Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/74411


Title: Comparison of the relative effectiveness of different kinds of reinforcers: A PEM approach
Authors: Ma, Hsen-Hsing
馬信行
Contributors: 教育系
Keywords: meta-analysis;positive reinforcement;single-case experiments
Date: 2009
Issue Date: 2015-04-09 10:34:32 (UTC+8)
Abstract: The purpose of the present study was to apply the percentage of data points exceeding the median of baseline phase (PEM) approach for a meta-analysis of single-case experiments to compare the relative effectiveness of different kinds of reinforcers used in behavior modification. Altogether 153 studies were located, which produced 1091 effect sizes. The grand mean of the 153 PEM scores was 0.92. The main finding was that among the positive reinforcers, "activities" was the most effective (PEM score = 0.95) while "objects" and "edibles" were relatively less effective (PEM score = 0.85 and 0.83, respectively). The results of the present study are of importance in respect to the choice of reinforcer for use in intervention in behavior modification. (Contains 1 figure and 1 table.)
Relation: Behavior Analyst Today, 10(3), 398-427
Data Type: article
DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0100680
Appears in Collections:[教育學系] 期刊論文

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
398-427.pdf712KbAdobe PDF716View/Open


All items in 學術集成 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


社群 sharing