Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/87397| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 蕭宇超 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Hsiao Yu-chau | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳雅玫 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Chen, Ya-mei | en_US |
| dc.creator | 陳雅玫 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator | Chen, Ya-mei | en_US |
| dc.date | 1995 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-04-28T06:37:15Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-04-28T06:37:15Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2016-04-28T06:37:15Z | - |
| dc.identifier | B2002002873 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/87397 | - |
| dc.description | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 語言學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 82555003 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | 本文主要是從音韻,句法,語義及言談分析四部門的介面關係來探討閩南副詞的各種變調現象.副詞的句法及語義修飾功能可能影響閩南語重疊副詞的變調行為.當重疊副詞的句法與語義功能呈現差異時.它則單獨形成一個音韻片語.副詞內在的語義特性與閩南語一般副詞的變調有密切的關連.副詞可以是副語修飾語或句子修飾語.述語修飾語在語義上修飾述語或述語內的成份,因此與述語共同形成一個音韻片語;句子修飾語在語義上修飾主詞,句子或說話者,其必須單獨形成一個音韻片語.最後,我們從言談分析的角度重新分析閩南語的副詞.訊息結構中的焦點,主題及評論等結構會促成副詞音韻片語的重組.當副詞構成整個主題或評論時,它必須單獨形成一個獨立片語 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This thesis explores the adverbial phrasings in Southern | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgments..........iv\r\nChinese Abstract..........xi\r\nEnglish Abstract..........X\r\nChapter 1 Intrduction..........1\r\nChapter 2 Literature Review..........4\r\n2.1Introduction..........4\r\n2.2Syntax-Phonology Connection..........4\r\n2.3End-based Theory..........6\r\n2.3.1Selkirk’s End-based Approach..........6\r\n2.3.2Hsiao’s Phonological Phrase..........7\r\n2.4Semantic Theories of Adverbs..........8\r\n2.4.1Sobelman’s Syntax-Semantics Mismatch..........8\r\n2.4.2Jackendoff’s Projection Rules..........9\r\n2.4.3Huang’s Predicate Structures..........11\r\n2.4.4Bellert’s Semantic Categories of Arguments..........12\r\n2.4.5Ernst’s Semantic Readings..........13\r\n2.4.6Infantido-Trouki’s Truth-Conditionality..........13\r\n2.5Discourse Conditions..........14\r\n2.5.1Discourse Focus..........14\r\n2.5.1.1Focal Phrasing\r\n2.5.1.2Focusing Adjunct\r\n2.5.2Information Structure..........17\r\n2.6Tone System in Southern Min..........18\r\nChapter 3 From the Syntax-Semantics Mismatch to Adverbial Tonal Phrasing..........21\r\n3.1Introduction..........21\r\n3.2Tone Group Formation for Adverbs..........21\r\n3.2.1Cheng’s(1968)Approach..........21\r\n3.2.2Chen’s(1987)Analysis..........22\r\n3.2.3Hsiao’s(1991, 1995)Approach..........24\r\n3.3Tone Sandhi of Adverbial suffix-a..........25\r\n3.4Semantic Orientations of Reduplicated Adverbs..........29\r\n3.4.1VP-oriented Adverbs..........29\r\n3.4.2Clause-oriented Adverbs..........30\r\n3.4.3Dua-.oriented and Multi-oriented Adverbs..........31\r\n3.4.3.1Subject/VP-oriented Adverbs..........32\r\n3.4.3.1.1Agent/VP-oriented Adverbs..........32\r\n3.4.3.1.2Mind/VP-oriented Adverbs..........34\r\n3.4.3.2Topic/VP-oriented Adverbs..........35\r\n3.4.3.3Mulit-oriented Adverbs..........37\r\n3.5Syntax-Semantics Mismatch..........38\r\n3.6Conclusion..........41\r\nChapter 4 From Semantic Categorization to Adverbial Tonal Phrasing..........44\r\n4.1Introduction..........44\r\n4.2Adverbs as the Predicate Modifiers Only..........44\r\n4.2.1Manner Adverbs..........45\r\n4.2.2Action-related Time Adverbs..........45\r\n4.2.3Manner-related Locative Adverbs..........46\r\n4.2.4Manner-related Pragmatic Adverbs..........47\r\n4.2.5Degree Adverbs..........47\r\n4.3Adverbs as the Sentence Modifiers Only..........49\r\n4.3.1Event Adverbs..........49\r\n4.3.2Event-related Time Adverbs..........50\r\n4.3.3Event-related Locative Adverbs..........51\r\n4.3.4Speaker Adverbs..........52\r\n4.3.4.1Attitudinal Adverbs..........52\r\n4.3.4.2Modal Adverbs..........53\r\n4.3.4.3Pragmatic Adverbs..........55\r\n4.3.4.4Domain Adverbs..........56\r\n4.4Adverbs as both the Sentence Modifiers and the Predicate Modifiers..........57\r\n4.4.1Evaluative Adverbs..........57\r\n4.4.2Mental State Adverbs..........58\r\n4.5Interface Between Semantics and Phonology..........59\r\n4.6Conclusion..........63\r\nChapter 5 From the Discourse Information Structure to Adverbial Tonal Phrasing..........64\r\n5.1Introduction..........64\r\n5.2Discourse Focus..........64\r\n5.2.1Contextual Focus..........65\r\n5.2.2Structural Focus..........66\r\n5.2.3Focal Phrasing..........68\r\n5.3Topic..........70\r\n5.3.1A Nonfocused Topic..........70\r\n5.3.2Part of a Nonfocused Topic..........72\r\n5.3.3Part of a Structurally Focused Topic but not Carrying the Focus..........73\r\n5.3.4Part of a Structurally Focused Topic and Carrying the Focus..........75\r\n5.3.5Part of a Structurally Focused Topic and Carring Part of the Focus..........77\r\n5.3.6A Contextually Focused Topic..........78\r\n5.3.7Part of a Contextually Focused Topic..........79\r\n5.4Commnet..........80\r\n5.4.1A Nonfocused Comment..........81\r\n5.4.2Part of a Nonfocused Comment..........82\r\n5.4.3Part of a Structurally Focused Comment but not Carrying the Focus..........84\r\n5.4.4Part of a Structurally Focused Comment and Carrying the Focus..........85\r\n5.4.5 Part of a Structurally Focused Comment and Carrying Part of the Focus..........87\r\n5.4.6A Contextually Focused Comment..........88\r\n5.4.7Part of a Contextually Focused Comment..........89\r\n5.4.8A Neutral Comment..........90\r\n5.5Compex Information Structure..........92\r\n5.6Conclusion..........96\r\nChapter 6 Conclusion..........98\r\nBibliography..........103 | zh_TW |
| dc.source.uri | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002002873 | en_US |
| dc.subject | 閩南語 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 副詞變調 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 音韻 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 句法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 語義 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 言談分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Southern Min | en_US |
| dc.subject | Adverbial | en_US |
| dc.subject | Tone Sandhi | en_US |
| dc.subject | Phonology | en_US |
| dc.subject | Syntax | en_US |
| dc.subject | Semantics | en_US |
| dc.title | 閩南語的副詞變調音韻中的介面現象 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Tone Sandhi of Adverbsin Southern Min: Interfaces in Phonology | en_US |
| dc.type | thesis | en_US |
| dc.relation.reference | Bibliography\r\nAllerton, D . J. & A. Cruttenden. 1979. \"Three Reasons for Accenting a Definite Subject. “Journal of Linguistics 15 : 49-53.\r\nBellert, Irena. 1977. liOn Semantic and Distributional Properties of Sentential Adverbs.\" Linguistic Inguiry 2: 337-351.\r\nBickmore, L. 1989. Kinyambo Prosody. Univ. of California. Los Angeles. Ph.D. Dissertation.\r\nBodman, N. 1955. Spoken Amoy Hokkien. Kuala Lumpur: Government, Federation of Malaya.\r\nBolinger, D. L. 1972. \"Accent is Predictable (If You1re a Mind-reader).\" Languae 48: 633-644.\r\nBuysschaert, Joost. 1982. Criteria for the Classification of English Adverbials. Paleis der Academien, Brussel.\r\nCarlson, L. 1983 . Dialogue Games: An Approach to Discourse Analysis. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland.\r\n---,1984. \"Focus and Dialogue Games: A Game-Theoretical Approach to the Interpretation of Intonational Focusing. “ Cognitive Constraints on Communication ,eds by L. Vaina and J. Hintikka D., 295-333. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland .\r\nCheng, L. 1987. \"Derived Domains and Mandarin Third Tone Sandhi. “ CLS 23: 16-29.\r\nCheng, R. 1968. \"Tone Sandhi in Taiwanese. “ Linguistics 41: 9-42.\r\n---,1973. “ Some Notes on Tone Sandhi in Taiwanese. “ Linguistics 100: 2-25.\r\nChen, M. 1987. “The Syntax of Xiamen Tone Sandhi . “ Phonology Yearbook 4: 109-15l.\r\nChomsky, N. 1965 . Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: Mass.\r\nChomsky, Noam & Morris Halle. 1968. The sound Pattern of English. New York: Praeger.\r\nChung, R. 1989. Aspects of Kejia Phonology. U. of Illinois. Ph. D. Dissertation.\r\nClements, G. N. 1978 . Tone and Syntax in Ewe. Elements of Tone, Stress, and Intonation, ed. by D. J. Napol, 21-99. Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press.\r\nDeemter, K. V. 1994. \"What`s New? A Semantic Perspective on Sentence Accent.\" Journal of Semantics: 1-31.\r\nErnst, T. 1984. Towards an Integrated Theory of Adverb Position in English. IULC. Bloomington.\r\nEva, Koktova. 1986. Sentence adverbials in a functional description. University of Hamburg.\r\nGreenbaum, Sidney. 1969. Studies in English Adverbial Usage. Coral Gables: University of Miami Press.\r\nHale, Kenneth & Elisabeth Selkirk. 1987. \"Government and tonal phrasing in Papago.\" Phonology Yearbook 4: 151-183.\r\nHalliday, M.A.K. 1967. Intonation and Grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton.\r\nHayes, B. 1989. “The Prosodic Hierarchy in Meter. \"Phonetics and Phonology 1: 201-206.\r\nHocket, Ch. F. 1958 . A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: Macmaillan.\r\nHong, W. 1985. Tai-wan He-Iao-yu Sheng-diau Yan-jiu (Tone Sandhi of Southern Min in Taiwan) . Taipei: Zi-li Evening News.\r\nHsiao, Y. 1991. Syntax, Rhyme, and Tone: A Triangular Relationship. Taipei: the Crane Pub.\r\n---,1995. Southern Min Tone Sandhi and Theories of Prosodic Phonology. Taipei: Student Book Co., Ltd.\r\nHsiao, Y. & Ya-mei Chen. 1995 . \"Parameterizing Adverbial Tonal Operations in Southern Min: A Semantic-discourse Account. “ Paper for the Second International Symposium on Languages in Taiwan. National Taiwan Univ.\r\nHuang, F. 1975. A Study of Adverbs. Paris: The Hauge.\r\nIfantidou-Trouki, Elly. 1993. \"Sentential adverbs and relevance.”Lingua 90: 69- 90.\r\nJackendoff, R. S. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Genetive Grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press.\r\nKaisse, E. 1985. Connected Speech: The Interaction of Syntax and Phonology. Lodon: Academic Press.\r\nKanerva, J. 1989. Focus and Phrasing in Chichewa Phonology. Stanford University. Ph.D . Dissertation.\r\n---,1990. \"Focusing on Phonological Phrase in Chichewa.\" The Phonology Syntax Connection, eds. by Inkelas, S. and D. Zec. Chicago : the University of Chicago Press. 145-162.\r\nLehrer, A. 1975. \"Interpreting certain adverbs : semantics or pragmatics?\" Journal of Linguistics 11: 239-248.\r\nLin, J. 1994 . \"Lexical Government and Tone Group Formation in Xiamen Chinese.\" Phonology 11: 237-275.\r\nMcCarthy, John & Alan Prince. 1993. Prosodic Morphology I: Constraint Interaction and Satisfaction. Ms. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and Rutgers University.\r\nMcConnell-Gillian, Sally. 1982. “ Adverbs and Logical form: A Linguistically Realistic theory.\" Language 58: 144-184.\r\nMost, R. B. & Eli S. 1979. \"Information Structure in Sentences: New Information.\" Language and Speech 22 : 89-95.\r\nNespor, M & I. Vogel. 1986. Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris Publictions.\r\nOdden, D. 1987. \"Kimatuumbi Phrase Phnology.\" Phonology Yearbook 4:13-36.\r\nOu, S. 1996. A Prosody-Theoretic Approach to Southern Min Special Tone Sandhi. National Chengchi University. M.A. Thesis.\r\nOu, S & Y. Hsiao. 1995. \"Cong Yun-lu Yin-yun-xue Kan Tai-wan Min-nan-yu de Ching-sheng Xian-xiang\" (Neutral Tone Sandhi in Southern Min: A Prosodic Approach). Paper for the 4th Symposium on Chinese Phonology and the 13 th Annual Conference of the Association of Chinese Phonology, R.O.C. National Nomal University.\r\nPrince, Alan & Paul Smolensky. 1991. \"Optimality.\" Paper Presented at Arizona Phonology Conference.\r\nPrince, Alan & Paul Smolensky. 1992. \"Optimality: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar.\" Paper Presented at 12th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Los Angeles.\r\nQuirk, R. et al. 1972. A Grammar of Contemporary English . London: Longman.\r\nSchreiber, P. A. 1971. “ Some Constraints on the Formation of English Sentence Adverbs.\" Linguistic Inquiry 2: 83-101.\r\nSelkirk, E. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: the Relation between Sound and Structure. MIT Press.\r\n---,1986. \"On Derived Domain in Sentence Phonology.\" Phonology Yearbook 3: 371-405.\r\nShen, Y. 1988. \"A Tentative Hypothtesis Regarding Trisyllabic Tone Sandhi in Pingyao.\" U. of California, San Diago, Manuscript.\r\nShih, C. 1986. The Prosodic Domain of Tone Sandhi in Chinese. UCSD. Ph.D. Dissertation.\r\nSobelman, C. P. 1982. \"`RERE DE HE YI WAN CHA`- A STUDY NOTE\r\nRELATED QUESTIONS.\" Journal of Chinese Linguistics 10: 52-76.\r\nTaglicht, J. 1982. \"Intonation and the assessment of information.\" Journal of Linguistics18: 213-230.\r\nTang, Ting-ch`in. 1990. “ Syntax and Semantics of English Adverbs and Adverbials: A X-Bar Structure Analysis.\" Proceedings of the Seventh National Conference on The Teaching of Language: 233-312.\r\nTerken, J & Julia H. 1994. \"Deaccentuation of Words Representing `Given` Information: Effects of Persistence of Grammatical Function and Surface Position.\" Language and Speech 37: 125-145.\r\nThomason, R. & Robert S. 1973 . \"A Semantic Theory of Adverbs.\" Linguistic Inquiry 4: 195-220.\r\nWilson, D. & Dan Sperber. 1993 . \"Linguistic form and relevance.\" Lingua 90: 1-25.\r\nXu, J. 1990. Tai-wan-yu Kai-luan (Introduction to Taiwanese). Taipei: Foundation of the Study and Development of Taiwan Languages.\r\nYang, X. 1991. Tai-wan Min-nan-yu Yu-fa-gao (Manuscripts of the Grammar of SouthernMin in Taiwan). Taipei: Da-an.\r\nZhang, H. 1992. Topics in Chinese Phrasal Phonology. University of Californa, San Diago. Ph.D . Dissertation. | zh_TW |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| item.grantfulltext | open | - |
| item.openairetype | thesis | - |
| item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec | - |
| item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| index.html | 115 B | HTML2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.