Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/89517| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 楊懿麗 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | 李路得 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator | 李路得 | zh_TW |
| dc.date | 1991 | en_US |
| dc.date | 1990 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-05-02T08:57:39Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-05-02T08:57:39Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2016-05-02T08:57:39Z | - |
| dc.identifier | B2002004899 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/89517 | - |
| dc.description | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 英國語文學系 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Table of Contents\r\nList of Tables.iv\r\nCHAPTER ONE Introduction………………..1\r\n1.1 Introdution………………..1\r\n1.2 The Purposes of the Study………………..1\r\n1.3 The Research Hypotheses………………..7\r\n1.4 The Limitations of the Study………………..9\r\n1.5 Definition of Terms………………..10\r\nCHAPTER TWO Review of Related Literature………………..13\r\n2.1 Biological Considerations………………..14\r\n2.2 Cognitive Factors………………..19\r\n2.2.1 Monitoring………………..22\r\n2.2.2 Field Independence\\Dependence………………..24\r\n2.2.3 Tolerance of Ambiguity………………..26\r\n2.3 Language Environments………………..28\r\n2.4 Experimental Reports………………..33\r\n2.4.1 Formal Environments………………..34\r\n2.4.1.1 Long-Term Studies………………..34\r\n2.4.1.2 Short-Term Studies………………..35\r\n2.4.2 Informal Environments………………..38\r\n2.4.2.1 Long-Term Studies………………..39\r\n2.4.2.2 Short-Term Studies………………..41\r\n2.5 Domestic Studies………………..43\r\n2.6 Conclusions………………..45\r\nCHAPTER THREE Methods and Procedures………………..49\r\n3.1 Subjects………………..49\r\n3.2 Design and Materials………………..51\r\n3.2.1 The Questionnaire………………..51\r\n3.2.2 The Tests………………..52\r\n3.2.2.1 Grammar Test………………..54\r\n3.2.2.2 Reading Test………………..55\r\n3.2.2.3 Writing Test………………..56\r\n3.3 Procedures………………..57\r\n3.4 Scoring………………..59\r\n3.5 Statistical Methods………………..60\r\nCHAPTER FOUR Results………………..64\r\n4.1 General Language Backgrounds of the Subjects………………..64\r\n4.2 Overall Performance………………..68\r\n4.3 Correlations between the Language\r\nBackgrounds of the Subjects and \r\nthe Scores on the Tests ………………..70\r\n4.3.1 Correlations between the Characteristics\r\nof Grade 1 Subjects\r\nand the Testing Scores………………..71\r\n4.3.1.1 Sex………………..73\r\n4.3.1.2 Extracurricular English\r\nLearning at Junior High\r\nSchool Level (EEJS) ………………..73\r\n4.3.1.3 Length of EEJS………………..74\r\n4.3.1.4 English Learning in\r\nChildhood (ELC) ………………..76\r\n4.3.2 Correlations between the Characteristics\r\nof Grade 2 Subjects\r\nand the Testing Scores………………..83\r\n4.3.2.1 Sex………………..84\r\n4.3.2.2 Extracurricular English\r\nLearning at Junior High\r\nSchool Level (EEJS) ………………..85\r\n4.3.2.3 Length of EEJS………………..86\r\n4.3.2.4 English Learning in\r\nChildhood (ELC) ………………..88\r\n4.4 The Interactions between ELC and Length\r\nof EEJS………………..95\r\n4.5 The Predictability of the Scores in Terms of\r\nthe Language Backgrounds`? of the Subjects………………..100\r\nCHAPTER FIVE Discussions and Conclusions………………..106\r\n5.1 Summary of the Findings………………..107\r\n5.2 Discussions………………..111\r\n5.2.1 The Performance of ELC Subjects Versus\r\nNon-ELC Subjects………………..113\r\n5.2.2 The Influence of Age of Early Start\r\nand Length of ELC………………..113\r\n5.2.3 The Influence of the Content of\r\nInstruction………………..114\r\n\r\n5.2.4 The Comparison between Grade 1 and\r\nGrade 2………………..116\r\n5.3 Conclusions………………..119\r\n5.3.1 Implications for Education………………..120\r\n5.3.2 Recommendations of Further Research………………..121\r\nReference in English Language………………..123\r\nReference in Chinese Language………………..132\r\nAppendix………………..134 | zh_TW |
| dc.source.uri | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002004899 | en_US |
| dc.title | 兒童英語與國中英語學習成果之關連研究報告 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The relationships between English learning in childhood & English achievements in junior high school | en_US |
| dc.type | thesis | en_US |
| dc.relation.reference | References In English Language\r\nAbraham, Roberta G. 1985. “ Field Independence-Dependence and the Teaching of Grammar.\" TESOL Quarterly, 19, 689-702.\r\nAsher, J., and Price, B. 1961 . \"The Learning Strategy of Total Physical Response: Some Age Differences.\" In Stephen D. Krashen, Robin C. Scarcella, and Michael H.\r\nLong, eds. 1982. Child-Adult Differences In Second Language Acguisition. Rowley: Newbury House.\r\nAusubel, David A,. 1964. \"Adults Versus Children in Second Language Learning: Psychological Considerations.\" Modern Language Journal, 48, 420-424.\r\nBarroso, Felix. 1976. \"Hemispheric Asymmetry of Function in Children.\" In Rieber, R. W`. The :Neuropsychology of Language.New York: Plenum.\r\nBialystok, Ellen. 1978. \"A Theoretical Model of Second Language Learning.\" Language Learning, 28, 69-83.\r\nBorich, Gary D., and Tom Kubiszyn. 1987. Educational Testing and Measurement: Classroom Application and Practice. 2nd ed. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman.\r\nBrega, E. and Newell, J. 1965. \"Comparison of Performance by FLES Program Students and Regular French III Students on Hodern Language Association Tests.\" French Review ,39, 433-438.\r\nBrown, H. Douglas. 1987. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. 2nd ed. Prentice-Hall.\r\nBudner, S. 1962. \"Intolerance of Ambiguity as a Personality Yariable. ,. Journal of Personality, 30, 29-50, cited by\r\nCarol Chapeele and Cheryl Roberts. 1986. \"Ambiguity Tolerance and Field Independence as Predictors of Proficiency in English as a Second Language.”Language Learning, 36, 27-45.\r\nChapelle, Carol A. and Roberts, Cheryl. 1986. \"_Ambiguity Tolerance and Field Independence as Predictors of Proficiency in English as a Second Language. ,. Language Learning, 36, 25-45.\r\nCummins, James. 1980. \" The Cross-Lingual Dimensions of Language Proficiency: Implications for bilingual Education and the Optimal Age Issue.\" TESOL Quarteriy , 14 ,175-187.\r\nDulay H., and Burt, M. 1973. \" Should We Teach Children Syntax?Language Learning,24 245-58.\r\nDulay, Heidi, Marina Burt, and Stephen Krashen. 1982.Language Two. New York :oxford.\r\nEkstrand, L. 1978. \"English without a book Revisited \" The Effect of Age on Second Language Acquisition in Formal Setting.\" (Department of Educational and Psychological Research, School of Education, Malmo, Sweden J , no. 60 ,October 1978. Rpt. In Stephen D. krashen, Robin C.\r\nScarcella, and Michael H. Long, eds. 1982. Child-Adult Differences In Second Language Acquisition Rowley:Newbury House.\r\nFathman, Ann K. 1915. \" The Relationship between Age and Second Language Productive Ability” Language Learning,25,245-253.\r\n-------- 1976. \"Variables Affecting the Successful Learning of English as a Second Language. \"TESOL Quarterly, 10,433-443.\r\nFIege , James E. 1981. \"The Phonological Basis of foreign _Accent: A Hypothesis.\"TESOL Quarterly, 15, 443-455.\r\nFerguson, George A. 1959 . Statistical Analysis in Psychology & Education. .4th ed. New York:Mcgraw-Hill.\r\nGenesee, Fred. 1982. \"Experimental Neuropsychological Research on Second Language Processing.\" TESOL Quarterly 16, 315-322.\r\nHale, T. and E. Budar. 1970. “Are TESOL Classes the Only Answer?\" Modern Language Journal, 5-1, ~81--192.\r\nHansen, Jacqueiline and Stansfield, Charles. 1981. \"The Relationship of Field Dependent-Independent Cognitive Styles to Foreign Language Achievement. ,. Language Learning, 31,349- 367.\r\nHeaton, J. B. 1986. Writing English Language Tests. New York: Longman. Hill, Jane. 1970. \"Foreign Accents, Language Acquisition, and Cerebral dominance Revisited.\" Language Learning, 20,237-241.\r\n Justman, Joseph, and Martin L. Nass. 1956. \"The High School Achievement of Pupils who were and were Not Introduced to a Foreign Language in Elementary School.\" The Hodern Language Journal, 60, 120-123.\r\nKinsbourne, M. 1975. \"The Ontogeny of Cerebral Dominance.\"\r\nThe Structure of Language. In D. Aaronson and R. Rieber,\r\neds. Developmental Psycholinguistics and Communication\r\nDisorders. New `York: New York Academy of Sciences,244-250\r\n, cited by Neidi Dulay, Marine Burt, and Stephen\r\nKrashen. Language Two. (New York:Onford,1982 ), 89 -90.\r\nKrashen, Stephen. 1973. \"Lateralization. Language Learning,\r\nand the Critical Period: Some New- Evidence. Language\r\nLearning, 63-74.\r\n-------- 1976. \"Formal and Informal Linguistic Environments\r\nin Language Acquisition and Language Learning. ,. TESOL\r\nQuarterly , 10, 157-168.\r\n-------- 1979. \"Accounting for Child-Adult Differences In\r\nSecond Language Rate and Attainment. \" TESOL Quarterly,\r\n1979, 43, 573-582.\r\n-------- 1981. Second Language Acquisition and Second\r\nLanguage Learning. Oxford Pergamon.\r\nKrashen, Stephen, Butler, J., Birnbaum, R., and Roberston, J.\r\n1978. \"Two Studies in Language Acquisition and Language\r\nLearning. \" ITL: Review of Applied Linguistics, 39-4-0: 73-\r\n92, cited by Heidi Dulay, Marina Burt,and Stephen \r\nKrashen. Language Two.New York: Oxford, 1982), 63.\r\nKrashen, S., Michael A. Long, and Robin C.Scarcella. 1979.\r\n\"Age, Rate and Eventual Attainment in Second Language\r\nAcquisition.\" TESOL Quarterly, 13, 573-582.\r\nKrashen, Stephen, and Bon, P. 1975. \"An Error Analysis of an\r\nAdvanced ESL Learner.\" Working Papers on Bilingualism,\r\n7, 125-129, cited by Heidi Dulay, ~Marina Burt, and\r\nStephen Krashen. Language Two. (New York: Oxford:\r\n1982), 65-66.\r\nKrashen, Stephen, and Tracy D. Terrell. 1983. The Natural\r\nApproach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom. Oxford:\r\nPergamon.\r\nKrashen, Stephen D, Robin C. Scarcella, and Michael H. Long,\r\neds. 1982. Child-adult Differences in Second Language\r\nAcquisition. Rowley, ~Mass : Newbury House.\r\nKrashen, Stephen, and Seliger ,H. 1975. \"The Essential\r\nCharacterisitics of Formal Instruction. `TESOL Quarterly,\r\n9, 173-183.\r\nLenneberg, Eric. 1967. Biological foundations of Language .\r\nNew York: John Wiley and Sons.\r\nMacaulay, R.K. S. 1 9 7 8 . \"The myth of Female Superiority in\r\nLanguage. ,. Journal of Child Language,5, 353-37-4, cited\r\nby Dan Isaac Slobin. Psycholinguistics. 2nd ed.\r\n(Glenview, Ill. Scott, Foresman,1979),74.\r\nMadsen, Harold S. 1983. Techniques in Testing. New York:\r\nOxford. Mclaughlim, Barry. 1985. Second-Language\r\nAcquisition in childhood: Volume 2. School-Age Children.\r\n2nd ed. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.\r\nNorris, Beth S. K., and Louis J. Gerstman. 1986. \"Age\r\nContrasts in the Learning of Language-Relevant Materials:\r\nSome Challenges to Critical Period Hypothesis.\" Language\r\nLearning, 36, 311-352.\r\nNeufeld, Gerald G. 1980. \"On the Adult` s Ability to Acquire\r\nPhonology.\" TESOL Quarterl ,14, 185-198,\r\nNorton, R ,W,1975. \"Measurement of Ambiguity Tolerance,\"\r\n Journal of Personality Assessment, 39,607-618, cited by\r\nCarol Chapeele , and Cheryl Roberts. 1986, \"Ambiguity\r\nTolerance and Field Independence as Predictors of\r\nProficiency in English as a Second Language,\"Learning, 36, 27-45.\r\nOller, John W. Jr. and Naoko Nagato. 1974. \"The Long-Term\r\nEffect of FLES: An Experiment.\" The Modern Language\r\n Journal, 58, 15-19.\r\n01 son, L., and ? Samuels, S. J. 1973 . \" The Re1ationship between\r\nAge and Accuracy of Fore1gn Language Pronunciation. ,.\r\nJournal of Educational Research I 66, 263-267, Rpt. in\r\nStephen D. Krashen, Robin C. Scarcella, and Michael H.\r\nLong, eds. 1982. Child -),Adu1t Differences 1n Second\r\nLanguage ,Acquisition .Rowley : Newbury House.\r\nOyama, S. 1976,”A Sensitive Period for the Acquisition of\r\nA Nonnative Phonological System.\" Journal of Psycholinguistic \r\nResearch. 5, 261- 285 . Rpt. In Stephen D.\r\nKrashen, Robin C. Scarcella, Michael H. Long I eds. 1982.\r\nChild-Adult Differences in Second Lang1..1a~e Acquisition.\r\nRowley: Newbury House.\r\nPatkowski. M,1980, The Sensitive Period for the Acquisition\r\nof Syntax 1n a Second Language. Language Learning, 30,\r\n449-472.\r\nPhillips, John L. Jr. 1981. Piaget`s Theor: A primer San\r\nFrancisco: W.H. Freeman.\r\nRosansky, Ellen J. 1975), \"The Critical Period for the\r\nAcquisition of Language: Some cognitive Developmental\r\nConsideration, \" working Papers on Bilingualism 6. 92-\r\n102, cited by H. Douglas Brown, Principles of Language\r\nLearning and Teaching. 2nd Ed.(New Jersey:Prenticehall,1987)47\r\nScarceiia, R., and Higa, C . 1982. \"Input and Age Differences\r\n1n Second Language Acguisition .. , 1n Stephen D. Erashen,\r\nRobin C- . Scarcella, and Michael H. Long ,eds . 1982.\r\nChild-Adult Differences in Second Language Acquisition\r\nRowley: Newbury House.\r\nScovel, Thomas. 1969. Foreign Accents, Language Acquisition,\r\nand Cerbra1 Dominance .\" Language Learning,19,245-254\r\n---------- 1982.” Questions Concerning the Application of\r\nNeurolinguistic Research to Second Language Language Learning\r\nTeaching,\" TESOL Quarterly` , 16, 323-331.\r\nSeliger, Herbert W.1977. “Does Practice Made Perfect : Study of Interaction Patterns and 12 Comperence\r\nLanguage Learning , 27, 263-278.\r\n1982. \"On the Possible Role of the Right Hemisphere in Second Language Acguisition.\" TESOL Quarterly ,16, 307-314.\r\nSeliger, H., S. Krashen, and P. Ladefoged. 1975. \"Maturational\r\nConstraints in the –Acquisition of Second Languages.\r\nLanguage Sciences, 38, 20-22. Rpt. in Stephen.\r\nKrashen, Robin C.Scarcella , and Michael H. Long, eds.\r\n1982. Child-Adult.. difierences in Second Language\r\nAcquisition , Rowley: Newbury House.\r\nSnow, C., and Ferguson, C. A, eds. 1977. Talking to Children:\r\nLanguage Input and Acquistion. Cambridge: Cambridge\r\nUniversity Press.\r\nSnow,C., and Hoefnagel - Hohle, M.1977”Age Differences in the\r\nPronunciation of Foreign Sound ” Language and Speech , 20,357-65.Rpt, in Stephen D, Krashen, Robin C. Scarcella, and Michael H. Long, eas,1982. Child\r\nAdult Differences in Second Language Acquisition,\r\nRowley: Xewbury House.\r\n-------- 1978. \"The Critical Period for Language Acquisi tion:\r\nEvidence from Second Language Learning.\" Child Development.\r\n49, 1114-1128. Rpt. In Stephen D. Krashen, Robin\r\nC. Scarcella , and Michael H. Long, eds,182. Child-\r\nAdult Differences In Second Laneguage . Acquisition,\r\nRowley: Newbury House.\r\nSorenson, Arthus, 1967. \"Multilingualism in the Northwest \r\nAmazon. \"American Anthropologist, 69, 670-684, cited by\r\n Jane H. Hill. 1970. \"Foreign Accents, Language Acquisition,\r\nand Cerebral Dominapce Revisi ted ... Language, 20, 237-248.\r\nTaylor, Barry. 1974. \"Toward a Theory of Language Acquisition.\r\nLanguaQ`e Learning, 24, 23-25.\r\nWitelson, S, and Pallie,W.1973. “Left Hemisphere Specialization for Language in the Newborn ”Brain, 96, 621-646,\r\ncited by Heidi Dulay, Marina burt, and Stephen Krashen, Language Two.(New York: Oxford, 1982), p. 89.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nReferences in Chinese Language\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n中國時報(China Times Daily , 1987) 兒童學英語，到底好不好? 」 中國時報一週專題，民國七十六年四月二十二日。\r\n王萬清(Wang , 1987)「兒童為何闖入英語世界? 」 師友月刊，民國七十六年元月,9-10。\r\n周中天( Chou , 1988)「兒童提前學習英語對其日後英語能力影響之研究 」 國科會專題研究報告， (NSC-78-0301-H003-11) 民國七十八年七月。\r\n林振春(Lin ,1987) 「 台北升大學補習班學生生活狀況調查研究」社教雙月刊，民國七十六年16期， 191-232。\r\n柵美報導(Cha-Mei Report , 1989)「兒童英語風吹入柵美」民國七十八年十二月十六日， 792期，第三版。\r\n秦夢群(Ch`in , 1987)「小學生該學ABC 嗎? 」 師友月刊，民國七十六年元月， 16-17。\r\n陳玉婕(Chen, 1987)「先跑的孩子不一定贏一談兒童英語的功效 」， 師友月刊，民國七十六年元月， 6 – 8。\r\n陳英豪&吳裕益(Ch`en and Wu , 1982)「測驗的編製與應用」，台北:信文圖書出版社有限公司，民國七十一年三月一版。\r\n黃自來(Huang , 1989)「年齡、動機與學習第二語言一兼談小學是否應教英語 」 英語文教學論文集，中華民國第六屆英語文教學研討會，台北:文鶴出版公司，民國七十八年五月， 37-52。\r\n教育文摘月刊(Educational Medium Digest , 1989) 「教育部認為不宜提早學英語 」 民國七十八年九月， 38-42。\r\n楊懿麗(Yang , 1988) 「國小兒童學習英語之實驗研究報告 」 國科會專題研究報告， NSC-77-3301-H-004-03，民七十七年九月。\r\n楊國樞等(Yang et al , 1985) 「社會及行為科學研究法 」 ，上下兩冊，台北:台灣東華書局股份有限公司，民國七十四年一版。\r\n劉家寧(Lin, 1989) 「 台北市國小學童參加校外英語學習消費行為之研究 」 ，中原大學企管研究所碩士論文，民國七十八年七月。\r\n謝效昭(Hsieh,1987)「大台北地區兒童才藝班之消費行為研究」政大企管研究所碩士論文，民國七十六年六月。 | zh_TW |
| item.grantfulltext | open | - |
| item.openairetype | thesis | - |
| item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec | - |
| item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| index.html | 115 B | HTML2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.