Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/79535| 題名: | 台灣民眾的政府績效感受與政府信任 Perceptions of Government Performance and Trust in Government |
作者: | 林芳如 Lin, Fang Ju |
貢獻者: | 黃東益 Huang, Tong Yi 林芳如 Lin, Fang Ju |
關鍵詞: | 政府績效 政府信任 公民滿意度 政治態度 government performance trust in government citizen satisfaction political attitude |
日期: | 2010 | 上傳時間: | 2-Dec-2015 | 摘要: | 政府信任的研究議題受到政治學以及公共行政的重視與關注，乃因在民主政體中，民眾對政府的信任不僅能提升民主代議制度中政府治理合法性，同時也是促進社會整合與凝聚所不可或缺的要素。政府信任的課題，在台灣解嚴之後，更受到討論與重視。國內相關研究指出，台灣民眾對於政府的信任程度係逐漸下滑的趨勢。因此，系統性地探討、分析影響政府信任的因素，進而提出改善不信任或提升信任感的策略或方法，無論從行政學術研究或政府管理的角度，皆有其研究的必要與價值。\n本研究結合績效理論途徑與政治途徑來解釋公共服務品質、公共服務倫理、個人屬性傾向與政治態度對政府信任的影響，並運用實證調查來分析驗證。其研究目的有二：一是期能由理論層次釐清個人屬性傾向、政府績效感受、公民滿意度和政府信任之間的辯證關係；另一則是在經驗層次上將這些概念運作化，透過電話調查抽樣訪問台灣地區20歲以上民眾所蒐集的實證資料予以分析檢證，進而瞭解二項理論在解釋政府信任變異上的程度或殊異。\n 研究結果顯示，台灣民眾對政府信任的現況是民眾對於政府機構與成員的信任程度差異並不大，但其中對於立法院與立法委員的信任相較偏低。此外，民眾對公共服務品質與公共服務倫理評價所形成的政府績效感受，正向影響其公民滿意度，以及對中央政府、地方政府與整體政府之信任。而不同政黨傾向、統獨立場與族群認同的民眾，其對政府績效的感受、公民滿意度與政府信任是有所差異。政黨傾向在政府績效感受、公民滿意度與政府信任的解釋力是不容忽視的。最後比較績效理論與政治理論途徑對政府信任的解釋力，則因民眾對政府角色的認知不同而有別，當將政府視為行政運作或公共服務提供者，績效理論途徑解釋力較佳；相對地，將政府視為政治運作實體或特定執政者，則政治理論途徑解釋力較佳。\n整體而言，本研究從公共行政的視野填補目前國內在政府信任研究上之缺口，在理論研究上揭示個體績效理論途徑對政府信任的影響，並經由實證調查驗證民眾對公共服務品質、公共服務倫理的感受，對於公民滿意度與政府信任具有顯著解釋力，並根據研究成果分就研究方法、理論模式與行政實務改革等提出建議。 Political science and public administration have placed importance on the issue of citizens` trust in government. In the democratic politics, citizens` trust in government can not only strengthen the legitimacy of political and administrative institutions but also benefits for social integration. In Taiwan, researchers have paid more attention to studying in it after abolishing Martial Law and indicated the trust towards decline. \nIt`s essential for theory and practice of public administration to investigate the key to trust in government. This dissertation reviews the existing researches and surveys to propose a theoretical framework which consists of performance and political theory. Furthermore, it elaborates the relations among political attitude, demographic factors, perceptions of government performance, citizen satisfaction and trust in government. The data used in this dissertation are taken from a computer-assisted telephone interviewing survey of Taiwanese citizens over the age of 20 conducted in 2010. \nFinally, this dissertation concludes main findings are as follows, first, citizens have a lower level of trust in the Legislative Yuan and legislators. Second, perceptions of government performance, such as public service quality and public service ethic, leads to citizens` satisfaction and trust in government. Party identification significantly affects perceptions of government performance, citizen satisfaction and trust in government. Third, the performance theory is more valid when citizens regard government services and public administration as an important part of government. Otherwise, the political theory has better explanatory power when citizens refer the concept of government to politics. |
參考文獻: | 朱武獻。(2006)。政府改造現況與展望。日新法律，第6期，頁172-190。\n江明修、陳欽春。(2005a)。充實社會資本之研究。行政院經濟建設委員會綜合計畫處編印，新世紀第2期國家建設計畫研擬專題研究系列「社會、法政篇」。台北：行政院經濟建設委員會。\n江明修、陳欽春。(2005b)。台灣社會資本現況與政策架構發展。發展公益事業建構和諧社會研討會。上海：復旦大學。\n吳明隆(2009)。結構方程式：AMOS的操作與應用。台北：五南。\n吳重禮、許文賓(2003)。誰是政黨認同者與獨立選民---以2001年台灣地區選民政黨認同的決定因素為例，《政治科學論叢》，第18期，頁101-140。\n李世宏、吳重禮(2003)。總統施政表現評價影響因素之分析與比較：以整體施政、經濟發展與兩岸關係為例，公共行政學報，第8期，頁35-71。\n周子敬編著(2006)。結構方程模式(SEM) 精通LISREL。臺北：全華科技。\n法務部。(2008)。97年台灣地區廉政指標民意調查研究。\n法務部。97年臺灣地區廉政指標民意調查第一次調查報告書http://www.acp.moj.gov.tw/public/Data/81226174939991.pdf。\n法務部調查局。(2007)。廉政工作年報。\n法務部調查局。(2008)。廉政工作年報。\n邱皓政(2008)。量化研究方法(二)：統計原理與分析技術。台北：雙葉。\n施能傑。(2004)。公共服務倫理的理論架構與規範作。政治科學論叢，第20期，頁103～140。\n洪永泰、陳義彥、黃德福(1995)。台北市民眾市政意向之研究，台北市政府研考會委託研究，國立政治大學選舉研究中心執行。\n洪永泰。(2007)。台灣地區民眾的政治信任感。http://www.ios.sinica.edu.tw/ios/index.php\n孫本初。(2004)。公部門知識管理中信任倫理之研究：人際信任與組際信任。2004年第2屆台灣公共行政與公共事務系所聯合會(TASPAA)年會之「多元環境下公共治理的新定位學術研討會」。台北：政大公企中心。\n盛治仁. (2003)。台灣民眾民主價值及政治信任感研究--政黨輪替前後的比較。選舉研究，第10卷，第3期，頁115-169。\n莊文忠、胡龍騰。(2006)。治理績效、施政滿意度與政治信任的連結：地方政府的初探性研究。台灣政治學會與台北大學公共行政暨政策學系主辦之2006年台灣政治學。\n莊文忠、陳俊明、胡龍騰、余致力。(2007)。公民的廉政認知與民主治理：組織、成員與制度的實證分析。全球化時代的公民與國家暨台灣社會變遷基本調查第十次研討會。台北：中央研究院政治學研究所籌備處主辦、社會學研究所協辦。\n陳俊明、黃東益、陳敦源。(2005)。電子化政府與公民信任：一個探索性的台灣個案研究。公共服務績效與公民信任：理論與實務的創新。台中：東海大學。\n陳陸輝、周應龍。(2008)。政治信任的持續與變遷。中央研究院社會學研究所主辦「台灣的社會變遷1985~2005：台灣社會變遷調查計畫第11次研討會第2階段」。台北：中央研究院。\n陳陸輝。(2000)。台灣選民政黨認同的持續與變遷，選舉研究，第7卷，第2期，頁39-52。\n陳陸輝。(2003)。政治信任、施政表現與民眾對台灣民主的展望。台灣政治學刊，第7卷，第2期，頁149-188。\n陳陸輝。(2006)。政治信任的政治後果：以2004年立法委員選舉為例。台灣民主季刊，第3 卷，第2期，頁39-62。\n陳欽春。(2004)。民主治理與社會資本：台灣公民信任實證。國立台北大學公共行政暨政策學系博士論文。\n黃秀端、趙湘瓊。(1995)。台灣婦女近十年來政治態度之變遷：民國七十二年至八十一年，問題與研究，第35卷，第10期。\n黃秀端。(1995)。1994年省市長選舉選民參與競選活動之分析，選舉研究， 第2卷第1期。\n黃東益、李仲彬。(2008)。電子化政府使用與政府信任：台灣的個案研究。2008台灣公共行政與公共事務系所聯合會(TASPAA)之「夥伴關係與永續發展國際學術研討會」。台中：東海大學。\n黃德福(1991)。台灣地區七十八年底選舉分裂投票之初探研究：以台北縣、雲林縣與高雄縣為個案，政治學報，第19期，頁55-80。\n黃德福。(2009)。台灣民眾政治信任與政策偏好之研究。行政院研究發展考核委員會委託研究。\n榮泰生(2009)。AMOS與研究方法。台北：五南。\n劉義周(1994)。台灣政黨形象的世代差異，選舉研究，第1卷，第1期，頁53-73。\n劉義周。(2006)。2002年至2004年「選舉與民住化調查」三年期研究計畫：民國93年立法委員選舉大型面訪案(IV)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/5289/1/932420H004005SSS.pdf。\n蔡志恆。(1993)。我國網路公民對電子化政府信任之研究：新公共管理績效理論的驗證。國立政治大學公共行政研究所博士論文。\n蔡秀涓、王千文。(2009)。台灣民主治理重要基礎：公務人員公共服務倫理認知分析。2009年台灣公共行政與公共事務係所聯合會年會暨「全球化下新公共管理趨勢與挑戰：理論與實踐」研討會。高雄：中山大學。\n鄭夙芬、陳陸輝、劉嘉薇。(2005)。2004年總統選舉的結果：程序公平與政治信任。2005年台灣政治學會年會暨台灣民主的挑戰與前景學術研討會。台北：政治大學政治系、台灣政治學會。\nKenny, D. A., Kashy, D., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, and G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 233-265). New York: McGraw-Hill.\nAbramson, P. R. (1983). Political Attitudes in American: Formation and Change. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company Press.\nAbramson, P. R., & Finifter, A. W. (1981). On the Meaning of Political Trust: New Evidence From Items Introduced in 1978. American Journal of Political Science, 25(2), 297-307.\nADB. (1999). Governance: Sound Development management. Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.\nAdministration, N. A. o. P. (1999). Government to Trust and Respect: Rebuilding Citizen-Government Relations for the 21st Century. Washington, D.C.: NAPA.\nAnderson, C. J., & AndrewJ.LoTempio. (2002). Winning, Losing, and Political Trust in America. British Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 335-351.\nAnderson, C., & Tverdova, Y. (2003). Corruption, Political Allegiances, and Attitudes Toward Government in Contemporary Democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 91-109.\nAnderson, E. W., & Sullivan, M. W. (1993). The Antecedents and Consequences of Customer Satisfaction for Firms. Marketing Sciences, 12(2), 125-143.\nAPEC. (2007). APEC Economic Policy Report. Singapore: APEC Secretariat.\nBaier, A. (1986). Trust and Anti- Trust. Ethics, 96(2): 231-260.\nBaldassare, M. (1985). Trust in Local Government. Social Science Quarterly, 66(3), 704-712.\nBehn, R. D. (1995). The big questions of public management. Public Administration Review, 55(4), 313-324.\nBehn, R. D. (2002). Government Performance and the Conundrum of Public Trust. In J. John D. Donahue and Joseph S. Nye (Ed.), Market Based Governance: Supply Side, Demand Side, Upside, and Downside (pp. 323-348). Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.\nBlind, P. K. (2006). Building Trust in Government in the Twenty-First Century: Review of Literature and Emerging Issues. Paper presented at the 7th Global Forum on Reinventing Government Building Trust in Government 26-29 June 2007, Vienna, Austria.\nBok, D. (1997). Measuring the Performance of Government. In J. S. Nye, P. D. Zelikow & D. C. King (Eds.), Why People don`t Trust Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.\nBok, D. (2001). The Trouble with Government. Cambridge, Mass : Harvard University Press.\nBouckaert, G., & Van de Walle, S.(2001). Government Performance and Trust in Government. Paper presented at the European Group for Public Administration Annual Conference, Vaasa, Finland. \nBouckaert, G., & Van de Walle, S. (2003). Comparing Measures of Citizen Trust and User Satisfaction as Indictors of "good Governance": Difficulties in Linking Trust and Satisfaction Indicators. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 69(3), 329-343.\nBouckaert, G., & Van de Walle, S. (2003). Quality of Public Service Delivery and Trust in Government. In A. Salminen (Ed.), Governing Networks: EGPA Yearbook (pp. 299-318). Amsterdam: IOS Press.\nBouckaert, G., Laegreid, P., & Van de Walle, S. (2005). Trust, Quality Measurement Models, and Value Chain Monitoring. Public Performance & Management Review, 28(4), 460-464.\nBouckaert, G., Van de Walle, S., Maddens, B., & Kampen, J. K. (2002). Identity vs Performance: An Overview of Theories Explaining Trust in Government. Leuven: Public Management Institute.\nBowler, S., & Karp, J. A. (2004). Politicians, Scandals, and Trust in Government. Political Behavior, 26(3), 271-287.\nBrehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual- Level Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 999-1023.\nBrown, K., & Coulter, P. B. (1983). Subjective and Objective Measures of Police Service Delivery. Public Administration Review, 43, 150-58.\nBrudney, J. L., & England, R. E. (1982). Urban Policy Making and Subjective Service Evaluations: Are They Compatible. Public Administration Review, 42(2), 127-135.\nBurnett, M., Tsang, S., Studer, S., Hills, P., & Welford, R. (2008). Measuring Trust in Government: A Hong Kong Perspective. International Public Management Review, 9(2), 107-126.\nCampbell, A., Philip, E. C., Warren, E. M., & Donald, E. S. (1964). The American Voter : an Abridgement. University of Michigan. Survey Research Center.Chang, E. C. C., & Chu, Y.-h. (2006). Corruption and Trust: Exceptionalism in Asian Democracies. The Journal of Politics, 68(2), 259-271.\nChanley, V. A. (2002). Trust in Government in the Aftermath of 9/11: Determinants and Consequences. Political Psychology, 23(3), 469-483.\nCheema, S. (2005). Building Democratic Institutions: Governance Reform in Developing Countries. Conn.: Kumarian Press.\nChristensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2005). Trust in Government: The Relative Importance of Service Satisfaction, Political Factors, and Demography. Public Performance & Management Review, 28(4), 487-511.\nChristensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2005). Trust in Government: The Relative Importance of Service Satisfaction, Political Factors, and Demography. Public Performance & Management Review, 28(4), 487-511.\nChristensen, T., & Lagreid, P. (2002). Trust in Government: the Relative Importance of Service Satisfaction, Political Factors and Demography, Conference of the European Group of Public Administration, group on “Quality, satisfaction and trust in government”. Potsdam, Germany.\nChristensen, T., & Lagreid, P. (2003). Working Paper 7, Stein Rokkan Center for Social Studies and Bergen University Research Foundation.\nCitrin, J., & Green, D. P. (1986). Presidential Leadership and the Resurgence of Trust in Government. British Journal of Political Science, 16(4), 431-453.\nCitrin, J., & Muste, C. (1999). Trust in Government. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of Political Attitudes (pp. 465-532). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.\nClarke, H. D., & Acock, A. C. (1989). National Elections and Political Attitudes: The Case of Political Efficacy. British Journal of Political Science, 19(4), 551-562.\nClarke, H. D., Kornberg, A., & Stewart, M. C. (1984). Parliament and Political Support in Canada. American Journal of Political Science, 78(2), 451-469.\nCooper, T. L. (2006). The Responsible Administrator: An Approach to Ethics for the Administration. San Francisco, Calif. : Jossey-Bass.\nCraig, S. C., Niemi, R. G., & Silver, G. E. (1990). Political Efficacy and Trust: A Report on the NES Pilot Study Items. Political Behavior, 12(3), 289-314.\nDalton, R. J. (1999). Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government (pp. 57-77). Oxford: Oxford University Press.\nDalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices : the erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. New York: Oxford University Press.\nDehoog, R. H., Lowery, D., & Lyons, W. E. (1990). Citizen Satisfaction with Local Governance: A Test of Individual, Jurisdictional, and City-Specific Explanations. Journal of Politics, 52(3), 807-837.\nDeLeon, L. (1996). Ethics and Entrepreneurship. Policy Studies Journal, 24(3), 495-510.\nDenhardt, K. G. (2001). The Ethics of Public Service. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.\nDinsdale, G., & Marson, D. B. (1999). Citizen/ Client Surveys: Dispelling Myths and Redrawing Maps. Canadian Centre for management Development.\nEaston, D. (1975). A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support. British Journal of Political Science, 5(4), 435-437.\nEaston, D. (1979). A Systems Analysis of Political Life. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.\nEsman, M. J. (1997). Public Administration, Ethnic Conflict, and economic Development. Public Administration Review, 57(6), 527-533.\nFeldheim, M. A., & Wang, X. (2004). Ethics and Public Trust. Public Integrity, 6(1), p63-75.\nFerris, G. R., and Michele K. Kacmar. (1992). Perceptions of Organizational Politics. Journal of Management, 18(1), 93-116.\nFlinders, M. (2008). Delegated Governance and the British State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.\nFornell, C., Johnson, M. D., Anderson, E. W., Cha, J., & Bryant, B. E. (1996). The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature, Purpose, and Findings. Journal of Marketing, 60(4), 7-18.\nFukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: The Free Press.\nGawthrop, L. C. (1997). Democracy, Bureaucracy, and Hypocrisy Redux: A Search for the Sympathy and Compassion. Public Administration Review, 57(3), 205-210.\nGilman, S. C. (2005). Ethics Code and Codes of Conduct as Tools for Promoting Ethical and Professional Service: Comparative Success and Lessons.. Washington, DC: The World Bank.\nGlaser, M. A., & Hildreth, B. W. (1999). Service Delivery Satisfaction and Willingness to Pay Taxes. Public Productivity & Management Review, 23(1), 48-67.\nGoldoff, A. C. (1996). The Public Interest Standard and Deregulation: The Impact of the Fairness Doctrine. International Journal of Public Administration, 19(1), 51-74.\nHalvorsen, K. (2003). Assessing the Effects of Public Participation. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 535-543.\nHeintzman, R., & Marson, B. (2005). People, Service and Trust: Is There a Public Sector Service Value Chain. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71(4), 549-575.\nHetherington, M. J. (1998). The political Relevance of Political Trust. American Political Science Review, 92(4), 791-808.\nHetherington, M. J. (1999). The Effect of Political Trust on the Presidential vote, 1968-96. American Political Science Review, 93(2), 311-326.\nHibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2001). Process Preferences and American Politics: What the People Want Government to be. The American Political Science Review, 95(1), 145-153.\nHouston, D. J., & Harding, L. K. (2008). Trust in the Public Service: A Cross-National Examination, The 66 Annual National Conference of the Midwest Political Science Association. Chicago.\nKacmar, M. K., Dennis P. Bozeman, Dawn S. Carlson, and William P. Anthony. (1999). An Examination of the Perceptions of Organizational Politics Model: Replication and Extension. Human Relations, 52(3), 383-341.\nKampen, J. K., Van de Walle, S., & Bouckaert, G. (2003). On the relative role of the public administration, the public services and the political institutions in building trust in government in Flanders. Paper presented at the ASPA’s 64th National conference: The Power of Public Service’, Washington D.C.\nKampen, J. K., Van de Walle, S., Maddens, B., & Bouckaert, G. (2002). Intra and extra governmental determinants of trust in government. Paper presented at the the European Group of Public Administration (EGPA) Annual Conference, Potsdam, Germany.\nKampen, J. K., Walle, S. V. d., & Bouckaert, G. (2006). Assessing the Relation Between Satisfaction with Public Service Delivery and Trust in Government: The Impact of the Predisposition of Citizens Toward Government on Evaluations of Its Performance. Public Performance & Management Review, 29(4), 387-404.\nKaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2009). Governance Matters VIII: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators1996-2008. http://www.elpais.com/elpaismedia/ultimahora/media/200906/29/espana/20090629elpepunac_3_Pes_PDF.pdf.\nKeele, L. (2005). The Authorities Really Do Matter: Party Control and Trust in Government. The Journal of Politics, 67(3), 873-886.\nKelly, J. M., & Swindell, D. (2002). A Multiple-indicator Approach to Municipal service evaluation: Correlating Performance Measurement and Citizen Satisfaction Across Jurisdictions. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 610-621.\nKenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 223–265). New York: McGraw-Hill\nKettl, D. F. (2000). The Global Public Management Revolution: A Report on the Transformation of Governance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.\nKikuchi, M. (2007). Assessing Government Efforts to (RE) Build Trust in Government: Challenges and Lessons Learned From Japanese Experiences. International Public Management Review, 8(2), 183-203.\nKim, S. (2007). Democratic Governance, Government Performance, and Trust in Government: China and South Korea. The Public Management Research Conference. Tucson, Arizona.\nKim, S.-E. (2005). The Role of Trust in the Modern administrative State: An Integrative Model. Administration & Society, 37(5), 611-635.\nLawrence, R. Z. (1997). Is It Really the Economy, Stupid? In J. S. Nye, P. D. Zelikow & D. C. King (Eds.), Why People don`t Trust Government: Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.\nLewis, C. W., & Gilman, S. C. (2005). The Ethics Challenge in Public Service: A Problem-Solving Guide. San Francisco, Calif. : Jossey-Bass.\nLewis, D. J., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a Social Reality. Social Forces, 63(4), 967-985.\nLyons, W. E., David Lowery, & DeHoog, R. H. (1992). The Politics of Dissatisfaction : Citizens, Services, and Urban Institutions. Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharp.\nMarch, J. G. (1994). A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen. New York : Free Press.\nMcallister, I. (1999). The Economic Performance of Government. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.\nMenzel, D. C. (2007). Ethics Management for Public Administrators. New York: M.E. Sharpe.\nMiller, A. H. (1974). Political Issues and Trust in Government: 1964-1970. The American Political Science Review, 68(3), 951-972.\nMiller, A. H., & Listhaug, O. (1990). Political Parties and Confidence in Government: A Comparison of Norway, Sweden and the United States. British Journal of Political Science, 20(3), 57-386.\nMiller, A. H., & Listhaug, O. (1999). Political Performance and Institutional Trust. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.\nMishler, W., & Rose, R. (1997). Trust, distrust and skepticism: Popular evaluations of civil and political institutions in Post-Communist Societies. Journal of Politics, 59(2), 418-451.\nMishler, W., & Rose, R. (2001). What are the Origins of Political Trust? Testing Institutional and Cultural Theories in Post-Communist Societies. Comparative Political Studies, 34(1), 30-62.\nMuller, E. N., & Jukam, T. O. (1977). On the Meaning of Political Support. American Political Science Review, 71(4), 1561-1595.\nNewton, K. (1997). Social Capital and Democracy. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(5), 575-586.\nNewton, K. (2005). Support for Democracy Social Capital, Civil Society and Political Performance. Berlin: Social Science Research Center.\nNewton, K., & Norris, P. (1999). Confidence in Public Institutions: Faith, Culture or Performance, Paper at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Atlanta.\nMORI Social Research Institute. (2003). The More Thing Change: Government, the Economy and Public Services Science the 1970s. \nNorris, P. (1999). Introduction: The Growth of Critical Citizens. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government (pp. 1-30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.\nNye, J. S. (1997). Introduction: The Decline of Confidence in Government. In J. S. Nye, P. D. Zelikow & D. C. King (Eds.), Why People don`t Trust Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.\nNye, J. S., Zelikow, P. D., & King, D. C. (1997). Why People don`t Trust Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.\nOECD. (1998). Principles for Managing Ethics in the Public Sector. PUMA Policy Brief no.4.\nOECD. (1999). Public Sector Corruption: An International Survey of Prevention Measures. Paris: OECD.\nOECD. (2000). Trust in Government: Ethics Measures in OECD countries. Paris: OECD.\nOliver, R. L. (1980). A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460-469.\nOliver, R. L. (1997). Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. New York : McGraw Hill.\nOrren, G. (1997). Fall from Grace: The Public`s Loss of Faith in Government. In J. S. Nye, P. D. Zelikow & D. C. King (Eds.), Why People Don`t Trust Government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.\nOsborne, D. E., & Gaebler, T. (1993). Reinventing Government. New York: Plume.\nParry, G. (1976). Trust, Distrust and Consensus. British Journal of Political Science, 6(2), 129-143.\nPew Research Center for People and the Press. (1998). Deconstructing Distrust: How Americans View Government. http://206.65.84.148/trusttab.htm.\nPharr, S. J., & Putnam, R. D. (Eds.). (2000). Disaffected Democracies: What is Troubling the Trilateral Countries? Princeton: Princeton University Press.\nPollitt, C. (1988). Bringing Customers into Performance Measurement. Policy and Politics, 16, 77-87.\nPratt, J. W., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (1991). Principals and Agents: the Structure of Business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.\nPunyaratabandhu, S. (2007). Corruption and Government Trust: A Survey of Urban and Rural Inhabitanta in the North and Noreheast of Thailand. International Public Management Review, 8(2), 164-182.\nPutnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1993). Making Democracy Work : Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press.\nRego, A., Sarrico, C. S., & Moreira, J. M. (2006). Trust in Portuguese Public Authorities. Public Integrity, 8(1), 77-92.\nRose, R., Mischler, W., & Haerpfer, C. (1998). Social Capital in Civic and Stressful Societies. Studies in International Comparative Development, 32: 85-111.\nRose-Ackerman, S. (1998). Lessons from Italy for Latin America. Journal of Public and International Affairs, 9(Fall), 447-469.\nRose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.\nRose-Ackerman, S. (2001). Trust, Honesty, and Corruption: Theories and Survey Evidence from Post-Socialist Societies. http://www.colbud.hu/honesty-trust/rose/pub01.PDF\nRuscio, K. P. (1996). Trust, Democracy, and Public Management: A Theoretical Argument. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(3), 461-477.\nRyan, N. (2000). Public Confidence in the Public Sector. A Discussion Paper prepared for the Office of the Auditor General of Western Australia.\nSalminen, A., & Ikola-Norrbacka, R. (2009). Trust and Integrity Violations in Finnish Public Administration: The Views of Citizens. Halduskultuur, 10, 74-93.\nSandholtz, W., & Koetzle, W. (2000). Accounting for corruption: Economic structure, democracy, and trade. International Studies Quarterly, 44(1), 31-35.\nSeligson, M. A. (2002). The Impact of Corruption on Regime Legitimacy: A Comparative Study of Four Latin American Countries. Journal of Politics, 64(2), 408-433.\nSeligson, M. A. (2002). The Impact of Corruption on Regime Legitimacy: A Comparative Study of Four Latin American Countries. Journal of Politics, 64(2), 408-433.\nSims, H. (2001). Public Confidence in Government, and Government Service Delivery. Canadian Center for Management Development.\nSztompka, P. (1996). Trust and Emerging Democracy. International Sociology, 11(1), 37-62.\nSztompka, P. (1999). Trust: A Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\nThomas, C. W. (1998). Maintaining and restoring public trust in government agencies and their employees. . Administration & Society, 30(2): 166-193.\nVan de Walle, S. (2002). Public Service Performance and Truat in Government: The Problem of Causality, Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the European Group of Public Administration, Sep. 4-7, Postdam.\nVan de Walle, S. (2004). Perceptions of Administrative Performance: The Key to Trust in Government? Lecven: Katholieke Universiteit.\nVan de Walle, S. (2008). Perceptions of Corruption As Distrust? Cause and Effect in Attitudes Towards Government. In L. Huberts, C. Jurkiewicz & J. Maesschalck (Eds.), Ethics and Integrity and the Politics of Governance (pp. 215-236.): Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.\nVan de Walle, S., Van Roosbroek, S., & Bouckaert, G. (2008). Trust in the Public Sector: Is there any Evidence for a Long-Term Decline? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 74(1), 47-64.\nVan Ryzin, G. G. (2004). Expectations, Performance, and Citizen Satisfaction with Urban Services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(3), 433.\nVan Ryzin, G. G. (2005). Testing the Expectancy Disconfirmation Model of Citizen Satisfaction with Local Government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(September), 599-611.\nVan Ryzin, G. G. (2007). Pieces of Puzzle: Linking Government Performance, Citizen Satisfaction, and Trust. Public Performance & Management Review, 30(4), 521-535.\nVan Ryzin, G., G., Douglas, M., & Stephen, I. (2004). Drivers and Consequences of Citizen Satisfaction: An Application of the American Customer Satisfaction Index Model to New York City. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 331-341.\nVigoda, E. (2000). Are You Being Served? The Responsiveness of Public Administration to Citizens` Demands: An Empirical Examination in Isreal. Public Administration, 78(1), 165-191.\nVigoda, E. (2001). Reactions to Organizational Politics: A Cross-Cultural Examination in Israel and Britain. Human Relations, 54(2), 1483-1518.\nVigoda, E., & Yuval, F. (2003). Managerial Quality, Administrative Performance and Trust in Governance Revisited: A follow-Up Study of Causality. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 16(7), 502-522.\nVigoda, E., & Yuval, F. (2005). A National Assessment Project of Public Administration: Theoretical Framework and Preliminary Findings from Isral. Public Administration Quarterly, 28(3/4), 501-537.\nVigoda-Gadot, E. (2006). Citizens` Perceptions of Politics and Ethics in Public Administration: A Five-Year National Study of Their Relationship to Satisfaction with Services, Trust in Governance, and Voice Orientations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 285-305.\nWalters , L. C., Aydelotte, J., & ., J. M. (2000). Putting More Public in Policy Analysis. Public Administration Review, 60(4), 349-359.\nWebler, T., and Seth Tuler. (2000). Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Theoretical Reflections from a Case Study. Administration and Society, 32(5), 566-595.\nWillian, J. T. (1985). Systemic Influences on Political Trust: The Importance of Perceived Institutional Performance. Political Methodology, 11(1-2): 125-142.\nYackee, S. W., & Lowery, D. (2005). Understanding Public Support for the U.S. Bureaucracy: A Macro Politics View. Public Management Review, 7(4), 515-536.\nYang, K., & Holzer, M. (2006). The performance-Trust Link: Implications for Performance Measurement. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 114-126.\nZaller, J. R. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press. | 描述: | 博士 國立政治大學 公共行政學系 90256503 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090256503 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 650301.pdf | 2.38 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.