Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/77597
題名: 霸凌旁觀者行為傾向影響因素探討-以高雄市都會區國中學生為例
Bullying bystander behavior affect factors among Kaohsiung junior high students
作者: 張育慈
貢獻者: 楊佩榮
張育慈
關鍵詞: 霸凌
旁觀者
保護者
局外者
態度
個人責任
同儕團體規範
Bully
Bystanders
Defenders
Outsiders
Attitude
personal responsibility
Peer group norm
日期: 2015
上傳時間: 17-Aug-2015
摘要: 霸凌事件頻繁出現在各大報章雜誌,霸凌受害者在霸凌事件中經常處於權力不均等的地位,無法主動求援。借鏡西方之成功反霸凌計畫,發現霸凌事件中旁觀者的反應對於揭露、制止霸凌有相當之重要性。本研究將霸凌旁觀者區分為保護者以及局外者,過往研究發現兩者雖同為霸凌事件之旁觀者,然其行為結果卻有截然不同的影響。保護者行為的出現,可使學生對校園安全感受提高並有助於降低霸凌發生率,局外者行為則否。本研究參考Latané 與 Darley(1970)提出之旁觀者決策歷程模式等助人行為理論,推論學生對霸凌的態度、個人責任感,以及同儕團體規範會影響旁觀者的行為傾向,期望透過本研究了解國中學生旁觀霸凌事件的反應傾向,以及影響旁觀者行為之個人及同儕因素。\n本研究採取實證典範之調查研究方法,研究樣本包和高雄市都會區國民中學421位學生,並且採用描述性統計、T檢定、單因子變異數分析以及多元迴歸等研究方法,依據受試者在「旁觀者行為」量表、霸凌「態度」量表、「個人責任感」量表以及「同儕團體規範」量表之得分進行統計分析。研究發現如下:\n一、高雄市都會區國中學生,具有中度之保護者行為以及局外者行為傾向。\n二、女性相較於男性較傾向出現保護者行為,對霸凌持較高的反對態度,且對「朋友」具有較高之個人責任感。\n三、學生對「同學」之「個人責任感」受到「年級」所影響,「七年級」學生對於同學之個人責任感高於「八、九年級」學生。\n四、學生對於「同學」之「個人責任感」以及「同儕團體規範」可以預測「保護者行為傾向」以及「局外者行為傾向」。\n最後,依據本研究的結果提出實務建議與未來研究方向。
Bullying is frequently reported in major newspapers and magazines. Bullying victims are usually in a disadvantaged position making them unable to call for help on their own. Successful anti-bullying programs in the west have found that bystanders hold an important role in the disclosure or cessation of bullying incidents. This study classified bystanders into defenders and outsiders. Although both are bystanders, defenders could increase a sense of security on campus and reduce the incidence of bullying. Outsiders, on the other hand, could not achieve such effect. Using Latané & Darley, s decision-tree model of bystander intervention, this study hypothesized that personal attitude and responsibility and peer group norm toward bullying would affect bystander behavior in the incidence of bullying. This study aimed to understand the way Taiwanese junior high students responded to bullying and factors that might affect bystander behavior.\nUsing survey research method, data were collected from 421 junior high school students in Kaohsiung Metropolitan Area as samples using questionnaires, including bystander behavior scale, bullying attitude scale, personal responsibility scale, and peer group norms scale. Statistical methods, such as descriptive statistics、t-tests、one way ANOVAs, and multiple regressions, were used, and the results are reported in the following:\n1.Junior high school students in Kaohsiung Metropolitan Area had above average scores in their behavioral tendency as defenders or outsiders in incidence of bullying.\n2.Female tended to have more defender behavior than male did. Also, female tended to oppose bullying more strongly and showed more sense of personal responsibility if “a friend” was bullied.\n3.“Seventh graders” showed stronger sense of personal responsibility than 8th and 9th graders.\n4.The sense of personal responsibility if “a classmate” was bullied and peer group norm (peers tended to aid the victims) both predicted behavioral tendency as defenders and outsider.\nImplications and future directions were discussed.
參考文獻: 壹、中文部分\n牛玉珍(1996)。團儕團體影響過程及同儕壓力之處理。台灣教育,546,43-45。\n王淑芬(2009,4月15日)。國中校園霸凌嚴重 高市府允諾檢討。大紀元。2014年9月9日,取自http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/9/4/15/n2495930.htm\n王濟川(2004)。Logistic 迴歸模型–方法及應用。臺北市:五南。\n王慶福、洪光遠、程淑華、王郁茗(譯)(2008)。社會心理學。臺北市:雙葉。(Brehm, S., Kassin, S., & Fein, S., 2002)\n余銹梅(2011)。兒童的霸凌經驗與同儕關係。玄奘大學碩士論文。\n李茂政(譯)(1980)。影響態度與改變行為。臺北市:黎明文化。(Zimbardo, Ebbesen, & Maslach, 1977)\n李惠加(1997)。青少年發展。臺北市:心理。\n李美枝(2002)。社會心理學:理論研究與應用。臺北市:文笙。\n李淑貞(譯)(2007)。無霸凌校園-給學校、教師和家長的指導手冊。臺北市:五南。(O`Moore Mona & Minton Stephen James)\n李雅君(2010)。嘉義市國小高年級學生校園被霸凌現況與影響之研究。國立中正大學碩士論文。\n吳清山, 林天祐(2007)。教育e辭書。臺北市:高等教育。\n吳明隆、陳明珠(2012)。霸凌議題與校園霸凌策略。臺北市:五南。\n吳碧如、曾麗婷(2014)。校園霸凌防治中被忽略的一環:霸凌旁觀者之探討。學校行政月刊,92,122-143。\n邪精霞(2012)。國小高年級學童關係霸凌行為與同儕互動相關之研究。國立中正大學碩士論文。\n林哲立、邱曉君、顏菲麗(譯)(2007)。人類行為與社會環境。臺北市:雙葉。(Jose B. Ashford, Craig W. LeCroy & Kathy L. Lortie, 2001) \n林萬億(2012)。學校社會工作實務。高雄市:巨流。\n周念縈(譯)(2008)。人類發展學-青少年與成年發展。臺北市:巨流。(James W. Vander Zanden, 2008)。\n周海娟、郭盛哲、黃信洋(譯)(2013)。社會心理學:歐洲觀點。臺北市:富學。(Hewstone, M., Stroebe, W., Jonas, K)\n兒童福利聯盟文教基金會(2004)。國小兒童校園霸凌(bully)現象調查報告。2013年8月7日取自http://www.children.org.tw./。\n兒童福利聯盟文教基金會(2007)。兒童校園霸凌者現況調查報告。2014年9月5日取自http://www.children.org.tw./。\n兒童福利聯盟文教基金會(2011)。台灣校園霸凌現象調查報告。2013年8月7日取自http://www.children.org.tw./。\n邱皓政(2008)。量化研究與統計分析(基礎版)─SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。臺北市:五南。\n邱靖惠、蕭慧琳(2009)。台灣校園霸凌現象與危機因素之解析。兒童及少年福利期刊,(15),147-166。\n洪福源(2001)。國中校園欺凌行為與學校氣氛及相關因素之研究。彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化縣。\n洪福源(2003)。校園欺凌行為的本質及其防治策略。教育研究月刊,(110),88-98。\n姜定宇(2009)。心理學導論。臺北市:五南。\n范慧瑩(2009)。修復式正義處理國中校園欺凌事件之成效探討。國立台北大學犯罪學研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。\n張春興(1989)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市:東華。\n張滿玲(譯)(1999)。社會心理學。臺北市:雙葉。(A. Peplau & David O. Sears)\n梁家瑜(譯)(2009)。社會心理學。臺北市:心理。(Baron, R. A., Byrne, D., Branscombe, N. R)\n陳億貞(譯)(2006)。普通心理學。臺北市:雙葉。(Robert J. Sternberg, 2000)\n陳皎眉、王叢貴、孫蒨如(2006)。社會心理學。臺北市:雙葉。\n陳文俊(2007)。社會科學研究方法。臺北市:雙葉。(Babbie, E., 2005)\n陳薇先(2012)。臺東縣國中學生父母管教方式、同儕關係與霸凌行為之相關性研究。國立檯東大學碩士論文。\n陳利銘(2013)。霸凌事件旁觀者的影響與防制策略探討。人文與社會科學簡訊,14(3),56-63。\n教育部(2011)。校園重大偏差或霸凌事件之預防與處理建議(二版)。臺北市:作者。\n教育部(2011)。認識校園霸凌。取自教育部防治校園霸凌專區網址:https://csrc.edu.tw/bully/bullying.asp。\n教育部(2011)。加拿大反霸凌日-「粉紅T恤日」。取自教育部電子報:http://epaper.edu.tw/windows.aspx?windows_sn=7029。\n教育部(2011)。高雄市防治校園霸凌報告。2014年9月9日,取自https://csrc.edu.tw/FileManage。\n教育部(2011)。校園重大偏差或霸凌事件之預防與處理建議(二版)。\n教育部(2012)。校園霸凌防制準則。取自教育部,主管法規查詢系統:http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContentDetails.aspx?id=GL000683&KeyWordHL=&StyleType=1。\n郭靜晃(2006)。青少年心理學。臺北市:紅葉文化。\n黃易進(2011)。新北市國中學生校園霸凌行為現況之研究。淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文。\n游恆山(譯)(2010)。心理學。臺北市:五南。( Richard J. Gerrig, Philip G. Zimbardo, 2001)\n曾華源、劉曉春(譯)(2004)。社會心理學。臺北市:洪葉。(Robert A. Baron & Donn Byrne, 1997)\n雷庚玲、曾慧芸(1999)。誰說我不聽話,我聽朋友的話-談青少年社會同儕順從行為之發展現象與成因。測驗與輔導,153,3178-3182。\n劉國兆、鐘明倫(2013)。校園霸凌之性質與類型。載於翁福元(主編),校園霸凌學理與實務(頁19-34)。臺北市:高等教育。\n蔡嘉玲(2009)。台南縣完全中學學生受霸凌經驗與恐懼感氣氛相關研究-以霸凌態度為中介變項。台南科技大學技職教育與人力資源發展碩士論文,未出版,台南市。\n鄭維瑄(2011)。校園霸凌成因與處遇-社會生態觀點。社區發展季刊,135,194-216。\n魏麗敏、黃德祥(2002)。國中學校氣氛與校園霸凌行為及相關因素之研究。國科會研究報告(編號NSC90-2413-H-142-002)。\n魏麗敏、陳明珠、蕭佳華(2013)。防治霸凌問題的困境與輔導策略。載於翁福元(主編),校園霸凌學理與實務(頁343-341)。臺北市:高等教育。\n瞿海源(2007)。調查研究方法。臺北市:三民。\n蘇清守(1989)。國中學生的助人行為及其在道德教育上的涵義。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版:臺北市。\n蘇尹翎(2000)。社會連結與雲嘉地區少年偏差行為-Hirschi社會控制理論之驗證研究。華南大學教育社會學研究所碩士論文,未出版:嘉義縣。\n\n貳、英文部分\nBerkowitz, L. (1969). The frustration-aggression hypothesis revisited. In L. Berkowitz(Ed.), Roots of aggression: Re-examination of the frustration- aggression hypothesis. New York, NY: Atherton Press.\nBar-Tal, D. (1976). Prosocial behavior: Theory and research. Washington, D C: Hemisphere Publishing Co.\nBabbie, E. (2004). The Practice of Social Research (10th Ed.). Belmont, C.A.: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.\nCowie, H. (2000). Bystanding or standing by: Gender issues in coping with bullying in English schools. Aggressive Behavior, 26, 85-97.\nCraig, W. M., Pepler, D. J., & Atlas, R. (2000). Observations of bullying in the playground and in the classroom. School Psychology International, 21, 22-36.\nColoroso, B. (2003). Thy bully, the bullied, and the bystander: From preschool to high school—how parents and teachers can help break the cycle of violence. New York, NY: HarperResource.\nField, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London, England: Sage.\nGini, G. (2006). Bullying as a social process: The role of group membership in students’ perception of inter-group aggression at school. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 51-65.\nGini, G. (2007). Who is blameworthy? Social identity and inter-group bullying. School Psychology International, 28, 77-89.\nKärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T., Alanen, E., Poskiparta, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2011). Going to Scale: A nonrandomized nationwide trial of the KiVa antibullying program for comprehensive schools. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(6), 796-805.\nFinnish Ministry of Education and Culture (2012)。There is no bullying in KiVa school. KiVa® antibullying program’s Website: http://www.kivakoulu.fi/there-is-no-bullying-in-kiva-school.\nLatané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why Doesn’t he help? NY: Appleton-Centruy-Crofts.\nLodge, J., & Frydenberg, E. (2005). The role of peer bystanders in school bullying: Positive steps toward promoting peaceful schools. Theory into Practice, 44, 329-336.\nLi, Q. (2006). Cyberbullying in schools. School Psychology International, 27(2), 157-170.\nOlweus, D. (1991). Bully/Victim problems among school children: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. In I. Rubin & D. Pepler (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 411-447). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.\nOlweus, D. (1993). Bully at school: What We Know We can Do. Oxford: Blackwell.\nOlweus, D. (1994). Bullying at school: basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 1171-1190.\nO’ Connell, P., Pepler, D., & Craig, W. (1999). Peer involvement in bullying: Insights and challenges for intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 22(4), 437-452.\nOlweus, D. (1999).The nature of school bullying. New York:Routledge.\nOlweus, D. (2001). Peer harassment: A critical analysis and some important issues. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 3-20). New York: Guilford Press.\nOrpinas, P., & Horne, M. A. (2006). Bulling prevention: Creating a positive school climate and developing social competence. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.\nNansel, T. R.,Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simons-Monton. B., Scheidt, P.(2001). Bullying Behaviors Among US Youth-Prevalence and Association with Psychosocial Adjustment. JAMA, 285, 2094-2100.\nNishina, A., & Juvonen, J. (2005). Daily reports of witnessing and experiencing peer harassment in middle school. Child Development, 76, 435-450.\nPolanin, J. R., Espelage, D. L., & Pigott, T. D. (2012). A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Bullying Prevention Programs` Effects on Bystander Intervention Behavior. School Psychology Review, 41(1), 47-65.\nPiliavin, J. A., & Piliavin, I. M. (1972). The effect of blood on reactions to a victim. Journal of personality and social psychology, 23, 353-361.\nPellegrini, A. D., & Long, J. (2002). A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary to secondary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 259-280.\nPozzoli, T., Rebecca P., & Gini, Gianluca. (2012). Bystanders’ Reactions to Bullying: A Cross-cultural Analysis of Personal Correlates Among Italian and Singaporean Students. Social Development, 21 (4), 686-703.\nPozzoli, T., Rebecca P., & Gini, Gianluca. (2010). Active Defending and Passive Bystanding Behavior in Bullying: The Role of Personal Characteristics and Perceived Peer Pressure. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 815–827.\nRigby K, & Slee PT. (1991). Bullying among Australian school children: reported behavior and attitudes toward victims. Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 615-627.\nRigby. K. (1996). Bullying in School and What to Do about It. London: Jessica Kingsley.\nRigby, K. (2005). Why do some children bully at school? The contributions of negative attitudes towards victims and the perceived expectations of friends, parents and teachers. School Psychology International, 26, 147-161.\nRigby, K., & Johnson, B. (2006). Expressed readiness of Australian schoolchildren to act as bystanders in support of children who are being bullied. Educational Psychology, 26, 425-440.\nSchiamberd, L. B. (1988). Child and Adolescent Developmen. New York:Macmillan.\nSalmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Bjo¨ rkqvist, K., O¨ sterman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant Roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1-15.\nSalmivalli, C. (1999). Participant role approach to school bullying: Implications for interventions. Journal of Adolescence, 22(4), 453-459.\nSalmivalli, C., & Voeten, M. (2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behaviour in bullying situations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28(3), 246-258.\nSullivan,K., & Cleary, M. (2004). Bullying in secondary school: What it looks like and how to manage it. London: Paul Chapman.\nSumi Choi, and Young I Cho. (2012). Influence of psychological and social factors on bystanders’ roles in school bullying among Korean-American students in the United States. School Psychology International, 34(1), 67-81.\nWei, H.S., Jonson-Reid, M., & Tsao, H.L. (2007). Bullying and victimization among Taiwanese 7th graders: A multi-method assessment. School Psychology International, 28(4), 479-500.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
社會工作研究所
100264016
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1002640161
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
016101.pdf2.21 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.