Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/89336| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林邦傑 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | 蔡文青 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | CAI, WEN-QING | en_US |
| dc.creator | 蔡文青 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator | CAI, WEN-QING | en_US |
| dc.date | 1992 | en_US |
| dc.date | 1991 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-05-02T07:21:10Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-05-02T07:21:10Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2016-05-02T07:21:10Z | - |
| dc.identifier | B2002004423 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/89336 | - |
| dc.description | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 心理學系 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | 摘要 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄\r\n第一章 緒論--------------------1\r\n第一節 研究動機--------------------1\r\n第二節 影響公平判斷的因素--------------------2\r\n第三節 研究目的--------------------7\r\n第四節 重要名詞詮釋--------------------8\r\n第二章 文獻探討及研究假設--------------------9\r\n第一節 分配公平--------------------10\r\n第二節 程序公平--------------------16\r\n第三節 整體公平感--------------------23\r\n第四節 研究假設--------------------27\r\n第三章 研究方法--------------------31\r\n第四章 分析結果--------------------36\r\n第五章 討論與建議--------------------56\r\n第一節 結果討論--------------------56\r\n第二節 研究限制與建議--------------------60\r\n參考書目--------------------63\r\n附錄一 問卷中的故事內容--------------------68\r\n附錄二 問卷中的問題部分--------------------79\r\n附錄三 問卷--------------------81 | zh_TW |
| dc.source.uri | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002004423 | en_US |
| dc.title | 在公司中人際親疏關係對公平判斷之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.type | thesis | en_US |
| dc.relation.reference | 參考書目\r\n中文部分\r\n林邦傑(民8 0) 。 我國學生與教師社會性公道之研究國科會補助論文。\r\n林邦傑(民8 1) 。 不同年齡的青少年所知覺的不公平情境及其預期後果。國科會補助論文。\r\n黃光國(民7 6) 。 人情與面子:中國人的權力遊戲。 楊國樞:中國人的心理。台北:桂冠圖書公司。\r\n黃光國(民7 8) 。 儒家思想中的正義觀。 揚國樞:中國人的心理與行為。 台北:桂冠圖書公司。\r\n\r\n英文部分\r\nAlexander, S., & Ruderman, M. (1987). The role of procedural and distributive justice In organizational behavior. Social Justice Research, Vol. 1, No.2, 177-198.\r\nAmbrose, M. L., Harland, L. K., & Kulik, C. T. (1991). Influence of social comparisons on perceptions of organizational fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 76, No.2, 239-246.\r\nAustin, W. (1980). Friendship and fairness: Effects of type of relationship and task performance on choice of distribution rules. Personality and Social Psychology\r\nBulletin, Vol. 6, No.3, 402-408.\r\nAustin, W., & Tobiasen, J. (1982). Moral evaluation in intimate relationships. In J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen(Eds.), Equity and justice In soical behavior, New York: Academic press\r\nBarrett, E. J., & Lamm, H. (1989). The role of procedural justice in the allocation of limited resources: A west German perspective. Social Justice Research, Vol. 3,\r\nNo.1, 21-30.\r\nBarrett?Howard. E., & Tyler, T. R. (1986). Procedural justice as a criterion In allocation decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 50, No.2, ? 296-304.\r\nChlu, C. (1990). Normative expectations of social behavior and concern for members of the collective in Chinese socity. The Journal of Psychology, 124(1), 103-111.\r\nChiu, C. (1991). Role expectation as the principal criterion in justice judgement among Hong Kong Chinese students. The Journal of Psychology, 125(5), 557-565.\r\nCohen, R. L. (1985). Procedural justice and participation. Human Relations, Vol, 38, No.7, 643-663.\r\nCohen, R. L. (1987). Destributive Justice: Theory and research. Social Justice Research, Vol. 1, No. 1, 19-39.\r\nDeutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice. Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 31, No.3, 137?149 .\r\nEarley, P. C. & Lind, E. A. (1987). Procedural justice and participation in task selection: The role of control in mediating justice judgement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 52, No.6, 1148-1160.\r\nFolger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of \"voice\" and Improvement on experienced inequity. Journal . of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 35, No.2, 108-119.\r\nFolger, R. (1986). Rethinking equity theory, A referent cognitions model. In H. W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds). Justice in social relations. New York. Plenum Press.\r\nFolger, R. (1987). Distributive and procedural justice in the workplace. Social Justice Research, Vol. 1, No.2, 143-159.\r\nFolger, R., & Martin, C. (1986). Relative deprivation and referent cognitions: Distributive and procedural justice effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 531-546.\r\nFolger, R., Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 32, Iss, 1, Mar, 115-130.\r\nFurby, L. (1986). Psychology and justice. In R. L. Cohen (Ed) Justice: Views from the social science. New York: Plenum Press.\r\nGreenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 71, No. 2, 340-342.\r\nGreenberg, J. (1987). Reaction to procedural injustice in payment distributions: Do the means justify the ends? Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 172, No. 1, 55-61\r\nGreenberg, J., & Cohen, R. L. (1982). Why justice ? Normative and instrumental interpretations. In J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen (Eds.) Equity and justice behavior, New York: Academic Press.\r\nHui, C. H., Triandls, H. C., & Yee, C. (1991). Cultural differences In reward allocation: Is collectivism the explanation? British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 145-157.\r\nHwang, K. K. (1990). Modernalization of the Chinese family business. International Journal of Psychology, 25, 593?618.\r\nKrebs, D. (1982). Prosocial behavior, equity, and jus tice. In J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen (Eds) Equity and justice behavior, New York: Academic Press.\r\nLeventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. J. Gergen, M. Greenberg, & R. H.\r\nWillis (Eds) Social Exchange, Advances in Theory and Research, New York: Plenum Press.\r\nLind, B. A. & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The generality of procedural justice. In B. A. Lind & T. R. Tyler (Eds.) The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press\r\nLind, B. A. & Tyler, T. R. (1988). Procedural justice in law 2, Sources and implications of procedural justice judgements. In B. A. Lind & T. R. Tyler (Eds.) The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.\r\nLind, E. A., Kafer, R., & Earley, (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice instrumental and noninstrumental concersn in fairness judgements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 50, No.2, 296?304.\r\nMikula, G. (1984). Justice and fairness in interpersonal relations: Thought and suggestions. In H. Tajfel(Ed.) The social dimension: European developments in social\r\npsychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\r\nMikula, G. (1986). The experience of Injustice: Toward a better understanding of its phenomenology. In H. W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds). Justice in social relations. New York: Plenum Press.\r\nMiller, M. L. (1989). Process and decision control in the work place: Separate effects, independence from distributive justice, and tests of explanatory mechanisms. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10(4), 337-354.\r\nStake, J. E. (1983). Factors in reward distribution: Allocator motive, gender, and protestant ethic dndoresement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 44, NO.2, 410-418.\r\nTyler, T. R. (1986). When does procedural justice matter in organizational settings? Research on Negotiation in Organizations, Vol. 1, 7-23.\r\nTyler, T. R. (1986). The psychology of leadership evaluation. In H. W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds). Justice in social relations. New York:? Plenum Press.\r\nTyler, T. R. (1987). Conditions leading to value-expressive effects in judgements of procedural justice: A test of four models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vo1.52, No.2, 333-344.\r\nTyler, T. R. (1987). Procedural Justice Research. Social Justice Research, Vol. 1, No.1, 41-65.\r\nTyler, T. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 57, No.5, 830-838.\r\nZajac, . E. E. (1985). Perceived economic justice: The example of public utility regulation. In H. P. Young (Ed) Cost allocation: methods principle, applications. 119-153. | zh_TW |
| item.grantfulltext | open | - |
| item.openairetype | thesis | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec | - |
| item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| index.html | 115 B | HTML2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.