Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/83524| 題名: | 食品安全事件的媒體再現──以Yahoo!奇摩新聞的「毒澱粉」報導以及其讀者評論為例 Media Representation of Food Safety Issues: How the “Toxic Starch” Scandals were Covered and Commented on Yahoo! News |
作者: | 陳毓屏 Chen, Yu Ping |
貢獻者: | 施琮仁 Shih, Tsung Jen 陳毓屏 Chen, Yu Ping |
關鍵詞: | 科學新聞 風險傳播 健康傳播 報導品質 讀者評論 讀者互動 食品安全 |
日期: | 2016 | 上傳時間: | 1-四月-2016 | 摘要: | 本研究以《Yahoo!奇摩新聞》的毒澱粉報導以及其讀者評論為研究對象，研究重點分為兩大部分，第一是探討台灣媒體如何再現食品安全新聞，欲了解其風險訊息品質、可讀性表現，第二是探討讀者評論，並聚焦討論是否不同的讀者評論特色會有讀者互動溝通上的差異，而風險訊息品質的高低又是否會有讀者互動溝通上的不同。\n 本研究以內容分析法分析《Yahoo!奇摩新聞》的毒澱粉報導以及其讀者評論，樣本蒐集以官方單位開始對事件發表聲明的日期為起始日（2013年5月13日），做出處置的階段為結束日（2013年6月21日）。\n 本研究發現台灣媒體報導食品安全新聞時，儘管會告知風險，但對報導注意度有益的表現形式不足，欠缺整理過的資訊，幾乎不會使用表格、流程圖等化繁為簡的方式解釋毒澱粉的危害或流向，也很少使用故事手法呈現報導；對報導理解度有益的部分則呈現出解釋力偏弱的情形，報導解釋專有名詞和關鍵概念的比例不高，也極少提供中英對照名詞；此外，也發現毒澱粉新聞提供的風險資訊中，質化資訊多於量化資訊，個人難以依其評估自身風險。\n 最後在探討新聞資訊精確度與讀者評論特色對讀者互動溝通相關性的部分，發現讀者評論才是影響互動的主要因素，「不禮貌的讀者評論」、「提及個人故事或經驗談的評論」以及「離題的評論」都較能引發讀者互動；新聞對讀者的互動則沒有顯著的影響。 | 參考文獻: | 中文部分\n〈2013大事回顧－食不安 廠商黑心 台灣蒙塵〉。（2013年12月10日）。上網日期：2016年3月23日，取自Yahoo奇摩新聞網站https://tw.news.yahoo.com/2-%E9%A3%9F%E4%B8%8D%E5%AE%89-%E5%BB%A0%E5%95%86%E9%BB%91%E5%BF%83-%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E8%92%99%E5%A1%B5-074546535.html\n〈25噸粉圓粄條摻傷腎澱粉疑已下肚三聚氰胺翻版下架銷毀〉（2013年5月14日）。上網日期：2015年3月21日，取自蘋果日報網站http://www.appledaily.com.tw/appledaily/article/headline/20130514/35016420/\nBrian Wynne（2007）。〈風險社會、不確定性和科學民主化：STS的未來〉，陳瑞麟（主編），《科技、醫療與社會》，頁15-42。\n〈Yahoo奇摩2013「十大年度新聞」給你真相！〉。取自http://ycorpblog.tumblr.com/post/69759201191/yahoo-2013\n〈Yahoo奇摩2013年「十大熱搜榜」出爐!〉。取自http://ycorpblog.tumblr.com/post/68741740802/yahoo-2013\n〈只查證明難防作假 毒澱粉風波賴清德宣布暫緩行政稽查〉（2013年6月4日）。上網日期：2015年3月21日，取自自由時報網站http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/paper/685030\n〈吃毒澱粉肉圓「像在服毒」1顆就超標〉（2013年5月26日）。上網日期：2015年3月21日，取自蘋果日報網站http://www.appledaily.com.tw/appledaily/article/headline/20130526/35042740/\n〈多吃豬皮雞腳加速排毒〉（2013年5月25日）。上網日期：2015年3月21日，取自蘋果日報網站http://www.appledaily.com.tw/appledaily/article/headline/20130525/35041172/applesearch/%\n〈吳敦義︰「毒澱粉沒有那麼多毒」網友罵翻天〉（2013年6月11日）。上網日期：2015年3月21日，取自自由時報網站http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/paper/6870\n〈阿基師火大「不肖業者抓去槍斃」〉（2013年5月15日）。上網日期：2015年3月21日，取自蘋果日報網站http://www.appledaily.com.tw/appledaily/article/headline/20130515/35018305/\n〈非列管毒化物濫用風險難防〉（2013年5月15日）。上網日期：2015年3月21日，取自自由時報網站http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2013/new/may/15/today-life8.htm\n〈星國查驗台製11食品含毒澱粉〉（2013年5月28日）。上網日期：2015年3月21日，取自自由時報網站 http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/focus/paper/683199\n〈毒澱粉主婦聯盟里仁有機豆花也淪陷〉（2013年5月25日）。上網日期：2015年3月21日，取自蘋果日報網站http://www.appledaily.com.tw/appledaily/article/headline/20130525/35040693/applesearch/\n〈毒澱粉致洗腎？別妄加論斷〉（楊振昌，2013年6月9日）。上網日期：2015年3月21日，取自聯合知識庫http://udndata.com/library/\n〈毒澱粉製黑輪超商量販下架〉（2013年5月15日）。上網日期：2015年3月21日，取自蘋果日報網站http://www.appledaily.com.tw/appledaily/article/headline/20130515/35018295/applesearch/\n〈毒澱粉竄全台專家：疑國人腎臟病主因〉（2013年5月26日）。上網日期：2015年3月21日，取自自由時報網站http://iservice.libertytimes.com.tw/liveNews/news.php?no=813478&type=%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB\n〈科技部傳播調查資料庫 第一期第二次（2013）：網路使用行為〉（2013）。取自科技部傳播調查資料庫網頁http://www.crctaiwan.nctu.edu.tw/AnnualSurvey_detail.asp?ASD_ID=17\n〈食品安全信任度調查結果〉（2013）。取自遠見民調http://www.gvsrc.net.tw/dispPageBox/GVSRCCP.aspx?ddsPageID=NEWS&dbid=3098763222\n〈順丁烯二酸酐化製澱粉之Q&A〉（2013）。取自衛生署福利部健康食品署網頁http://www.fda.gov.tw/tc/siteContent.aspx?sid=3473#.U_bjh2PCfYo\n〈新媒體與公民參與〉（2014）。取自傳播調查資料庫網頁：http://www.crctaiwan.nctu.edu.tw/ResultsShow_detail.asp?RS_ID=12\n〈豬皮、雞腳解「毒澱粉」？多喝水最佳！〉（2013年5月27日）。上網日期：2015年3月21日，取自自由時報網站：http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/814066\n〈澱粉摻順丁烯二酸毒澱粉流傳42年〉（2013年5月28日）。上網日期：2015年3月20日，取自Yahoo奇摩新聞網站https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E6%BE%B1%E7%B2%89%E6%91%BB%E9%A0%86%E4%B8%81%E7%83%AF%E4%BA%8C%E9%85%B8-%E6%AF%92%E6%BE%B1%E7%B2%89%E6%B5%81%E5%82%B342%E5%B9%B4-121848766.html\n〈聯成石化才是源頭？毒澱粉牽涉廣〉（2013年5月20日）。上網日期：2015年3月20日，取自自由時報網站http://iservice.libertytimes.com.tw/liveNews/news.php?no=810427&type=%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB\n《華人健康網》。上網日期：2015年1月21日，取自http://www.top1health.com/Article/236/13728\n王泰俐（2003）。〈誰的互動性網站?—從2000 年和 2002 年選舉看臺灣選舉網站互動性概念的演進〉，《新聞學研究》， 77: 107-141。\n吳宜倫（2015年12月4日）。〈臉書在台推出Instant Articles 啟動閱讀新視野〉，《電子商務時報》。上網日期：2015年12月5日，取自http://www.ectimes.org.tw/Shownews.aspx?id=151203230500\n吳筱玫（2003）。《網路傳播概論》。台北：智勝。\n李孝軍、顏春蘭（無日期）。〈環境檢驗的優質美學—濃度計量 ppm 與 ppb 及 ppt〉，取自行政院環境保護署環境檢驗所網頁http://www.niea.gov.tw/\n林天送（2013）。〈營養解說毒澱粉的毒性〉，《健康世界》，330：26-30。\n林東泰（2002）。《大眾傳播理論》，台北：師大書院。\n林金池（2008）。《「合作／非合作」語用原則─論記者與消息來源之語言互動策略》。國立政治大學傳播學院在職專班碩士論文。\n林詩玟（2012）。《以資源基礎觀點分析入口網站的新聞策略聯盟》。交通大學傳播研究所碩士論文。\n林維國（2013）。《新媒體與民意: 理論與實證》。台灣五南。\n邱柏勝（2014）。《食品安全風險議題的媒體再現與框架分析：以瘦肉精美牛爭議新聞報導為例》。臺灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文。\n邱柔毓（2014）。《信任與背叛：「食品安全」新聞報導的敘事分析》。淡江大學大眾傳播學系碩士論文。\n胡邵嘉（1999）。〈如果身體會說...:醫療報導語言中的人與身體〉，《新聞學研究》，61:1-61。\n徐美苓、楊意菁（2011）。〈科技風險與全球暖化報導品質分析〉，「2011中華傳播學會年會」，新竹交通大學客家學院。\n康照洲（2013年6月13日）。〈食品驗出順丁烯二酸就是不法？〉，《中國時報》。上網日期：2015年3月25日，取自http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20130613000434-260109\n張約翰（2015年12月17日）。〈紐約時報如何將你不敢看的留言變成一門好生意？〉，《聯合報》。上網日期：2016年1月21日，取自http://opinion.udn.com/opinion/story/9114/1361941\n張郁敏（2013）。〈什麼樣的科學新聞內容會受新聞媒體青睞? 報紙與電視科學新聞媒體顯著性之決定因素初探〉，《 新聞學研究》，117: 47-88。\n張卿卿（2012）。〈科學新聞資訊呈現形式及其對閱聽眾資訊接收的影響－以科學知識觀點與認知基模理論來探討〉，《科學教育學刊》，20（3）：193-216。\n陳姿伶（2012）。《行政院衛生署處理塑化劑事件之危機情境、危機回應策略及媒體效能》。臺灣師範大學大眾傳播研究所碩士論文。\n陳琪惠（2006）。《有機食品的媒體再現－以《中國時報》、《聯合報》以及《民生報》的報導為例（1995-2006年）》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。\n陳雅妤（2012）。《核能科技的新聞建構－以福島核災報導為例》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。\n陳毓屏（2014年3月）。〈探討媒體的科學報導品質--以《蘋果日報》、《自由時報》、《聯合報》報導「毒澱粉事件」為例〉，「2014台灣STS年會」，新竹交通大學客家學院。\n陳綱佩、張寶芳、洪瑞雲（2007）。〈科學報導的閱讀理解與隱喻的角色〉，《中華傳播學刊》，11：71-109。\n陳憶寧（2011）。〈當科學家與記者相遇: 探討兩種專業對於科學新聞的看法差異〉，《中華傳播學刊》，19:147-187。\n陳韻如（2011）。〈保護誰的生命？秘魯「婦女運動」公共議題的新聞框架〉，《新聞學研究》，109:121-166。\n曾薏珊（2011）。《H1N1新型流感報導中憤怨恐慌的要素與風險解釋》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。\n黃俊儒（2014）。《別輕易相信！你必須知道的科學偽新聞》。台北：時報出版。\n楊智元（2009）。《毒奶粉的風險論述分析與三聚氰胺的管制爭議》。臺灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文。\n臧國仁（1999）。《新聞媒體與消息來源—媒介框架與真實建構之論述》。台北：三民書局。\n劉靜瑀（2013年4月26日）。〈台灣餐飲服務業年營業額創歷史新高〉。上網日期：2015年5月21日，取自中央廣播電台網站http://news.rti.org.tw/index_newsContent.aspx?nid=420313\n劉鶴群、林秀雲、陳麗欣、胡正申與黃韻如（2010）。《社會科學研究方法》 ，台北：雙葉。（原書：Babbie, E.﹝1975﹞. The Practice of Social Research(12 Ed.) from Cengage Learning）\n鄧宗聖（2004）。〈誰在近用媒介？初探報紙讀者投書的文化資本生態〉，《中華傳播學刊》，6：195-239。\n鄭宇君（2003）。〈從社會脈絡解析科學新聞的產製－以基因新聞為例〉，《新聞學研究》，74：121-147。\n駱慧雯（2013年6月6日）。〈毒澱粉氾濫 兒童健康飲食3觀念〉，\n謝君蔚（2008）。《基因科技的媒體再現：以基因改造食品新聞為例》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。\n謝君蔚、徐美苓（2011）。〈媒體再現科技發展與風險的框架與演變：以基因改造食品新聞為例〉，《中華傳播學刊》，20：143-179。\n謝佳書（無日期）。〈三餐老是在外台灣餐飲商機尚在！〉。取自中華徵信所企業股份有限公司網頁http://www.credit.com.tw/newweb/market/weekly/index.cfm?sn=128\n韓宜靜（2011）。《以敘事分析解讀有機食品在當代的意涵》。淡江大學大眾傳播學系碩士論文。\n顏若瑾（2010）。《政府危機傳播研究:以衛生署處理中國大陸毒奶粉事件為例》。臺灣師範大學大眾傳播研究所碩士論文。\n顏理謙（2015年7月15日）。〈讀報落伍了？63%美國讀者用Facebook看新聞〉，《數位時代》。取自http://www.bnext.com.tw/article/view/id/36771\n\n英文部分\nAllan, S. (2002). Media, risk and science. United Kingdom: Open University Press.\nAmberg, S. M., & Hall, T. E. (2010). Precision and rhetoric in media reporting about contamination in farmed salmon.Science Communication, 32(4), 489–513.\nAnderson, A. A., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Xenos, M. A., & Ladwig, P. (2013). The ‘Nasty effect:’ online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 373–387. \nAnderson, W. A. (2000). The future relationship between the media, the food industry and the consumer. British Medical Bulletin, 56(1), 254–268. \nAngouri, J., & Tseliga, T. (2010). ‘You have no idea what you are talking about!’ From e-disagreement to e-impoliteness in two online fora. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, 6(1), 57-82 .\nAyoob, K.-T., Duyff, R. L., & Quagliani, D. (2002). Position of the American Dietetic association. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 102(2), 260–266. \nBaram-Tsabari, A., & Segev, E.(2011). Exploring new web-based tools to identify public interest in science. Public Understanding of Science, 20(1), 130-143\nBarthel, M., Shearer, E., Gottfried, J., & Mitchell, A. (2015, July 14). The evolving role of news on Twitter and Facebook. Retrieved March 21, 2016, from http://www.journalism.org/2015/07/14/the-evolving-role-of-news-on-twitter-and-facebook/\nBerry, T. R., Wharf-Higgins, J., & Naylor, P. J. (2007). SARS wars: an examination of the quantity and construction of health information in the news media. Health communication, 21(1), 35-44.\nBlaine, K., & Powell, D. (2001) Communication of food-related risks. AgBioForum, 4(3&4), 179-185. \nBorah, P. (2012). Does it matter where you read the news story? Interaction of Incivility and news frames in the political Blogosphere. Communication Research, 41(6), 809–827.\nBorra, S. T., Earl, R., & Hogan, E. H. (1998). Paucity of nutrition and food safety ‘news you can use’reveals opportunity for dietetics practitioners. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 98(2), 190-193.\nBrechman, J. M., Lee, C. J., & Cappella, J. N. (2011). Distorting genetic research about cancer: from bench science to press release to published news. Journal of Communication, 61(3), 496-513.\nBruhn, C. M. (1995). Consumer attitudes and market response to irradiated food. Journal of Food Protection, 58(2), 175-181.\nBruhn, C. M. (1997). Consumer concerns: motivating to action. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 3(4), 511.\nCahill, S., Morley, K., & Powell, D. A. (2010). Coverage of organic agriculture in north American newspapers. British Food Journal, 112(7), 710–722.\nChang, C. (2011). News coverage of health-related issues and its impacts on perceptions: Taiwan as an example. Health Communication, 27(2), 111–123. \nChmiel, A., Sobkowicz, P., Sienkiewicz, J., Paltoglou, G., Buckley, K., Thelwall, M., & Hołyst, J. A. (2011). Negative emotions boost user activity at BBC forum. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 390(16), 2936–2944.\nClark, F. (2006). A longitudinal study of the New York times science times section. Science Communication, 27(4), 496–513. \n Coe, K., Kenski, K., & Rains, S. A. (2014). Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of Incivility in newspaper Website comments. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 658–679. \nConnery, B. A. (1997). IMHO: Authority and egalitarian rhetoric in the virtual coffeehouse. In D. Porter (Ed.), Internet culture (pp.161-179). New York: Routledge.\nCoombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2002). Helping crisis managers protect Reputational assets: Initial tests of the Situational crisis communication theory. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(2), 165–186. \nCovello, V. T. (2001). Risk communication, the west Nile virus epidemic, and bioterrorism: Responding to the communication challenges posed by the intentional or unintentional release of a pathogen in an urban setting. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 78(2), 382–391.\nDe Jonge, J., Frewer, L., van Trijp, H., Jan Renes, R., de Wit, W., & Timmers, J. (2004). Monitoring consumer confidence in food safety: An exploratory study. British Food Journal, 106(10/11), 837–849.\nDe Jonge, J., Van Trijp, H., Renes, R. J., & Frewer, L. J. (2010). Consumer confidence in the safety of food and newspaper coverage of food safety issues: A longitudinal perspective. Risk Analysis, 30(1), 125–142.\nDiakopoulos, N., & Naaman, M. (2011) Towards quality discourse in online news comments. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on computer supported cooperative work, March 19–23, Hangzhou, China.\nDriedger, S. M. (2007). Risk and the media: A comparison of print and televised news stories of a Canadian drinking water risk event. Risk analysis, 27(3), 775-786.\nDriedger, S. M., Jardine, C. G., Boyd, A. D., & Mistry, B. (2009). Do the first 10 days equal a year? Comparing two Canadian public health risk events using the national media. Health, Risk & Society, 11(1), 39-53. \nDudo, A. D., Dahlstrom, M. F., & Brossard, D. (2007). Reporting a potential pandemic a risk-related assessment of avian influenza coverage in US newspapers. Science Communication, 28(4), 429-454.\n Earnscliffe Research and Communications. (2001). Presentation to the CFIA consultation on plant molecular farming. Ottawa, Canada. November 1.\nFernandez-Duque, D., & Johnson, M. L. (1999). Attention metaphors: How metaphors guide the cognitive psychology of attention. Cognitive Science, 23(1), 83–116. \nFleming, K., Thorson, E., & Zhang, Y. (2006). Going beyond exposure to local news media: An information-processing examination of public perceptions of food safety. Journal of health communication, 11(8), 789-806.\nFreelon, D. (2010). ReCal: Intercoder reliability calculation as a web service. International Journal of Internet Science, 5(1), 20-33.\nFreelon, D. (2013). ReCal OIR: Ordinal, interval, and ratio intercoder reliability as a web service. International Journal of Internet Science, 8(1), 10-16.\nFreudenburg, W. R., Coleman, C.-L., Gonzales, J., & Helgeland, C. (1996). Media coverage of hazard events: Analyzing the assumptions. Risk Analysis, 16(1), 31–42. \nGamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. The American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1-37.\nGauthier, E. (2010). Foodborne microbial risks in the press: The framing of listeriosis in Canadian newspapers. Public Understanding of Science, 20(2), 270–286.\nGray, J., Chambers, L., & Bounegru, L. (2012). The data journalism handbook." O`Reilly Media, Inc.". Retrieved from http://datajournalismhandbook.org/\nHansen, J., Holm, L., Frewer, L., Robinson, P., & Sandøe, P. (2003). Beyond the knowledge deficit: recent research into lay and expert attitudes to food risks. Appetite, 41(2), 111-121.\nHayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication methods and measures,1(1), 77-89.\nHeidmann, I., & Milde, J. (2013). Communication about scientific uncertainty: how scientists and science journalists deal with uncertainties in nanoparticle research. Environmental Sciences Europe, 25(1), 1-11.\nHoban, Thomas. (1998). Trends in consumer attitudes about agricultural biotechnology. Retrieved from: AgBioForum the World Wide Web: http://www.agbioforum.org.\nHsu, M. L. (2008). Food risk and crisis communication in Taiwan: Cases of dioxin contamination. In International Forum on Public Relations and Advertising–Crisis Management and Integrated Strategic Communication, Hong Kong, PRC.\nInternational Food Information Council Foundation (2014). 2014 Food and Health Survey. Retrieved from Food Insight: www.foodinsight.org/articles/2014-food-and-health-survey\nInternational Food Information Council. (2005). Food for thought VI. Executive summary. Retrieved from http://www.foodinsight.org/Food_For_Thought_VI_\nJacob, C. J., Lok, C., Morley, K., & Powell, D. A. (2010). Government management of two media-facilitated crises involving dioxin contamination of food. Public Understanding of Science, 20(2), 261–269. \nJensen, J. D., Carcioppolo, N., King, A. J., Bernat, J. K., Davis, L., Yale, R., & Smith, J. (2011). Including limitations in news coverage of cancer research: Effects of news hedging on fatalism, medical skepticism, patient trust, and backlash. Journal of health communication, 16(5), 486-503.\nKalaitzandonakes, N., Marks, L. A., &Vickner, S. S. (2004). Media coverage of biotech foods and influence on consumer choice. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86(5), 1238-1246.\nKiesler, S., Zubrow, D., Moses, A. M., & Geller, V. (1985). Affect in computer-mediated communication: An experiment in synchronous terminal-to-terminal discussion. Human-Computer Interaction, 1(1), 77-104.\nKim, S. H., & Anne Willis, L. (2007). Talking about obesity: News framing of who is responsible for causing and fixing the problem. Journal of health communication, 12(4), 359-376.\nKitzinger, J., & Reilly, J. (1997). The rise and fall of risk reporting: Media coverage of human genetics research, "False memory syndrome’ and "Mad cow disease`. European Journal of Communication, 12(3), 319-350. \nKohler, C., & Riessman. (2001). ANALYSIS OF PERSONAL NARRATIVES. Retrieved from http://xenia.media.mit.edu/~brooks/storybiz/riessman.pdf \nKouper, I. (2010). Science blogs and public engagement with science: Practices, challenges, and opportunities. Journal of Science Communication, 9(1), 1-10.\nLaBarre, S. (2013). Why we’re shutting off our comments. Popular Science, 24, 2013-09. Retrieved from: http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2013-09/why-were-shutting-our-comments?src=SOC&dom=tw\nLaslo, E., Baram-Tsabari, A., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2011). A growth medium for the message: Online science journalism affordances for exploring public discourse of science and ethics. Journalism, 12(7), 847-870. \nLazarus, R. S. (1993). From psychological stress to the emotions: A history of changing outlooks. Annual review of psychology, 44(1), 1-22.\nLedford, C. J. W. (2013). Mediated medication-risk messages: A content analysis of print news coverage of increased medication risk. Communication Quarterly, 61(4), 397-412.\nLee, E.-J., & Jang, Y. J. (2010). What do others’ reactions to news on Internet portal sites tell us? Effects of presentation format and readers` need for Cognition on reality perception. Communication Research, 37(6), 825-846. \nLen-Rios, M. E., Bhandari, M., & Medvedeva, Y. S. (2014). Deliberation of the scientific evidence for Breastfeeding: Online comments as social representations. Science Communication, 36(6), 778-801.\nLeón, B. (2008). Science related information in European television: a study of prime-time news. Public Understanding of Science, 17(4), 443-460.\nLichter, S. R., & Amundson, D. (1996). Food for thought: Reporting of diet, nutrition and food safety May 1995-July 1995. Center for Media and Public Affairs.\nLichter, S. R., & Rothman, S. (1999). Environmental cancer: A political disease? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.\nLogan, R. A., Zengjun, P., & Wilson, N. F. (2000). Prevailing impressions in science and medical news: A content analysis of the Los Angeles Times and the Washington post. Science Communication, 22(1), 27-45. \nMichelle Driedger, S. (2008). Creating shared realities through communication: Exploring the agenda-building role of the media and its sources in the E. Coli contamination of a Canadian public drinking water supply. Journal of Risk Research,11(1), 23-40. \nMiller, J. D., Augenbraun, E., Schulhof, J., & Kimmel, L. G. (2006). Adult science learning from local television newscasts. Science Communication, 28(2), 216-242.\nMiller, S. (2001). Public understanding of science at the crossroads. Public understanding of science, 10(1), 115-120.\nMou, Y., & Lin, C. A. (2014). Communicating food safety via the social media: The role of knowledge and emotions on risk perception and prevention. Science Communication, 36(5), 593-616. \nNational Science Board (2014) Science and Technology: Public Attitudes and Understanding. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/index.cfm/chapter-7/c7h.htm\nNational Science Board. (2010). Science and Technology: Public Attitudes and Understanding. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind10/c7/c7h.htm\nNelkin, D. (1987). Selling science: How the press covers science and technology. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.\nNeurauter-Kessels, M. (2011). Im/polite reader responses on British online news sites. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, 7(2), 187-214.\nNisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, reservations, or promise? A media effects model for public perceptions of science and technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584-608\nNucci, M. L., Cuite, C. L., & Hallman, W. K. (2009). When good food goes bad television network news and the spinach recall of 2006. Science Communication, 31(2), 238-265\nPetts, J., Horlick-Jones, T., Murdock, G., Hargreaves, D., McLachlan, S., & Loftstedt, R. (2001). Social amplification of risk: The media and the public. Retrieved from www.hse.gov.uk/research/crr_pdf/2001/#pdfcrr01329.pdf \nPew Project for Excellence in Journalism (2010). The state of the news media：An annual report on American journalism. Retrieved Journary 9th, 2015 from :http://www.stateofthemedia.org/2010/online-summary-essay/audience-behavior/\nPiggott, N. E., & Marsh, T. L. (2004). Does food safety information impact US meat demand? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86(1), 154-174.\nPurcell, K., Rainie, L., Mitchell, A., Rosenstiel, T., & Olmstead, K. (2010). Understanding the participatory news consumer. Pew Internet and American Life Project, 1, 19-21.\nQin, W., & Brown, J. L. (2006). Consumer opinions about genetically engineered salmon and information effect on opinions a qualitative approach. Science Communication, 28(2), 243-272.\nQin, W., & Brown, J. L. (2007). Public reactions to information about genetically engineered foods effects of information formats and male female differences. Public Understanding of Science, 16(4), 471-488.\nQuiring, O. (2009). What do users associate with ‘interactivity’? A qualitative study on user schemata. New Media & Society, 11(6), 899-920.\nRafaeli, S., & Sudweeks, F. (1997). Networked interactivity. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 2(4). Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00201.x/full\nReview of the Scientific Basis for Safety Decisions on Hazards of Substances Added to Food. (2012). Retrieved from The Pew Charitable Trust: http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/issue-briefs/2012/07/27/review-of-the-scientific-basis-for-safety-decisions-on-hazards-of-substances-added-to-food\nRice, R. E., & Love, G. (1987). Electronic emotion socioemotional content in a computer-mediated communication network. Communication research, 14(1), 85-108.\nRobinson, S. (2010). Traditionalists vs. Convergers: Textual privilege, boundary work, and the journalist--audience relationship in the commenting policies of online news sites. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 16(1), 125-143.\nRoche, J. P. & M. A. T. Muskavitch. 2003. Limited precision in print media communication of West Nile Virus risks. Science Communication 24 (3): 353-365.\nRodriguez, L. (2007). The impact of risk communication on the acceptance of irradiated food. Science Communication, 28(4),476-500. \nRogers, C. L. (1999). The importance of understanding audiences. In S. M. Friedman,\nRuiz, C., Domingo, D., Mico, J. L., Diaz-Noci, J., Masip, P., & Meso, K. (2011). Public sphere 2.0? The democratic qualities of citizen debates in online newspapers. The International Journal of Press/Politics , 22, 463-487.\nS. Dunwoody & C. L. Rogers (Eds.), Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science. (p. 191). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.\nScheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of communication, 49(1), 103-122.\nSecko, D. M., Tlalka, S., Dunlop, M., Kingdon, A., & Amend, E. (2011). The unfinished science story: Journalist–audience interactions from the Globe and Mail’s online health and science sections. Journalism, 12(7), 814-831.\nSegev, E., &Baram-Tsabari, A. (2012). Seeking science information online: Data mining Google to better understand the roles of the media and the education system. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 813-829.\nShan, L., Regan, A., De Brun, A., Barnett, J., van der Sanden, M. C. A., Wall, P., & McConnon, A. (2013). Food crisis coverage by social and traditional media: A case study of the 2008 Irish dioxin crisis. Public Understanding of Science,23(8), 911-928.\nShih, T.-J., Wijaya, R., & Brossard, D. (2008). Media coverage of public health epidemics: Linking framing and issue attention cycle toward an integrated theory of print news coverage of epidemics. Mass Communication and Society,11(2), 141-160.\nSlovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk analysis, 24(2), 311-322.\nSobieraj, S., & Berry, J. M. (2011). From incivility to outrage: Political discourse in blogs, talkradio, and cable news. Political Communication, 28, 19-41.\nSparks, P., & Shepherd, R. (1994). Public perceptions of the potential hazards associated with food production and food consumption: an empirical study. Risk analysis, 14(5), 799-806.\nStromer-Galley, J., & Martinson, A. M. (2009). Coherence in political computer-mediated communication: analyzing topic relevance and drift in chat. Discourse & Communication, 3(2), 195-216.\nTen Eyck, T. A. (1999). Shaping a food safety debate: Control efforts of newspaper reporters and sources in the food irradiation controversy. Science Communication, 20(4), 426-447. \nTodt, O., Munoz, E., Gonzalez, M., Ponce, G., & Estevez, B. (2008). Consumer attitudes and the governance of food safety. Public Understanding of Science, 18(1), 103-114.\nTrench, B. (2009). Science reporting in the electronic embrace of the Internet. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Brian_Trench/publication/234187283_Science_reporting_in_the_electronic_embrace_of_the_internet/links/542e674c0cf29bbc126f198e.pdf \nUpadhyay, S. R. (2010). Identity and impoliteness in computer-mediated reader responses. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, 6(1), 105-127.\nWeber, P. (2013). Discussions in the comments section: Factors influencing participation and interactivity in online newspapers’ reader comments. New Media & Society, 16(6), 941-957.\nWilcock, A., Pun, M., Khanona, J., & Aung, M. (2004). Consumer attitudes, knowledge andbehaviour: a review of food safety issues. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 15(2), 56-66.\nWright, S., & Street, J. (2007). Democracy, deliberation and design: the case of online discussion forums. New Media & Society, 9(5), 849-869.\nZheng, Y. (2012). Framing food-related salmonella outbreaks in leading US newspapers and TVnetworks: Attribution of responsibilities and crisis response strategies. (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/12545/\nZhou, Y., & Moy, P. (2007). Parsing framing processes: The interplay between online public opinion and media coverage. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 79-98.\nZiegele, M., Breiner, T., & Quiring, O. (2014). What creates Interactivity in online news discussions? An exploratory analysis of discussion factors in user comments on news items. Journal of Communication, 64(6), 1111-1138. | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 新聞學系 101451021 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101451021 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 102101.pdf | 1.99 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.