Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/84840| 題名: | 蘇聯末期公民社會萌芽之研究 The Research of an Emerging Civil Society in late USSR |
作者: | 羅彥傑 Lo, Yen-Chieh |
貢獻者: | 郭武平 羅彥傑 Lo, Yen-Chieh |
關鍵詞: | 蘇聯 公民社會 新制度主義 民主化 自由化 Soviet Union Civil Society New institutionalism Democratization Liberalization |
日期: | 2001 | 上傳時間: | 15-Apr-2016 | 摘要: | 自一九七○年代中期南歐、拉丁美洲與蘇聯暨東歐各國相繼爆發民主浪潮以來，「公民社會」(Civil Society)即成為政治與社會學界探討的焦點。「公民社會」有賴於對個人結社言論自由、公共參與自由和政治參與自由的保障，因此其具有國家及社會走向自由化的意函。由於自由化往往先於民主化，在研究極權與威權國家民主轉型的過程中，「公民社會」便正好可作為研究一國走向民主化的起點。在世界各國民主轉型的例子中，蘇聯的民主轉型過程顯得與眾不同，這一方面是因為蘇聯本身是多民族帝國，境內民族問題嚴重，另一方面是因為蘇聯作為全球第一個、也是實施最久的社會主義國家，其擁抱的極權主義體制對國家與社會之間的關係產生深刻的影響。 Since South Europe, Latin America and the Soviet bloc began the democratization in 1970s, civil society has become the focus of the politics and sociology of academic circle. Civil society depends on the assurance of the association freedom, speech freedom, public participation freedom and political participation freedom, implying that the state and society are being or have been liberalized. Because liberalization always goes ahead of democratization, civil society happens to be used as a starting point of research of post-Communist transition. The USSR’s case seems so different with others, not only it as a multi-nation empire, but also it as the first and long-enduring socialist country in the world. |
參考文獻: | 壹. 中文部分\r\n一. 書籍\r\nDavid Potter & David Goldbalt & Margaret Kiloh & Paul Lewis著。 王謙等譯，民主化的歷程。台北：韋伯文化事業出版社，二○○○年。\r\nDusko Doder & Louise Branson著，譚天譯。戈巴契夫傳。台北：聯經出版事業公司，一九九○年。\r\nKate Nash著，林庭瑤譯。當代政治社會學。台北︰韋伯，二○○一年。\r\nSamuel P. Huntington著，劉軍寧譯。第三波：二十世紀末的民主化浪潮。台北：五南圖書出版公司，一九九四年。\r\nUlrich Beck著，孫治本譯。全球化危機。台北︰台灣商務印書館，一九九九年。\r\n尹慶耀。蘇維埃帝國的消亡。台北：五南圖書出版有限公司，一九九四年。\r\n戈巴契夫。改革與新思維。香港：民主大學，一九九○年。\r\n戈巴契夫著，譚天譯。俄羅斯的教訓。台北：貓頭鷹出版社，二○○一年。\r\n王廷玉等編譯，蘇聯改革中的各政黨和政治組織。吉林：吉林人民出版社，一九九二年。\r\n田弘茂、朱雲漢、Larry Diamond、Marc Plattnar主編。鞏固第三波民主。台北：業強出版社，一九九七年。\r\n別爾嘉耶夫著，汪劍釗譯。俄羅斯的命運。昆明：雲南人民出版社，一九九九年。\r\n李邁先。東歐諸國史。台北︰三民書局，一九九○年。\r\n李邁先。俄國史（上卷）（下卷）。台北︰正中書局，一九六九年。\r\n周煦。強權競爭下的阿富汗。台北縣永和市：漢苑，一九九○年。\r\n林琳文。後社會主義中國：毛澤東、鄧小平、江澤民。台北：升智文化，一九九七年。\r\n阿爾蒙德與維伯著。公民文化－五個國家的政治態度和民主制。北京︰華夏出版社，一九八九年。\r\n姚海。俄羅斯文化之路。台北︰淑馨，一九九一年。\r\n段昌國。保守與進取︰十九世紀俄國思想與政治變動之關係。台北︰大安出版社，一九九一年。\r\n洛克。政府論次講。台北：唐山出版社，一九八六年。\r\n韋伯著，于曉、陳維剛等譯。新教倫理與資本主義精神。台北︰唐山，一九九一年。\r\n殷海光基金會主編。市民社會與民主的反思。台北︰桂冠，一九九八年。\r\n涂爾幹著，芮傳明、趙學元譯。宗教生活的基本形式。台北：桂冠，一九九二年。\r\n畢英賢。俄羅斯。台北：政大國關中心，一九九四年。\r\n畢英賢。新蘇聯－社會主義祖國在蛻變中。台北：時報文化，一九九一年。\r\n郭武平。社會變遷與俄羅斯政治發展模式的選擇。台北：行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告，一九九八年。\r\n郭武平。俄羅斯的政黨政治。台北：五南圖書出版公司，一九九九年。\r\n陳鴻瑜。政治發展理論。台北：桂冠，一九九二年。\r\n費爾南．布勞岱爾著，施康強等譯。十五至十八世紀的物質文明、經濟和資本主義。台北︰貓頭鷹出版社，一九九九年。\r\n馮紹雷著。制度變遷與對外關係－一九九二年以來的俄羅斯。上海︰上海人民出版社，一九九七年。\r\n黃榮村等編。邁向公與義的社會（上）（下）。台北：時報文化，二○○○年。\r\n蔡文輝。社會變遷。台北：三民書局，一九九二年。\r\n顧忠華。社會學理論與社會實踐。台北：允晨文化，一九九九年。\r\n二. 期刊\r\n王承宗。「蘇聯共產黨第十九次黨代表會議研析」。問題與研究。第二七卷，第一二期。（一九八八年九月）：12-21。\r\n王承宗。「前蘇聯與俄羅斯新聞傳媒之研究」。問題與研究。第三八卷，第一一期。（一九九九年）：53-76。\r\n李玉珍。「蘇聯最高蘇維埃的改革」。問題與研究。第二九卷，第一四期。（一九九○年十一月）：36-49。\r\n畢至。「蘇聯通過社團（包括政黨）法」。問題與研究。第二九卷，第一四期。（一九九○年十一月）：101。\r\n郭承天、吳煥偉。「民主與經濟發展：結合質與量的研究方法」。問題與研究。第三六卷，第九期。（一九九七年九月）：75-98。\r\n三. 論文\r\n尤淑女。蘇聯「人民代表大會」之研究。台北：國立政治大學東亞研究所碩士論文，一九九二年。\r\n左志方。戈巴契夫「公開性」政策對新聞自由化之影響。台北：淡江大學俄羅斯研究所碩士論文，一九九四年。\r\n宋啟華。戈巴契夫時期蘇聯大眾傳播媒體自由化及其衝擊之研究。台北：淡江大學俄羅斯研究所碩士論文，一九九四年。\r\n林勝偉。公民社會的自主性原則及其組織條件。台北：國立政治大學社會學研究所碩士論文，二○○○年。\r\n金圭學。蘇聯社會主義體制的轉型︰以戈巴契夫時期（一九八五－一九九一）的民主化轉型為分析核心。台北：淡江大學歐洲研究所碩士論文，一九九六年。\r\n郭武平。論戈巴契夫的「改造」：理想與實踐。台北：國立政治大學東亞研究所博士論文，一九九四年。\r\n黃雅芳。東正教在蘇聯解體前後政教關係之探討︰一九八五年至一九九七年。台北︰國立政治大學俄羅斯研究所碩士論文，一九九八年。\r\n潘淑文。蘇聯的政治轉型：一九八五年至一九九一年。台北：國立台灣大學政治研究所碩士論文，一九九三年。\r\n四. 報紙\r\n羅彥傑。自由時報。「掃蕩企業寡頭，克宮氛圍詭譎」。二○○○年七月十八日，頁一○。\r\n貳. 英文部分\r\n一. 書籍\r\nAhdieh, Robert B.. Russia’s Constitutional Revolution: 1985-1996. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University, 1997.\r\nBenhabib, Seyla ed.. Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.\r\nBenn, David Wedgwood. From Glasnost to Freedom of Speech: Russian Openness and International Relations. New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press, 1992.\r\nBertsch, Gary K. & Thomas W. Ganschow. Comparative Communism: the Soviet, Chinese, and Yugoslav Models. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company, 1976.\r\nBialer, Seweryn. Politics, Society, and Nationality Inside Gorbachev`s Russia. Boulder & London: Westview Press, 1989.\r\nBillington, James H. The Icon and the Axe. New York: Lowe & Brydone Ltd., 1966.\r\nBrown, Archie & Michael Kaser & Gerald S. Smith ed.. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Russia and the former Soviet Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.\r\nBrzezinski, Zbigniew. The Grand Failure: the Birth and Death of Communism in the Twentieth Century. New York: Collier, 1990.\r\nCalhoun, Craig ed.. Social Theory and Politics of Identity. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994.\r\nCohen, Jean L. and Andrew Arato. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992.\r\nCohen, Stephen F. & Katerina van den Heuvel. Voices of Glasnost: Interviews with Gorbachev’s Reformers. New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 1989.\r\nConnor, Walter D.. Socialism’s Dilemmas: State and Society in the Soviet Bloc. New York: Columbia University Press, 1988.\r\nDallin, Alexander. Political Parties in Russia. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley, 1993.\r\nFish, Steven. Democracy from Scratch. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1995.\r\nFriedrich, Carl J. & Zbigniew Brzezinski. Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1965.\r\nGellner, Ernest. Conditions of Liberty: Civil Society and Its Rivals. London: Allen Lane Penguin Press, 1994.\r\nGiddens, Anthony. Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1994.\r\nGorbachev, Mikhail. Mikhail Gorbachev Memoirs. New York: Macmillan, 1995.\r\nHall, John. A. ed.. Civil Society: Theory, History, Comparison. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995.\r\nHelsinki Watch Committee, Nyeformaly: Civil Society in the USSR. Helsinki Watch, 1990.\r\nHill, Ronald J. ed.. Gorbachev and Perestoika: Toward a New Socialism?. England: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 1989.\r\nHosking, Geoffery. The Awakening of the Soviet Union. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1991.\r\nHuber, Robert T. and Donald R. Kelly ed.. Perestroika-Era Politics: The New Soviet Legislature and Gorbachev’s Political Reforms. New York: Sharpe, 1991.\r\nKamenka, Eugene & Alice Erh-Soon Tay. Transition From Socialism. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire Pty Limited, 1991.\r\nKeane, John ed.. Civil Society and the State: New Europe Perspectives. London: Verso, 1988.\r\nKukathas, Chandran & David W. Lovell & William Maley ed.. The Transition from Socialism. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire, 1991.\r\nLee, Stephen J. Peter the Great. London: Routledge, 1993.\r\nLewin, Moshe. The Gorbachev Phenomenon: A Historical Interpretation. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991.\r\nMedvedev, Zhores. The Legacy of Chernobyl. Oxford: Blackwell, 1990.\r\nMelville, Andrei and Gail W. Lapidus, ed.. The Glasnost Papers: Voices on Reform from Moscow. Oxford: Westview Press, 1990.\r\nMews, Stuart ed.. Religion in Politics: A World Guide. London: Longman, 1989.\r\nOliva, L. Jay. Peter the Great. New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1970.\r\nPetro, Nicolai N.. The Rebirth of Russian Democracy: An Interpretation of Political Culture. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1995.\r\nPoznanxki, Kazimierz & Henry M. Jackson. Constructing Capitalism: the Reemergence of Civil Society and Liberal Economy in the Post-Communist World. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1992.\r\nRau, Zbigniew. The Reemergence of Civil Society in East Europe and the Soviet Union. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1991.\r\nRieber, Alfred J. & Alvin Z. Rubinstein ed.. Perestroika at the Crossroads. New York: Sharpe, 1991.\r\nRoberts, Brad and Nina Belyaeva ed.. After Perestroika: Democracy in the Soviet Union. Washington D.C.: The Center for Strategic and International Studies, 1991.\r\nRoniger, Luis & Ayse Gunes-Ayata ed.. Democracy, Clientelism, and Civil Society. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1994.\r\nRowley, Charles K. ed.. Classical Liberalism and Civil Society. Northampton, Mass.: Edward Elgar, 1997.\r\nSacks, Michael Paul & Jerry G. Pankhurst ed.. Understanding Soviet Society. Boston: Unwin Hyman, 1988.\r\nSakwa, Richard. Gorbachev and His Reforms: 1985-1990. New York ; London: Philip Allan, 1990.\r\nSchechter, Michael G. ed.. The Revival of Civil Society: Global and Comparative Perspectives. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1999.\r\nSedaitis, Judith B. and Jim Butterfield ed.. Perestroika from Below. Boulder: Westview, 1991.\r\nSeligman, Adam B. The Idea of Civil Society. New York: The Free Press, 1992.\r\nSergeyev, Viktor & Nikolai Biryukov. Russia’s Road to Democracy. Brookfield, Vt., USA: E. Elgar, 1993.\r\nShlapentokh, Vladimir. Public and Private Life of the Soviet People . New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.\r\nSmith, Gordon B.. Soviet Politics: Struggling with Change. Hampshire: Macmillan, 1992.\r\nSmith, Hedrick. The Russians. New York: Ballantine Books, 1973.\r\nStewart, John Massey ed.. The Soviet Environment: Problems, Policies and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.\r\nSumner, B.H.. Peter the Great and the Emergence of Russia. New York: Collier Books, 1966.\r\nTarasulo, Issac J. ed.. Gorbachev and Glasnost: Viewpoints from the Soviet Press. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources Inc., 1989.\r\nTismaneanu, Vladimir ed.. Political Culture and Civil Society in Russia and the New States of Eurasia. Armonk, N. Y.: M. E. Sharpe, 1995.\r\nTolz, Vera. The USSR’s Emerging Multiparty System. Washington, D.C.: The Center for Strategic and International Studies, 1990.\r\nWald, Kenneth D.. Religion and Politics in the United States. Washington D. C.: Congressional Quarterly Inc., 1992.\r\nWalzer, Michael ed.. Toward a Global Civil Society. Providence, Rhode Island: Berghahn Books, 1995.\r\nWare, Kallistos. The Orthodoxy Church. London: Penguin Books, 1997.\r\nWhite, Anne. Democratization in Russia under Gorbachev 1985-91: The Birth of a Voluntary Sector. London: Macmillan Press Ltd, 1999.\r\n二. 期刊\r\nBell, Daniel. “American Exceptionalism Revisited: The Role of Civil Society.” The Public Interest. No. 95 (1989). pp.38-56.\r\nBonnell, Victoria E. “Moscow: A View from Below.” Dissent. (Summer 1989). pp. 311-365.\r\nFish, M. Steven. “Postcommunist Subversion: Social Science and Democratization in East Europe and Eurasia.” Slavic Review. Vol. 58, No. 4 (Winter 1999). pp. 794-823.\r\nHolloway, David. “The Catastrophe and After.” New York Review of Books. Vol.37, No.12 (19 July 1990). pp. 4-7.\r\nIanitskii, O. N.. “The Environmental Movement.” Soviet Review. Vol. 32, No. 1 (Jan-Feb). pp. 51-69.\r\nKrizan, Mojmir. “‘Civil Society’- a New Paradigm in the Yugoslav Theoretical Discussion.” Praxis International. Vol. 9, No. 1/2 (April/July 1989). pp. 152-163.\r\nKumar, Krishan. “Civil Society Again: a reply to Christopher Bryant`s `Social Self-organization, Civility and Sociology’.” British Journal of Sociology. Vol. 41, No.1 (1994). pp. 127-131.\r\nLukin, A. V.. “The Transitional Period in Russia.” Russian Politics and law. Vol. 38, No. 1. (January-February 2000). pp. 6-32.\r\nMoses, Joel C.. “Democratic Reform in the Gorbachev Era: Dimensions of Reform in the Soviet Union, 1986-89.” The Russian Review. Vol. 48, No. 3 (1989). pp. 235-270.\r\nOttung, Robert W. “The Russian Right and the Dilemmas of Party Organization.” Soviet Studies. Vol. 44, No. 3 (1992). pp. 445-478.\r\nSungurov, A.Iu.. “Mediating Organizations in the Structure of Civil Society.” Russian Politics and Law. Vol. 38, No.4. (July-August 2000). pp. 45-63.\r\nTeague, Elizabeth. “Perestroika and the Soviet Worker.” Government and Opposition. Vol. 25, No. 2 (Spring 1990). pp. 191-211.\r\nWigle, Marcia A.. “Political Participation and Party Formation in Russia, 1985-1992: Institutionalizing Democracy?” Russia Review. 53 (April 1994). pp.240-270. | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 俄羅斯研究所 87263003 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2002001028 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| index.html | 115 B | HTML2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.