Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/88196
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳振寬 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Chen, Zhen Kuan | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | 張國雄 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Dennis Zhang, Guo Xiong | en_US |
dc.creator | 張國雄 | zh_TW |
dc.creator | Dennis Zhang, Guo Xiong | en_US |
dc.date | 1994 | en_US |
dc.date | 1993 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-04-29T07:08:01Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-04-29T07:08:01Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-04-29T07:08:01Z | - |
dc.identifier | B2002003739 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/88196 | - |
dc.description | 碩士 | zh_TW |
dc.description | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
dc.description | 英國語文學系 | zh_TW |
dc.description | G795409 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | 基於憲法的保障以及選民的負託,立法委員得以在會期內,就政府施政得失要求官員答詢解釋。而立委由於來自不同的社會、政治背景,自然各有其獨特的質詢方式。因此,國會實為「中斷言談」(Interruption)之研究提供一適切領域。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | With a mandate by the Constitution and the electorate, lawmakers can inquire the government officials` explanations for policies within the parliamentary sessions, tt is only natural that lawmakers coming from diverse social and political realms may show distinct styles of questioning. Thus, parliament does offer a fit province for interruption analysis. | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgements-----iii\r\nChinese Abstract-----vii\r\nEnglish Abstract-----viii\r\nTABLE OF CONTENTS-----iv\r\nChapter\r\n1. Introduction-----1\r\n The Problem and Purpose-----1\r\n Review of Previous Researches-----3\r\n Turn-Taking System-----3\r\n Definition of Interruption-----8\r\n Significance of Interruption-----17\r\n2. Background-----25\r\n Taiwan`s Recent History of Political Development-----25\r\n Ethnic Differences-----29\r\n Aborigine-----30\r\n Taiwanese-----30\r\n Hakka-----31\r\n Mainland Chinese-----32\r\n Party Politics-----32\r\n The Nationalist Party (Kuomintang)-----33\r\n Democratic Progressive Party-----34\r\n Chinese New Party-----36\r\n Official Ranking-----37\r\n3. Methodology-----41\r\n The Power Semantics-----42\r\n Legislature: The Legislative Yuan-----43\r\n Organization of the Legislature-----44\r\n The Questioning System-----45\r\n Party Identity-----49\r\n Official Ranking-----51\r\n Ethnic Identity-----52\r\n The Data-----54\r\n The Procedures-----55\r\n The Hypotheses-----57\r\n4. Results and Discussion-----60\r\n General Discussion-----60\r\n The Effects of Party Identity-----62\r\n The Effects of Ethnic Differences-----65\r\n The Effects of Official Ranking-----70\r\n5. Conclusion-----79\r\n The Status of CPI-----80\r\n The Validity of the Data-----81\r\n The Selection of the Variables-----83\r\n Further Directions-----85\r\nAppendixes\r\n A. Transcription Symbols-----86\r\n B. Name List of the Officials-----87\r\n C. Exchanges of Interruptions Between Lawmakers and Officials in Each Dyad-----89\r\nWorks Cited----100 | zh_TW |
dc.source.uri | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002003739 | en_US |
dc.subject | 中斷言談 | zh_TW |
dc.subject | 質詢 | zh_TW |
dc.subject | 權力 | zh_TW |
dc.subject | 黨派 | zh_TW |
dc.subject | 種族 | zh_TW |
dc.subject | 官階 | zh_TW |
dc.subject | interruption | en_US |
dc.subject | question | en_US |
dc.subject | power | en_US |
dc.subject | party | en_US |
dc.subject | ethnicity | en_US |
dc.subject | ranking | en_US |
dc.title | 闡釋臺灣國會「中斷質詢」的社會政治因素 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Sociopolitical Determinants in Interpreting Taiwan`s Parliamentary Interruption | en_US |
dc.type | thesis | en_US |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
item.openairetype | thesis | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
index.html | 115 B | HTML2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.