Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/84848
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor王定士zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorWang, Ding-Shuen_US
dc.contributor.author陳慶輝zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorChen, Ching-Huien_US
dc.creator陳慶輝zh_TW
dc.creatorChen, Ching-Huien_US
dc.date2001en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-15T07:59:14Z-
dc.date.available2016-04-15T07:59:14Z-
dc.date.issued2016-04-15T07:59:14Z-
dc.identifierA2002001036en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/84848-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description俄羅斯研究所zh_TW
dc.description.abstract俄羅斯聯邦是一個多民族國家,共有一百多個不同的民族生活在俄羅斯這塊土地上。這些少數民族有著自己的語言與文化,一有機會即想脫離俄羅斯獨立。尤其是車臣與韃靼斯坦這類文化差異較大的民族,一心渴望擁有自己主權。除了少數民族的獨立要求外,俄羅斯聯邦仍必須應付境內的地方主義聲浪。主要是因為俄羅斯的聯邦體制是由民族聯邦與區域聯邦結合而成的,境內有以民族為基礎的聯邦主體,同時也有以行政區域為劃分基礎的主體。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractRussian federation is a multi-national state, there are more than one hundred kinds of races. These minority races have their own culture and language, they desire to be independent from Russian federation, especially Chechenya and Tarstan. Besides independent demand, there still have localism in Russian federation. In Russian federation, there are two kinds of federal subject. One is ethno subject which based on races different from Russian, the other is territorial subject.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents封面頁\r\n證明書\r\n誌謝\r\n摘要\r\n目錄\r\n第一章 緒論\r\n第一節 研究動機與目的\r\n第二節 研究範圍\r\n第三節 文獻述評\r\n第四節 研究途徑與架構\r\n第二章 俄羅斯聯邦制度的發展\r\n第一節 俄羅斯聯邦體制的建構\r\n第二節 俄羅斯聯邦行政區劃與權力劃分\r\n第三節 俄羅斯聯邦體制的特點\r\n第三章 地方離心傾向的成因\r\n第一節 政治方面的因素\r\n第二節 經濟方面的因素\r\n第三節 法律與制度方面的因素\r\n第四章 地方對聯邦的態度\r\n第一節 態度分類\r\n第二節 個案研究\r\n第五章 政治發展與普欽改革\r\n第一節 俄羅斯獨立初期的政治發展\r\n第二節 國會生態演變\r\n第三節 高層鬥爭\r\n第四節 普欽的政治改革\r\n第六章 結論\r\n附錄\r\n附錄一:俄羅斯行政地圖\r\n附錄二:聯邦主體譯名中英俄對照表\r\n附錄三:俄羅斯聯邦條約\r\n附錄四:俄羅斯聯邦與韃靼斯坦共和國之條約\r\n參考書目zh_TW
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2002001036en_US
dc.subject俄羅斯zh_TW
dc.subject俄羅斯聯邦zh_TW
dc.subject聯邦主義zh_TW
dc.subject中央地方關係zh_TW
dc.subject分離主義zh_TW
dc.subject不對稱聯邦zh_TW
dc.subject車臣戰爭zh_TW
dc.subjectrussiaen_US
dc.subjectrussian federationen_US
dc.subjectfederalismen_US
dc.subjectcenter-periphery relationen_US
dc.subjectsecessionismen_US
dc.subjectasymmetric federationen_US
dc.subjectChecheny waren_US
dc.title俄羅斯中央與地方關係,1992~1999zh_TW
dc.titleRussian Center-periphery Relations, 1992~1999en_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.relation.reference一、中文部分\r\n(一)中文書籍\r\n孔寒冰,當代各國政治體制—俄羅斯(蘭州:蘭州大學出版,1998年3月)\r\n艾倫•李帕特(Arend Lijphart)著,當代民主類型與政治,陳坤森譯(台北:桂冠出版社,民國82年)\r\n吳玉山,俄羅斯轉型,1992-1999:一個政治經濟學的分析,(台北:五南,民89年)\r\n海遠編,葉利欽時代的俄羅斯:政治卷,(北京: 人民出版社,2001)\r\n畢英賢編,俄羅斯,(台北:政大國研中心,民84年)\r\n郭武平,「社會變遷與俄羅斯憲政發展模式的選擇」,行政院國家科學委員會出國研究人員研究報告,(民國88年8月)\r\n惠爾(K. C. Wheare),聯邦政府,曾惠仁譯(台北:商務印書館,民國81年7月)\r\n葉自成,俄羅斯政府與政治(台北:揚智文化,1997)\r\n閩懿,蘇維埃聯邦制之研究,淡江大學俄羅斯研究所碩士論文,民國86年12月。\r\n劉長琨編,俄羅斯聯邦財政制度,(北京: 中國財政經濟出版社,1998)\r\n歐茵西與王佩瑛譯,「俄羅斯憲法」,新編世界各國憲法大全 (台北:國大秘書處,民85年)\r\n薛君度、陸南泉主編,新俄羅斯:政治、經濟、外交(北京:社會科學出版社,1997年5月)\r\n(二)中文期刊\r\n王承宗,「車臣戰爭與車臣問題」,問題與研究,39,6(民國89年6月): 1-29。\r\n王承宗,「俄羅斯國家體制之研究」,問題與研究,34,8(民86年8月): 23-34。\r\n王麗萍,「蘇聯解體的國家結構特徵分析」,東歐中亞研究,3(1999): 18。\r\n余邃,「俄羅斯:癥結與出路何在?」,世界知識,1(1993): 3。\r\n吳東野,「『半總統制』政府體系的理論與實際」,問題與研究,35, 8 (民國85年8月): 37-49。\r\n吳東野,「半總統制政府體系的理論與實際」,問題與研究,35,8(民85年8月): 37-49。\r\n李玉珍,「『車臣事件』與俄羅聯邦的民族問題」,問題與研究,34,8 (民國84年8 月): 35-45。\r\n李玉珍,「蘇聯八月政變」,問題與研究,30,11(民80年11月): 16。\r\n洪鐮德,許明富合著之「俄羅斯行政與立法機關權力之爭的分析」,俄情研究,3,6: 2。\r\n畢英賢,「俄羅斯的新國會與新政府」,問題與研究,33,3(民83年3月): 4。\r\n畢英賢,「俄羅斯國會改選之研析」,問題與研究,35,4(民85年,4月)。\r\n畢英賢,「劇變中的俄羅斯局勢」,問題與研究,32,7(民82年7月): 4。\r\n許湘濤,「俄羅斯的政治發展:1990-1996」,問題與研究,35,12(民85年12月): 29-58。\r\n馮邵雷,「展望普京新政」,國際政治,7(2000): 147-149.\r\n趙竹成,「俄羅斯聯邦體制的不對稱性與『韃靼斯坦』模式」,國立政治大學學報,第79期,pp. 1-28。\r\n趙龍庚,「普京邁出政改第一步」,現代國際關係,7(2000): 6-9.\r\n劉向文、王惠敏,「俄羅斯維護聯邦統一的理論和實踐」,東歐中亞研究,2(1999): 17-18。\r\n劉清才,「俄羅斯聯邦制度的發展演變」,東歐中亞研究,12(1998): 131-136。\r\n酈久,「俄羅斯大漲價之後」,世界知識,3(1992): 11。\r\n(三)中文報紙\r\n人民日報\r\n中國時報\r\n自由時報\r\n香港大公報\r\n香港文匯報\r\n聯合報\r\n二、英文部分\r\n(一)英文書籍\r\nAlexseev, Mikhail A. Center-Periphery Conflict in Post-Soviet Russia: A Federation Imperiled (Macmillan, 1999)\r\nAsh, Timothy Garton,. The Magic Lantern (New York: Random House, 1990)\r\nBremmer, Ian and Tatars, Ray, eds. New States, New Politics: Building the Post-Soviet Nations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997)\r\nBreslauer, George W. Khrushchev and Brezhnev as Leaders: Building Authority in Soviet Politics (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1982)\r\nConnor, Walter,. The National Question in Marxist-Leninist Theory and Strategy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984)\r\nElazar, Daniel J. Exploring Federalism (Tuscaloosa : University of Alabama Press, 1987)\r\nFriedgut , Theodore H. and Hahn, Jeffrey W. eds.. Local Power and Post-Soviet Politics (Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1994)\r\nHahn, Jeffrey W. Democratization in Russia: The Development of Legislative Institutions (Sharpe, 1995)\r\nHough, Jerry. The Soviet Prefects: The Local Party Organs in Industrial Decision-Making (Cambridge, MA: Harvard university Press, 1969).\r\nLapidus, Gail W. eds. The New Russia: Troubled Transformation (Westview Press, 1995)\r\nRiker, William H. Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance (Boston: Little Brown, 1964)\r\nRubin, Barnett R. and Jack Snyder, Post-Soviet Political Order: Conflict and State Building (Routledge, 1998).\r\nStarr, Frederick. Decentralization and Self-Government in Russia: 1830-1870(Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1972).\r\nStoner-Weiss, Kathryn,. Local Heroes: The Political Economy of Russian Regional Governance (Princeton N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1997)\r\nWallich, Christine. Russia and the Challenge of Fiscal Federalism (Washington, D.C: World Bank, 1994)\r\n(二)英文期刊\r\nAndrews, Josephine and Kathryn Stoner-Weiss, “Regionalism and Reform in Provincial Russia,” Post-Soviet Affairs 11,4(Oct-Dec. 1995): 384-406.\r\nBelin, Laura. “All sides claim victory in the 1996 gubernatorial elections,”Transition, 3, 3(1997): 24-27.\r\nBerkowitz, Daniel and Beth Mitchneck, “Fiscal Decentralization in the Soviet Economy”, Comparative Economic Studies 34(1992): 1-18.\r\nBrudny, Yitzhak M. “In Pursuit of Russian Presidency: Why and How Yeltsin Won the 1996 Presidential Election”, Communist and Post-Communist studies 30,3(September, 1997): 255-275.\r\nGorenburg, Dmitry. “Regional Separatism in Russia: Ethnic Mobilisation or Power Grab?” Europe-Asia Studies 51,2(1999): 245-274.\r\nKempton, Daniel. “The Republic of Sakha (Yakutia): The Evolution of Centre-Periphery Relations in the Russian Federation, “ Europe-Asia Studies 48,4(1996)\r\nKerr, D.,’ The New Eurasianism : The Rise of Geopolitics in Russia’s Foreign Policy”, Europe-Asia Studies 47, 6(1995): 977-988.\r\nLapidus, Gail W. “Asymmetrical Federalism and State Breakdown in Russia”, Post-Soviet Affairs 15,1 (1999): 74-82.\r\nMilanovic, Branko “Why Have Communnist Federation Collapsed?” Challenge 37 (March-April 1994)\r\nMurrell, Peter. “What is Shock Therapy? What did it do in Poland and Russia?” Post-Soviet Affairs 9,2(Apr-Jun, 1993): 112-115.\r\nOrdeshook, Peter C. “Russia`s Party System: Is Russian Federalism Viable? `, Post-Soviet Affairs 12,3(Jul-Sep, 1996): 195-217.\r\nOrttung, Robert W. “Battling over Electoral Laws”, Transition 1,15 (Aug. 1995): 33-34.\r\nRahr, Alexander. “The First Year of Russian Independence”, RFE/RL Research Report (1 Jan.1993): 50-57.\r\nSharlet, Robert “The Russian Constitutional Court: The First Term”, Post-Soviet Affairs 9,1(1993)\r\nShugart, Mattew Soberg “Executive-Legislative Relations in Post-Communist Europe,” Transition 2,25(Dec. 1996): 11-26.\r\nSlider, Darrell. “Russia’s Market-Distorting Federalism”, Post-Soviet Geography and Economics 38,8(Oct. 1997): 445-460.\r\nSolnick, Steven L. “Federal Bargaining in Russia”. East Europe Constitutional Review (fall, 1995): 52-58.\r\nSolnick, Steven. “Methods of Central Control Over Russia’s Province, and Prospects for the Future” Program on New Approaches to Russian Security (PONARS), Policy Memo 97(Nov. 1999)\r\nSolomon, Peter J. “The Limits of Legal Order in Post-Soviet Russia”, Post-Soviet Affairs 11,2(Apr-Jun, 1995): 89-114.\r\nStoner-Weiss, Kathryn. “Central Weakness and Provincial Autonomy: Observations on the Devolution Process in Russia”, Post-Soviet Affairs 15,1(1999): 87-106.\r\nTreisman, Daniel. “Russia’s ‘Ethnic Revival’”: The Separatist Activism of Regional Leaders in a Postcommunist Order.” World Politics 49,2(Jan. 1997): 212-249.\r\nTreisman, Daniel. “The Politics of Intergovernmental Transfers in Post-Soviet Russia.” British Journal of Political Science 26,3(Jul. 1996): 299-335.\r\nZlotnik, Mark. “Russia’s Governors: All the President’s Men?” Problem of Post-Communism 43,6(1996): 26-34.\r\n(三)英文報紙\r\nFBIS-SOV\r\nKeesing`s Record of World Events\r\nMoscow News\r\nRadio Free Europe/Radio Liberty Newsline\r\nWashington post\r\n三、俄文部分\r\n(一)俄文書籍\r\nGlubotskiy, A., A. Mukhin, and N. Tyukov, Organy vlasti sub”yektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii【俄羅斯聯邦主體的政權機關】(Moscow: Panorama, 1995).\r\nGuboglo, M. N. eds,. Federalizm vlasti i vlast’ federalizma【聯邦的權力與權力的聯邦】 (Moscow, 1997)\r\nKommentarii k Konstitutsii Rossiiskoi Federatsii【俄羅斯聯邦憲法評析】(Moscow,1996)\r\n(二)俄文報紙\r\nINTERFAX\r\nKomsomol’skaia Pravda\r\nMoskovskie Novosti\r\nNezavisimaya gazeta\r\nPskovskaya Pravda\r\nRossiikaya gazeta\r\nRossiyskiye vesti\r\nSegodnya\r\nSovetskaya Rossiy\r\n四、 網路文章\r\n”Election Boost for Yeltsin,” The Times, 20 Dec. 1999,http://www.the-times.co.uk/news/pages/tim/99/12/20/timfgnrus01002.html?1163706。\r\nIrina Busygina, “Federalism from Above”, http://www.tol.cz/.\r\n“SPS Win Resurrects Reformers,” Russia Journal, 21 Dec. 1999,http://www.russiajournal.com/start/news/article.cgi?ind=2010zh_TW
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
index.html115 BHTML2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.