Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/78178
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor外文中心
dc.creatorYou, Xiaoye;Liu, Yichun
dc.creator劉怡君zh_TW
dc.date2009-06
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-02T07:51:32Z-
dc.date.available2015-09-02T07:51:32Z-
dc.date.issued2015-09-02T07:51:32Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/78178-
dc.description.abstractThe article discusses the contrastive studies of Chinese rhetoric that have been excessively used in myths. It cites the traditional expository and persuasive writings related to the eight-legged examination essay of writers Robert Kaplan, Carolyn Matalene, and Guanjun Cai. It adds that the modern English writing emphasized the individual`s experience and voice, and encourages the individual to express in explicit and unequivocal terms.
dc.format.extent601164 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.relationCollege Composition & Communication, 60(4), 833
dc.titleConfucians Love to Argue: Policy Essays in Ancient China
dc.typearticleen
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:期刊論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
833.pdf587.07 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.