Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/87676| 題名: | 國中教師科學信念與教學信念,教學行為的關係 Relationship between scientific belief,teaching belief and teaching behavior about junior high school teachers |
作者: | 潘雅芳 Pan, Ya-Fang |
貢獻者: | 詹志禹 潘雅芳 Pan, Ya-Fang |
關鍵詞: | 信念 科學信念 教學信念 國中教師 belief scientific belief teaching belief junior high school |
日期: | 1995 | 上傳時間: | 28-Apr-2016 | 摘要: | 本研究主要目的為:(一)探討不同背景變項的國中教師,其科學信念是否有差異,(二)探究國中教師科學信念與教學信念的關係,(三)探究國中教師科學信念與教學行為的關係,(四)探究國中教師科學信念與教學信念,教學行為的關係. | 參考文獻: | 中文部分:\r\n王道還等譯(Thomas S. Kuhn 著) (民83) 。科學革命的結構\r\nO 台北:遠流O\r\n王俊明(民7 1 )。國小級任教師之領導行為對班級氣氛的影\r\n響O 國立台灣師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。\r\n江天驟(民77) 。當代西方科學哲學。台北:谷風。\r\n江新合(民82) 。數學及自然科學師資之培訓研究: (血)國中\r\n理化科教學困難和教師內顯特質之相關研究。行政院國\r\n家科學委員會專題研究計釗成果報告。國立高雄師範大學\r\n科教所。\r\n江新合(民83) 。國中理化教師群體信念及心態特質的調查研\r\n究O 國立高雄師範大學學報， 5 ， 159-184 。\r\n汪榮才(民68) 。教師行為、學生制握信念與學業成就。臺南\r\n師專學報， 12 , 1 1 1 - 1 3 1 。\r\n李平寫(民76) 。向科學理性的權威挑戰一科學哲學「頑童」\r\n保羅﹒費若本。當代， 10 ， 13-19\r\n李佳錦(民83) 。國中理化教師的教學信念研究。國立高雄\r\n師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n李章瑋(民84) 。國民小學自然科學潛在課程之研究一以自\r\n然科教師及教學中的科學圖像為例。台北市立師範學院初\r\n教研究所碩士論文。\r\n沈清松(民80) 0 )Mffi~屆質證論的哲學(上)。人文及社會學科教\r\n學通訊， 1(5) ， 190-201 0\r\n吳清lLI (民73) 。臺北市國民中學導師專業教育背景與管教態\r\n度對學生生活適應的影響。國立政治大學教育研究所碩\r\n士論文。\r\n周寄中譯(Lakatos ， I. & Musgrav ， A 編著) (民82) 。批判\r\n與知識的增長(Criticism and Growth of Knowledge)\r\n。台北:桂冠。\r\n林清財(民79) 。我國國民小學教師教育信念之相關研究。國\r\n立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。\r\n林寶山(民7 1 )。學習環境量表簡介。輔導月刊， 40-41 。\r\n林彩|岫(民76) 。國民中學教師專業自主性之研究。國立臺灣\r\n師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n洪謙(民79) 。邏輯經驗主義論文集。台北:遠流。\r\n洪庸院(民74) 。波柏的科學方法論及其在教育上的意義。國\r\n立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n柯華葳、幸曼玲(民84) 。小學日常教學活動之生態研究。教\r\n改通訊， 12 。\r\n高強華(民8 1 )。教師信念研究及其在學校教育革新上的意\r\n義。國立台灣師範大學教育研究集刊， 34 ， 85-1 日。\r\n徐俊祥(民84) 。課程與教學的反思一一個傳記式研究法的例\r\n子。初等教育學報， 5 (2) ，香港:中文大學香港教育研\r\n究所。\r\n莊文瑞(民76) 。當代科學哲學的轉向一巴怕與孔恩的論辯。\r\n當代， 10 ， 26-36 。\r\n孫:志麟(民79) 。國民小學教師自我效能及相關因素之研究。\r\n國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n郭生玉(民74) 。教師的問按與直接影響行為和學童創造力及\r\n學業成績之關係。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理學報，此，\r\n57-84 。\r\n郭重吉(民77) 。從認知的觀點探討自然科學的學習。教育學\r\n院學報， 13 ， 352-378 。\r\n郭重吉(民8 1 )。從建構主義的觀點探討中小學數理教學的改\r\n進。科學發展月刊， 20(5) ， 548-570 0\r\n郭重吉、詐玫理(民8 1 )。從科學哲學觀點的演變探討科學教\r\n育的過去與未來。彰化師範大學學報， 3 ， 531-5610\r\n許攻理(民8 1 )。我國國民中學自然科學教師科學哲學觀點之\r\n調查研究。國立彰化師純大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n張巨育、吳寅華(民83) 。邏輯與歷史一現代科學方法論的擅\r\n變。台北:淑馨。\r\n張芬芬(民73) 。師大結業生分發實習前後教學態度與任教意\r\n願之比較研究。國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n張芬芬(民80) 。師範生教育實習中泊在課程之人種誌研究。\r\n國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n|凍英豪、吳裕盆、李坤崇(民79) 。教師態度量表修訂報告。\r\n測驗年刊， 37 , 25-33 。\r\n陳衛平譯(Larry Laudan 著) (民8 1 )。科學的進步與問題。\r\n台北:桂冠。\r\n舒光(民82) 。科學哲學導論。台北:水牛。\r\n白:煒光(民83) 。科學哲學導論。台北:五悶。\r\n舒煒光、邱仁宗(民79) 。當代西方科學哲學述評。台北:水牛。\r\n黃鴻艾(民70) 。學校經驗對國中教師教室領導行為的影響。\r\n國立臺灣師i向大學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n詹仕鑫(民78) 。我國國民中學科學教師教學風格之研究。國\r\n立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n!當志禹(民83) 。理性思考教學模式對科學態度及民主精神之\r\n影響。教育部顧問室委託研究報告，編號83-3-M-001o\r\n倉志禹、吳璧純(民8 1 )。邏輯實證論的迷思。思與言， 30(1)101-121\r\n趙金祁、許榮富、黃芳裕(民8 1 )。科學哲學對科學知識主體\r\n主張的演變。科學教育月刊， 154 ， 2 ， 18 。\r\n趟金祁、許榮富、與黃芳裕(民82) 。科學哲學對組成科學知\r\n識之主張及其演變。科學教育月刊， 161 ， 4-17 。\r\n蔡坤鴻譯(Karl R. Popp 盯著) (民78) 。臆測與駁斥(上) - -\r\n科學知識的成長。台北:幼獅。\r\n鄭呈因(民83) 。國中理化科實習教師教學個案研究。國立高\r\n雄師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n鄭昭明(民83) 。認知心理學:理論與實踐。台北:桂冠。\r\n盧美貴(民69) 。國小教師教導方式與學生學習行為之關係。\r\n國立師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。\r\n西文部份\r\nAbimbola, I . O. (1983). The relevance of the \"New\"\r\nphilosophy of science for the science curriculum.\r\nS c h 001 Sci e n c e and JlIf at h e 17l a tic s, 8 3( 3 ), 1 8 1 - 1 9 3 .\r\nAguirre, J. M., Haggerty, S. M., & Linder, C. J. (\r\n1990). Student-teachers` conceptions of science,\r\nteaching and learning: A case study in preservice\r\nscience education. International\r\nJournal of Science education, 14:4), 381-390.\r\nAikenhead, G. S. (1984). The decision making: The\r\ncase of prairie high.Journal of Research tn\r\nSci e n c e Tea chi n g, 2 1( 2 ), 1 6 7 - 1 8 6 .\r\nBauch, P . A. (1984). The impact of teachers` tnstructional\r\nbeliefs on their teaching: Implications\r\nfor research and practice. (ERIC\r\nDocument Reproduction Service No. ED 252 954)\r\nBeers, S. E., Bloomingdale, J. R . (1983)Epistemological\r\nand instructional assumptions of\r\ncollege teachers. (ERIC Document Reproduction\r\nService No. ED 232 522)\r\nBigge, M. L. (1982).Educational philosophies for\r\nteachers. Ohio: Bell & Howell.\r\nBrickhouse, N. W. (1989a). Teachers` beliefs about\r\nscience and science teaching: Narratives of con-\r\nvictions`actions and constraints. Dissertation\r\nAbstracts International 49/11.\r\nBrickhouse, N. W. (1989b). Teachers content\r\nknowledge about the nature of science and its\r\nrelationship to classroom practice. (ERIC\r\nDocument Reproduction Service No. ED 306 133)\r\nBrickhouse, N. W. (1989c). The teaching of philosophy\r\nof science in secondary classrooms:\r\nCase studies of teachers` personal theories.\r\nInternational Journal of Science Education,\r\n11(4),437-449.\r\nBrickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers` beliefs about\r\nthe nature of science and their relationship to\r\nclassroom practice. Journal of Teacher Educat\r\nion 41 ( 3 ) 53-60.\r\nBrickhouse, N., & Bonder, G. M. (1992). The beginning\r\nscience teacher: Classroom narratives of\r\nconvictions and constraints. Journal of Res\r\near chi n Sci e n c e Tea chi n g, 2 9( 5 ), 4 7 1 - 4 8 5 .\r\nBrousseau, B. A. (1984).Comparing education\r\nbeliefs of teacher candidates and their nonteaching\r\ncounterparts.\r\nBrousseau, B. A. (1984)., Book, C., & Byers, J. L.\r\n( 1 9 8 8`). Tea c her bel i e f san d the cuI t u res 0 f\r\ntea chi n g. lou rna l 0 f Tea c her E d II cat ion, 3 9( 6 ) ,33-39.\r\nBrousseau, B. A., & Freeman, D. 1 . (1988). How do\r\nteacher education faculty members define desirable\r\nteacher beliefs? Teaching and Teacher\r\nEducation, 4(3),267-273.\r\nBurbles, N. C . , & Linn, M. C . (1991). Science education\r\nand philosophy of science: Congruence or\r\ncontradiction? Interactional lournal of Science\r\nEducation, 13(3),227-241.\r\nCalderhead, J. (Ed . ) (1987).Exploring teacher\r\nthinking. London : Mackays.\r\nCampbell, D. T. (1974). Evolutionary epistemology.\r\nI n G era r d R a d nit z k y and W. W . Bar tIe y XII (E d s ) . ,\r\nEvolutionary epistemology, rationality, and the\r\nsociology of knowledge, 47-89. Illinois: Open\r\nCourt.\r\nChang, Tzuchau. (1995). An inveatigation of\r\nTaiwanese graduate students` beliefs about scie\r\nn t i f i c k now led g e .giji &, 4 0, 5 8 3 - 6 1 8 .\r\nClark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers`\r\nthought process. In Wittrock, M. C. (Ed.),\r\nHandbook of Research on Teaching(3rd ed.)(pp.\r\n253-296). New York: Macmillan.\r\nClasen, R. E., & Bowman, W. E. (1974). Toward a\r\nstudent-centered learning focus inventory for\r\njunior high and middle school teachers. The\r\nJ 0 urn a I 0 fEd u cat ion a IRe sea r c h, 6 8( 1 ), 9 - 1 1 .\r\nCorporaal, A. H. (1991). Repertory grid research\r\ninto cognitions of prospective primary school\r\nteachers. Teaching and Teacher Education,7(4),315-329.\r\nCronin-Jones, L., & Shaw, E. L. (1992). The\r\ninfluence of methods instruction on the beliefs\r\nof preservice elementary and secondary SCIence\r\nteachers: Preliminary comparative analyses.\r\nS c h 0 0 I Sci e n c e a fl d !vI at hem a tic s, 9 2( 1 ), 1 4 - 2 2 .\r\nDuffee, L., & Aikenhead, G. (1992). Curriculum\r\nc han g e, s t u.d e n t e val u a t ion, and tea c her p r act i c a I\r\nknowledge. Science Education, 76(5),493-506.\r\nDuschl, R. A. (1983). Science teachers` belief about\r\nthe nature of science and the selection,implementation,\r\nand development of instructional\r\ntasks: A case study. Dissertation Abstracts\r\nInternational, 45/02.\r\nDuschl, R. A., & Wright, E. (1989). A case study of\r\nhigh school teachers` decision making models\r\nfor planning and teaching science. Journal of\r\nRes ear chi n Sci e n c e Tea chi n g, 2 6( 6 ), 467 - 5 0 1 .\r\nForge, 1. C. (1979). A role for philosophy of\r\nscience in the teaching of science. Journal of\r\nPhiloso-phy of Education, 13, 109-118.\r\nFrey, K. M. (1987).Administrative implications of\r\nself-reported instructional beliefs and\r\npractices of secondary school teachers. (PHD.\r\nThe Univer-sity of Arizona). DAI 48/03A.\r\nGallagher, 1. 1. (1991). Prospective and practicing\r\nsecondary school science teachers` knowledge\r\nand beliefs about the philosophy of SClence.\r\nSci e n c e E d u cat ion , 7 5( 1 ), 1 2 1 - 1 3 3 .\r\nHashweh, M. Z. (1996). Effects of science teachers`\r\nepistemological beliefs in teaching. Journal of\r\nRes ear chi Il Sci e n c e Tea chi n g, 3 3( 1 ), 4 7 - 6 3 .\r\nHodson, D. (1985).Philosophy of science ,SClence\r\nand science education. Studies in Science Education,12, 25-57.\r\nHodson, D. (1986).Philosophy of SCIence and SCIence\r\neducation. Journal of Philosophy of Education,20(2),215-225.\r\nHodson, D.(1993). Philosophic stance of secondary\r\nschool science teachers,curriculum experiences,\r\nand children`s understanding of science:some\r\npreliminary findings. Interchange, 24,41-52.\r\nHook, C. M . & Rosenshine, B. V. (1979). Accuracy\r\nof teacher reports of their classroom behavior.\r\nRev i e W 0 fEd u cat ion a l Res ear c h, 4 9( 1 ), 1 - 1 2 .\r\nKagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of research on\r\ntea c her bel i e f. Ed u cat i 0 11 alP s y c h 0 log i s t, 2 7( 1 ) ,65-90.\r\nKoulaidis, V., & Ogborn, J. (1988). Use of systematic\r\nnetworks in the development of a questionnaire.\r\nInternational Journal of Science Education,\r\n10(5),497-509 .\r\nKoulaidis, V . , & Ogborn, J. (1989). Philosophy of\r\nscience: An empirical study of teachers` views.\r\nInternational Journal of Science Education,\r\n11(2),173-184.\r\nKoulaidis, V., & Ogborn, J. (1995). Science teachers`\r\nphilosophical assumptions: How well do we\r\nunderstand them? International Journal of\r\nScience Education, 17(3),273-283.\r\nLa n tz, 0., & K as s, H. (1 9 8 7 ) . C he m i s try tea c her s `\r\nfunctional paradigms. Science Education, 71(1),\r\n117-134.\r\nLaudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems:Toward\r\na theory of scientific growth. US: University\r\nof California.\r\nLederman, N. G. (1992). Students` and teachers`\r\nconceptions of the nature of science: A reVlew\r\nof the research. Journal of Research In Science\r\nTeaching, 29(4), 331-359.\r\nLederman, N. G., & Zeidler, D. L. (1987). Science\r\nteachers` conceptions of the nature of science:\r\nDo they really influence teaching behavior.\r\nSci-ence Education, 71(5),721-734.\r\nMoos, R. H. (1979).Evaluating educational\r\nenvironment. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.\r\nMunby, H. (1984). A qualitative approach to the\r\nstudy of a teacher`s beliefs.Journal of Research\r\nin science teaching, 21(1),27-38.\r\nNespor, J. K. (1985).The role of beliefs in the\r\npractice of teaching: Fillal report of the\r\nteacher beliefs study. (ERIC Document\r\nReproduction Service No. ED 270 446)\r\nN e s p 0 r, J. K. (1 9 8 7 ). The r ole 0 f bel i e f sin t·h e\r\npractice of teaching.Journal of Curriculum\r\nStu d - i e s, 1 9( 4 ), 3 1 7 - 3 2 8 .\r\nN i s bet t, R. E., & R 0 s s, L. (1 9 8 0 ) .H u man i n fer e Jl c e :\r\nStrategies andshortcomings of social judgement.\r\nEnglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.\r\nNussbaum, J. (1989). Classroom conceptual chang~\r\nphilosophical perspectives. International Journal\r\nof Science Education, 11, 530-540.\r\nOgunniyi, M. B. (1982). An analysis of prospective\r\nscience teachers` understanding of the nature of\r\nscience. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,\r\n19(1),25-32.\r\nOgunniyi, M. B., & Pella, M. O. (1980). Conceptualizations\r\nof scientific concepts,laws,and theories\r\nheld by Kwara State,Nigeria secondary\r\nschool science teachers. Science Education, 64\r\n(5),591-599.\r\nPajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers` beliefs and educational\r\nresearch: Cleaning up a messy construct.\r\nRev i e W of Ed u cat ion a l Res ear c h, 6 2( 3 ), 3 07-332.\r\nPerkinson, H. J. (1993).Teachers without goals,\r\nstudents without purposes. New York: McGraw\r\nHill.\r\nPomeroy, D. (1993). Implications of teachers` beliefs\r\nabout the nature of science:Comparison of\r\nthe beliefs of scientists, secondary science\r\nteachers,and elementary teachers.Science Education,\r\n77(3),261-178.\r\nPope, M., & Denicolo, P. (1993). The art and SCIence\r\nof constructive research in teacher think-\r\n\r\n\r\n1 n g. Tea chi n g and Tea c her E d II cat ion, 9( 5 ) ,529-544.\r\nPopper, K. R. (1953,1974). The problem of induction.\r\nIn David Miller (Ed.),Popper selections\r\n(pp.101-117). New Jersey: Princeton University.\r\nPopper, K. R. (1960). The growth of scientific\r\nk now 1 e d g e. I n D a v i d Mill e I` (E d . ) ,P 0 p per\r\nselections(pp.171-180). New Jersey: Princeton University.\r\nPopper, K. R. (1967). Knowledge: Subjective versus\r\nobjective. In David Miller (Ed.),Popper selections(\r\npp . 101-117). New Jersey: Princeton University.(pp.58-77).\r\nPopper, K. R. (1973). Evolutionary epistemology.\r\nIn David Miller (Ed.),Popper selections(pp.78-\r\n86). New Jersey: Princeton University.\r\nPopper, K. R. (1974). Campbell on the evolutionary\r\ntheory of knowledge. In Gerard Radnitzky and\r\nW. W. Bar tIe y ,III (E d s ) . , E vol uti 0 n a r y\r\nepistemology, rationality, and the sociology of\r\nknowledge, 115-120. Illinois: Open Court.\r\nR a d nit z k y, G., & Bar t ley JII W. W. (1 9 8 7 ) . E vol u -\r\ntionary epistemology, rationality, and the\r\nsociology of knowledge. Illinois: Open Court.\r\nRichards, J. (1992).Beginning Professionals`\r\nmeta-phors in an early field placement. (ERIC\r\nDocu-ment Reproduction Service No. ED 3483 5 3 )\r\nRobinson, J. (1969). Philosophy of SCIence: Implication\r\nfor teacher education. Journal of Res\r\near chi n Sci e n c e Tea chi n g) 6( 1 ), 9 9 - 1 04 .\r\nRowell, J. A., & Cawthron, E. R. (1982). Images of\r\nSCIences: An empirical study. European Journal\r\nof Science Education) 4:1), 79-94.\r\nRubba, P. A. & Anderson, H. O. (1978). Development\r\nof an instrument to assess secondary\r\nschool students` understanding of the nature of\r\nsci e n t i f i c k now 1 e d g e . Sci e n c e Ed u cat ion) 6 2( 4 ) ,449-458.\r\nShavelson, R. J. & Stern, P. (1981). Research on\r\nteachers` pedagogical thoughts,judgements,decisions,\r\nand behavior. Review of Educational Res\r\near c h) 5 1, 4 5 5 - 4 9 8 .\r\nSigel, Irving E. (1985). A conceptual analysis of\r\nbeliefs. In Irving E. Sigel(Eds.),Parental belief\r\nsystems: The psychological consequences for\r\nchildren(pp. 433-456). Hilladale, NJ : Erlbaum.\r\nSigel, Irving E. (1992). The belief-behavior connection\r\n: A resolvable dilemma? In Irving E,\r\nSigel(Eds.), Parental belief systems:the psychological\r\nconsequences for clzildren(pp. 433-456).\r\nHilladale, NJ: Erlbaum.\r\nSmith, D. C., & Neal, D. C. (1989). The construction\r\nof subject matter knowledge in primary\r\nSCIence teaching. Teaching & Teacher Education,5(1), 1-20 .\r\nSutton, C. (1996) . Beliefs about SCIence and beliefs\r\nabout language. Interllational Journal of\r\nScience Education, 18(1), 1-18.\r\nTaylor, P. C. (1990).The influence of teacher\r\nbeliefs on constructivist teaching practices.\r\n(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED\r\n320 883)\r\nTabachnick, B. R. et al. (1982).The impact of the\r\nstudent teaching experience on the development\r\noft e a c her per s p e c t i v e s. ( E RIC D O`c u men t Rep r 0 -\r\nduction Service No. ED 218 251)\r\nTabachnick, B. R., & Zeichner, K. M. (1985)Ihe\r\ndevelopment of teacher perspectives: Final\r\nreport. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service\r\nNo . ED 266099)\r\nThompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers` beliefs and conceptions:\r\nA synthesis of the research. In D. A.\r\nGrouws(Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathe-\r\nmatics Teaching and Learning, 127-146. New\r\nYork: Macmillan.\r\nTobin, K., & Gallagher, I. (1987). What happens In\r\nhigh school science classrooms? Journal of\r\nCurriculum Studies, 19(6),549-560.\r\nTornvall, A. (1987). An investigation into the relationship\r\nbetween teacher beliefs and the philosophy\r\nof Laroplan 69. Journal of Curriculum\r\nStudies, 19(2),175-182.\r\nTuan, H. L. (1991).The influence of preserVlce\r\nsecondary science teachers` beliefs about\r\nscience and pedagogy on their planning and\r\nteaching . (ERIC Document Reproduction Service\r\nNo. ED 332 871)\r\nWehling, L. I., & Charters, W. W. (1969). DimenSlons\r\nof teacher beliefs about the teaching\r\nprocess. American Educational Research\r\nJournal, fK1),7-30.\r\nWellington, T., & Lakin, S. (1994). Who will teach\r\nthe `nature of science?:Teachers` views of\r\nscience and their implications for science education.\r\nInternational Journal of Science Education,\r\n1fi.,2) , 175-190.\r\nWinitzky, N., Kauchak, D., & Kelly, M. (1994).\r\nMeasuring teachers` structural knowledge.\r\nTea chi Il g and Tea c her E d II cat ion, 1 O( 2 ), 1 2 5 -139 .\r\nZeichner, K. M., & Tabachnick, B. R. (1983).\r\nTeacher perspectives ill the face of institutional\r\npress.(ERIC Document Reproduction\r\nService No. ED 240113) | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 教育學系 83152011 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002002776 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| index.html | 115 B | HTML2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.