Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/73590
題名: 企業高薪低報對台灣勞保退休年金及經濟成長影響之分析
An Investigation of the Influence of Enterprises Underreporting Wage upon Labor Insurance Retirement Annuity and Economic Growth
作者: 陳冠彰
貢獻者: 毛維凌
Mao, Wei Lin
陳冠彰
關鍵詞: 勞保退休年金
高薪低報
隨收隨付制
勞保費率
所得替代率
經濟成長
企業獨占力
個人所得稅
Labor insurance retirement annuity
Underreporting wage
Pay-as-you-go system
Labor insurance premium rate
Income replacement rate
Economic growth
enterprise monopoly power
personal income tax
日期: 2014
上傳時間: 2-Mar-2015
摘要: 文建構一個具有內生成長特性的跨期替代模型,並假設勞保制度在隨收隨付制度(Pay-as-You-Go System)下,分析企業高薪低報的行為對於勞保退休年金與經濟成長之影響。另外研究政府實施勞保政策時,對於經濟成長、所得替代率與勞保退休年金總額所帶來之衝擊。此為本文的第一個主題;研究發現提高勞保費率將造成企業薪資低報的行為更為嚴重,不利於經濟成長;而且調高勞保費率可能會降低勞保退休年金的總額。此外,薪資低報成本相似於逃稅成本,較低的薪資低報成本有助於提高經濟成長,增加所得替代率,但反將導致勞工的勞保退休年金總額減少。至於有關懲罰雇主高薪低報的策略,分別有稽查機率與懲罰率兩種,加強稽查或加重懲罰均使得經濟成長率與所得替代率下跌,但是卻都有利於增加勞工的勞保退休年金之累積,而且懲罰率策略在增加勞保退休金方面之效率會高於加強勞保稽查策略。\n本文第二個主題將廠商部分修改成不完全競爭市場,並且納入個人所得稅,來探討企業獨占力對於勞保年金制度的影響。研究發現:(1) 獨占力與薪資低報成本為正相關的情形下。大部分企業獨占力與經濟成長呈現正相關,但如果獨占力偏小會有負相關的狀況出現。較高的企業獨占力,將使勞保所得替代率下跌,但對於勞工最後領取的勞保年金影響則是不確定的。;(2)在個人所得稅部分,本文發現個人所得稅上升不利於經濟成長,但其影響力道會隨薪資申報率降低而減少;(3)個人所得稅提高將使勞保年金的所得替代率下降,但薪資申報率對其效果影響並不大;(4)個人所得稅上升將導致勞保年金總額減少,但較低的薪資申報率使其下降速度減緩;(5)重新檢視勞保費率部分,發現勞保費率對於經濟成長的影響,會因個人所得稅率的不同,有不一樣的結果。此點與前文的結論有所不同。
In this paper we build an endogenous growth in an overlapping generations (OLG) model with a pay-as-you-go labor insurance system to analyze the impact of employer under-report employees’ income on the labor insurance retirement annuity and the economic growth. We also investigate the effects of government policies on the economic growth, income replacement rate and total amount of labor insurance annuity. It is the first topic in this paper. Research finds that the increase of labor insurance premium rate has negative effect on economic growth because it will cause an increasing tendency of employees to under-report employees’ income. Besides, an increasing in labor insurance premium rate may reduce the total amount of labor insurance retirement annuity. In addition, the cost of underreporting wage is similar to cost of tax evasion. The lower cost of underreporting wage can contribute to economic growth and increase income replacement rate, however, it will result in a decrease in amount of labor insurance retirement annuity. There are two government policies used to punish the employers who under-report the wage include detection probability and punishment rate, both policies have positive effects on labor insurance retirement annuity. Furthermore, the efficiency of punishment rate is better than detection probability. \nThe second topic, we will modify firm model to imperfectly competitive and adding personal income tax to analyze the impact of enterprise monopoly power on the labor insurance retirement annuity and economic growth. The researched results indicate: (1) In the situation that monopoly power is positive relationship to the cost of underreporting wage, we find that the most is positive relationship between enterprise monopoly power and economic growth, but the smaller enterprise monopoly power may have negative relationship. The higher enterprise monopoly power will result in a decrease in income replacement rate, but it is uncertain for influence on labor insurance retirement annuity; (2) In the part of personal income tax, research finds that an increase in personal income tax has negative effect on economic growth, but the impact has to reduce with the decrease of wage reporting rate; (3) A raise of personal income tax will reduce income replacement rate of labor insurance retirement annuity, but the power not be affected by wage reporting rate; (4) A raise of personal income tax will reduce amount of labor insurance retirement annuity, but lower wage reporting rate will slow down its speed of reducing; (5) Reviewing the part of labor insurance premium rate, we find that influence of labor insurance premium rate on economic growth are different from result with difference of personal income tax. This point is different from result of the first topic.\n 
參考文獻: 勞工保險局全球資訊網,http://www.bli.gov.tw/default.aspx。\n中華民國資訊統計網,http://www.stat.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=4。\n行政院勞工委員會-勞動情勢統計要覽100年度,http://statdb.cla.gov.tw/html/trend/101/index.html。\n財政部 (1990)「臺北市國稅統計」,《財政部臺北市國稅局》。\n辛炳隆與王素彎 (2005)「勞工法令及相關政策變革對我國產業的影響與因應」,《經濟部工業局94年度委託研究計畫》。\n辛炳隆、何金巡、林建甫與周麗芳 (2009),「臺灣勞保年金制度的總體經濟計量分析」,《臺灣經濟預測與政策》,40(1),127-179。\n陳冠彰 (2014) 「企業高薪低報對台灣勞保退休年金及經濟成長影響之分析」,(已接受尚未刊登)。\n劉景中(2011) 「銀行集中度及效率對市場競爭度的影響」,《經濟論文叢刊》,第39卷,第1期,115-173。\nAllingham, M. and A. Sandmo (1972), “Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis,” Journal of Public Economics, 1, 323-338.\nAljoša, F. and P. Sašo (2012), “Underreporting and Minimum Wage,” LICOS Discussion Papers 32412, LICOS - Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance, KU Leuven.\nBarreto, R. A. (2000), “Endogenous Corruption in a Neoclassical Growth Model,” European Economic Review, 44, 35-60.\nBoyd, J. H. (1990), “Symmetries, dynamic equilibria, and the value function”, in Ramachandran R.and Sato, R. (eds.), Conservation Laws and Symmetry: Applications to Economics and Ffinance, Boston: Kluwer.\nBruce, N. and J. Turnovsky (2013). “Social Security, Growth, an Welfare in Overlapping Generations Economies With or Without Annuities,” Journal of Public Economics, 101, S.12-24.\nCaballe, J. and J. Panades (1997), “Tax Evasion and Economic Growth,” Public Finance / Finances Publiques, 52, 318-340.\nChen, B. L. (2003), “Tax Evasion in a Model of Endogenous Growth,” Review of Economic Dynamics, 6(2),381-403.\nChen, K. P. and C. C. Chu (2005), “Internal Control Versus External Manipulation: A Model of Corporate Income Tax Evasion,” The RAND Journal of Economics, 36(1), 151-164.\nClerides, S., M. D., Delis, and S. Kokas (2013), “A New Data Set on Competition in National Banking Markets.” University of Cyprus Working Papers in Economics, No. 08-2013.\nCremer, H. and F. Gahvari (1993), “Tax Evasion and Optimal Commodity Taxation,” Journal of Public Economics, 50, 261-275.\nDiamond, P. A. (1965), “National Debt in a Neoclassical Growth Model,” American Economic Review, 55, 1126-1150.\nDixit, A. K. and J. E. Stiglitz,(1977), “Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity,” American Economic Review, 67, 297-308.\nFeinstein, J. S. (1991), “An Econometric Analysis of Income Tax Evasion and its Detection,” The RAND Journal of Economics, 22(1), 14-35.\nFeldstein, M. (1999), “Tax Avoidance and the Deadweight Loss of the Income Tax,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(41), 674-680. \nGuo, J. T. and K. J. Lansing,(1999), “Optimal Taxation of Capital Income with Imperfectly Competitive Product Markets,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 23, 967-955\nHuntington, S. P. (1968), “Political Order in Changing Society,” Yale Univ. Press, New Heaven, CT.\nJoulfaian, D. (2000), “Corporate Income Tax Evasion and Managerial Preferences,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(41), 698-701.\nLucas R. E. (1988), “On the Mechanics of Economic Development,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 2-42.\nMauro, P. (1995), “Corruption and Economic Growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110 (3), 681-712.\nMares, I. (2003), “The Sources of Business Interests in Social Insurance: Sectoral Versus National Differences,” World Politics, 55, 229-258.\nMadzharova, B. (2010), “The Effect of Low Corporate Income Tax on Social Security Evasion,” Cerge-EI Prague, EPRN Seminars, Univ. of Copenhagen, 2010 Nov 12.\nNyland, C., R. Smyth, and C. J. Zhu (2006), “What Determines the Extent to Which Employers will Comply with their Social Security Obligations?” Evidence from Chinese Firm-Level Data. Social Policy and Administration, 40(2), 196-214.\nPecchenino, R. A. and K. R. Utendorf (1999), “ Social Security, Social Welfare and the Aging Population,” Journal of Population Economics, 12, 607-623.\nRomer, P. (1986), “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth,” Journal of the Political Economy, 94, 1002 - 1035.\nSamuelson, P. (1958), “An Exact Consumption-Loan Model of Interest with or without the Social Contrivance of Money,” Journal of Political Economy, 66(6), 467-482.\nSachs, J. D. and A. M. Warner (1996), “The Social Welfare State and Competitiveness,” in World Economic Forum, (ed.), The Global Competitiveness Report, 1996, 20–26, Geneva: World Economic Forum.\nYaniv, G. (1988), “Withholding and Non-Withheld Tax Evasion,” Journal of Public Economics, 35, 183-204.
描述: 博士
國立政治大學
經濟學系
97258507
103
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0972585071
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
507101.pdf1.45 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.