Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/77877
題名: 盧那察爾斯基之藝術思想探源
On the Origins of Anatoly Lunacharsky’s Thoughts about Art
作者: 吳岱融
Wu, Tai Jung
貢獻者: 林永芳
Lin, Yung Fang
吳岱融
Wu, Tai Jung
關鍵詞: 蘇聯藝術
馬克思主義
社會主義寫實主義
藝術理論
Soviet art
Marxism
Socialist Realism
Art theory
日期: 2015
上傳時間: 24-Aug-2015
摘要: 盧那察爾斯基(Anatoly Lunacharsky, 1875-1933)於1917-1929年間擔任蘇聯教育人民委員部(Narkompros)首任委員,在任期間發表了大量關於藝術的文章及報告,其在蘇聯藝術發展史中扮演極為重要的角色,然而他以藝術達到社會主義理想的主張與正統馬克思主義的經濟決定論十分不同,他相信群眾意識才是推動革命的必要條件。而他從在俄國十月革命之前就抱持這種想法,因此曾一度主張將宗教與社會主義結合,使革命意識成為一種宗教情感而深植人心,而這種想法受到被極度反對宗教的列寧的嚴厲批評,隨後這種想法才轉向以藝術來實現。 \n 在盧那察爾斯基思想中可見到實證主義(Positivism)、費爾巴哈(Ludwig Feuerbach)宗教哲學、尼采(Friedrich Nietzsche)哲學與華格納(Richard Wagner)的色彩,這使盧那察爾斯基的藝術理論在眾多馬克思主義美學家中顯得獨樹一格,本論文主要透過盧那察爾斯基的著作,並加上中西學者對於盧那察爾斯基的研究,不以馬克思主義為中心來理解盧那察爾斯基的藝術思想,探討盧那察爾斯基對於藝術與革命的認知與實踐。
Anatoly Lunacharsky(1875-1933) was the first Commissar of The People`s Commissariat for Education(Narkompros) from 1917-1929. During his tenure, he published many articles and reports about the arts and played a very important role in the history of artistic development in the Soviet Union. However, his proposal to achieve the ideal of Socialism through the arts was very different from the orthodox economic determinism of Marxism. He believed that mass consciousness was a must to promote the revolution. He already held this idea long before the October Revolution in Russia. Thus, he once advocated combining religion and Socialism, making revolutionary consciousness into a religion deeply rooted in everyone’s mind. Nevertheless, this idea was severely criticized by Lenin, who was very opposed to religion. Afterward, Lunacharsky’s thoughts changed, turning instead to realize ideals through art. \n The influences of Positivism, Feuerbach’s philosophy of religion, Nietzsche’s philosophy and Wagner’s concept of art can be seen in Lunacharsky’s thought, making his views on art unique among Marxist aestheticians. In this paper, instead of understanding Lunacharsky’s theory of art in the context of Marxism, discussion will focus on Lunacharsky’s works and Chinese/Western scholars’ studies on Lunacharsky in order to learn more about Lunacharsky’s thoughts and practice of art and revolution.
參考文獻: 壹、 中文部分\n(一)專書\nBenjamin,許绮玲、林志明譯,迎向靈光消逝的年代:本雅明論藝術 (桂林: \n 廣西師範大學出版社,2008)\nCamilla Gray,曾長生譯,俄國的藝術實驗 (台北市:遠流出版,1995)\nArnold Hauser,居延安譯,藝術社會學 (台北市:雅典,1990),頁20-21。\nPeter Buger,蘇佩君、徐明松譯,前衛藝術理論 (台北市:時報文化,1998)\nPierre Bourdieu,劉暉譯,藝術的法則 (北京:中央編譯出版社,2001)\nRobert Bocock,田心喻譯,文化霸權 (台北市:遠流出版社,1991)\n孔德,黃建華譯,論實證精神 (北京:商務印書館,2009)\n尼采,錢春綺譯,查拉圖斯特拉如是說 (北京:新知三聯書店,2007)\n布迪厄,劉暉譯,藝術的法則 (北京:中央編譯出版社,2001)\n列寧,列寧選集 (北京:人民出版社,1960)\n李醒民,馬赫 (台北市:東大發行,1995)\n李毓章,人:宗教的太陽 – 費爾巴哈的宗教哲學研究 (臺北市:遠流,1995)\n孫本文,社會心理學 (台北市:台灣商務印書館,1946)\n洪鎌德,西方馬克思主義 (台北市:楊智文化,2004)\n陳學明,文化工業 (台北市:楊智文化,1996)\n耿一偉主編,未來藝術革命手冊 (台北市:黑眼睛文化,2013)\n恩斯特•馬赫,洪謙譯,感覺的分析 (北京:商務影印出版,1986)\n馬克思、恩格斯,馬克思恩格斯全集 - 第三卷 (北京:人民出版社,1985)\n馬龍閃,蘇聯文化體制沿革史 (北京:中國社會科學出版社,1996)\n晨朋,20世紀俄蘇美術 (北京:文化藝術出版社,1997)\n梁一儒等,20世紀上中葉的馬克思主義美學思想 (北京:中央編譯社,1999)\n奚靜之,俄羅斯蘇聯美術史 (台北市:藝術家出版社,1990)\n程正民等,盧那察爾斯基文藝理論批評的現代性闡釋 (北京:北京大學出版社,\n 2006)\n歐力同,孔德及其實證主義 (上海:上海社會科學院,1987)\n豪澤爾,居延安譯,藝術社會學 (台北市:雅典,1990)\n盧那察爾斯基,井勤蓀譯,在音樂世界中 (上海:上海文藝,1984)\n盧那察爾斯基,吳谷鷹譯,關於藝術的對話 – 盧那察爾斯基美學文選 (北京:\n 三聯書店,1991)\n盧那察爾斯基,郭家申譯,藝術及其最新形式 (天津:百花文藝出版社,1998)\n盧那察爾斯基,雪峰譯,藝術之社會的基礎 (上海:水沫書店,1929)\n盧那察爾斯基,魯迅譯,魯迅譯文集 – 第四卷 (福州: 福建教育出版社,2008)\n盧那察爾斯基,蔣路譯,論文學 (北京:人民文學出版社,1978)\n(二)中文期刊\n洪謙,〈談談馬赫〉,社會科學戰線 ,第2期(1982),頁21-23。\n張建華,〈從知識菁英到政治菁英 – 盧那察爾斯基的政治軌跡和思想歷程〉,學\n 習與探索,第1期(2010),頁228-235。\n\n貳、 英文部分\n(一) 專書\nAdelmann F.J., Demythologizing Marxism (Netherlands: Springer, 1969)\nBengt Jangfeldt, translated from Swedish, Mayakovsky: A Biography(Chicago:The \n University Chicago Press, 2014\nGerald Raunig, Translated by Aileen Derieg, Art and Revolution: Transversal Activism in the Long Twentieth Century (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2007)\nGroys Boris, Art Power (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2008)\nGroys Boris, The Total Art of Stalinism: Avant-Garde, Aesthetic Dictatorship, and \n beyond (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1992)\nPospielovsky Dimitry, A History of Marxist-Leninist Atheism and Soviet Anti-Religious Policies (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1987)\nRichard Overy, The Dictators – Hitler’s Germany, Stalin’s Russia (New York: \n Norton, 2004)\nRichard Stites, Revolutionary Dreams (New York: Oxford University Press. 1991)\n\nRosamund Bartiett, Wagner and Russia (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995)\nRosenthal Bernice Glatzer, Nietzsche and Soviet Culture: Ally and Adversary (New \n York: Cambridge University Press, 1994)\nRosenthal Bernice Glatzer, Nittzsche in Russia (Princeton: Princeton University, \n1986)\nRosenthal Bernice Glatzer, New Myth New World – From Nietzsche to Stalinism \n (University Park: Pennsylvania state university Press, 2002)\nSheila Fitzpatrick, The Commissariat of Enlightenment – Soviet Organization of \n Education and the Arts under Lunacharsky (New York: Cambridge, 2002)\nW. Eugene Kleinbauer, Modern Perspectives in Western Art History: An Anthology of \n Twentieth-century Writings on the Visual Arts (Toronto: University of Toronto, 1971)\n(二) 期刊\nAvraham Yassour, “Philosophy-Religion-Politics: Borochov, Bogdanov and \n Lunacharsky”, Studies in Soviet Thought, Vol. 31, No.3 (1986), pp. 199-230.\nRoland Boer, “Religion and Socialism:A. V. Lunacharsky and the God-Builders”, Political theology, Vol. 15, No. 2 (2014), pp.188-209.\n\n(三) 網路資源\n華格納文庫 http://users.belgacom.net/wagnerlibrary\n\n參、 俄文部分\n(一)網路資源\n盧那察爾斯基的遺產 http://lunacharsky.newgod.su/home
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
俄羅斯研究所
102263010
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102263010
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
301001.pdf1.92 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.