Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/81598
題名: 台灣後民主化時期公民社會的崛起:以太陽花運動為例分析國家與社會的互動關係
Rising Civil Society in Post-Democratization Taiwan:
作者: 劉雅慈
Liu, Ya Cih
貢獻者: 魏玫娟
Wei, Mei Chuan
劉雅慈
Liu, Ya Cih
關鍵詞: 太陽花運動
民主化
公民社會
the Sunflower Movement
democratization
civil society
日期: 2015
上傳時間: 1-Mar-2016
摘要: 本篇論透過文分析公民社會在台灣民主化過程所扮演的腳色來檢視國家與社會的互動;並聚焦於太陽花運動分析台灣後民主化時期公民社會的崛起。
This dissertation seeks to examine the state-society relations in Taiwan through analyzing the role of civil society in different stages of Taiwan’s political development with a focus on the impact of the Sunflower Movement in March 2014 on Taiwan’s state-society relations. The Sunflower Movement is viewed by some observers and commentators as a significant sign of a (re-)rising civil society in Taiwan since the process of democratization was completed in the 1990s. Civil society, in the explanations of modernization theory, played a crucial role in Taiwan’s political transition from authoritarianism to democracy. However, civil society, as an important sphere for the contestation and formation of public consciousness, which is essential to democracy, seems to cease to play its democratic role adequately since the country had its first regime change when the major opposition party, the Democratic Progressive Party (the DPP) took power from the ruling Kuomintang (the KMT) in 2000. Drawing upon civil society theories in relations to the role of civil society in the democratization process and in a democratic, this study aims to pursue the question as to how exactly the Sunflower Movement impact on the state policies and democratic discourse in Taiwan.
參考文獻: Alexander, J. C. (2006). The Civil Sphere (1st ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.\nAlmond, G. A., & Powell, G. B. (1966). Comparative Politics: a Developmental Approach. Boston: Little, Brown.\nAmsden, A. H., & Chu, W. (2003). Second-Mover Advantage: Latecomer Upgrading in Taiwan. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.\nAntlöv, H., Brinkerhoff, D., & Rapp, E. (2008). Civil Society Organizations and Democratic Reform:Progress, Capacities, and Challenges in Indonesia. In Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action Philadelphia PA.\nArrigo, L. G. (1945). From Democratic Movement to Bourgeois Democracy: The Internal Politics of the Taiwan Democratic Progressive Party in 1991. The Other Taiwan.\nBaiocchi, G., Heller, P., & Silva, M. K. (2011). Bootstrapping Democracy: Transforming Local Governance and Civil Society in Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.\nBello, W., & Rosenfeld, S. (1992). Dragons in Distress: Asia’s Miracle Economies in Crisis (1st ed.). London: Penguin Books.\nBroadbent, J., & Brockman, V. (Eds.). (2010). East Asian Social Movements: Power Protest and Change in a Dynamic Region. New York: Springer-Verlag New York.\nCalhoun, C. (1993). Civil Society and the Public Sphere. Public Culture, 5(2).\nCampbell, A. (1954). The Voter Decides. (G. Gurin & W. E. Miller, Eds.). United States: Row, Peterson and Company.\nCannon, B., & Hume, M. (2012). Central America, Civil Society and the ‘Pink Tide’: Democratization or De-democratization? Democratization, 19(6), 1039–1064. http://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.619775\nChambers, S. (2003). Deliberative Democratic Theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 6, 307–326.\nChao, L., & Myers, R. H. (2000). How Elections Promoted Democracy in Taiwan under Martial Law. The China Quarterly, 162. http://doi.org/10.1017/s0305741000008183\nChen, W. Q., Change, H. H., & Huang, S. J. (2015). An Era of Networked Social Movements? Participants of the Sunflower Movement-Probing the Strength of Interpersonal Ties and Factors of Social Media 網絡社會運動世代來臨? 太陽花運動參與者的人際連帶與社群媒體因素初探. In The 20th Anniversary Conference on Students Movement and Social Justice (pp. 1–25). Academia Sinica.\nCheng, T. (1989). Democratizing the Quasi-Leninist Regime in Taiwan. World Politics, 41(04), 471–499. http://doi.org/10.2307/2010527\nCheng, T., & Haggard, S. (Eds.). (1991). Political Change in Taiwan. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.\nChilton, S. (1988). Defining Political Culture. Political Research Quarterly, 41(3), 419–445. http://doi.org/10.1177/106591298804100303\nChow, P. C. Y. (2002). Taiwan’s Modernization in Global Perspective. United States: Praeger Publishers.\nChu, Y. H. (2004). Taiwan’s National Identity Politics and the Prospect of Cross-Strait Relations. Asian Survey, 44(4), 484–512. http://doi.org/10.1525/as.2004.44.4.484\nChu, Y. H. (2007). Taiwan in 2006: A Year of Political Turmoil. Asian Survey, 47(1), 44–51. http://doi.org/10.1525/as.2007.47.1.44\nChu, Y. H. (2008). Taiwan in 2007: The Waiting Game. Asian Survey, 48(1), 124–132. http://doi.org/10.1525/as.2008.48.1.124\nChu, Y. H., & Diamond, L. (2001). Sizing Up Taiwan’s Political Earthquake. East Asia Institute.\nChu, Y. H., & Huang, M. H. (2010). Solving an Asian Puzzle. Journal of Democracy, 21(4), 114–122. http://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2010.0009\nChu, Y. H., & Lin, J. W. (2001). Political Development in 20th-Century Taiwan: State-Building, Regime Transformation and the Construction of National Identity. The China Quarterly. http://doi.org/10.1017/s0009443901000067\nCohen, J. (1999). American Civil Society Talk. In R. Fullinwider (Ed.), Civil Society, Democracy, and Civic Renewal. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.\nCohen, M. J. (1988). Taiwan at the Crossroads: Human Rights Political Development and Social Change on the Beautiful Island. Asia Resource Center.\nColeman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(s1). http://doi.org/10.1086/228943\nCopper, J. F. (1990). Taiwan’s recent elections: fulfilling the democratic promise. Baltimore, MD: Maryland Series in Contemporary Asian Studies.\nCopper, J. F. (1996). The Taiwan Political Miracle: Essays on Political Development, Elections, and Foreign Relations. United States: East Asia Research Institute.\nCopper, J. F. (2009). Transitioning from the Chen Shui-bian to the Ma Ying-jeou Presidency: The State of Democratization in Taiwan. In S. Brown, C. Clark, H. Takeuchi, & A. Tan (Eds.), Taiwan at a turning point (pp. 4–21). Baltimore, MD: University of Maryland School of Law.\nDahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. United States: New Haven, Yale University Press, 1971.\nDahrendorf, R. (1997). After 1989: Morals, Revolution and Civil Society. Basingstoke: Macmillan, in association with St. Antony’s College, Oxford.\nDiamond, L. (1994). Rethinking Civil Society: Towards Democratic Consolidation. Journal of Democracy, 5(3), 4–17.\nDiamond, L. (2001). How Democratic Is Taiwan? Five Key Challenges for Democratic Development and Consolidation. In The Transition from One-Party Rule: Taiwan’s New Government and Cross-Straits Relations (p. 20). Columbia University.\nDiamond, L. J. (2000). Is Pakistan the (Reverse) Wave of the Future? Journal of Democracy, 11(3), 91–106. http://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2000.0050\nDickson, B. J. (1993). The Lessons of Defeat: The Reorganization of the Kuomintang on Taiwan, 1950–52. The China Quarterly, 133. http://doi.org/10.1017/s0305741000018191\nDittmer, L. (2005). Taiwan’s Aim-Inhibited Quest for Identity and the China Factor. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 40(1-2), 71–90. http://doi.org/10.1177/0021909605052945\nEaston, D. (1953). The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.\nEdelman, M. (2001). Social Movements: Changing Paradigms and Forms of Politics. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30(1), 285–317. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.285\nFarrar, C., Fishkin, J. S., Green, D. P., List, C., Luskin, R. C., & Paluck, E. L. (2004). Disaggregating Deliberation’s Effects: An Experiment within a Deliberative Poll.\nFell, D. J. (2010). Taiwan’s Democracy: Towards a Liberal Democracy or Authoritarianism? Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 39(2), 187–201.\nFung, A., Wright, E. O., & Abers, R. (2003). The Real Utopias Project: v. 4: Deepening Democracy - Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. London: Verso Books.\nGastil, J., Deess, E. P., & Weiser, P. (2002). Civic Awakening in the Jury Room: A Test of the Connection between Jury Deliberation and Political Participation. The Journal of Politics, 64(02). http://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.00141\nGellner, E. (1994). Conditions of Liberty: Civil Society and Its Rivals. New York, NY: Allen Lane/Penguin Press.\nGiunchi, E. (2011). Democratic Transition and Social Spending: the Case of Pakistan in the 1990s. Democratization, 18(6), 1270–1290. http://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.572621\nGrano, S. A. (2014). Change and Continuities: Taiwan’s Post-2008 Environmental Policies. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 43(3), 129–159.\nGrugel, J. (2002). Democratization: A Critical Introduction. United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.\nGöbel, C. (2001). Towards a Consolidated Democracy? Informal and Formal Institutions in Taiwan’s Political Process. In Taiwan Studies at the APSA Annual Meeting (pp. 1–26). San Francisco.\nHinnebusch, R. (2006). Authoritarian Persistence, Democratization Theory and the Middle East: An Overview and Critique. Democratization, 13(3), 373–395. http://doi.org/10.1080/13510340600579243\nHo, M. S. (2005). Taiwan’s State and Social Movements Under the DPP Government, 2000–2004. Journal of East Asian Studies, 5, 401–425.\nHo, M. S. (2005). Weakened State and Social Movement: the paradox of Taiwanese environmental politics after the power transfer. Journal of Contemporary China, 14(43), 339–352. http://doi.org/10.1080/10670560500065587\nHo, M. S. (2010). Environmental Movement in Democratizing Taiwan (1980–2004): A Political Opportunity Structure Perspective. Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies, 283–314. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09626-1_13\nHo, M. S. (2010). Understanding the Trajectory of Social Movements in Taiwan (1980-2010). Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 39(3).\nHsiao, H. H. (1990). Emerging Social Movements and the Rise of a Demanding Civil Society in Taiwan. The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, (24), 163–180. http://doi.org/10.2307/2158893\nHsiao, H. H. (1996). Social Movements and Civil Society in Taiwan. The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies, 11.\nHsieh, F. S. J. (2005). Ethnicity, National Identity, and Domestic Politics in Taiwan. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 40(1-2), 13–28. http://doi.org/10.1177/0021909605052936\nHsu, S. C. (2015). The China Factor and Taiwan’s CSOs in the Sunflower Movement: The Case of Democratic Front against the Cross-Strait service trade Aggrement. In The 20th Anniversary Conference on Students Movement and Social Justice (pp. 1–24). Academia Sinica.\nHuang, T. F., & Yu, C. H. (1999). Developing a Party System and Democratic Democratic Consolidation. In S. Tsang & H. M. Tien (Eds.), Democratization in Taiwan: Implication for China. MacMillan Press Ltd.\nHuang, T. W. (2006). The President Refuses to Cohabit: Semi-Presidentialism in Taiwan. Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal, 15(2), 376–402.\nHungtington, S. P. (1991). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century (3rd ed.). Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.\nIshiyama, J. T. (2011). Comparative Politics: Principles of Democracy and Democratization. United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell (an imprint of John Wiley & Sons Ltd).\nIvonne, P. (2003). Transnational Activism in Asia: Problems of Power and Democracy. (N. Piper & A. Uhlin, Eds.). United Kingdom: Routledge.\nKumar, K. (1993). Civil Society: An Inquiry into the Usefulness of an Historical Term. The British Journal of Sociology, 44(3). http://doi.org/10.2307/591808\nKuo, C. T. (2000). Taiwan’s Distorted Democracy in Comparative Perspective. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 35(1), 85–111. http://doi.org/10.1177/002190960003500106\nLai, T. H., Myers, R. H., & Wei, W. (1991). A tragic Beginning: the Taiwan Uprising of February 28, 1947. United States: Stanford University Press.\nLeib, E. J. (2004). Deliberative Democracy in America: A Proposal for A Popular Branch of government. United States: Pennsylvania State University Press.\nLin, K. M. (2009). State, Civil Society, and Deliberative Democracy: The practice of Consensus Conference in Taiwan. Taiwanese Sociology, 17, 161–217.\nLinz, J. J., & Stepan, A. C. (1996). Toward Consolidated Democracies. Journal of Democracy, 7(2), 14–33. http://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1996.0031\nLipset, S. M. (1959). Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53(01), 69–105. http://doi.org/10.2307/1951731\nLiu, H. J. (2015). Study of Social Protest Events. In The 20th Anniversary Conference on Students Movement and Social Justice (pp. 1–19).\nLu, Y. L. (1991). Political Opposition in Taiwan: The Development of the Democratic Progressive Party. In T. Cheng & S. Haggard (Eds.), Political change in Taiwan (pp. 121–146). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.\nLuskin, R. C., & Fishkin, J. S. (2004). Deliberation and ‘Better Citizens’.\nLuskin, R. C., Fishkin, J. S., & Jowell, R. (2002). Considered Opinions: Deliberative Polling in Britain. British Journal of Political Science, 32(03), 455–487. http://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123402000194\nMackie, G. (2004). Schumpeter’s Leadership Democracy.\nMinkoff, D. C. (1997). The Sequencing of Social Movements. American Sociological Review, 62(5). http://doi.org/10.2307/2657360\nMuller, K. B. (2006). The Civil Society-State Relationship in Contemporary Discourse: A Complementary Account from Giddens’ Perspective1. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 8(2), 311–330. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856x.2006.00212.x\nMyint, Y. (1994). Democratic Transition in Taiwan.\nMøller, J., & Skaaning, S. E. (2013). The Third Wave: Inside the Numbers. Journal of Democracy, 24(4), 97–109. http://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2013.0057\nNabatchi, T. (2010). Addressing the Citizenship and Democratic Deficits: The Potential of Deliberative Democracy for Public Administration. The American Review of Public Administration, 40(4), 376–399. http://doi.org/10.1177/0275074009356467\nNgok, M. (2007). Political Development in Hong Kong: State, Political Society, and Civil Society. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.\nNorris, P. (1999). Introduction: The Growth of Critical Citizens? Critical Citizens, 1–28. http://doi.org/10.1093/0198295685.003.0001\nO’Donnell, G., & Schmitter, P. (1986). Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies, Vol. 4 (1st ed.). United States: Johns Hopkins University Press.\nOlsen, M. E. (1982). Participatory Pluralism: Political Participation and Influence in the United States and Sweden. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.\nOttaway, M., & Carothers, T. (Eds.). (2000). Funding Virtue: Civil Society Aid and Democracy Promotion. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.\nPateman, C. (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory. United Kingdom: Cambridge [Eng.] University Press, 1970.\nPotter, D. (1977). Democratization at the Same Time in South Korea and Taiwan. In D. Potter, D. Goldblatt, M. Kiloh, & P. Lewis (Eds.), Democratization (1st ed.). USA: Blackwell.\nPowell, B. G. (1982). Contemporary Democracies: Participation, Stability and Violence. Cambridge, Mass: Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press, 1982.\nPutnam, R. (1995). Tuning in, Tuning out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(04), 664–683. http://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096500058856\nRigger, S. (1999). Politics in Taiwan: Voting for Democracy. United Kingdom: London : Routledge, 1999.\nRigger, S. (2006). Taiwan’s Rising Rationalism: Generations, Politics, and ‘Taiwanese Nationalism’. Washington, D.C.: East-West Center.\nSchattschneider, E. E. (1975). The Semi Sovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.\nSchumpeter, J. A. (1976). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (1st ed.). London: George Allen & Unwin.\nShen, S., & Wu, N. T. (2008). Ethnic and Civic Nationalisms: Two Roads to the Formation of Taiwan’s New Nation. In P. C. Y. Chow (Ed.), The ‘One China’ Dilemma (1st ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.\nSomers, M. R. (1993). Citizenship and the Place of the Public Sphere: Law, Community, and Political Culture in the Transition to Democracy. American Sociological Review, 58(5). http://doi.org/10.2307/2096277\nStepan, A. C. (1988). Rethinking Military Politics: Brazil and the Southern Cone. United States: Princeton University Press.\nTan, Q., Yu, P. K., & Chen, W. (1996). Local Politics in Taiwan: Democratic Consolidation. Asian Survey, 36(5), 483–494. http://doi.org/10.1525/as.1996.36.5.01p0133j\nTarrow, S. G. (1994). Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\nTien, H. M. (1991). Transformation of an Authoritarian Party State: Taiwan’s Development Experience. In T. Cheng & S. Haggard (Eds.), Political change in Taiwan. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.\nTocqueville, A. de. (1863). Democracy in America. (H. Reeve, Trans.) (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Sever & Francis.\nTsai, C. H., & Chao, S. C. (2008). Nonpartisans and Party System of Taiwan: Evidence from 1996, 2000 and 2004 Presidential Elections. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 43(6), 615–641. http://doi.org/10.1177/0021909608096657\nTzeng, A. (2015). The Axis of the Sunflower Movement 太陽花運動的論述軸線. In The 20th Anniversary Conference on Students Movement and Social Justice. Academia Sinica.\nUslaner, E. M. (2002). The Moral Foundations of Trust (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\nWang, Y. T. (2012). A Case Study of Parties’ Programmatic and Clientelistic Electoral Appeals in Taiwan. Sweden: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.\nWeigle, M. A. (2000). Russia’s Liberal Project: State-Society Relations in the Transition from Communism (Post-Communist Cultural Studies Series). Pennsylvania State University Press.\nWeng, B. S. J. (2009). A Short History of Taiwan’s Democracy Movement. In B. Bridges & L. S. Ho (Eds.), Public Governance in Asia and the Limits of Electoral Democracy. Edward Elgar Publishing.\nWheeler, E., & Chu, Y. H. (1993). Crafting Democracy in Taiwan. The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, (30). http://doi.org/10.2307/2950011\nWu, Y. S. (2001). Taiwan in 2000 Managing the Aftershocks from Power Transfer. Asian Survey, 41(1), 40–48. http://doi.org/10.1525/as.2001.41.1.40\nYu, C. H. (2005). The Evolving Party System in Taiwan, 1995-2004. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 40(1-2), 105–123. http://doi.org/10.1177/0021909605052947\n\nNews/ Websites\nArthur. (2015, July 31). Civics Curriculum Reform Based on Ethnocentrism May Harm our Children. Retrieved 17 August 2015, from http://outreachfortaiwan.org/2015/07/30/civics-curriculum-reform-based-on-ethnocentrism-may-harm-our-children/\nChen, P. H., & Chen, W. H. (2015, August 6). Curriculum Protests: Curriculum Adjustments ‘Undermine Aborigines’. Retrieved 17 August 2015, from http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2015/08/06/2003624741\nCole, M. J. (2014, March 20). Taiwanese Occupy Legislature Over China Pact. Retrieved 11 June 2015, from http://thediplomat.com/2014/03/taiwanese-occupy-legislature-over-china-pact/\nCole, M. J. (2015, July 24). Taiwanese Students Occupy Education Ministry over Textbook Controversy. Retrieved 17 August 2015, from http://thediplomat.com/2015/07/taiwanese-students-occupy-education-ministry-over-textbook-controversy/\nEDITORIAL: Implications of Taipei Mayoral Race. (2014, July 29). Retrieved 4 June 2015, from http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2014/07/29/2003596153\nGershman, C. (2000, November 27). The Role of Civil Society Organizations in the Global Movement for Democracy | National Endowment for Democracy. Retrieved 22 June 2015, from http://www.ned.org/about/board/meet-our-president/archived-remarks-and-presentations/112700\nHuang, M. H. (2014, December 8). Taiwan’s Changing Political Landscape: The KMT’s Landslide Defeat in the Nine-in-One Elections. Retrieved 17 August 2015, from http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2014/12/08-taiwan-political-landscape-elections\nLin, R., Liang, P. C., & Chen, W. H. (2015, May 30). Students Stage Nationwide Protest. Retrieved 17 August 2015, from http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2015/05/30/2003619486\nRamzy, A. (2014, November 29). Independent is Elected Taipei Mayor as Taiwan’s Governing Party Falters. Asia Pacific. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/30/world/asia/independent-is-elected-taipei-mayor-as-taiwans-governing-party-falters-.html?_r=0\nSmith, G. (2015, May 7). Taiwan’s Sunflower Revolution: One Year Later. Retrieved 7 August 2015, from http://fpif.org/taiwans-sunflower-revolution-one-year-later/\nTaiwan Students Protest ‘China-centric’ Education. (2015, July 22). Retrieved 17 August 2015, from http://gulfnews.com/news/asia/china/taiwan-students-protest-china-centric-education-1.1554360\nTang, C. L., & Chen, W. H. (2015, April 28). Student Activism Comes of Age: Exhibit. Retrieved 7 August 2015, from http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2015/04/28/2003616980\nWho is Lin Fei-fan? A Brief Bio of the Student Leader Behind Taiwan’s Sunflower Movement. (2014, March 31). Retrieved 16 August 2015, from http://translate.chineseconnects.com/bio-lin-fei-fan/
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)
102926005
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102926005
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
600501.pdf811.46 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.