Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/90965
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor陳新雄zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorCHEN, XIN-XIONGen_US
dc.contributor.author沈壹農zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorSHEN, YI-NINGen_US
dc.creator沈壹農zh_TW
dc.creatorSHEN, YI-NINGen_US
dc.date1986en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-04T09:17:38Z-
dc.date.available2016-05-04T09:17:38Z-
dc.date.issued2016-05-04T09:17:38Z-
dc.identifierB2002006045en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/90965-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description中國文學系zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本論文係以「原本玉篇」殘卷為對象,擇該書所引述「說文」與今傳「二徐本說文」\r\n二者之間,正其是非,題曰:「原本玉篇引述唐以前舊本說文考異」。文都二十萬言\r\n,本論析為七章,係以「原本玉篇」所存七卷作為區分,其前為緒論,其後乃結語。\r\n所用「原本玉篇」之材料,乃日本「東方文化叢書第六」之複製本,不足者以羅振玉\r\n及楊守敬刊本補足之,並輯入少數他書所存錄者;總存字二0九二字,所引述「說文\r\n」者,凡一二六一條,引者八二一條,述者四四0條,其引「說文」之八二一條中,\r\n與今「二徐本說文」相較而合者,唯二六0條耳,其異者達五六一條。考校之結果,\r\n今「二徐本說文」是而「原本玉篇」非者,固亦有之,然今本誤者則佔絕大部份,可\r\n見「原本玉篇」之可貴也。今「二徐本說文」之誤,就說解言:有形誤者、音誤者、\r\n誤倒者、誤置者、誤羨者、竄入者、漏奪者;甚收字:有失數者、誤增者、誤合者、\r\n誤分者、誤置部首者,亦有形體 謬者。而尤要者,則可知今「二徐本說文」亦有據\r\n「原本玉篇」而改竄之痕跡也。zh_TW
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002006045en_US
dc.subject原本玉篇zh_TW
dc.subject唐朝zh_TW
dc.subject說文zh_TW
dc.subject二徐本說文zh_TW
dc.subject羅振玉zh_TW
dc.subject楊守敬zh_TW
dc.subjectTANG-DYNASTYen_US
dc.subjectLUO-ZHEN-YUen_US
dc.subjectYANG-SHOU-JINGen_US
dc.title原本玉篇引述唐以前舊本說文考異zh_TW
dc.typethesisen_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
index.html98 BHTML2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.