Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/88809| 題名: | 公共行政理論危機與重建方向 The Crisis and Rebuilding Direction of Public Administration The ory |
作者: | 蔡秀涓 Tsai, Hsiu Chuan |
貢獻者: | 江明修 Chiang,Ming Hsiu 蔡秀涓 Tsai,Hsiu Chuan |
關鍵詞: | 技術理性 典範 公共哲學 溝通理性 自然論 質的研究 Technological Rationality Paradigm Communicative Rationality Naturalitic Qualtative Research |
日期: | 1993 | 上傳時間: | 29-Apr-2016 | 摘要: | 公共行政做為人類日常活動中之一環，其角色則是越來越重要；尤其是近 | 參考文獻: | 王文科編譯\r\n民79 質的教育研究法。 台北:師大書苑。\r\n江明修\r\n民80 a.「公民、公共哲學與『公共』行政教育淺談」。 紀\r\n念張金鑑教授八秩晉九誕辰行政學術研討會。\r\nb. 「社會科學多重典範的爭辯:試論質與量研究方法\r\n的整合」 。「公共事務與國家發展』學術研討會。\r\n民81 「 危機與重建一公共行政教育之省思」 第四屆全國\r\n管理教育研討會。\r\n林鍾昕\r\n民82 「 危機與重建一公共行政教育之省思」 國立政治大\r\n學學報第六十六期。 頁21-45 。\r\n林鍾祈譯\r\n1991 公共政策與批判理論。 台北:遠流出版社。\r\n吳瓊恩\r\n民78 「 從各學科典範變遷趨勢探討公共組織理論實證研究\r\n的限制及其突破的可能性」。台北:政治大學學報，\r\n第六十期。\r\n民81 行政學的範圖與方法。 台北:五南圖書出版公司。\r\n民82 「 公共行政教育的內涵與方向」 國立政治大學學報\r\n第六十六期，頁1-19。\r\n施能傑\r\n民80 「 以公共做為公共行政研究與教育的起點」。紀念張\r\n金鑑教授八秩晉九誕辰行政學術研討會。\r\n陳伯璋\r\n民77 「辯證與批判一哈伯馬斯社會科學方法論評析」。 台\r\n北:文星，第118期，頁18-27。\r\n陳川正\r\n民80 公共性與社會演化一論哈伯馬斯《公共領域的結構變\r\n遷)) 。 東吳大學社會研究所碩士論文。\r\n王愧三 1990 「 公共的悲劇」。台北:當代，第56期，頁\r\n108-111 。\r\n張潤書\r\n民77 行政學。 台北:三民書局。\r\n張世杰\r\n民81 公共組織理論研究方法論的反省－社會科學典範的途徑。國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。\r\n黃瑞祺\r\n民79 批判理論與現代社會學。臺北:巨流圖書公司。\r\n黃政傑\r\n民78 「教育研究亟須擺脫量化的支配」，中國教育學會主編，教育研究方法論。臺北:師大書苑。\r\n黃適卓\r\n民81 立法院次級問政團體集思會之質的研究。國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。\r\n楊深坑\r\n1990 「哈伯馬斯的現代科技批判」。台北:當代，第56期，頁46-55。\r\n廖仁義譯\r\n1988 法蘭克福學派，Bottomore Tom著。台北:桂冠圖書股份有限公司Pusey Michael著。台北:桂冠圖書股份有限公司。\r\n歐用生\r\n民78 質的研究。 台北:師大書苑。\r\n薛華\r\n1989 哈貝馬斯的溝通倫理學。 台北:結構群。\r\n談谷錚譯\r\n民80 公民資格。 台北:桂冠圖書公司\r\n許世雨\r\n民81 非營利部門對公共行政之影響。 國立政治大學公共行\r\n政研究所碩士論文。\r\n顏良恭\r\n民80「公共行政理論與實際的關係，實證論、詮釋學與批\r\n判理論的比較」。「 公共事務與國家發展」學術研討\r\n會。\r\n夏林清與鄭村棋 譯著\r\n民78 行動科學一實踐中的探究。 台北:張老師出版社。\r\n\r\n\r\nBernstein R. J.\r\n1982 The Restructuring of Social And Political Theory.\r\nPennsylvania: Pennsylvania University Press.\r\nBogdan,R.C. & Biklon, S. K.\r\n1982 Qualitative Research for Education:An Introduction\r\nto Theory and Methods. Boston:All yn & Bacon.\r\nilottomore,Tom.\r\n1984 The Frankfurt School. London:Ellis Horwood.\r\nilozeman.\r\n1987 All Organization are Public:Bridging Public and\r\nPrivate Organizational Theories. San Francisco:\r\nJossey-Bass.\r\nBurrel,G. & Morgan,G.\r\n1979 Sociology Paradigm and Organizational Analysis.\r\nLondon: Heinemann.\r\nCapra, Fritjof.\r\n1983 The Tao of Physics. Shambhala. Boston:Shambhala.\r\nCaiden,G.E.\r\n1988 “The Vitality of Administrative Reform.” \r\nInternational Review of Administrative Science, pp.331-357.\r\nCopper,Terry L.\r\n1991 An Ethics of Citizenship for Public Administration. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall . \r\nDenhardt, Robert B.\r\n1984 Theories of Public Organization. Montery California: Cole Publishion.\r\nDexter,Lewis A.\r\n1970 Elite and Specialized interviewing. Evanston,IL:Northwestern University Press.\r\nDimock,M.\r\n1990 “The Restorative Qualities of Citizenship.”Public Administration Review, vol.50, pp.21-25.\r\nDobel J. Patrick\r\n1992 “The Moral Realities of Public Life:Some \r\nInsights of Fiction” American Review of \r\nPublic Administration, vol.22,No2.\r\nFeyerabend,Paul.\r\n1975 Science in Free Society. London: Lowe & Brydone.\r\nFrederickson,H. G.\r\n19S2 \"The Recovery of Civism in Public Administration.\r\n\"Public Administration Review,vol.42,pp.501-50S.\r\n1991 \"Toward a Theory of The Public for Public\r\nAdministration.\" Administration & Society,\r\nvol.22. pp.395- 417.\r\nHabermas,J.\r\n19S9 knowledge and Human Interest. trans, J. Shapiro.\r\nCambridge:Polity Press.\r\n1979 Communication and the Evolution of Society.\r\ntrans. T. Mc CarthY,Boston: Beacon Press.\r\n19S4 The Theory of Communicative Action. vol. I, II,\r\ntrans. T. McCarthy, Boston: Beacon Press.\r\n19S9 The Structural Transformation of the Public\r\nSphere -A -Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois\r\nSocietY(1962)trans,T. Burger. Cambridge Mass:MIT\r\nPress.\r\nHarmon, Micheal M.\r\n1981 Action Theory for Public Administration. New\r\nYork: Longman.\r\nHarmon,Michael M. & Mayer,Richard T.\r\n1986 Organization Theory for Public Administration.\r\nLittle, Brown & Company.\r\nHenry, Nicholas L.\r\n1986 Public Administration and Public Affairs.\r\nEnglewood Cliffs. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.\r\nHejka-Ekins, A.\r\n1988 \"Teaching Ethics in Public Administration. II\r\nPublic Administration. II Public Administrat i on\r\nReview. vol. 48,pp. 887-889.\r\nHerring, E. P.\r\n1936 Public Administration and the Public Interest.\r\nNew York:Mc Graw-Hall.\r\nJun, Jong S.\r\n1986 Public Administration--Design and Problem\r\nSolving. New York:Ma-Cmillan Publishing Company.\r\nKuhn, T.S.\r\n1962, 1970 The Structure of Scientific Revolution.\r\nChicago: Chicago University Press.\r\nLincoln. Y.S.(ed.)\r\n1985 Organizational Theory and Inquiry: The Paradigm\r\nRevolution. Bever ly Hill, CA: Sage.\r\nLincoln, Yvonna S. & Guba, Egon G.\r\n1985 Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hill,C. A.:Sage\r\nBooks. Mastermar, Margaret.\r\n1970 \"The Nature of a Paradigm. \"In I. Lakatos and A.\r\nMusgrave,eds., pp.59-89. Criticism and the\r\nGrowth of know ledge. Cambr idge: Caulbr idge\r\nUniversity.\r\n1980 \"Paradigms, Metaphors, and Puzzle Solving in\r\n,Organization Theory. Administrative Science\r\nQuarterly, vOI.25,pp.605-22.\r\nMorgan, Gareth.\r\n1986 Images of Organization. Sage Publication.\r\n1980 Qualitative Evaluation Methods. Beverly Hills,\r\nCA : Sage Publication Inc.\r\nPatteon, Michael Quinn\r\n1990 Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods.\r\nNew-bury Park, CA: Sage Publication Inc.\r\nPopper,Karl R.\r\n1959 The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York:\r\nBasic Books.\r\nRitzer George.\r\n1980 Sociology:A Multiple Paradigm Science. Boston:\r\nAll yn and Bacon.\r\nPrigogine I lya & Isabelle Stenger.\r\n1984 Order out of Chaos: Man`s New Dialogae with\r\nNature. N. Y. : Bantam Books.\r\nSpradley, J. P.\r\n1980 Participant Observation. New York : Holt,\r\nRinehart and Winston.\r\nTaylor,S. J. & Bogdan, R.\r\n1984 Introduction to qualitative Research Methods:\r\nThe Search for Meanings. New York: John Wiley &\r\nSons.\r\nTocqueville, Alexis.\r\n1956 Democracy in America. New York: Nentor.\r\nSullivan,William.\r\n1986 Reconstructing Public Philosophy.\r\nBerkley: Uni versi ty of cali fornia Press.\r\n1989 \"Toward a Public Philosphy of Public Administration:\r\nA civic Perspecti ve of the Public. II\r\nPublic Administration Review,vol. 49 No.2,\r\npp.173-179.\r\n1991 \"Contemporary Issues in American Public\r\nAdministration Education: The Search for an\r\nEducational Focus ll Public Administration Review\r\nJanuary/FebruarY,vol.51.No.1,pp.4-13.\r\nWaldo,D .\r\n1948 The Administrative State. Ronald Press, New York.\r\nYin, R. K.\r\n1984 Case Study Research:Design and Methods. Beverly\r\nHills, CA :Sage . | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 公共行政學系 G796608 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002004013 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| index.html | 115 B | HTML2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.