Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/86236| 題名: | 中文對話中的異議現象 Disagreement in Mandarin Chinese Conversation |
作者: | 林智怡 Lin, Zhi-Yi |
貢獻者: | 李櫻 Li, Ying Cherry Dr. 林智怡 Lin, Zhi-Yi |
關鍵詞: | 異議 中文對話 語用策略 語言特徵 合作 原則 禮貌原則 性別 衝突對話 disagreement Mandarin Chinese conversation pragmatic strategies linguistic features CP PP gender conflict talk |
日期: | 1998 | 上傳時間: | 27-四月-2016 | 摘要: | 國 立 政 治 大 學 研 究 所 碩 士 論 文 提 要 Abstract |
參考文獻: | Bibliography\r\nAdger, Carolyn Temple. 1984. Communicative competence in the\r\nculturally diverse classroom: negotiating norms for\r\nlinguistic interaction. In Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation,\r\nlinguistics. Georgetown University.\r\nAlbee, E. 1962. Who’s afraid of Virginia Woolf? New York:\r\nAtheneum.\r\nAries, Elizabeth. 1976. Interaction patterns and themes of\r\nmale, female and mixed groups. Small Group Behavior 7 (1): 7-\r\n18.\r\nAtkinson, Maxwell, and Heritage, John. 1984. Preference\r\norganization. In Structure of Social Action, Atkinson and Heritage (eds.): 53-56. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge\r\nUniversity Press.\r\nAzuma, H., Hess, R. D., Kashin-gawa, K., and Conroy, M. 1980.\r\nMaternal control strategies and the child’s cognitive\r\ndevelopment: a cross-cultural paradox and its\r\ninterpretation. Paper presented at the International\r\nCongress of Psychology. Leipzig.\r\nBateson, Gregory. 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York:\r\nBallantine.\r\nBeebe, L., & cummings, M. 1985. Speech act performance: A\r\nfunction of the data collection procedure? Paper presented\r\nat TESOL ’85, New York.\r\nBeebe, Leslie M. & Tomoko Takahashi. 1989. Sociolinguistic\r\nvariation in face-threatening speech acts: chastisement and\r\ndisagreement. In The Dynamic Interlanguage: Empirical\r\nStudies in Second Language Variation, Eisenstein, Mirian R..\r\n(ed.):199-218. New York: Plenum Press.\r\nBilmes, Jack. 1988. The concept of preference in conversation\r\nanalysis. In Language in society 17: 161-181.\r\nBlum-Kulka, Shoshana. 1990. You don’t touch lettuce with your\r\nfingers: Parental politensess in family discourse. Journal\r\nof Pragmatics: Politeness, 259-288.\r\nBoggs, Stephen T. 1978. The Development of verbal disputing in\r\npart-Hawaiian children. Language in Society, 7: 325-344.\r\nBrenneis, Donald. 1988. Language and disputing. Annual Review\r\nof Anthropology, 17: 221-237.\r\nBrenneis, Donald & Laura Lein. 1977. You fruithead: a\r\nsociolinguistic approach to children’s dispute settlement.\r\nIn Child Discourse, S. Ervin-Tripp and C. Mitchell-Kernan\r\n(eds.): 49-65. New York: Academic Press.\r\nBrown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1978/1987.\r\nPoliteness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge:\r\nCambridge University Press.\r\nCoates, Jennifer. 1989. Gossip revisited: language in all-\r\nfemale groups. In Women in Their Speech Communities,\r\nJennifer Coates and Deborah Cameron (eds.): 94-121. London:\r\nLongman.\r\nEdelsky, Carole. 1981. Who’s got the floor? Language in\r\nSociety 10: 383-421.\r\nEisenberg, Ann R. and Catherine Garvey. 1981. Children’s use\r\nof verbal strategies in resolving conflicts. Discourse\r\nProcesses, 4: 149-170.\r\nFraser, Bruce. 1975. The concept of politeness. Paper presented\r\nat the 1985 NWAVE Meeting. Georgetown University.\r\n---. 1990. Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics.\r\n14: 219-236.\r\nFraser, Bruce and William Nolen. 1981. The association of\r\ndeference with linguistic form. International Journal of\r\nthe Sociology of Language 27: 93-109.\r\nGenishi, Celia and Marianna di Paolo. 1982. Learning through\r\nargument in a preschool. In Communicating in the Classroom,\r\nL.C. Wilkinson (ed.): 49-68. New York: Academic Press.\r\nGoffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face to\r\nFace Behavior. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.\r\n---. 1971. Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public\r\nOrder. New York: Basic Books.\r\nGoodwin Charles and M.H. Goodwin. 1990. Interstitial argument.\r\nIn Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversations, Grimshaw, Allen D. (ed.): 85.\r\nCambridge: Cambridge University Press.\r\nGoodwin, Marjorie Harness. 1978. Conversational practices in a\r\npeer group of urban black children. Unpublished Ph.D.\r\ndissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of\r\nPennsylvania.\r\n---. 1980a. He-said-she said: formal cultural procedures for\r\nthe construction of a gossip dispute activity. American\r\nEthnologist, 7: 674-695.\r\n---. 1980b. Directive / response speech sequences in girls’\r\nand boys’ task activities. In Women and Language in\r\nLiterature and Society, S. McConnell-Ginet, R. Borker, and\r\nN. Furman (eds.): 157-173. New York: Praeger.\r\n---. 1982. Processes of dispute management among urban black\r\nchildren. American Ethnologist, 9: 76-69.\r\nGrice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Speech Act.\r\nVol. 3 of Syntax and Semantics, P. Cole and J. Morgan\r\n(eds.). New York: Academic Press.\r\nGrimshaw, Allen D. 1990. Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic\r\nInvestigations of Arguments in Conversations. Cambridge:\r\nCambridge University Press.\r\nGu, Yueguo. 1990. Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese.\r\nJournal of Pragmatics 14: 237-257.\r\nGunthner, Susanne. 1993. The Negotiation of Dissent in\r\nIntercultural Communication—an analysis of a Chinese-German\r\nconversation. Paper presented on the 4th International\r\nPragmatics Conference. Kobe Japan.\r\nHo, D.Y. F. 1975. On the Concept of Face. American Journal of\r\nSociology 81.4: 867-884.\r\nHolmes, Janet. 1995. Women, Men, and Politeness. New York:\r\nLongman.\r\nHu, Hsien Chin. 1944. The Chinese Concept of ‘face’.\r\nAmerican Anthropologist 46: 45-64.\r\nHuang, Shuanfan. 1984. Two studies on prototype semantics: xiao\r\n(filial piety) and mei mianzi (loss of face). A paper\r\npresented to the International Symposium on Psychological\r\nAspects of the Chinese Language. Hong Kong, July 2-5, 1984.\r\nHymes, Dell. 1972. On communicative competence. In\r\nSociolinguistics, J. B. Pride and Janet Homes (eds.): 269-\r\n293. Harmondsworth: Penguin.\r\nKalick, Susan. 1975. ‘…like Ann’s gynaecologist or the time\r\nI was almost raped’—personal narratives in women’s rape\r\ngroups. Journal of American Folklore 88: 3-11.\r\nKasper, Gabriele. 1990. Linguistic politeness: current research\r\nissues. Journal of Pragmatics: Politeness, 193-218.\r\nKnoblauch, Hubert. 1991. The taming of foes: the avoidance of\r\nasymmetry I informal discussions. In Asymmetries in\r\nDialogue, Ivana Markova and Klaus Foppa (eds.): 166-195.\r\nHemel Hempstead: Barnes and Noble.\r\nKotthoff, Helga. 1993. Disagreement and concession in disputes:\r\nOn the context sensitivity of preference structures.\r\nLanguage in Society 22: 193-216.\r\nKrainer, Elizabeth. 1988. Challenges in a psychotherapy group.\r\nIn Proceedings of the fourteenth Annual Meeting f the\r\nBerkeley Linguistics Society: 100-113.\r\nKuo, Sai-hua. 1992. Formulaic opposition markers in Chinese\r\nconflict talk. Georgetown-University-Round-Table-on-\r\nLanguages-and-Linguistics: 388-402.\r\n---. 1997. Cooperation and competition in collaborative\r\nnarration. Paper presented at the 6th International\r\nConference on Language and Social Psychology, Ottawa,\r\nCanada, May 16-20, 1997.\r\nLakoff, Robin. 1973. The logic of politeness: or, miniding your\r\np’s and q’s. In Papers from the ninth regional meeting of\r\nthe Chicago Linguistic Society, C. Corum et al. (eds.): 292-\r\n305. Chicago Linguistic Society.\r\n---. 1975. Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper and\r\nRow.\r\n---. 1977. What you can do with words: Politeness, pragmatics,\r\nand performatives. In Proceedings of The Texas Conference\r\non Performatives, Presuppositions, and Implicatures, A. Rogers, B. Wall and J. Murphy (eds.): 79-105. Arlington:\r\nCenter of Applied Linguistics.\r\nLee David A. & Jennifer J. Peck. 1995. Troubled waters:\r\nArgument as sociability revisited. In Language in Society\r\n24: 29-52.\r\nLeech, Geoffrey. 1977. Langage and tact. L.A.U.T. Paper 46.\r\nReprinted as Leech 1980, Language and Tact. Amsterdam:\r\nBenjamins.\r\n---. 1980. Explorations in Semantics and Pragmatics.\r\nAmsterdam: John Benjamins.\r\n---. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.\r\nLeet-Pellegrini, H. M. 1980. Conversational dominance as a\r\nfunction of gender and expertise. In Language: Social\r\nPsychological Perspectives, Howard Giles, Peter Robinson and Philip Smith (eds.): 97-104. Oxford: Pergamon Press.\r\nLein, L., & Brenneis, D. 1978. Children’s disputes in three\r\nspeech communities. Language in Society, 7: 299-323.\r\nLevinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge\r\nUniversity Press.\r\nLiao, Chao-chih. 1994. A Study on the Strategies, Maxims, and\r\nDevelopment of Refusal in Mandarin Chinese. Taipei: The\r\nCrane Publishing CO., LTD.\r\nLii-shih, Yu-hwei E. 1986. Conversational Politeness and\r\nForeign Language Teaching. Taipei: Crane.\r\nLii-shih, Yu-hwei E. 1994. What do “Yes” and “No” really\r\nmean in Chinese? In Georgetown University Round Table on\r\nLanguages and Linguistics 1994, James E. Alatis (ed.), 128-\r\n149.\r\nMaltz, Daniel N. and Borker, Ruth A. 1982. A cultural approach\r\nto male-female miscommunication. In Language and Social\r\nIdentity, John J. Gumperz (ed.): 196-216. Cambridge:\r\nCambridge University Press.\r\nMaynard, Douglas W. 1985a. How children start arguments.\r\nLanguage in Society, 14: 1-29.\r\n---. 1985b. On the functions of social conflict among\r\nchildren. American Sociological Review, 50: 207-223.\r\nMegaree, E. I. 1969. Influence of sex roles on the\r\nmanifestation of leadership. In Journal of Applied\r\nPsychology 53, 5: 377-382.\r\nMunro, Fran. 1987. Female and male participation in small-group\r\ninteraction in the ESOL classroom. Unpublished terms\r\nproject. Graduate Diploma in TESOL. Sydney: Sydney College\r\nof Advanced Education.\r\nMuntigl, Peter and William, Turnbull. 1998. Conversational\r\nstructures and facework in arguing. Journal of Pragmatics\r\n29: 225-256.\r\nNaotsuka, Reiko, Nancy Sakamoto et al. 1981. Mutual\r\nUnderstanding of Different Cultures. Osaka: Taishukan.\r\nPilkington, Jane. 1992. ‘Don’t try to make out that I’m\r\nnice!’ The different strategies women and men use when\r\ngossiping. Wellington Working Papers in Linguistics 5: 37-\r\n60.\r\nPomerantz, Anita. 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with\r\nassessments: some features of preferred / dispreferred turn\r\nshapes. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage. Eds. Structures\r\nof social action: Studies in conversation analysis. 57-\r\n101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\r\nRichards, Jack C. and M. Sukwiwat. 1983. Language transfer and\r\nconversational competence. Applied Linguistics 4.2: 113-125.\r\nSacks, Harvey. 1973. The preference for agreement in natural\r\nconversation. Paper presented at the Linguistic Institute,\r\nAnn Arbor, Michigan.\r\nSchick Case, Susan. 1988. Cultural differences, not\r\ndeficiencies: an analysis of managerial women’s language.\r\nIn Women’s Careers: Pathways and Pitfalls, Suzanna Rose and\r\nLaurie Larwood (eds.): 41-63. New York: Praeger.\r\nSchiffrin, Deborah. 1984. Jewish argument as sociability.\r\nLanguage in Society, 13: 311-335.\r\n---. 1985. Everyday argument: the organization of diversity in\r\ntalk. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis 3: Discourse and\r\nDialogue, T. van Dijk (ed.): 35-46. London: Academic Press.\r\n---. 1987. Discourse Markers. New York: Cambridge University\r\nPress.\r\nSchmidt, Richards W. 1980. Review of questions and politeness\r\nin social interaction. In RELC 11(2): 100-114.\r\nSell, Roger D. 1991. The politeness of literary texts. In\r\nLiterary Pragmatics, R. Sell (ed.): 208-224. London:\r\nRoutledge.\r\nShils, Edward. 1968. Deference. In Social Stratification, J.\r\nA. Jackson (ed.): 104-132. Cambridge: Cambridge University\r\nPress.\r\nSimmel, George. 1949. The sociology of sociability. In\r\nAmerican Journal of Sociology 55: 254-261.\r\nStubbe, Maria. 1991. Talking at cross-purposes: the effect of\r\ngender on New Zealand primary schoolchildren’s interaction\r\nstrategies in pair discussions. MA thesis. Wellington:\r\nVictoria University.\r\nSwacker, Marjorie. 1979. Women’s verbal behaviour at learned\r\nand profesinoal conferences. In The Sociology of the\r\nLanguages of American Women, Berry-Lou Dubois and Isobel\r\nCrouch (eds.): 155-160. San Antonio, Tex.: Trinity\r\nUniversity.\r\nTannen Deborah. 1984. Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk\r\namong Friends. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing\r\nCorporation.\r\n---. 1986. That’s Not What I Meant! How Conversational Style\r\nMakes or Breaks Your relations with Others. New York:\r\nWilliam Morrow; London: J. M. Dent.\r\n---. 1990. You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in\r\nConversation. New York: William Morrow.\r\n---. 1993. What’s in a frame?: Surface evidence for underlying\r\nexpectations. In Framing in Discourse: 14-56. Oxford: Oxford\r\nUniversity Press.\r\nVuchinich, Samuel. 1988. The sequential organization of closing\r\nin verbal family conflict. In Conflict Talk, A.D. Grimshaw\r\n(ed.): 118-138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\r\nWang, Yu-fang. 1997. Dispreferred Responses in Mandarin Chinese\r\nConversation. In Proceedings of the First Symposium on\r\nDiscourse and Syntax in Chinese and Formosan Languages: 103-\r\n134. Taipei: NTU.\r\nWatts, Richard J. 1992. Linguistic politeness and polite verbal\r\nbehavior: reconsidering claims for university. In Trends in\r\nLinguistics, Studies and Monographs 59: Politeness in\r\nLanguage, Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich\r\n(eds.). Mouton De Gruyter.\r\nWatzlawick, Paul, Janet H. beavin, and don D. Jackson. 1967.\r\nPragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Interactional\r\nPatterns, Pathologies, and Paradoxes. New York: W.W. Norton.\r\nWest, Candace and A. Garcia. 1988. Conversational shift work: a\r\nstudy of topical transitions between women and men. Social\r\nProblem 35.5: 551-75. | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 語言學研究所 85555007 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002001660 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| index.html | 115 B | HTML2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.