Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/88767
題名: 論中山學說中的「國家」理論
作者: 劉佩怡
LIU, PEI-YI
貢獻者: 高永光
GAO, YONG-GUANG
劉佩怡
LIU, PEI-YI
關鍵詞: 國家
中山先生
日期: 1993
上傳時間: 29-四月-2016
參考文獻: 史思虹\r\n1989“人民主義”。中國論壇,第336期。\r\n\r\n卡維波\r\n1989“如何看待民間社會”。中國論壇,第336期。\r\n\r\n朱岑樓\r\n1980 三民主義與社會學。台北:正中書局。\r\n\r\n朱雲漢,黃德福\r\n1989 建立台灣政治經濟新秩序。台北:國家政策研究資料中心。\r\n\r\n何兆武譯,Jean Jacques Rousseau著\r\n1987 社會契約論。台北:唐山出版社。\r\n\r\n呂亞力\r\n1988 政治學,台北:三民書局。\r\n\r\n余英時\r\n1953 近代文化的新趨勢,香港:中文大學\r\n\r\n李孝悌\r\n1989 “再論市民社會”。中國論壇,第340期。\r\n\r\n李英明\r\n1990a 馬克思社會衝突論。台北:時報出版社。\r\n1990b “國家角色的再認識”。中國論壇,第351期。\r\n\r\n沈宗瑞\r\n1987“世界體系理論方法論與三民主義研究”。中山學術論叢,第七期。\r\n\r\n車城滿\r\n1990 “馬克思政治思想中間階級鬥爭之探討”,共黨問題研究,第十六卷第二期。\r\n\r\n林中平\r\n1988“”國家組織“或”大有為政府“?”。台灣社會研究季刊,第一卷第一期,頁91-116。台北:台灣社會研究季刊\r\n\r\n林桂圃\r\n1980“國父的國家論”。摘自,國父思想與現代政治思想。台北:黎明書局。\r\n\r\n周世輔、周陽山著\r\n1990 中山思想新詮-總論與民族主義。台北:三民書局。\r\n\r\n周道濟、黃啟民合著\r\n1984三民主義的國際觀。台北:正中書局\r\n\r\n姜新立\r\n1988“馬克思與韋伯的理論模式與原創”。共黨問題研究,第十四卷第四期。\r\n\r\n洪鐮德\r\n1984 馬克思與社會學,台北:遠景出版社。\r\n1988 新馬克思主義和現代社會科學。台北:森大出版社。\r\n\r\n孫文\r\n1989a國父全集,第一冊。台北:近代中國出版社。\r\n1989b國父全集,第二冊。台北:近代中國出版社。\r\n1989c國父全集,第三冊。台北:近代中國出版社。\r\n\r\n高永光\r\n1989“新國家主義研究興起的探討”。國魂月刊,五月號。\r\n\r\n馬克思、恩格斯著\r\n1958 馬克思恩格斯全集,第四卷。北京:人民出版社。\r\n1961 馬克思恩格斯全集,第八卷。北京:人民出版社。\r\n1972 馬克思恩格斯全集,第一卷。北京:人民出版社。\r\n1973 共產黨宣言。北京:人民出版社。\r\n\r\n孫善豪\r\n1989“民間社會語文明社會”。中國論壇,第336期。\r\n\r\n陳一筠譯,Andrew Webster著\r\n1990 發展社會學。台北:桂冠出版社。\r\n陳子恆\r\n1989 “多元主義的神話”。中國論壇,第320期。\r\n\r\n陳文政\r\n1988 從發展社會學的論點觀點論三民主義之國家發展策略。台北:師大三民主義研究所碩士論文。\r\n\r\n陳文富\r\n1990“三民主義與共產主義關於國家觀之比較”。東亞季刊,第21卷四期。\r\n\r\n陳忠信\r\n1989 國家政策與批判的公共論述。台北:國家政策研究資料中心。\r\n\r\n許雅棠\r\n1989 “中山先生的思想與行動的解讀方式”。孫文思想的理論與實際,陳儀深、劉阿榮編,台北:弘文館出版社。\r\n\r\n陳榮源\r\n1987 孫逸仙與馬克思主義國家關的比較研究。台北:政大三民主義研究所碩士論文\r\n\r\n黃丘隆譯,弗蘭克.帕金著\r\n1989 馬克思.韋伯。台北:結構群出版社\r\n\r\n黃丘隆譯,亨利.列菲弗爾著\r\n1990 從黑格爾到毛澤東-國家理論。台北:結構群出版社。\r\n\r\n逯扶東\r\n1987 西洋政治思想史。台北:三民書局\r\n\r\n黃茜如\r\n1989 “國家自主性與民間社會”。中國論壇,第341期。\r\n\r\n彭懷恩\r\n1990 台灣發展的政治經濟分析。台北:風雲論壇出版社。\r\n\r\n鄒文海\r\n1970 政治學。台北:三民書局。\r\n\r\n葛蘭西著,谷風出版社譯\r\n1989 獄中札記。台北:谷風出版社。\r\n\r\n翟本瑞\r\n1987 “西方式民階級的源起及其意義”。思與言,第25卷第二期。\r\n1989 “現代國家形成的社會學反省意義”。思與言,第27第三期。\r\n\r\n董安琪譯,Mancur Olson著\r\n1991 集體行動的邏輯。台北:遠流出版社。\r\n\r\n董來燦\r\n1987 美國壓力團體之研究。台北:台灣商務印書館。\r\n\r\n楊逢泰\r\n1989 民族自決的理論與實際。台北:正中書局。\r\n\r\n鄭朴譯,M. Weber著\r\n1977 社會經濟史。台北:商務印書館。\r\n\r\n鄭學稼\r\n1965 列寧主義國家論之批判。台北:黎明書局。\r\n\r\n鞠德風\r\n1986 國父軍政主張與我國政治發展之研究。台北:政治作戰學校政研所碩士論文。\r\n\r\n蕭全政\r\n1988 政治與經濟的整合。台北:桂冠出版社。\r\n\r\n蕭新煌\r\n1982 “民主主義中的國家發展策略”。中華學報,第16卷第1期。\r\n\r\n薩孟武譯,F. Oppenheimer著\r\n1986 國家論。台北:東大出版社。\r\n1990 政治學。台北:三民書局。\r\n\r\n龐建國\r\n1985 “政治與發展社會學之新動向:以「政府」維中心之研究途徑的興起”。中山社會科學譯粹,第一卷第一期。\r\n1987 “國家與社會-新馬克思主義的看法及其批判”。黃河雜誌,第16卷第5期。\r\n1988 “國家機關與台灣社會轉型”。當代中國轉型學術研討會專刊。台北:中國青年反共救國團。\r\n\r\nAlmond. Gabriel A.\r\n1983 \"Corporatism. Pluralism and Professional Memory\".\r\nWorld Politics. 35 (January).\r\nAlmond. Gabriel A. and G. B-ingham Powell. Jr.\r\n1978 Comparative Politics: System, Process, and Police.\r\nNew York: Brown and Company.\r\nAlthusser, Louis\r\n1977 Lenin and Philosophy. New York.\r\nBadie. Bertrand and Pierre Birnboum\r\n1983 \"The Sociology of the State\". ln State, Society, and\r\nHistory. Translated by Authur Goldhammer. Chicago: The\r\nUniversity of Chicago Press.\r\nBaradat. L. P.\r\n1984 Political Ideology. New Jersey: P-H.\r\nBause. D. K.\r\n1979 \"The Peripheralizzation of China\". in The World-System\r\nof Capitalism. London: Sage.\r\nBenjamin, Roger & Raymond Duvall\r\n1985 \"The Capitalist State in Context in the Democratic\r\nState\". Roger Benjamin and Stephen L. El kin (eds) ..\r\nKansas University Press.\r\nBentley. Authur\r\n1949 The Process of Government. Evanston: Principia Press.\r\nBlock. Fred\r\n1977 \"The Ruling Class Does Not Rule\". Socialist Revolution\r\n(7): 6-28.\r\nBocock, Robert\r\n1986 Hegemony. London: Tavistock Publications. Ltd.\r\nBottomore T. B.\r\n1983 A Dictionary of Marxist Thought. Oxford: Blackwell .\r\nBowie. N. E. and R. L. Simon\r\n1977 The Individual and the Political Order. New Jersey:\r\nEnglewood Cliffs.\r\nCa rnoy, Ma rt in\r\n1984 The State and Political Theory. N.J.: Princeton Press.\r\nCassier, E.\r\n1946 The Myth of the State, New Haven: Yale University\r\nPress.\r\nCawson, Alan\r\n1980 Corporatism and Welfare. London: Heinemann Educational\r\nBooks.\r\nChiang, Hsin Li (姜新立.)\r\n1991 \" Mar xis man d the S tat e\". 成功大學社會科學學報,第四期\r\nChirkin, V., Yu Yudin, & O. Zhidkov\r\n1979 Fundamentals of the Socialist Theory of the State and\r\nLaw. Progress Publishers, Moscow.\r\nCohen, Paul A.\r\n1984 Discovering History ln China. New York: Columbia\r\nUniv. Press.\r\nColeman,W.D.\r\n1985 “State Corporatism as a Sectoral Phenomenon”. In A. Cawson.ed., Organized Interests and the State.London: Sage Pulications Ltd.\r\n\r\nDahrendorf.Ralf\r\n1959 Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society.Stanford.\r\n\r\nEvans.Peter B.. Dietrich Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol\r\n1985 “On the Road toward a more Adequate Understannding of the State”. In Bringing the State Back In. edited by Peter B. Evans. Dietrich Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol. New York: Cambridge University Press.\r\n\r\nFerguson, Yale H. & Richard W. Mansbach \r\n1989 The State. Conceptual Chaos. And the Future of International Relations Theory. The University of Denver.\r\n\r\nFriedrich,Carl J.\r\n1968 Constitutional Govertment and Democracy. Waltham, Mass. Blaisdele Pub. Co.\r\n\r\nGettell.R.G.\r\n1949 Political Science. Rev.ed.. Ginn. \r\n\r\nGold. Thomas \r\n1986 State and Society in Taiwan Miracle. N.Y.:M.E. \r\n\r\nGold, David A., Clarence Y.H. Lo & Erik Olin Wright \r\n1975 “Recent Development in Marxist Theories of the Capitalist State”. Monthly Review (OCT-NOV). \r\nGould, Julius & William L. Kold\r\n1974 Dictionary of the Social Science.\r\nHeclo, Hugh\r\n1974 Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden. New\r\nHaven: Yale University Press.\r\nHegel\r\n1942 Philosophy of Right. trans. by T. M. Knox. London:\r\nOxford.\r\nHobbes, Thomas\r\n1950 Levatham. Colonial Press Incs., Clinton, Mass.\r\nHopkins, T. K. and 1. Wallerstein\r\n1977 \"Patterns of Development of the l\"lodern World System\".\r\nReview: 111-145.\r\nHuntington, S. P.\r\n1965 \"Political Development and Political Decay\". World\r\nPolitics, Vol.17.(April)\r\nJessop, Bop\r\n1982 The Capitalist State - Marxist Theory and Methods.\r\nNew York: New York University Press.\r\nKeelen, John T.S.\r\n1985 \"Situating France on the Pluralism-Corporatism\r\nCont i nuum\". Compa rat i ve Po 1 it i cs (Janna ry) .\r\nKrasner, Stephen D.\r\n1984 \"Approaches to the State Alternative Conceptions and\r\nHistorical Dyamics\", Comparative Politics, VoLl6\r\n(Jan. )\r\nLaski,Harold\r\n1981 “The Fundations of Sovereighty”. Michael Curtis. Ed.,The Great Political Theories. Vol.2, New York:Avon Books.\r\n\r\nLenin, V.I.\r\n1963 Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism.New York: International Publishers.\r\n\r\nLentner, Howard H.\r\n1984 “The Concept of the State”. Comparative Politics (April)\r\n\r\nLocke,John\r\n1967 Two Tracks on Government . London:Cambridge.\r\n\r\nMacridis,R.C.\r\n1968 “Comparative Politics and the Study of Government”. Comparative Politics, Vol.1., No.1(October): 79-90.\r\n\r\nMarx,Karl\r\n1975a The Eighteen Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte.Meck,Vol. 11. New York: International Publishers.\r\n1975b Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Law. Meck ,Vol. 3. New York: International Publishers. \r\n1976 The German Ideology. Moscow:Progress Publishers.\r\n\r\nMcLellan. David \r\n1986 Karl Marx. Penguin Books. \r\n\r\nMiliband, Ralph \r\n1969 The state in Capitalist Society.N.Y.: Basic Books.\r\n1977 Marxism and Politics. Oxford.\r\nM\"jlls, C. Wrlght\r\n1951 Whlte Collar. New York : Oxford Universlty Press .\r\nMoulder. F. V.\r\nIS`l7 Japan, Cllina, and tile Modern \\~orld Economy. London:\r\nCambrldge Unlverslty Press.\r\nNettle. J.P.\r\n1968 \"The State as a Conceptual Variable\". \\~orld Polltics,\r\nVol .10, No.4 (July): 559-592.\r\nNordllnger, Eric A.\r\n1981 On the Autonomy of the Democratic State. Cambrldge,\r\nHarvard University Press.\r\n1984 Contradictions of the Welfare State. London:\r\nHutchlnson.\r\nOffe, Claus and Volker Ronge ..\r\n1992 \"Theses on the Theory of the State\". The State and its\r\nCritlcs Volume 2. Edlted by Andrew Levine. Cambridge\r\nUniversity Press.\r\nPonlantas, Nicos\r\n1982 \"On Soclal Class\". In Anthony Giddens & David Held\r\neds., Classes, Power, and Conflict. London .\r\nSchimitter, Phllippex\r\n1974 \"Still the Century of Corporatlsm?\". in F. P. Pike &\r\nT. Stritch eds., The New Corporatlsm. London : Notre\r\nDame University Press.\r\nSimmons, A. J.\r\n1979 moral Princlples and Politlcal Obligations. Princeton,\r\nN. J.: Princeton University Press.\r\nSkocpol, Theda\r\n1979 State & Social Revolution. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.\r\n1985 “Bring the State Back in: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research”. In Bringing the State Back in: 3-37 . Edited by Peter B. Evans. Dietrich Reuschemeyer and Theda Skocpol. N.Y.:Cambridge University Press.\r\nStepan,Alfred\r\n1978 The State and Society:Peru in Comparatuve Perspective .N.J.: Princeton University Press.\r\n\r\nVincent,Andrew\r\n1987 Theories of the State.Oxford and Sutplus Value, London: Sheed and Ward.\r\n\r\nWallerstein I. \r\n1974 The Modern World System . N.Y.: Academic Press. \r\n1979 The Capitalist World-Economy. Cambridge Univ. Press.\r\n\r\nWeber. Max.\r\n1978 Weber: Selections in Translation, Trans. by E. Matthews. Ed. By W. G. Runciman, London: Cambridge University Press.\r\n1982 “Selections from Economiy and Society,Vols. 1. And 2, and General Economic History”, in Giddens Antony & Held Daivd eds., Classes, Power, and Conflict. London.\r\n1985 Economy and Society.台北: 宗青圖書公司\r\nWi1iams. Raymond\r\n1985 \"The Party System and the Future of the State ln\r\nAdvanced Capitalist Countries\". International\r\nPol itical Science Review. Vol.6. No .l.\r\nWilliamson. Peter J.\r\n1989 Corporatism in Perspective - An Introductory Guild\r\nto Corporatist Theory. London: Sage.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
中山人文社會科學研究所
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002004254
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
index.html115 BHTML2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.