Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/78087
題名: 阿根廷華語文學習者的需求分析與教學建議
Analysis and Suggestions for Chinese Teaching Materials in Argentina
作者: 郭恩光
Kuo, Silvia Luz
貢獻者: 謝林德
Schilling, Dennis
郭恩光
Kuo, Silvia Luz
關鍵詞: 華語文教學
教材設計
阿根廷華語教學
學習者之需求
溝通教學法
Teaching of Chinese as Foreign Language
Teaching Material Design
Chinese Language Teaching in Argentina
Learner’s Needs
Communicative Language Teaching
日期: 2015
上傳時間: 1-Sep-2015
摘要: 在過去幾十年的時間,西方國家逐漸興起華文熱。拉丁美洲則到2000年代才漸漸開始看到越來越多的華語課程,因此如今華語教學在此地區仍處於一個不斷變化的階段。在阿根廷,由於華語教師以及華語教材的需求日益增長,當地的華語教師經常必須自備教材或是遷就於不適合的教材。筆者在阿根廷實際從事過華語職業教師數年,於此時期內發現當地使用的對外華語教學教材之理念與教學的實際做法之間存在明顯的差異性。筆者在教學中發現阿根廷學習者具有獨特的語言學習需求與習慣,因此教學法應該迎合學習者的特色與需求。如今阿根廷的華語教學界裡所面臨的問題涉及以下三方面:一是要如何滿足學員的需求、再者是要如何迎合當地學員的語言學習習慣與當地華語教師所使用的教學法、三是要如何突破教目前所使用的教材之無相關性和無效性。目前阿根廷的華語學習者所使用的教材中,有一半是以英語編寫,主要對象是以英語為母語者。另一半是來自中華人民共和國,並以西班牙文編寫的教材。在2009年間,當地的教師出版了一本號稱針對拉丁美洲華語學習者所寫得教材,但是本教材在教學品質及內容相關性皆有缺失。雖然這些教材在阿根廷被廣泛使用,然而對於當地學習者而言卻稱不上是最理想的教材。阿根廷目前所使用的教材主要的缺失,首先在於議題和語言內容與學習者的生活毫無相關。再者,此類教材的設計與教學法不符合當地學習者的需求。最後,教材所採用的練習題無法激勵學習者的思考和溝通能力。本研究的目的為初步分析阿根廷目前所使用的華語教材,並探討其實用性(或有效性)及相關性。藉由了解學習者的需求和當地教師們對於教材的意見,筆者將提出較有效的教學法和相稱的教材。本論文結合了筆者本人在阿根廷教學的實務經驗和當地學習者之意見。在經過教材分析後,筆者以最適合當地華語學習者的溝通教學法(特別採用溝通性教學法)設計出一個課程單元教案,希冀能提升往後西班牙語為母語者的華語學習效果,並對推動區域化華語文教材的編制能有些許貢獻。
In the past decade, most countries of the Western hemisphere witnessed the surge of the “Chinese Language Fever”. Such a wave arrived in Latin America in mid 2000, with the emergence of Chinese language courses. At present, the teaching of Chinese as a foreign language in this part of the world is still at an early stage of development. In Argentina, the need for qualified Chinese teachers as well as adequate teaching materials is nowadays most urgent, as local teachers find themselves having to adjust to available teaching materials, or in need of preparing additional teaching material to compensate for the shortcomings of currently used course books. During my years as a teacher of Chinese in Argentina, I realized that the underpinnings of the Chinese pedagogical materials are in stark contrast with the practices in the actual classroom. Through my teaching it became apparent that Argentine learners possess distinctive language learning habits and needs, which had to be catered for by means of a suitable teaching methodology. In order to improve the current situation, teachers of Chinese in Argentina must seriously address the following three questions: How should learners’ needs be addressed? How should we reconcile the discrepancy between teaching methodologies and students’ language learning habits? And lastly, how should we reconcile the lack of relevance and effectiveness of Chinese teaching materials? At the moment, half of the materials used by local learners are written in English, i.e. with an English speaking learner in mind. The other half is published in the People’s Republic of China with explanations and instructions written in Spanish. Although circa 2009 a book published by local teachers emerged claiming to be designed specifically for the Latin American learner, the pedagogical quality and relevance of the content are highly questionable. Although these materials are widely used in Argentina, they are far from being ideal for the local learner. The main flaws of Chinese teaching materials currently used in Argentina are namely, the lack of relevance of the themes and linguistic content with respect to the learner’s world experience, and last, but not least, the failure of the practice activities to encourage significant intellectual processes and the development of communicational skills. The aim of this research is, therefore, to analyze the pedagogical materials currently in use in Argentina, in order to evaluate their effectiveness and relevance. In view of the needs revealed by local learners and the opinions of Chinese teachers in said country, I intend to propose a more adequate methodology, as well as a set of sample materials. Thus the present paper is the result of my personal experience as a teacher of Chinese in Argentina and the integration of the opinions of local Chinese language learners. After having analyzed the materials currently available, I will present a set of sample materials, in the hope that it will contribute to the improvement of the quality of the Chinese learning process for Spanish speakers, as well as to promote the future development of localized Chinese teaching materials.
參考文獻: 王弘宇 (2003) ,〈中國大陸漢語教材出版的成就與不足〉,《世界漢語教學》,第 1期(總第63期),頁98-104。\n王曉彭等 (2009) ,《今日漢語,課本》,第一冊,北京:外語教學與研究出版社。\n李宇明 (2009) ,〈海外華語教學漫議〉,《暨南大學華語文學院學報》,第4期 (總第36期),頁6-11。\n李泉 (2006) ,《對外漢語教材研究》,北京:商務印書館。\n李櫻 (2012) ,《語用研究與華語教學》,台北:中正書局。\n努麗雅 (2009) ,《針對西班牙文母語者的初級華語教材編寫設計》,台北:國立台 灣師範大學華語文教學研究所碩士論文。\n呂必松 (1993) ,《對外漢語教學研究》,北京:北京語言學院。\n岳丹薇 (2009) ,《任務型教學在初級華語教學上之成效》,台北:國立台灣師範大 學華語文教學研究所碩士論文。\n胡明揚 (1999) ,〈對外漢語教學基礎教材的編寫問題〉,《語言教學與研究》,第 1期,頁4-16。\n高順全 (2005) ,《對外漢語教學探新》,北京:北京大學。\n馬玲 (2011) ,〈海外華語文教師培訓之本土化培訓模式〉,《考試週刊》,第49 期,頁21。\n馬箭飛 (2000) ,〈以"交際任務"為基礎的漢語短期教學新模式〉,《世界漢語教 學》,第54期,頁87-93。\n郭熙 (2006) ,〈海外華語教學研究的現狀與展望〉,《世界漢語教學》,第1期 (總第75期),頁106-115。\n陳燕秋 (2002) ,《台灣現今華語文教材的評估與展望》,台北:國立台灣師範大學 華語文教學研究所碩士論文。\n陳薌宇 (2005) ,《以交際為本之華語文教學研究》,台北:國立台灣師範大學華語 文教學研究所碩士論文。\n曾昭陽編 (2012) ,《彭巴草原上的番薯:臺灣人阿根廷移民史 1960 - 2012》,新北 市: 典藏文創。\n黃瓊儀 (2006) ,《任務導向教學法與傳統式教學法之比較研究-以初級華語教學為 例》,台北:國立台灣師範大學華語文教學研究所碩士論文。\n曾薇慈 (2007) ,《任務型教學活動在華語教學上之成效研究》,台北:國立台灣師 範大學華語文教學研究所碩士論文。\n舒兆民 (2010) ,《華語文教學講義》,台北:新學林出版社。\n舒兆民 (2011年1月) ,〈華語為第二語言教學法〉,文章網路位置: \n http://blog.huayuworld.org/gallery/12977/華語為第二語教學法.pdf\n葉德明 (1999) ,《華語文教學規範語理論基礎》,台北:師大書苑。\n葉德明編 (2008) ,《實用視聽華語I》,台北:正中書局。\n趙士鈺 (1998) ,《漢語西班牙語雙語比較》,北京:語言大學出版社。\n趙金銘 (1997) ,〈對外漢語教材創新略論〉,《世界漢語教學》,第2期,\n 頁54- 61。\n趙金銘 (1998) ,〈對外漢語教材評估〉,《語言與教學研究》,第3期,\n 頁16- 19。\n趙金銘 (2004) ,《對外漢語教學概論》,北京:商務印書館。\n齊沛 (2003) ,〈對外漢語教材再評述〉,《語言教學與研究》,第1期,\n 頁58- 61。\n蔡雅薰編 (2008) ,《華語文教學導論》,台北:三民書局。\n劉珣 (2008) ,《新實用漢語課本: 西班牙文註釋》,第一冊,北京:北京語言大學 出版社。\n劉珣 (2008) ,《對外漢語教育學引論》,北京:北京語言大學出版社。\n劉織 (2004) ,〈商貿類漢語教材的簡要分析〉,《棗莊師範專科學校學報》,第21 卷,第5期,頁102-104。\n盧小寧 (1998) ,〈對外漢字教學研究的角度〉,《漢語學習》,第3期(總第105 期),頁49-51。\n謝錫金等 (2012) ,《非華語學生的中文學與教:課程、教材、教法與評估》,台 北:香港大學出版社。\nAnonymous. “El instituto Confucio eligiò a la Argentina para abrir una sede”. La Nacion. (2008, July 24th). \nAnonymous. “Estudian mandarin… en el centro porteño”. La Naciòn. (2012, Februrary 5th). \nAnonymous, “Reportaje de referencia V: Como es China para los argentinos.” (2012, January 31). CRI Online Español. http://espanol.cri.cn/1161/2012/01/31/1s237355.htm\nBermùdez Lièvano, Andrès (2012, Febrero 5). “Ofensiva de China en la “batalla cultural” ”. La Naciòn. Retrieved from http://lanacion.com.ar\nBossarelli, Marilina (2007). “Las empresas chinas en Argentina”. Equipo Multidisciplinario de Trabajo Decente: http://www.cgtrainternacional.com.ar/pdf/empresaschinasenArgentina.pdf\nBrumfit, Christopher (1984). Communicative Methodology in Language Teaching: The Roles of Fluency and Accuracy. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. \nBrumfit, C. J. & Johnson, K. (1979). The Communicative Approach to Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press. \nCanale, Michael & Merrill Swain (1980). “Theoretical Basis of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing”. Applied Linguistics, \n I (1): 1-47. \nChen, Yi (2008). “On Nowadays’ Research of the Spread of Chinese as a Foreign Language”. Canadian Center of Science and Education Journals: Asian Social Science. 4 (12): 118-122. \nDonato, Natalia (2015, July 18th). Argentina relanza vìnculo con China para revertir rojo comercial de US$5000 millones. El Cronista. Retrieved from: http://www.cronista.com\nDubin, Fraida & Elite Olshtain (1986). Course Design: Developing Programs and Materials for Language Learning. U. S. A.: Cambridge University Press.\nEllis, Rod (2003). Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. \nHalliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood (1998). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold. \nHo, Ping Hui & Silvia Abollo (2008). America Latina Habla Chino I. Buenos Aires: Centro de Publicaciones Universidad Nacional Litoral. \nHymes, Dell Hathaway (1971). On Communicative Competence. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. \nHymes, Dell Hathaway (1971). Sociolinguistics and the Ethnography of Speaking. In E. Ardener (Ed.), Social anthropology and language (pp. 47-93). London: Routledge.\nHymes, Dell Hathaway (1972). On communicative competence. In J.B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269-293). London: Penguin.\nHymes, Dell Hathaway (1973). Toward linguistic competence. Working Papers in Sociolinguistics, No. 16.\nJohnson, Keith (1982). Communicative Syllabus Design and Methodology. Oxford: Pergamon Press. \nKramsch, Claire (1986). “From Language Proficiency to Interactional Competence”. The Modern Language Journal, Volume 70, No. 4, 366-372. \nLillis, Theresa M. (2006). “Communicative Competence”. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edition, ed. by Keith Brown. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006 (online version). \nLittlemore, Jannette & Graham Low (2006). “Methaphoric Competence, Second Language Learning, and Communicative Language Ability”. Applied Linguistics, 27/2: 268-294. \nLittlewood, William (1981). Communicative Language Teaching: An Introduction. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.\nLittlewood, William (1984). Foreign and Second Language Learning – Language Acquisition Research and its Implications for the Classroom. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press. \nMarroquìn, Lucìa (2012, February 5). “En la Argentina, más puentes para acercar a los dos países”. La Naciòn. Retrieved from http://lanacion.com.ar\nNunan, David (1999). Second Language Teaching and Learning. Canada: Heinle Cengage Learning.\nNunan, David (1991). Language Teaching Methodology. United Kingdom: Prentice Hall I nternational (UK) Ltd. \nPackard, Jerome (2000). The Morphology of Chinese –A Linguistic and Cognitive Approach. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press. \nPattison, Pat (1987). Developing Communication Skills. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press. \nPremat, Silvina (2008). “China eligiò la Argentina para enseñar su idioma” La Naciòn. (December 10, 2008).\nRichards, Jack C. (1990). The Language Teaching Matrix. U. S. A.: Cambridge University Press.\nRichards, Jack C. & Willy A. Renandya (2002). Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.\nRichards, Jack C. & Theodore S. Rodgers (1986). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. USA: Cambridge University Press.\nRoming, Shane (2011, June 20). “Hungry China Shops in Argentina”. The Wall Street Journal Online. Retrieved April 2013, from: http://online.wsj.com/article/\nSato, Kazuyoshi & Robert C. Kleinsasser (1999). “Communicative Language Teaching (CLT): Practical Understandings”. The Modern Language Journal, Vol. 83, No. 4, 494-517.\nSavignon, Sandra J. (1983). Communicative Competence : Theory and Classroom Practice : Text and Contexts in Second Language Learning. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley. \nSavignon, Sandra J. (2006). “Communicative Language Teaching”. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edition, ed. by Keith Brown. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006 (online version). \nScarcella, Robin C. et al (Ed.) (1990). Developing Communicative Competence in a Second Language. U. S. A.: Heinle&Heinle Publishers. \nSkehan, Peter (1998). A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. \nSchiefel Busch, Richard L. & Joanne Pickar (Ed.). (1984). The Acquisition of Communicative Competence. Baltimore, U.S. A.: University Park Press. \nTomlinson, Brian (Ed.) (2003). Developing Materials for Language Teaching. Great Britain: Cromwell Press Group. \nTomlinson, Brian (Ed.) (1998). Materials Development in Language Teaching. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.\nWiddowson, Henry G. (1978). Teaching Language as Communication, Oxford: Oxford University Press. \nWiddowson, Henry G. (1990) Aspects of Language Teaching. USA: Oxford University Press.\nWilkins, D. A. (1976). Notional Syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press. \nWillis, Jane (1996). A Framework for Task-based Learning. Great Britain: Longman.\nWillis, Dave & Jane Willis (2007). Doing Task-based Teaching. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. \nYalden, Janice (1996). The communicative syllabus: Evolution, design and implementation . Hertfordshire, England: Prentice-Hall International. \nZhuang, Xin (2007). “From communicative competence to communicative language teaching”. Sino-US English Teaching , Volume 4, No. 9, 39-45.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
華語文教學碩士學位學程
981610181
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0981610181
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
018101.pdf4.9 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.