Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/87640| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 黃德福 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Huang Teh-fu | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | 劉明煌 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Liu, Ming-huang | en_US |
| dc.creator | 劉明煌 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator | Liu, Ming-huang | en_US |
| dc.date | 1995 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-04-28T07:22:16Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-04-28T07:22:16Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2016-04-28T07:22:16Z | - |
| dc.identifier | B2002002701 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/87640 | - |
| dc.description | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 政治學系 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 81252014 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | 本文的研究主旨在於 ： 從中央與地方政治權力關係變動的主軸來探 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章導論..........1\r\n第一節研究動機..........1\r\n第二節民主化研究探討..........2\r\n第三節文獻檢討與分析架構..........18\r\n第二章國民黨威權政體形成的歷史背景..........25\r\n第一節日據殖民統治體制的承襲..........25\r\n第二節二二八事件與土地改革..........27\r\n第三節軍事戒嚴與動員戡亂體制的延長..........31\r\n第四節結語..........33\r\n第三章中央與地方的依侍結盟(1949-1972)..........35\r\n第一節依侍關係的界定與特質..........35\r\n第二節國民黨威權政體的建構..........40\r\n第三節中央與地方的依侍結盟..........57\r\n第四節結語－中央與地方政治權力關係之建構..........65\r\n第四章中央與地方政治之間的激盪(1972-1986)..........67\r\n第一節本土化政策與台灣主體意識的浮現..........67\r\n第二節國民黨、地方派系與反對運動之間的互動..........79\r\n第三節中央單向隔離、控制的鬆弛..........89\r\n第四節結語－中央與地方政治權力關係之調整..........92\r\n第五章中央與地方政治權力關係的轉變(1986~)..........95\r\n第一節政治自由化與民主化的衝擊－黨國體制的瓦解..........95\r\n第二節立法院的轉型與國民黨的轉化..........109\r\n第三節地方派系的變與不變..........120\r\n第四節國民黨的台灣化－派閥政治乎？..........127\r\n第五節結語－中央與地方政治權力關係之轉變..........131\r\n第六章結論..........135\r\n參考書目..........143 | zh_TW |
| dc.source.uri | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002002701 | en_US |
| dc.subject | 威權政體 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 民主化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 威權轉型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 地方派系 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 依侍主義 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 選舉 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Authoritarian Regime | en_US |
| dc.subject | Democratization | en_US |
| dc.subject | Transition From Authoritarian Rule | en_US |
| dc.subject | Local Faction | en_US |
| dc.subject | Clientelism | en_US |
| dc.subject | Election | en_US |
| dc.title | 中央與地方政治權力關係之轉變--國民黨威權政體的鞏固與轉型 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Change of Power Relationship beTween National and Local Politics -- The Consolidation and Transition of Kuomintang Authoritarian Regime | en_US |
| dc.type | thesis | en_US |
| dc.relation.reference | 一、英文部分\r\nBermeo, Nancy. 1990. “Rethinking Regime Change,\" Comparative Politics 22\r\n(3): 359-77.\r\nBosco, Joseph. 1992. “Taiwan Factions: Guanxi, Patronage, adn the State in\r\nLocal Politics. Ethnology 31 (April): 157-83.\r\nCheng, Tun-Jen. 1989. “Democratizing the Quasi-Leninist Regime in Taiwan,”\r\nWorld Politics 41 (4): 471-99.\r\nChou, Yangsun and Andrew Nathan. 1987. ``Democratizing Transition in\r\nTaiwan,\" Asian Survey 27 (3): 277-99.\r\nChu, Yun-han. 1992. Crafting Democracy in Taiwan (Taipei: Institute for\r\nNational Policy Research).\r\nCollier, David and Deborah L. Norden 1992. “Strategic Choice Models of\r\nPolitical Change in Latin America,” Comparative Politics 24 (2): 229-\r\n43 .\r\nDiamond, Lany. 1993. “The Globalization of Democracy,”in Robelt o. Slater;\r\nBarry M. Schutz and Steven R. Dorr ed. Global Transformation and\r\nthe Third Tflord (Boulder: Lynne Riener Publishers). pp. 31-70.\r\nDiamond, Larry, Seymour M. Lipset, and Juan Linz. 1987. “Builiding and\r\nSustaining Democratic Govelmellt in Developing Cmmtries: Some\r\nTentative Findings,” World Affairs 150 (1): 5-19.\r\nEngstrom, Richard and Chi-huang Chu. 1984. “The Impact of 1980\r\nSupplementmy Election on Nationalist China`s Legislative Yuan,”\r\nAsian Survey 24 (4): 447-58.\r\nEsienstadt, S. N. and Louis Rongier. 1980. “Patron-Client Relations as a Model\r\nof Structuring Social Exchange,”Comparative Studies in Society and\r\nHistory 22: 42-75.\r\nHuang, Teh-fu. 1994. \"Elections and the Evolution of the Kuomintang,\" paper\r\nPresented at Democratization in Taiwan: Causal Elements and\r\nTheoretical Implications for Chinese Political Culture, the Multiparty\r\nSystem, and Cross Straits Relations,\" Washington, D.C, Apri18-9.\r\nHuang, Teh-fu. 1995. \"Electoral Competition and the Evolution of the\r\nKuomintang,\" Issues & Studies 31 (5): 91-120.\r\nHuntington, Samuel P. 1970. \"Social and Institution Dynamics of One-Party\r\nSystems,\" in Samuel P. Huntington and Clement H. Moore ed.\r\nAuthoritarian Politics in Modern Society (New York: Basic books).\r\npp. 3-47.\r\nHuntington, Samuel P. and Joan M. Nelson. 1977. No Easy Choice--Political\r\nParticipation in Developing Countries (Harvard University Press,\r\nSecond Printing).\r\nHuntington, Samuel P. 1984. \" Will More Countries Become Democratic?\"\r\nPolitical Science Quarterly 99 (Summer): 193-218.\r\nHuntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Waves: Democratization in the Late\r\nTwentieth Century (Norman: University of Oklahoma press).\r\nKarl, Teny Lynn. 1990. \"Dilemmas of Democratization in Latin America,\"\r\nComparative Politics 23 (October): 1-2l.\r\nLemarchand, Rene and Legg, Keith. 1972. \"Political Clientelism and\r\nDevelopment,\" Comparath!e Politics 4 (2): 149-78.\r\nLinz, Juan J. 1970. \"An Authoritarian Regime: Spain,\" in Erik Allardt and Stein\r\nRokkan, Mass Politics (New York: The Free Press), pp. 251-83.\r\nLinz, Juan J. 1990. \"Transition to Democracy,\" The Washington Quarterly 13\r\n(Summer): 143-64.\r\nMoore, Clement H. 1970. \"The Single Party as Source of Legitimacy,\" in\r\nSamuel P. Huntington and Clement H. Moore ed. Authoritarian\r\nPolitics in Modern Society (New York: Basic books). pp. 48-72.\r\nO`Donnell, Guillermo and Philippe Schmitter eds. 1986. Transitions from\r\nAuthoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusion About Uncertain\r\nDemocracies (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).\r\nPowell, John Duncan. 1970. \"Peasant Society and Clientelist Politics,1I The\r\nAmerican Political Science Review 64 (2): 411-425.\r\nPrzeworski, Adam. 1986. \"Some Problems in the Study of the Transition to\r\nDemocracy,\" in Guillermo O`Donnell, Philippe Schmitter, and\r\nWhitehead Laurence , eds. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule:\r\nComparative Perspective (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press),\r\npp. 47-63.\r\nPrzeworski, Adam. 1988. \"Democracy as A Contingent Outcome of Conflicts,\"\r\nin John Elster, and Rune Slagstad eds., Constitutionalism and\r\nDemocracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp.59-81.\r\nPrzeworski, Adam. 1992. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic\r\nReforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America (Camblidge:\r\nCambridge University Press).\r\nRustow, Dankwa11 A. 1970. \"Transition to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic\r\nModel,\" Comparative Politics 2 (April): 337-63.\r\nSa110ri, Giovanui. 1970. \"The Typology of Party Systems--Proposals for\r\nImprovement,\" in Edk Allardt aud Stein Rokkan ed. Mass Politics\r\n(New York: The Fress Press). pp. 322-52.\r\nScott, James C. 1972. \"Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast\r\nAsia,\" The American Political Science Review 66 (1): 91-113.\r\nShare, Donald, and Mainwaring, Scott. 1986. \"Transition Through Transaction:\r\nDemocratization ill Brazil and Spain,\" in Wayne A. Selcher ed.,\r\nPolitical Liberalization in Brazil: Dynamics, Dilemmas, and\r\nProspects (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press). pp. 175-215.\r\nStepan, Alfred. 1986. \"Paths toward Redemocratization: Theoretical and\r\nComparative Considerations,\" in Guillenno O`Donnell, Philippe\r\nSchmitter and Whitehead Laurence, eds. Transitions from\r\nAuthoritariaH Rule: Comparative Perspective (Baltimore: Johns\r\nHopkins University Press), pp. 64-84.\r\nWeingrod, Alex. 1968. \"Patrons, Patronage, and Political Parties,\" Comparatil`e\r\nStudies in Society and History 10 (4): 377-400.\r\nWinckler, Edwin A. 1984. \"Institutionalization and Participation on Taiwan:\r\nFrom Hard to Soft Authoritarianism?\" The China Quarterly 99\r\n(September): 481-499.\r\nWol( Eric R, 1966. \"Kinship, Friendship, and Patron-Client Relations in\r\nComplex Societies,\" in Michael Banton ed. The Social Antropology of\r\nComplex Societies (New York: Praeger), pp. 1-22.\r\nWu, Nai-teh, 1987, The Politics of Regime Patronage System: Mobilization\r\nand Control Within An Authoritarian Regime. Unpublished Ph. D\r\nDissertation. University of Chicago. | zh_TW |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| item.grantfulltext | open | - |
| item.openairetype | thesis | - |
| item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
| item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| index.html | 115 B | HTML2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.