Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/84885
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor修慧蘭zh_TW
dc.contributor.author孫頌賢zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorSun, Sung-Hsienen_US
dc.creator孫頌賢zh_TW
dc.creatorSun, Sung-Hsienen_US
dc.date2001en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-15T08:00:35Z-
dc.date.available2016-04-15T08:00:35Z-
dc.date.issued2016-04-15T08:00:35Z-
dc.identifierA2002001075en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/84885-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description教育學系zh_TW
dc.description88152016zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本研究乃依據家庭系統理論的觀點,欲探討家庭分化的測量問題與內涵,以企圖進行不同成員間觀點的測量與相關問題探討。其以「起飛期家庭」之在大學就讀學生為主要測量中心,但測量單位以家庭為單位,包括起飛期家庭中的大學生或研究生、父、母等三人,正式研究結果共蒐集到77個家庭的分化資料。主要研究結果可分成六個方面:zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents封面頁\r\n證明書\r\n致謝詞\r\n論文摘要\r\n目錄\r\n表目錄\r\n圖目錄\r\n第一章、緒論\r\n第一節、研究動機與目的\r\n第二節、研究問題\r\n第三節、名詞解釋\r\n第四節、研究範圍與限制\r\n第二章、文獻探討\r\n第一節、家族治療理論的家庭系統觀點\r\n第二節、家庭測量之理論與模式\r\n第三節、家庭系統分化之相關研究\r\n第四節、家庭系統測量之分析方式\r\n第三章、研究方法\r\n第一節、量表內容之建立\r\n第二節、預試之實施\r\n第三節、正式量表之實施\r\n第四節、資料分析\r\n第四章、結果與討論\r\n第一節、量表描述統計分析\r\n第二節、家庭系統分化內涵之分析\r\n第三節、不同成員間觀點的一致性與不一致性\r\n第四節、系統模式之驗證\r\n第五節、綜合討論\r\n第五章、結論與建議\r\n第一節、結論\r\n第二節、建議\r\n參考書目\r\n附錄\r\n附錄一、婚姻與家族治療實務者之訪談大綱\r\n附錄二、與家庭治療實務者訪談結果摘要\r\n附錄三、家人關係量表之預試量表\r\n附錄四、預試量表之題庫與架構\r\n附錄五、預試量表之題庫與篩選結果—以孩子用量表為準\r\n附錄六、家人關係量表之正式量表\r\n附錄七、九個自評量表在抽取四個因素後之解釋變項變異量\r\n附錄八、九個自陳量表陡坡考驗圖(Scree-Plot)\r\n附錄九、九個自評量表在抽取二個因素後之解釋變項變異量\r\n附錄十、四種模式之LISREL程式語法zh_TW
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2002001075en_US
dc.subject家庭系統觀zh_TW
dc.subject家庭測量zh_TW
dc.subject家庭分化zh_TW
dc.subject起飛期家庭zh_TW
dc.subject結構方程模式zh_TW
dc.subjectFamily System Paradigmen_US
dc.subjectFamily Measurementen_US
dc.subjectFamily Differentiationen_US
dc.subjectLaunching Familyen_US
dc.subjectStructure Equation Modelen_US
dc.title以家庭系統觀進行家庭測量之研究—以家庭分化為例zh_TW
dc.titleThe Research of System Measurement as Family System Paradigm:The Example of Family Differentiationen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.relation.reference王大維(民84)。從Minuchin的結構家族治療理論談家庭系統中的權力關係。諮商與輔導,115期,5-10。\r\n王大維(民85)。家庭系統分化與大學生的心理社會發展之相關係研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導學系碩士論文。未出版。\r\n王保進(民88)。視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。台北:心理。\r\n王嚮蕾(民83)。原生家庭父母自我分化與青少年自我分化、焦慮之相關研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。\r\n內政部(民89,6月)。88年離婚人數統計。內政統計通報。台北:內政部。\r\n利翠珊(民88)。家庭心理學的系統觀點與研究。應用心理研究,2期,21-40。\r\n吳就君(民88)。婚姻與家庭。台北:華騰。\r\n吳就君譯(民83)。新家庭如何塑造人。台北:張老師。\r\n吳麗娟(民87)。父母自我分化、教養態度對青少年子女自我分化、因應策略及適應影響之研究。教育心理學報,30卷,1期,頁91-132。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系。\r\n李安德(民81)。超個人心理學—心理學的新典範。台北:桂冠。\r\n易之新譯(民89)。敘事治療—解構並重寫生命的故事。台北:張老師。\r\n林美珠(民80)。憂鬱症患者家庭功能研究。東海大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。未出版。\r\n林清山(民79)。多特質多方法(MTMM)分析模式在驗證性建構效度考驗的應用。測驗年刊,37輯,113-130。\r\n修慧蘭(民87)。從家庭發展週期談學生行為問題。學生輔導,59期,62-71。\r\n張虹雯(民88)。父母爭吵時的三角關係運作與兒童行為問題之相關研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。\r\n莊耀嘉(民89)。家庭中人際互動結構與運作模式。本土心理學研究,12期,3-46。\r\n許韶玲(民86)。諮商理論的發展趨勢:現況與困境。輔導季刊,33(3),29-41。\r\n郭美岑(民87)。自我分化與婚姻品質之相關研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。\r\n郭進隆譯(民83)。第五項修練—學習型組織的藝術與實務。台北:天下。\r\n陳文卿(民87)。青少年自殺意念與家庭功能、無望感之相關研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導學系碩士論文。\r\n陳郁齡(民88)。家庭功能與大學生個體化、生活適應之關係研究。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。未出版。\r\n陳惠雯(民89)。婚姻衝突、家庭界限與青少年子女適應之相關研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。未出版。\r\n陳麗英(民84)。家庭功能的評估。中華心理衛生學刊,8(3),31-44。\r\n曾端真(民82)。家庭功能。諮商與輔導,91期,16-21。\r\n馮朝霖(民89)。教育哲學專論—主體、性情與創化:化混沌之情、原天地之美—-從情意教育到教育美學。台北:元照。\r\n黃光國(民88)。知其短,守其長:論「系統思維」的特色與限制。應用心理研究,3期,1-8。\r\n黃宗堅(民88)。家庭系統的測量與應用。應用心理研究,2期,83-109。\r\n黃迺毓、黃馨慧、蘇雪玉、唐先梅、李淑娟等(民87)。家庭概論:家庭類型。台北縣蘆洲市:國立空中大學。\r\n楊秀宜(民88)。犯罪青少年的家庭分化系統與其人格特質之相關研究。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。未出版。\r\n楊金滿(民84)。家庭互動關係與青少年自我統合發展之研究。私立中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文。\r\n賈紅鶯(民80)。父母自我分化、子女自我分化與子女適應水準之相關研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。\r\n劉惠琴(民88)。庖丁解牛,道乎?技乎?應用心理研究,3期,10-15。\r\n鄭玉英、趙家玉等譯(民84)。家庭會傷人—自我重生的新契機。台北:張老師。\r\n鄭夙芬(民87)。家庭功能之評估與應用—以臨床家庭為例。社區發展季刊,83期,287-304。\r\n穆怡梅譯(民83)。治療的勇氣之一:錯不在你。台北:生命潛能。\r\n薛雪萍(民89)。青少年家庭功能、親子衝突、因應策略與生活適應之相關研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。\r\n顏澤賢(民82)。現代系統理論。台北:遠流。\r\n羅國英(民84)。家庭研究中的測量問題—文獻探討。東吳社會工作學報,1期,37-90。\r\nAchenbach, T. M., McConaughy, S. H., & Howell, C. T. (1987). Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 213-232.\r\nAnderson, S. A., & Sabatelli, R. M. (1992). The differentiation in the family system scale(DIFS). The American Journal of Family Therapy, 20, 77-89.\r\nBartle-Haring, S. (1997). The relationships among parent-adolescent differentiation, sex role orientation and identity development in late adolescence and early adulthood. Journal of Adolescence, 20(5), 553-565.\r\nBartle-Haring, S., & Gavazzi, S. M. (1996). Multiple views on family data: The sample case of adolescence, maternal and paternal perspectives on family differentiation levels. Family Process, 35(4), 457-472.\r\nBartle-Haring, S., Kenny, D. A., & Gavazzi, S. M. (1999). Multiple perspectives on family differentiation: Analyses by multitrait multimethod matrix and triadic social relations models. Journal Marriage and the Family, 61, 491-503.\r\nBeavers, R., & Hampson, R. B. (2000). The Beavers systems model of family functioning. Journal of Family Therapy, 22, 128-143.\r\nBen-David, A., & Sprenkle, D. H. (1993). How do they(participants) understand our(researchers) intentions? A Qualitative test of the curvilinear assumptions of the adaptability items of the FACES Ⅲ. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 21(1), 17-26.\r\nBerardo, F. M. (1990). Trends and directions in family research in the 1980s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52(4), 809-817.\r\nBomar, J. A., & Sabatelli, R. M. (1996). Family system dynamics, gender, and psychosocial maturity in late adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Research, 11(4), 421-439.\r\nBowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.\r\nBray, J. H. (1995). Family assessment: Current issues in evaluating families. Family Relations, 44, 469-477.\r\nBray, J. H., Williamson, D. S. & Malone, P. E. (1984). Personal authority in the family system: Development of a questionnaire to measure personal authority in intergenerational family process. Journal of Marital and Family Theory, 10(2), 167-178.\r\nBray, J. H., & Harvey, D. M. (1992). Intimacy and individuation in young adults: Development of the young adult version of the personal authority in the family system questionnaire. Psychotherapy, 24(3), 516-528.\r\nCampbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81-105.\r\nCarr, A. (1995). Family therapy and clinical psychology. Journal of Family Therapy, 17, 435-444.\r\nCole D. A., & Jordan, A. E. (1989). Assessment of cohesion and adaptability in component family dyads: A question of convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36(4), 456-463.\r\nCole D. A., & McPherson, A. E. (1993). Relation of family subsystems to adolescent depression: Implementing a new family assessment strategy. Journal of Family Psychology, 7(1), 119-133.\r\nCook, T. D. (1985). Postpositivist critical multiplism. In R. L. Shotland & M. M. Mark(Eds.). Social Science and Social Policy. (pp.21-62). Beverly Hill: SAGE.\r\nCorey, G. (1996). Theory and practice of counseling and psychotherapy(5 th ed.). CA: Brooks/Cole.\r\nCottone, R. R. (1989). Defining the psychomedical and systemic paradigms in marital and family therapy. Journal of Marital and Family therapy, 15(3), 225-235.\r\nCromwell, R. E., & Peterson, G. W. (1983). Multisystem-multimethod family assessment in clinical contexts. Family Process, 22, 147-163.\r\nEpstein, N. B., Baldwin, L. M., & Bishop, D. S. (1983). The McMaster family assessment device. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 9(2), 171-180.\r\nFloyd, F. J., Weinand, J. W., & Cimmarusti, R. A. (1989). Clinical family assessment: Applying structured measurement procedures in treatment settings. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 15(3), 271-288.\r\nGaughan, E. (1995). Family assessment in psychoeducational evaluations: Case studies with the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales. Journal of School Psychology, 33(1), 7-28.\r\nGoldenberg, I., & Goldenberg, H. (1996). Family therapy: Overview(4 th ed.). CA: Brooks/Cole.\r\nGreen, R. G., & Vosler, N. R. (1992). Issues in the assessment of family practice: An empirical study. Journal of Social Service Research, 15(3/4), 1-19.\r\nGreen, R., & Werner, P. D. (1996). Intrusiveness and closeness-caregiving: Rethinking the concept of family “Enmeshment”. Family Process, 35(2), 115-136.\r\nGrotevant, H. D., & Carlson, C. I. (1989). Family assessment: A Guide to methods and measures: Family assessment: Past, present, and future. NY: The Guilford Press.\r\nGuentherman, K. K., & Hampton, B. R. (1992). Correlates of divorce on female differentiation from family of origin in early adulthood. Family Therapy, 19(3), 205-214.\r\nHargrave, T. D. (1994). Families and forgiveness: Healing wounds in the intergenerational family. NY: Brunner/Mazel, Inc.\r\nJacbo, T. (1995). The role of time frame in the assessment of family functioning. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 21(3), 281-288.\r\nJacob, T., & Tennenbaum, D. (1988). Family assessment: Rationale, methods and future directions. New York: Plenum.\r\nJoreskong, K. G., & & Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Chicago: SSI.\r\nKaslow, N. J., & Celano, M. P. (1995). The family therapy. In A. S. Gurman & S. B. Messer(Eds.). Essential psychotherapies: Theory and practice. (pp.343-402). New York: Guilford Press.\r\nKenny, D. A., & Kashy, D. A. (1992). Analysis of the multitrait-multimethod matrix by confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 165-172.\r\nLarson, J. H., Wilson, M. J., & Medora, N. (1998). Family of origin influences on marital attitudes and readiness for marriage in late adolescents. Journal of family issues, 19(6), 750-768.\r\nLavee, Y., & Olson, D. H. (1991). Family types and response to stress. Journal of Marriage and Family, 53, 786-798.\r\nLegg, C. (1997). Science and family therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 19, 401-415.\r\nLewinsohn, M. A., & Werner, P. D. (1997). Factors in Chinese marital process: Relationship to Marital adjustment. Family Process, 36(1), 43-61.\r\nMarsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1988). A new, more powerful approach to multitrait-multimethod analyses: Application of second-order confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(1), 107-117.\r\nMartin, J. M., & Cole, D. A. (1993). Adaptability and cohesion of dyadic relationships in families with developmentally disabled children. Journal Family Psychology, 7(2), 186-196.\r\nMetzler, C. W., Biglan, A., Ary, D. V., & Li, F. (1998). The stability and validity of early adolescents’ reports of parenting constructs. Journal of Family psychology, 12(4), 600-619.\r\nMiller, I. W., Ryan, C. E., Keitner, G. I., Bishop, D. S., & Epstein, N. B. (2000). The McMaster approach to families: Theory, assessment, treatment and research. Journal of Family Therapy, 22, 168-189.\r\nMinuchin, S. (1974). Family & family therapy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.\r\nMinuchin, S., & Fishman, H. C. (1981). Family therapy techniques. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.\r\nNichols, M. P., & Schwartz, R. C. (1991). Family therapy: Concepts and methods(2nd ed). MA: Allyn & Bacon.\r\nOlson, D. H. (2000). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Journal of Family Therapy, 22, 144-167.\r\nOlson, D. H., Portmer, J., & Lavee Y. (1985). FACESⅢ. St. Paul, MN: Family Social Science, University of Minnesota.\r\nPerosa, L. M., & Perosa, S. L. (1990). Convergent and discriminant validity for family self-report measures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50, 855-868.\r\nPerosa, L. M., Perosa, S. L., & Tam, H. P. (1996). The contribution of family structure and differentiation to identity development in females. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 25(6), 817-837.\r\nPiercy, F. P., & Sprenkle, D. H. (1990). Marriage and family therapy: A decade review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52(4), 1116-1126.\r\nPinsof, W. M. (1992). Toward a scientific paradigm for family psychology: The integrative process systems perspective. Journal of Family Psychology, 5(3/4), 432-447.\r\nPiotrowski, C. P. (1999). Use of tests and measures in marital and family research. Psychological Reports, 84, 1251-1252.\r\nSabatelli, R.M., & Anderson, S. (1991). Family system dynamics, peer relationships, and adolescents` psychological adjustment. Family Relations, 40(4), 363-369.\r\nSchneider, B. H. (1998). Cross-cultural comparison as doorkeeper in research on the social and emotional adjustment of children and adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 34(4), 793-797.\r\nShek, D. T. (1998). The Chinese version of the self-report family inventory: Does culture make a difference? Research on Social Work Practice, 8(3), 315-329.\r\nSidani, S., & Jones, E. (1995). Use of the multitrait multimethod(MTMM) to analyze family relational data. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 17(5), 556-570.\r\nSullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. NY: Norton.  Szapocznik, J., Kurtines, W., Hervis, O., Rio, A. T., Faraci, A. M., & Mitrani, V. B. (1991). Assessing change in family functioning as a result of treatment: The structural family systems rating scale(SFSR). Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 17(3), 295-310.\r\nTein, J., Rossa, M. W., & Michaels, M. (1994). Agreement between parent and child reports on parental behaviors. Journal of Marriage and the family, 56, 341-355.\r\nThomas, V. (1995). The clinical report: Integrating family assessment instruments into family counseling practice. Family Journal, 3(4), 284-298.\r\nThomas, V., & Olson, D. H. (1993). Problem families and the circumplex model: Observational assessment using the Clinical Rating Scale(CRS). Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 19(2), 159-175.\r\nThomas, V., & Olson, D. H. (1994). Circumplex model: curvilinearity using Clinical Rating Scale(CRS) and FACESⅢ. Family Journal, 2(1), 36-41.\r\nTouliatos, J., Perlmutter, B. F., & Straus, M. A. (1990). Handbook of family measurement techniques. London: SAGE.\r\nWatts, S. W., Kempf, W. G., & Cottone, R. R. (1997). On integrating family therapy: A review of the literature from 1988 to 1995. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 25(3), 193-212.\r\nWilkinson, I. (1987). Family assessment: A review. Journal of Family Therapy, 9, 367-380.\r\nWilkinson, I. (2000). The Darlington family assessment system: Clinical guidelines for practitioners. Journal of Family Therapy, 22, 211-224.\r\nWilkinson, I., Barnett, M. B., Delft, L., & Pirie, V. (1988). Family assessment: Developing a formal assessment system in clinical practice. Journal of Family therapy, 10, 17-32.\r\nWilkinson I. M., & Stratton, P. (1991). The reliability and validity of a system for family assessment. Journal of Family therapy, 13, 73-94.\r\nWood, B. (1985). Proximity and hierarchy: orthogonal dimensions of family interconnectedness. Family Process, 24, 487-507.\r\nWood, B., & Talmon, M. (1983). Family boundaries in transition: A search for alternatives. Family Process, 22, 347-357.zh_TW
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypethesis-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
index.html115 BHTML2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.