Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/75316
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor法律系-
dc.creatorYan, Anna-
dc.creator顏玉明-
dc.date2013-06-
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-26T10:16:15Z-
dc.date.available2015-05-26T10:16:15Z-
dc.date.issued2015-05-26T10:16:15Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/75316-
dc.description.abstractEthics issues rarely have easy answers. Many engineering professional societies have prepared codes of ethics, most of which deal with bribery, fraud and political corruption. Recently new issues, such as social justice, heritage preservation and environment protection have arisen. Before making decisions of each project, the engineers have to understand the implications of these decisions, and to hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public. However, in real world the conflicts confronted are always much more complicated than the engineering professionals may expect. This paper reviews the arguing case of Taiwan, the relocation of the Lo-Sheng Sanitarium. It aims to analyze the dilemmas between the development of public infrastructure, the need of heritage preservation and the call of, by applying the principles of the codes of ethics. This case is not closed so far; the project is delayed, the cost is overrun and the adverse objection lasts. The lessons learned include the consideration of the true meanings of the welfare of the public and the responsibilities of engineering professionals. It is hoped to draw attention of engineering professionals by illustrating the tremendous loss of all parties, and to encourage the ethical practice by devoting to pursue win-win solutions in making decisions.-
dc.format.extent176 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypetext/html-
dc.relationISEC 2013 - 7th International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference: New Developments in Structural Engineering and Construction, 2013, 1431-1435, 7th International Structural Engineering and Construction Conference: New Developments in Structural Engineering and Construction, ISEC 2013; University of Hawaii at ManoaHonolulu; United States; 18 June 2013 到 23 June 2013; 代碼 110387-
dc.subjectCrime; Decision making; Structural design; Engineering professionals; Environment protection; Ethical practices; Heritage preservation; Lo-Sheng sanitarium; Public infrastructures; Taipei metro xinzhuang line; Win-win solutions; Philosophical aspects-
dc.titleDilemmas of ethical practice: A study of responsible engineering-
dc.typeconferenceen
dc.identifier.doi10.3850/978-981-07-5354-2-EPE-11-540-
dc.doi.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3850/978-981-07-5354-2-EPE-11-540-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypeconference-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:會議論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
index.html176 BHTML2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.