Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/90179| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳彰儀 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | 林文蘭 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator | 林文蘭 | zh_TW |
| dc.date | 1989 | en_US |
| dc.date | 1988 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-05-03T06:17:14Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-05-03T06:17:14Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2016-05-03T06:17:14Z | - |
| dc.identifier | B2002005531 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/90179 | - |
| dc.description | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 心理學系 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | 摘要\r\n認知評價理論（cognitive evaluation theory）認為個人行為的自我控制感以及能力感會影響內在動機。本研究的目的即是探討在相同目標下不同的目標訊息(能力訊息與控制訊息)會如何影響個體的內在動機。\r\n本研究採用實驗法，研究的樣本是政治大學學生99名，受試被隨機分派到三個實驗組(這三組受試需完成的目標相同，但是他們得到的目標訊息不同，分別為無其它訊息、能力訊息與控制訊息)和一個控制組(沒有設定目標)，實驗作業為七巧板拼圖，每一位受試皆做作業15分鐘，然後測量其內在動機，內在動機的指標有三個：態度測量(受試對作業的興趣以及喜好程度)和行為測量(實驗結束後的休息期間，受試繼續做作業的時間)。\r\n實驗結果採用二因子變異數及Dunn的事前考驗分析，分析時每一個實驗組又區分為達到目標和未達到目標兩組，然後進行一些統計檢驗。結果顯示：(1)控制訊息組受試，不論目標達到與否，其內在動機均較控制組受試低(2)無其它訊息組與能力訊息組受試，不論達到目標與否，其內在動機均與控制組受試無差異。最後本研究以認知評價理論把結果加以討論。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄\r\n第一章 導論………1\r\n第一節 研究動機與目的………1\r\n第二節 文獻探討………3\r\n第三節 研究問題與假設………19\r\n第二章 研究方法………25\r\n第一節 研究對象………25\r\n第二節 實驗工具………25\r\n第三節 主試………27\r\n第四節 研究設計………28\r\n第五節 實驗程序………30\r\n第六節 統計方法………37\r\n第三章 研究結果………39\r\n第一節 有關操弄變項的檢驗………39\r\n第二節 各組受試在內在動機(態度)測量上的分析………48\r\n第三節 各組受試在內在動機(行為)測量上的分析………51\r\n第四節 不同依變項測量結果間的關係………53\r\n第五節 結論………54\r\n第四章 討論與建議………55\r\n第一節 討論………55\r\n第二節 檢討與建議………60\r\n參考書目………65\r\n附錄A 實驗作業………70\r\n附錄B 問卷………76\r\n\r\n圖表目次\r\n圖1-1 研究設計圖………22\r\n圖2-1 實驗室佈置圖………33\r\n表3-1 不同目標訊息各組受試在控制之覺上的變異數分析摘要表………42\r\n表3-2 不同目標訊息各組受試在控制知覺上的人數、平均數與標準差………43\r\n表3-3 不同目標訊息各組受試在控制知覺上的多重比較結果………43\r\n表3-4 不同目標訊息各組受試在能力回饋知覺的變異數分析摘要表………44\r\n表3-5 不同目標訊息各組受試在能力回饋知覺上的人數、平均數與標準差………45\r\n表3-6 不同目標訊息各組受試在能力回饋知覺的多重比較結果………45\r\n表3-7 不同目標訊息達到否各組受試在能力知覺的變異數分析摘要表………46\r\n表3-8 不同目標訊息達到否各組受試在能力知覺上的人數、平均數與標準差………47\r\n表3-9 不同目標訊息達到否各組受試在能力知覺上的多重比較結果………47\r\n表3-10 不同訊息目標與目標達到否各組受試在內在動機(態度)測量上的二因子變異數分析摘要表………49\r\n表3-11 不同訊息目標與目標達到否各組以及控制組受試在內在動機(態度)測量上的人數、平數均與標準差………51\r\n表3-12 不同訊息目標與目標達到否各組受試在內在動機(行為)測量上的二因子變異數分析摘要表………52\r\n表3-13 不同訊息目標與目標達到否各組以及控制組受試在內在動機(行為)測量上的人數、平數均與標準差………53 | zh_TW |
| dc.source.uri | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002005531 | en_US |
| dc.title | 不同訊息的目標設定對內在動機的影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.type | thesis | en_US |
| dc.relation.reference | 參考書目\r\n林清山(民65)心理與教育統計學。台北:東華出版社。\r\n裘友善(民75)目標難度對工作表現的影響。師範大學教研所博士論文。\r\n陳淑娟(民76 )過度辨正效果之研究- -酬賞種類、酬賞方式與認知發展階段對內在動機的影響。政治大學心理研究所碩士論文。\r\nAmabile, T. M., Dejong, W., &Lepper, M. R. (1976). Effects of externally imposed deadlines on subsequent intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 92-98.\r\nDeci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 105-115.\r\nDeci, E. L. (1972a). Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic reinforcement, and inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 113-120.\r\nDeci, E. L. (1972b). The effects of contingent and noncontingent rewards and controls on intrinsic motivation. Organizational Behavior And Human Performance, 8, 217-229.\r\nDeci, E. L. (1975). Notes on the theory and metatheory of intrinsic motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 15, 130-145.\r\nEirk, R. E. (1982). Experimental design (2nd ed) Monterey, California 93940: Brooks/coal\r\nPublishing Company.\r\nEnzie, M. E., &Ross, J. M. (1978). Increasing and decreasing interest with contingent rewards: a test of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 588-597.\r\nEres, M., &Zidon, I. (1984). Effect of goal acceptance on the relationship of goal difficulty to performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 69-78.\r\nGarland, H. (1982). Goal levels and task performance: a compelling replication of some compelling results. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 245-248.\r\nHirst, M.K. (1988). Intrinsic motivation as influenced by task interdependence and goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 96-101.\r\nLatham, G. P., &Erez, M., &Locke, E. A. (1988). Resolutioning scientific disputes by the joint desing of crucial experiments by the antagonists : application to the Erez-Latham disputs regarding participation in goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology (monograph).\r\nLatham, G. P., &Yuki, G. A. (1975). A review of research on the application of goal setting in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 824-845.\r\nLocke, E. A. (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organization Behavior and Human Performance, 3, 157-189.\r\nLocke, E. A. (1982). Relation of goal performance with a short work period multiple goal levels. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 512-514.\r\nLocke, E. A., Saari, M. L., Shaw, K. N., &Latham, G. P. (1981). Goal setting and task performance: 1969-1980. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 125-152.\r\nMaderlink, G., &Harackiewiez, J. M. (1984). Proximal versus distal goal setting and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 918-928.\r\nMento, J. A., Steel, P. R., &Karren, J. R. (1987). A meta-analytic study of the effects of goal setting on task performance : 1966-1984. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 52-83.\r\nMossholder, K. W. (1980). Effects of externally mediated goal setting on intrinsic motivation: a laboratory experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 202 - 210 .\r\nPhillips, J.S., &Freedman, S. M. (1988). The task related competency and compliance aspects of goal setting: a clarification. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 34-49 .\r\nRyan, R. M. (1982). Control and information in intrapersonal sphere: an extention of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 450-461.\r\nRyan, R. M., Mims, V., &Koestner, R. (1983). Relation of reward contingency and interpersonal context to intrinsic motivation: a review and test using cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 736-750.\r\nRosnfield, D., Folger, R., &Adelman, H. F. (1980). When rewards reflect competence : a qualification of over-justication effect. Journal of Personality and Social Pshcology, 39, 368-276.\r\nShally, E. C., & Oldham, G. R. (1985). Effects of goal difficulty and expected external evaluation on intrinsic motivation: a laboratory study. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 628-640.\r\nShalley, E. C., Oldham, R. G., &Porac, F. J. (1987). Effects of goal difficulty, goal-setting method, and expected external evaluation on intrinsic motivation. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 553-563.\r\nSteers, R. M., &Porter, L. W. (1974). The role of task goal attributes in employee performance. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 434-452.\r\nTubbs, M. E. (1986). Goal setting: a meta-analytic examination of the empirical evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 474-483. | zh_TW |
| item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| item.grantfulltext | open | - |
| item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec | - |
| item.openairetype | thesis | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| index.html | 115 B | HTML2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.