Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/81575
題名: 如何解釋貿易要素內涵假說
What explain factor content of trade prediction?
作者: 許宇慧
Hsu, Yu Huei
貢獻者: 王信實<br>李浩仲
許宇慧
Hsu,Yu Huei
關鍵詞: 貿易要素內涵
中間投入
貿易要素內涵假說
The Factor Contnet of Trade
intermediate inputs
Vanek prediction
日期: 2015
上傳時間: 1-Mar-2016
摘要: 本研究採用1995-2009年的WIOD 資料庫 World Input-Output Table(WIOT)、WIOD Socio Economic Accounts (SEAs)資料,將勞工使用教育程度分成三種技術勞工:高技術勞工、中技術勞工、低技術勞工與資本,五種要素的貿易要素內涵(Factor Content of Trade, FCT),利用sign test檢測貿易要素內涵假說Vanek prediction,而不同於其他文獻,本文進一步討論貿易要素內涵假說Vanek prediction的sign test檢測結果與產業比例、貿易壁壘、國家地區別等因素之間的關聯性。實證結果為當討論貿易要素內涵時,將勞工要素使用教育程度細分,會與單一勞工要素有不同的影響,而地區的人力資本特性也是影響貿易要素內涵假說檢測結果之因素,美、歐洲相較於亞洲,對於勞工的貿易要素內涵假說檢測結果有正向的影響,區域性之經濟問題與貿易壁壘皆對於檢測結果有負向的影響,而供給面的附加價值中間投入使用量造成貿易要素內涵假說檢測結果正確性影響與預測有些許差異,此外,資本因要素特性移動自由性較高,不受到開放程度、做生意難易程度變數的影響,相反之,開放程度越高以及做生意難易度越容易,皆能增加勞工貿易要素內涵假說檢測結果的正確性;資本只易受到供給面影響,而勞工則供給面及需求面的因素皆會對其貿易要素內涵造成影響。
參考文獻: 翁永和、陳添枝、劉碧珍 (2010),《國際貿易理論與政策第三版》台北: 雙葉書廊。 \nCassing, J., and Nishioka, S. (2015). Per capita income and the mystery of missing trade. Review of International Economics.\nChoi, Y.-S., and P. Krishna (2004). The factor content of bilateral trade: an empirical test. Journal of Political Economy 112, 887-914.\nDavis, D. R., and D. Weinstein (2001). An account of global factor trade. American Economic Review 91(5), 1423–1453.\nErumban ,A, A,Gouma, R,Vries, G, Vries, K., and Timmer, M. (2012). WIOD Socio‐Economic Accounts (SEA): Sources and Methods. Groningen, April.\nFoster, N., and Stehrer, R. (2001). On the bilateral factor content of trade with traded intermediates.\nLai, H., and Zhu, S. C. (2007). Technology, endowments, and the factor content of bilateral trade. Journal of International Economics, 71(2), 389-409.\nLeuven, E., Oosterbeek, H., and Van Ophem, H. (2004). Explaining international differences in male skill wage differentials by differences in demand and supply of skill*. The Economic Journal, 114(495), 466-486.\nMilner, C.R., Cabral, M., and Falvey, R. (2009). Does skill content explain total trade and intra-industry trade?*. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71(5), 601-619\nNishioka, S. (2012). International technology differences in production techniques: Implications for the factor content of trade. Journal of International Economics, 87(1), 98–104\nReimer, J. J. (2006). Global production sharing and trade in the services of factors. Journal of International Economics, 68(2), 384-408.\nStehrer, R. (2014). Does the Home Bias Explain Missing Trade in Factors? (No. 110). The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.\nStone, S., Cepeda, R. C., and Jankowska, A. (2011). The Role of Factor Content in Trade: Have Changes in Factor Endowments Been Reflected in Trade Patterns and on Relative Wages? (No. 109). OECD Publishing.\nTrefler, D. (1995). The case of missing trade and other HOV mysteries. The American Economic Review, 1029–1046. \nTrefler, D., and S. Zhu (2010). The structure of factor content predictions. The Journal of International Economics, 82(2), 195–207.\nZeddies, G (2013). Skill Content of Intra-European Trade Flows. European Journal of Comparative Economics, 10(1).
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
經濟學系
102258028
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102258028
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
802801.pdf1.3 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.