Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/89077
題名: 兒童保護家庭重整服務的網絡合作初探
A Preliminary Study of family reunification service of child protection network cooperation
作者: 陳宜君
Chen, Yi Chun
貢獻者: 謝美娥
陳宜君
Chen, Yi Chun
關鍵詞: 兒童保護
家庭重整
網絡合作
child protection
family reunification
network cooperation
日期: 2016
上傳時間: 2-May-2016
摘要: 本研究採用質性研究方法來探討高雄市、台中市的兒童保護服務網絡之合作現況,其中網絡成員的認定有別於過去跨專業角色,而是聚焦於服務家庭及兒少的公部門、家庭處遇單位、寄養單位與機構安置單位之間的合作關係,並以社會工作者及中階管理者作為此次研究的受訪對象。本研究的目的為:第一,了解「家庭重整服務」與「家外安置服務」之間的網絡合作情形;第二,探討現有的網絡合作情形所產生的優勢與挑戰;第三,藉由本研究結果之發現,期能對於「家庭重整服務」與「家外安置服務」之間現有的合作關係,提出具體的改善建議。本研究分別於高雄市、台中市抽取了十一個組織,共計十一個社工人員、十個中階管理者進行深度訪談,研究結果如下:一、高雄市與台中市的合作關係大多係基於「行政管理」與「個案需求」所產生,不同組織間的合作關係之正式化程度不一;二、影響網絡合作的原因可區分為「脈絡因素」、「過程因素」、「個別組織因素」與「服務對象因素」,在「脈絡因素」因素中包含了「環境因素」、「歷史文化因素」、「權力落差」以及「組織間的界線」。在「過程因素」中包含了「關係的維持」、「溝通順暢度」、「認知落差」、「所有權的挑戰」、「角色與責任的分工」、「團體領導者的適任度」、「網絡成員組成」和「合作架構與機制的清楚度」。「個別組織因素」則含括了「組織因素」、「員工因素」和「領導者因素」這幾個向度。在最後的「服務對象因素」中則包含了「特殊性」、「急迫性」與「重大改變」;三、受訪者在與不同組織間的合作感受有所差異,其中合作對象分別為公部門社工、家庭處遇單位社工、寄養社工與機構安置社工;四、受訪者對於目前的網絡領導者、合作關係與合作機制提出期待,在對網絡領導者部分,期待能「提升網絡合作的統籌能力」與「建立合作機制」。在合作關係的期待部分為「期待的一致性」、「提升資訊交換的完整性」與「合作對象單一化」。在合作機制的期待部分則是「重視網絡成員作為服務提供者的主體性」與「提升專業自主性,避免過度依賴」。\n除了上述研究結果外,另根據研究資料,研究者提出以下六點討論意見:一、委外作為服務提供的選擇?二、不對等的合作關係;三、評估落差的議題;四、安置服務的規劃特性;五、永久性服務規劃的執行困境;六、返家的可能性愈來愈低?這六大項次的討論呈現雖非本研究的主要目的,然與現行兒童保護服務的網絡運作有密不可分的關係,值得注意。根據上述研究結果,研究者另分別對於實務面與政策面提出建議,期能做為未來實務工作及政策制定之參考。
This research adopts qualitative research method to discuss the status quo of child protection network cooperation in Kaohsiung and Taichung city. In which, the network members` identification differentiates from cross-professional roles in the past; instead, it puts focus on cooperation relationship between public sectors serving family and children, family intervention service unit, foster family care unit and also institute care unit. Social workers as well as mid-level managers are main respondents in this research. The purpose of this research is showed as follow: First, to understand the cooperation between family reunification service and out-of-home care service. Second, to discuss the advantages and challenges caused by current network cooperation. Third, to be able to offer a concrete suggestion to improve the current cooperation relationship between family reunification service unit and out-of-home service unit. In-depth interviews are taken with eleven organizations including eleven social workers and ten mid-level managers in Kaohsiung and Taichung city in the research. The results show that: one, the cooperation in these row cities mostly bases on administrative management and case requirement. The degree of formalization among organizations is different; two, the factors that influence the cooperation can be divided into context, progress, the individual organize and service object. Mentioning the factor of context, it covers the factor of environment, factor of historic culture, factor of authority gap and factor of boundary existing among organizations. The factor progress includes maintenance in relationships, stability in communication, gap in awareness, challenge in possession, division in roles and responsibility, appropriateness of group leaders, combination of network members and last, clearness of cooperation structure as well as its mechanism. The factor of individual organize includes factor of organization, factor of employees and factor of leaders. The lastly mentioned factor of service object covers aspect of uniqueness, urgency and massive changes; three, respondents have various cooperation experience with different organizations, in which, the cooperators are social workers from public sector, family intervention service unit, foster family care unit and care institute; four, respondents express their expectation toward current network leaders, cooperation relationship and cooperation mechanism. Respondents also expect that their cooperation relationship could have consistency in expectation, integrity in information exchanging and simplification in service object. Their expectation toward cooperation mechanism put emphasis on how to value network members as main service provider and how to heighten professional autonomy for not being over dependent.\nBesides the research result mentioned above, the researcher has also pointed out six arguments based on the research data found. First of all: first, possibility that outsourcing becomes another option for service providing; second, imbalance cooperation relationship; third, issue of evaluation disparity; fourth, the characteristic of out-of-home care service; fifth, the impediment in conducting permanent service; sixth, lower and lower possibility for children to return home. These six arguments are not main purpose of this research; however, they are the other side of the coin meaning that they are inseparable with current functioning of child protection service network, which is noticeable. In accordance to the research results mentioned earlier, the researcher offers suggestions to actual practice, and to policy making, wishing to become future prototype.
參考文獻: 方秋梅(2012)。「家庭暴力加害人簡易型處遇計畫」網絡合作方案建立之探討。國立高雄師範大學性別教育研究所碩士論文。\n內政部戶政司(2015)。人口統計資料(http://www.ris.gov.tw/zh_TW/346)。檢索日期:2015/9/1\n衛生福利部保護服務司(2015)。兒童及少年保護執行概況(http://www.mohw.gov.tw/cht/DOPS/DM1.aspx?f_list_no=806&fod_list_no=4624)。檢索日期:2015/9/1。\n內政部兒童局(2013b)。聯合國兒童權利公約(http://www.cbi.gov.tw/CBI_2/internet/main/doc/doc_detail.aspx?uid=119&docid=1595)。檢索日期:2013/10/22。\n衛生福利部統計處(2015a)。兒童及少年福利服務(http://www.mohw.gov.tw/cht/DOS/Statistic.aspx?f_list_no=312&fod_list_no=4179)。檢索日期:2015/9/1。\n衛生福利部統計處(2015b)兒童及少年福利機構及服務概況(http://www.mohw.gov.tw/cht/DOS/Statistic.aspx?f_list_no=312&fod_list_no=4179)。檢索日期:2015/9/1\n王明仁、翁慧圓、何素秋(1997)。寄養服務社工員手冊。台中市:中華兒童福利基金會。\n王明仁、黃毓蘋(2008)。迢迢歸家路—台灣家庭寄養兒童少年結案返家之現況與建議。載於王明仁、彭淑華、孫彰良等作,兒童保護的模式與服務 (pp.277~303)。台中:台灣兒童暨家庭扶助基金會。\n王金永等譯(2000)。質化研究與社會工作(Deborah K. Padgett原著)。台北:洪葉文化。\n王仕圖(2004)。地方政府與非營利組織的資源網絡之研究:以嘉義市為例。非營利組織管理學刊,3,25-44。\n王雲東(2012)。社會研究方法:量化與質性取向及其應用(第二版)。台北:威仕曼文化。\n池祥麟(2011)。非營利組織與企業的互動關係。載於蕭新煌、官有垣、陸宛蘋主編,非營利部門:組織與運作。新北市:巨流。\n江明修(2005)。公私協力關係中台灣非營利組織公共課則與自主性之探究:理論辯證與制度設計。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫。\n何振宇(2008)有效管理機制之規劃與設計─社會福利委託服務網絡治理之初探。載於孫彰良(主編),如何建立福利服務輸送之有效管理機制。南投縣:內政部社會福利工作人員研習中心。\n何素秋(1999)。寄養父母工作滿足與持續服務意願。靜宜大學青少年兒童福利研究所碩士論文。\n沈慶盈(2000)。從組織間關係談社會服務資源的整合。社區發展季刊,89,145-155。\n余漢儀(2012)。兒童及少年受暴問題之研究。內政部家庭暴力暨性侵害防治委員會委託研究報告。\n余漢儀(1996)。兒童虐待:現象檢視與問題反思。台北:巨流。\n林俐君(2000)。育幼機構院童成長脈絡之探討─以受刑子女為例。國立台灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。\n林良穗(2008)。新移民家庭暴力個案防治網絡協調合作之經驗—以台中縣為例。亞洲大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。\n林勝義(2012)。兒童福利。台北:五南圖書出版公司。\n林玟漪(2007)。接受「家庭重聚」服務之案家的經驗探討。國立台灣大學社會工作學研究所碩士論文。\n林玉潔(2005)。影響少年安置滿意度之相關因素探究─以機構安置為例。國立台灣大學社會工作學研究所碩士論文。\n官有垣(2000)。非營利組織與社會福利:台灣本土個案分析。台北:亞太圖書。\n邱瑜瑾(2000)。非營利組織的資源網絡與應用。載於蕭新煌主編,非營利部門:組織與運作,339-383。台北:巨流。\n受虐兒童家庭維繫及家庭重整服務實施計畫,2006。\n社會工作人員專業協會(2006)。兒童及少年保護工作指南。台中市:內政部兒童局。\n吳敏欣(2009)。以家庭為中心的兒童保護處遇模式。發表於「華人社會工作與兒少權益」國際學術研討會。台中:靜宜大學社會工作與兒童少年福利學系、香港浸會大學社會工作系。\n兒童及少年福利機構設置標準(2013/12/31)\n兒童及少年福利與權益保障法(2014/1/22)\n胡木蘭(2006)。警察人員在受虐兒童保護網絡體系之因應情形及其相關因素之研究。國立暨南大學社會政策與社會工作學系碩士論文。\n洪健胤(2008)。福利服務輸送與管理機制。載於孫彰良(主編),如何建立福利服務輸送之有效管理機制。南投縣:內政部社會福利工作人員研習中心。\n祝健芳(2002)。婚姻暴力防治網絡中地方政府社工人員角色之研究。國立暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作研究所碩士論文。\n翁慧圓(2006)。兒童福利專業資源網絡之探討。社區發展季刊,115,173-185。\n翁毓秀、曾麗吟譯,Ian Milligan, Irene Stevens原著(2009)。安置兒童照顧─協同合作實務。台北:紅葉文化。\n陶蕃瀛(2003)。家外安置過程與寄養服務指標之研究。內政部兒童局委託研究計畫成果報告。\n梁筑雅(2011)。台中市受虐兒童保護之研究─制度與社會網絡之觀點。東海大學行政管理暨政策學系碩士論文。\n許瑋倫(2007)。不同安置型態下兒少安置環境觀感之探究。國立臺灣大學社會科學院社會工作學研究所碩士論文。\n陳向明(2009)。社會科學質的研究。台北:五南。\n陳叔綱(1996)。台北市兒童保護服務網絡之研究。東吳大學社會工作學系碩士論文。\n郭靜晃、曾華源(2000)建構社會福利資源網絡策略之探討―以兒童少年服務輸送為例。社區發展季刊,89,107-118。\n郭靜晃(2009)。兒童福利。新北市:揚智文化。\n彭淑華(2005)。以家庭處遇為基礎的兒童保護工作之檢視。兒童及少年福利期刊,9,頁31-56。\n彭淑華、范書菁、張緡鏐、邱采霈、劉美芝(2006)。發展兒童及少年保護個案家庭處遇服務模式之研究。內政部委託研究報告。\n彭淑華(2006)。兒童及少年保護個案家庭處遇服務方案評估報告。內政部兒童局補助評估報告。\n彭淑華(2007)。以家庭處遇為基礎的兒童保護工作台灣經驗。載於彭淑華主編,拒絕讓孩子受傷害:兒童保護工作模式國際研討會成果彙編。台中市:兒童家庭扶助基金會。\n彭淑華(2011)。由蹣跚學步到昂首前行:台灣兒童保護政策、法規與實務之發展經驗。社區發展季刊,133,273-293。\n閔宇經(1996)。民生主義社會服務輸送體系之研究─以「兒童保護網絡」為例。國立台灣師範大學三民主義研究所碩士論文。\n黃源協(2000)。社區照顧:臺灣與英國經驗的檢視。臺北:揚智文化。\n黃源協(2005)。老人福利機構公設民營可行性評估之研究。內政部委託研究報告。\n黃源協(2006)。社會資源網絡建構與個案管理實務─以中部四區為例。社區發展季刊,115,173-185。\n黃鈺倫(2010)。什麼是兒童的最佳利益?─兒保社工對受虐兒童安置返家之決策及影響因素。東吳大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。\n馮燕(2012)。我國兒童提少年福利的發展。載於李瑞金主編,21世紀台灣蛻變的兒童及少年福利。台中市:內政部兒童局。\n曾華源(2012)。兒童及少年福利資源:運用特色與有效性的議題。載於李瑞金主編,21世紀台灣蛻變的兒童及少年福利。台中市:內政部兒童局\n張緡鏐(2012)。處遇性兒童及少年保護服務。載於李瑞金主編,21世紀台灣蛻變的兒童及少年福利。台中市:內政部兒童局。\n張學鶚(1992)兒童保護服務措施網絡規劃之研究。中華民國社區發展研究中心八十年度研究報告。\n張世勳(2002)。地理群聚內廠商之網絡關係對其競爭力影響之研究-新竹科學園區為例。朝陽科技大學企業管理系碩士論文。\n雷文玫(2003)。國家、父母與兒童少年權益間的拉鋸─兒童及少年福利法修法評析,月旦法學雜誌,102,116-127。\n楊鸞貞(2004)。家庭暴力防治服務網絡建構整合之研究-以高雄市、彰化縣、台東縣為例。國立東華大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。\n楊瑩、施教裕(1997)。台灣省兒童及少年福利機構巡迴輔導發現及建議報告。南投:台灣省政府社會處。\n萬育維(2009)。從國家、政府和專業的三角關係來看兒童權益保障。發表於「華人社會工作與兒少權益」國際學術研討會。台中:靜宜大學社會工作與兒童少年福利學系、香港浸會大學社會工作系。\n趙善如(2009)。兒童少年福利服務資源網絡連結現況與影響因素之探討:以屏東縣為例。台灣社會工作學刊,7,85-128。\n潘淑滿(2010)。質性研究:理論與應用。台北:心理。\n劉麗雯(2004)。非營利組織:協調合作的社會福利服務。台北市:雙葉書廊。\n劉淑瓊(1997)依賴與對抗―論福利服務契約委託下政府與民間受託單位間的關係,社區發展季刊,(80),113-129。\n劉淑瓊(2005)。績效、品質與消費者權益保障:論社會服務契約委託的責信課題。社會政策與社會工作學刊,9(2),31-93。\n劉淑瓊(2008)。推倒「柏林圍牆」─論家庭暴力防制之網絡治理課題。東吳社會工作學報,19,1-35。\n劉淑瓊(2011a)。100年度兒童及少年保護及少年保護結構化決策模式結構化決策模式工具發展計畫。內政部兒童局委託研究報告。\n劉淑瓊(2011b)。非營利組織與政府的互動關係。載於蕭新煌、官有垣、陸宛蘋主編,非營利部門:組織與運作。新北市:巨流。\n劉淑怡、謝美娥(2011)。兒童少年保護社會工作者執行受虐兒童及少年家外安置之考量:以繼續安置為例。兒童及少年福利期刊,19,65-86。\n劉有志(2006)。我國兒童及少年保護安置制度之研究─以兒童及少年最佳利益原則為中心。國立中正大學法律所碩士論文。\n齊力(2005)。質性研究方法概論。載於齊力、林本炫主編,質性研究方法與資料分析(二版),頁1-19。嘉義:南華大學教育社會學研究所。\n蔡漢賢(1992)。社會工作辭典。台北:中華民國社區發展研究訓練中心。\n蔡嘉洳(2001)。醫務社工員參與兒童保護服務網絡之研究。中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文。\n鄭貴華(2001)。身體受虐兒童對「家庭重聚」接受意願之探討─以內政部中區兒童之家為例。東海大學社會工作學系碩士論文。\n鄭麗珍(2008)。兒童及少年保護體系之政府職能分析。行政院研究發展考核會委託研究報告。 \n鄭鈞元、賴奕志、黃瑋瑩(2009)。兒童福利。新北:群英出版社。\n鄭怡世(1999)。臺灣民間非營利社會福利機構參與社會福利服務探析。社區發展季刊,87,312-326。\n鄭怡世(2004)。從組織間關係的觀點談社會福利組織跨組織跨專業服務網絡的建構。社區發展季刊,107,413-426。\n衛生福利部南區兒童之家(2015)。社工科服務介紹(http://srch.mohw.gov.tw/about/7-3.asp)。檢索日期:2015/9/3。\n衛生福利部中區兒童之家(2015)。社會工作科服務介紹(http://crch.mohw.gov.tw/editor_model/u_editor_v1.asp?id={B82F906D-9F10-433C-B9C9-B550323EDE02})。檢索日期:2015/9/3。\n戴佳雯(1999)。高科技產業網絡特色之探討。國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。\n謝美娥(1993)。老人長期照護的相關論題。台北:桂冠。\n謝美娥(1995)。社會福利民營化的省思。載於林萬億等著,台灣的社會福利:民間觀點。台北:五南。\n魏希聖、劉邦富(2007)。社會福利政策執行網絡分析-以內政部兒童局失業家庭兒童短期照顧服務方案為例。玄奘社會科學學報,5,1-34。\n簡春安、鄒平儀(2004)。社會工作研究法。台北:巨流。\nAiken, M., Dewar, R., DiTomaso, N., Hage, J., & Zeitz, G.(1975). Coordinating human services. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.\nAshkanasy, N. M.(2011).Organizational Dynamics and Identity: Defining the New Paradigm. In Ashkanasy, N. M., Wilderom, C. P. M., Peterson, M. F., Thehandbook of organizational culture & climate(2ed),319-322. CA: Sage Publications.\nAustin, J. E. (2000a). Strategic Collaboration between Nonprofits and Business. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 69-97.\nBanks, D., Hazen, A. L., Coben, J. H., Wang, K.& Griffith, J. D.(2009). Collaboration between child welfare agencies and domestic violence service providers: Relationship with child welfare policies and practices for addressing domestic violence. Children and Youth Services Review,31,P497-505.\nBond, B. J. & Gittell, J. H.(2010). Cross-agency coordination of offender reentry: Testing collaboration outcomes. Journal of Criminal Justice,38,P118-129.\nBriskman, L.(2009).Pushing Ethical Boundaries for Children and Families. In R. Adams, L. Dominelli & M. Payne(Eds.),Critical Practice in Social Work 2nd(pp). UK: Palgrave Macmillan.\nClairborne, N., & Lawson, H. A. (2005). An intervention framework for collaboration. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 86, 93−103.\nDaews, S. S. & Prefontaine, L.(2003).Understanding new models of collaboration for delivering government service. Communications of the ACM ,46(1),p40-42.\nDarlington, Y. & Feeney, J. A.(2008). Collaboration between mental health and child protection services: Professionals` perceptions of best practice. Children and Youth Services Review,30,187–198.\nDarlington, Y., Feeney, J. A. & Rixon, K.(2004). Complexity, conflict and uncertainty: Issues in collaboration between child protection and mental health services. Children and Youth Services Review,26,p1175-1192.\nDawes, S. S. &Prefontaine, L.(2003).Understanding New Models of Collaboration for Delivering Government Services. Communication of the ACM,46(1),40-42.\nDimaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: InstitutionalIsomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. AmericanSociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.\nDowns, S. W., Moore, E., Mcfadden, E. J., & Costin, L. B.(2000).Child welfare and family services: Policy and practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.\nEikenberry, A. M.& Kluver, J. D. (2004). The Marketization of the Nonprofit Sector: Civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132-140.\nEinbinder, S. D., Robertson, P. J., Garcia, A., Vuckovic, G. & Patti, R. J.(2000). Interorganizational collaboration in social service organizations: A study of the prerequisites to success. Journal of Children & Poverty,6(2),p119-p140.\nFoster, M. K., & Meinhard, A. G. (2002). A Contingency View of Responses ofVoluntary Social Service Organizations in Ontario to Government Cutbacks. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences,19(1), 27-41.\nGans, S. P.& Horton, G. T.(1975). Integration of human services: The State and Municipal levels. New York: Praeger Publishers.\nGardner, R.(2007). Working Together to Improve Children’s Life Chances: The Challenge of Inter-agency Collaboration. In J. Weinstein, C. Whittington & T. Leiba(Eds.), Collaboration in Social Work Practice(pp). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.\nGulzar, L., & Henry, B. (2005). Interorganizational Collaboration for Health Care Between Nongovernmental Organizations (NGOs) in Pakistan. Social Science & Medicine,61(9),1930-1943.\nGuo, C.& Acar, M.(2005). Understanding Collaboration Among Nonprofit Organizations: Combining Resource Dependency, Institutional, and Network Perspectives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,34,p340-p361.\nHardcastle, D. A., Wenocur S., & Powers, P. R.(2004).Community Practice: Theories and Skills for Social Workers 2ed. New York: Oxford University Press.\nHimmelman, A. T. (2001). On coalitions and the transformation of power relations: Collaborative betterment and collaborative empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(2), 277−284.\nHorwath, J. & Morrison, T.(2007) Collaboration, integration and change in children’s services:Critical issues and key ingredients. Child Abuse & Neglect,31,p55-69.\nHudson, B., Hardy, B., Henwood, M., & Wistow, G. (2003). In pursuit of interagency collaboration in the public sector: What is the contribution of theory and research? In J. Reynolds, J. Henderson, J. Seden, J. C. Worth, & A. Bullman (Eds.), The managing care reader (pp. 232–241). London: Routledge.\nHuxham, C., & Vaugen, S. (2000). Ambiguity, complexity and dynamics in the membership of collaboration. Human Relations,53(6), 771–806.\nImperial, M. T.(2005).Using Collaboration as a Governance Strategy: Lessons from Six Watershed Management Programs. Administration and Society,37(3),281-320.\nIsett, K. R. & Provan, K. G. (2005). The Evolution of Dyadic Interorganizational Relationships in a Network of Publicly Funded Nonprofit Agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(1), 149-165.\nKirk, R. S.(2007a).An Introduction to the U.S. Child Protection System: Its Underlying and Changing Ideologies and Political / Cultural Context. 載於彭淑華等著,拒絕讓孩子受傷害:兒童保護工作模式國際研討會成果彙編。台中市:兒童家庭扶助基金會。\nKirk, R. S.(2007b). Child and Family Services, and the Challenges of Providing Child Protection Services in the United States. 載於彭淑華等著,拒絕讓孩子受傷害:兒童保護工作模式國際研討會成果彙編。台中市:兒童家庭扶助基金會。\nLevine, S., &White, P. E.(1961). Exchange as a conceptual framework for the study of interorganizational relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly,5(4),583-601.\nLincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G.(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage.\nLittell, J. H. &Schuerman, J. R.(1995).A synthesis of research on family preservation and family reunification programs. http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/cyp/fplitrev.htm\nMapp, S. C. (2002). A framework for family visiting for children in long-term foster care. Families in Society, 83(2), 175-182.\nMeyers, M. (1993). Organisational factors in the integration of services for children. Social Services Review, 67(4), 547–574.\nMilward, H. B., & Provan, K. G. (1998). Measuring Network Structure. Public Administration, 76(2), 387-407\nMorris, K.(2009). Family-based social Work. In R. Adams, L. Dominelli & M. Payne(Eds.), Critical Practice in Social Work 2nd(pp). UK: Palgrave Macmillan.\nMulford, C. L.,& Rogers, D. L.(1982). Apporaches to training. In D. L. Rogers, & D. A. Whetten (Eds), Interorganizational coordination : theory, research, and implementation(122-136). Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.\nMurray, V. V. (1998). Interorganizational Collaborations in The Nonprofit Sector, in Shafirtz, J. M. (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Administration, 1192-1196, Boulder, CO: Westview.\nMyers, J. E. B.(2006). Child Protection in America: past, present, and future. New York: Oxford University Press.\nOliver, E. C.(1990)Determinants of Interorganizational Relational Relationships:Integration and Future Directions. Academy of Management Review,15(2),241-265.\nOlson, L. M. (2003). Pathways to collaboration. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 11(4), 236–240.\nPodolny, J. M., & Page, K. (1998). Network forms of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 24,57-76.\nProvan, K. G.(1984). Interorganizational Cooperation and Decision Making Autonomy in a Consortium Multihospital System. Academy of Management Review,9(3),p494-504.\nSmith, B. D. & Mogro-Wilson, C.(2007). Multi-level influences on the practice of inter-agencycollaboration in child welfare and substance abuse treatment. Children and Youth Services Review,29,P546-556\nSnavely, K., &Tracy, M. B. (2000). Collaboration among Rural Nonprofit Organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 11(2), 145-157.\nStiffman, A. R., Striley, C., Horvath, V. E., Hadley-Ives, E., Polgar, M., Elze, D.(2001). Organizational context and provider perception as determinants of mental health service use. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research,28(2), 188 − 204.\nTang, A. (1997). The Changing Role of Government in Community services: Issues of access and equity to administrative review, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 56(2), 95-105.\nThoburn, J.(2007)Out-of-home care for the abused or neglected child: a review of the knowledge base for planning and neglect. In Wilson, K. & James, A.(Eds.), The Child Protection Handbook: The Practitioner’s Guide to Safeguarding Children 3rd ,New York : Bailliere Tindall。\nThorelli,H.B.(1986)Networks:Between Markets and Hierarchies. Strategic Management Journal,7(1),37-51.\nVan de Ven, A. H. and Walker, G.(1984)The dynamics of interorganizational coordination. Administrative Science Quarterly ,29(4),598–621.\nVan Slyke, D. M. (2002). The Public Management Challenges of Contracting with Nonprofits for Social Services, International Journal of Public Administration, 25(4), 489-517.\nWaddock, S. A.(1989). Understanding social partnerships: An evolutionary model of partnership organizations. Administration & Society ,21,78–100.\nWarren, R. L.,(1967). The interorganizational field as a focus for investigation. Administrative Science Quarterly,12(3),396-419.\nWasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.\nWelbourne, P.(2012). Social Work with Children and Families: Developing advanced practice. New York: Routledge.\nWells, R.(2006). Managing Child Welfare Agencies: What Do We Know about What Works?. Children and Youth Services Review, 28(10), 1181-1194.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
社會工作研究所
99264015
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099264015
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
401501.pdf1.94 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.