Unions in the Process of Democratization after 1989”, Perspectives on Political Science, Vol. 27, No. 3 (1998), pp. 148-154.\nJasiewicz, Krzysztof, “Dead Ends and New Beginnings:The Quest for a Procedural Republic in Poland”, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Vol. 33, No. 1 (2000), pp. 101-122.\nJohnston, Hank, “Toward an Explanation of Church Opposition to Authoritarian Regimes: Religio-Oppositional Subcultures in Poland and Catalonia”, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Vol. 28, No. 4 (1989), pp. 493-508.\nKarpinski, Jakub, “Polish Intellectuals in Opposition”, Problems of Communism, Vol. 36, No. 4 (1987), pp. 44-57.\nKennedy, Michael D., “Contingencies and the Alternatives of 1989: Toward a Theory and Practice of Negotiating Revolution”, East European Politics & Societies, Vol. 13, No. 2 (1999), pp. 293-302.\nKitschelt, Herbert, “Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Antinuclear Movement in Four Democracies”, British Journal of Political Science Vol. 16, (1986), pp. 57-85.\nKwiatkowski, Piotr, “Opinion Research and the Fall of Communism: Poland 1981–1990”, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, Vol. 4, No. 4 (1992), pp. 358-374.\nLewis, Paul G., “Political Institutionalisation and Party Development in Post-Communist Poland”, Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 46, No. 5 (1994), pp. 779-799.\nMalinowski, Krzysztof, “The Party System in Poland in 1989-1991”, Polish Western Affairs, Vol. 33, No. 1 (1992), pp.45-60.\nMeardi, Guglielmo, “The Legacy of ‘Solidarity’: Class, Democracy, Culture and Subjectivity in the Polish Social Movement”, Social Movement Studies, Vol. 4, No. 3 (2005), pp. 261-280.\nMorawska, Ewa, “Civil Religion Versus State Power in Poland”, Society, Vol. 21, No. 4 (1984), pp. 29-34.\nPastusiak, Longin, “Poland and the West in the New Era”, Korea and World Affairs, Vol. 14, No. 3 (1990), pp. 476-500.\nPaul, David W., and Maurice D. Simon, “Poland Today and Czechoslovakia 1968”, Problems of Communism, Vol. 30, No. 5 (1981), pp. 25-39.\nRustow, Dankwart A., “Transitions to Democracy”, Comparative Politics, Vol. 2, No. 3 (1970), pp. 337-363.\nTarrow, Sidney, “National Politics and Collective Action: Recent Theory and Research in Western Europe and the United State”, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 14 (1988), pp.421-440.\nWeigel, George, “Catholicism and Democracy: The Other Twentieth-Century Revolution”, The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 12, No. 4 (1989), pp. 5-25.\nWeydenthal, J.B. de, “Workers and Party in Poland”, Problems of Communism, Vol. 29, No. 6 (1980), pp. 1-22. \n\n三、網路資料\n圓桌會議—開始自由之路\nhttp://okragly-stol.pl/\n波蘭民意調查中心 Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej\nhttp://www.cbos.pl/EN/home_en/cbos_en.php\n波蘭電台：圓桌會議 Polskie Radio – Okrągły Stół\nhttp://www.polskieradio.pl/68/788/Tag/1256\n「我有知情權波蘭網站」 Mam Prawo Wiedziec\nhttp://mamprawowiedziec.pl/\n | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 俄羅斯研究所 101263013 103 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101263013 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 301301.pdf | 2.56 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.