Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94705
題名: 台灣連鎖服務業智慧資本建構之研究-以王品餐飲集團為例
Study on the intellectual capital developing of Taiwanese chain industry-with The Wang Steak Group as an approach
作者: 林志轅
Yuan, Lin,Chih
貢獻者: 溫肇東
林志轅
Lin,Chih Yuan
關鍵詞: 智慧資本
連鎖服務業
餐飲業
知識管理
日期: 2008
上傳時間: 9-May-2016
摘要: 隨著知識經濟的興起,知識與創新逐步取代有形資產,成為企業與產業進步的主要驅動要素,各企業開始注意智慧資本的管理,而服務業也逐漸成為經濟發展的主力。在台灣,服務業當中的連鎖服務業,連鎖總部超過1400家,密度高居世界第一,已躍居亞洲連鎖產業的領先群。連鎖業要建立競爭優勢、創造財富,在同業中脫穎而出,主要靠的就是其擁有的無形知識與能力,因此本研究即希望藉由深入觀察與剖析國內連鎖業中的餐飲連鎖業者「智慧資本」建立與累積的過程,以智慧資本觀點探討我國連鎖服務業經營與建立競爭優勢之關鍵為何,提供企業智慧資本管理與規劃的參考。\r\n 本研究採取個案研究方式,選擇連鎖經營已有不錯經營成績的台灣「王品餐飲集團」為研究對象,將智慧資本分為人力資本、結構資本與顧客資本,並結合知識管理中的取得、創造、儲存、擴散四個活動,深入探討其智慧資本建立與累積的過程。\r\n 最後,本研究的研究結論摘要如下:\r\n一、智慧資本構面的相對比重與內容會隨事業的發展而變化\r\n1.個案公司剛成立時,人力資本和顧客資本佔總智慧資本之最大比重;而後在發展過程中,結構資本與人力資本成為比重最大的兩項資本;直到公司發展後期,各智慧資本構面比重趨於平均。\r\n2.個案公司發展過程中,組織擁有的資源或能力由存在於個人身上的經驗、能力與關係資源,逐漸擴散到組織的制度與流程,並進而擴散到與顧客互動過程中所產生之相關知識、技能和價值。\r\n3.隨著個案公司的發展,人力、結構與顧客資本的內容,都朝向與創造顧客資本相關的方向發展。\r\n二、各智慧資本構面之重要性有所不同\r\n4.人力資本一直是支持個案公司在發展過程中不斷成長的重要關鍵。\r\n5.人力資本與結構資本對個案公司而言,扮演著刺激各項智慧資本建立與累積的重要角色。\r\n三、不同智慧資本建構方法與活動各有不同\r\n6.個案公司主要藉這有系統的教育訓練制度、及時分紅入股制度、鼓勵創新的企業文化、重視員工的企業文化、有效的員工招募與發掘外部利害關係人成為組織人力資本的方式,逐一建構起人力資本。而在建構過程中主要透過「取得」、「創造」、「儲存」三個建構活動來累積人力資本。\r\n7.個案公司主要藉著員工擁有的知識與能力、強制的規範與明文規定、內部聚會與社交活動的方式,逐一建構起結構資本。而在建構過程中主要透過「創造」、「儲存」、「擴散」三個建構活動來累積結構資本。\r\n8.個案公司主要藉著員工擁有的知識與能力、與其他企業的合作、從事公益活動、CRM系統的建構、顧客滿意的企業文化、整合行銷推廣的方式,逐一建構起顧客資本。而在建構過程中主要透過「取得」建構活動來累積顧客資本。\r\n四、組織原有智慧資本會對智慧資本的建構產生不同的影響\r\n9.人力資本的建構受組織原有的結構資本之影響最大。\r\n10.結構資本的建構受組織原有的人力資本之影響最大。\r\n11.人力資本與結構資本之間的建構活動互動愈頻繁,愈有利於本身智慧資本的建構與強化。\r\n12.顧客資本建構受組織原有之人力資本與結構資本影響最大。
With the emergence of knowledge-based economy, knowledge and innovation have replaced the physical assets gradually, and become the main driving factor in business and industry progress. All enterprises have begun to pay attention to intellectual capital management, and the service sector has gradually become the main force of economic development. In Taiwan, The number of chain store headquarters in service industry has exceeded 1400, and Taiwan’s chain-stores industry has become the leading group in Asia. Chain-stores companies mainly depend on their own invisible knowledge and ability to build competitive advantage, create wealth, and become the leading company in industry. Therefore from the perspective of intellectual capital, this study digs deeply into one of the chain restaurants company in Taiwan: the Wang Steak Group, which has made some remarkable achievements in chain restaurant operation, and wish to find some useful clues to help effectively and efficiently build up the chain-stores company’s intellectual capital and competitive strengths.\r\n\r\n This research divides intellectual capital into human capital, structural capital, and customer capital, and combines with the four main activities of knowledge management: acquiring, creating, securing and spreading knowledge to study the development and accumulation of intellectual capital deeply.\r\n \r\n The conclusions of this research can be summarized as below:\r\nA.The relative weight and composition of each intellectual capital dimension changed along with the development of Wang Steak Group.\r\n1.In the early stage, human capital and customer capital had the biggest relative weights among all three dimensions. In the mid stage, structural capital and human capital became the most important two dimensions. In the last stage of our observation, the distribution of these four dimensions’ relative weights tended to be more balanced.\r\n2.The company’s ability shifted from the experience and relation of individual to the structural capital, which better embedded within organization, and finally extended to the ability of customer capital outside the organization.\r\n3.The composition of human capital, structural capital, and customer capital developed towards a direction more focused on the creation of customer value.\r\nB.The importance of each intellectual capital dimension was different.\r\n4.Human capital was critical to sustain the continuous growth of the company.\r\n5.Human capital and structural capital acted as an important stimulant to the development and accumulation of the company’s intellectual capital.\r\nC.The methods to build up each intellectual capital dimension were different.\r\n6.The company built up their human capital using the methods below: Education and training system, monthly Bonus share system, the corporate culture that encourage innovation and respecting employees, effective staff recruitment system, and hiring high-ranking figure from other company. And the company used “acquiring, creating, securing knowledge” to build up their human capital in the process of building.\r\n7.The company built up their structural capital using the methods below: the knowledge and ability belong to employees, norms and rules, meetings and social activities. And the company used “creating, securing and spreading knowledge” to build up their structural capital in the process of building.\r\n8.The company built up their customer capital using the methods below: the knowledge and ability belong to employees, cooperation with other companies, Construction of the CRM system, the customer-oriented corporate culture, integrated brand communication. And the company used “acquiring knowledge” to build up their customer capital in the process of building.\r\nD.The company’s original intellectual capital affected the development of each intellectual capital dimension differently.\r\n9.The building of human capital was mostly affected by the company’s structural capital. The building of structural capital was mostly affected by the company’s human capital. And the more frequent interaction of human capital and structural capital, the more helpful to human and structural capital itself building.\r\n10.The building of customer capital was mostly affected by the company’s human capital and structural capital.
第一章 緒論 1\r\n第一節 研究背景與動機 1\r\n第二節 研究目的與研究問題 2\r\n第三節 研究流程 3\r\n\r\n第二章 文獻探討 5\r\n第一節 智慧資本相關文獻 5\r\n第二節 知識管理相關文獻 17\r\n第三節 餐飲連鎖服務業相關文獻 22\r\n\r\n第三章 研究方法 27\r\n第一節 研究架構 27\r\n第二節 操作性定義 30\r\n第三節 研究方法 31\r\n第四節 個案選擇 34\r\n第五節 研究限制 35\r\n\r\n第四章 個案描述 37\r\n\r\n第五章 個案分析 69\r\n第一節 王品集團發展三階段 69\r\n第二節 各時點資源盤點 73\r\n第三節 各時點智慧資本比較 102\r\n第四節 各時期智慧資本的建立與累積 111\r\n第五節 智慧資本建立與累積過程的各種分析 126\r\n\r\n第六章 研究發現 135\r\n第一節 智慧資本構面相對比重與內容之變化 135\r\n第二節 智慧資本之建立與累積 137\r\n\r\n第七章 研究結論與建議 143\r\n第一節 研究結論 143\r\n第二節 研究建議 147\r\n\r\n參考文獻 151
參考文獻: 中文文獻\r\n1.王郁璀. (2007):王品餐飲集團如何以企業文化推展國際行銷之分析。第一屆兩岸經營管理個案研討會論文集。\r\n2.王雅生. (2004):中國式領導行為模式在台灣連鎖餐飲業之應用與研究。成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。\r\n3.吳政和. (1996):餐飲業連鎖經營之研究。餐飲管理學術研究會論文集,中國飲食基金。\r\n4.吳思華、賴鈺晶(2000):我國網際網路智慧資本衡量及發展措施研究。經濟部工業局軟體五年計畫工作是委託計畫。\r\n5.吳思華、溫肇東、楊舜慧、李思壯(2007):新創事業資源組合、產權界定和價值創造的研究—以王品集團為例。「大學之道再創新高系列活動」:2007產業創新研討會,政大創新與創造力中心、經濟部技術處學界科專產業創新能耐平台計畫、教育部創造力教育中程發展計畫。\r\n6.林群盛. (1996).:連鎖經營產業之營運性關鍵成功因素暨競爭優勢分析-台灣連鎖餐飲業之實證。台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。\r\n7.施志宜. (1995):餐飲業經營管理成功因素之研究—以西式速食業為實証。第一屆餐飲管理學術研討會論文集,頁149-181。\r\n8.高秋英. (1999):餐飲管理-理論與實務。台北:揚智文化。\r\n9.高秋英、林玥秀(2004):餐飲管理-理論與實務。台北:揚智文化。\r\n10.徐純慧、郭永盛(2006):以「品牌識別要素蜂窩模型」建構「以顧客為基礎的品牌權益」—整合品牌傳播觀點。2006電子商務與數位生活研討會。\r\n11.國立政治大學智慧資本研究中心&資訊工業策進會資訊情報中心. (2006): 智慧資本管理。台北市:華泰文化。\r\n12.張美雲. (2007):台灣餐飲業創新經營關鍵因素之研究。中華民國科技管理論文集。\r\n13.溫肇東、蔡淑梨、莊皓鈞等著(2007):王品集團,多重目的個案研究整合計畫個案。政治大學。\r\n14.楊日融. (2003):咖啡店經營關鍵成功因素之研究。中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。\r\n15.廖翊閔. (2005):從甲馬創意看我國動畫事業智慧資本之建立與累積。政治大學科管所碩士論文。\r\n16.蔡佩君. (2003):新創事業的智慧資本建構與管理-以某醫工公司參與BOO過程為例。政治大學科管所碩士論文。\r\n17.蔡界勝. (1996):餐飲管理與經營。台北:五南。\r\n18.蔡曉娟. (1999):消費者對國際速食連鎖餐廳意象認知之研究。中國文化大學觀光事業研究所碩士論文。\r\n19.賴彥豪. (2000):智慧資本之評量與知識管理活動-兩個個案分析。政治大學企業管理學系碩士論文。\r\n20.譚大純、劉廷揚與蔡明洲. (1999):知識管理文獻之回顧與分類。中華民國科技管理論文集,中山大學企業管理學系。\r\n\r\n中文翻譯\r\n21.朱道凱譯. (1999):平衡計分卡:資訊時代的策略管理工具。台北:臉譜文化。Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (1996):The balanced scorecard : translating strategy into action.\r\n22.宋偉航譯. (1999):智慧資本:資訊時代的企業利基。台北:智庫文化。Thomas A. Stewart(1997),Intellectual capital: the new wealth of organizations.\r\n23.胡瑋珊譯. (1999):知識管理。台北:中國生產力中心。Davenport, T. H. & Prusak, L. (1998), Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know.\r\n24.徐佑蘭譯. (2002):建構智慧型組織。台北:中國生產力中心。Pentti Sydänmaanlakka(2002),An intelligent organization.\r\n25.蔣宛如譯. (2004):企業腦。台北:中國生產力中心。Leif Edvinsson(2002):Corporate longitude: navigate the knowledge.\r\n26.韓定國譯. (1987):麥當勞:探索金拱門的奇蹟。Love, John F. (1986): McDonald`s: behind the arches.\r\n\r\n\r\n英文文獻\r\n1.Al-Ali, N. (2003), Comprehensive Intellectual Capital Management, Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.\r\n2.Badaracco, J.L. (1991), The knowledge link, Boston: Harvard Business School Press。\r\n3.Bassi, L.J. & Mcmurrer, D.P. (1998),“Training Investment Can Mean Financial Performance”, Training & Development, 40-42.\r\n4.Bontis, N. (1998), “Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models”, Management Decision, Vol. 26, No. 2, 1998, p63-76.\r\n5.Brooking, A. (1996), Intellectual Capital: Core Asset for the Millennium Enterprise, London; Boston: International Thomson Business Press.\r\n6.Day, Jonathan D. & James C. Wendler (1998), Best practice and beyond: Knowledge strategies, The McKinsey Quarterly, p19-25.\r\n7.Edvinsson, L, & Sullivan, P (1996), Developing model for managing intellectual capital, European Management Journal,, Vol. 14 No.4\r\n8.Edvinsson, L & M. S. Malone. (1997), Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company`s True Value by Finding its Hidden Brainpower, NY: HarperCollins Publishers Inc.\r\n9.Huseman, R.C. & Goodman, J.P. (1999) Leading with knowledge-The nature of Competition in The 21th Century, U.S.A: Sage Publications, Inc.\r\n10.Lynn, B. (1998), “Intellectual capital: Management attitude in service industries,” CAM Magazine, February, p10-15.\r\n11.Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995), The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Company Foster Creativity and Innovation for Competitive Advantage, NY: Oxford University Press.\r\n12.Rob van der Spek and Spijkervet Andre. (1997), \"knowledge Management: Dealing Intelligently with Knowledge\", Knowledge Management and Its Integrative Elements, New York: CRC Press.\r\n13.Roos, J., and G. Roos (1997), “Measuring Your Company`s Intellectual Performance”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 30, No. 3, p.413-426.\r\n14.Roos, J., Roos Goran, Edvinsson Leif & Dragonetti, Nicola Carlo (1998), Intellectual Capital: Navigating in the New Business Landscape, NY: New York University Press.\r\n15.Saint-Onge, H.(1996), Tacit knowledge:The key to the strategic alignment of intellectual capital, Strategy&Leadership, March/ April, pp.10-14.\r\n16.Stewart, T. A. (1998), Intellectual Capital, New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell.\r\n17.Sullivan, P. H.(2000), Value-driven intellectual capital: How to convert intangible corporate assets into market value, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc..\r\n18.Sveiby, K. E. (1997), The New Organization Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets, San Francisco, Calif: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.\r\n19.Ulrich, D. (1998), intellectual capital = competence x commitment, Sloan Management Review, (Winter), p15-26\r\n20.Wiig, K. M. (1995), Knowledge Management Methods: Practical Approaches to Managing Knowledge, Arlington Texas: SCHEMA PRESS.\r\n21.William L. Miller, Langdon Morris (1999), 4th Generation R&D: Managing Knowledge, Technology and Innovation, New York: John Wiley.\r\n\r\n網站資料\r\n1.APQC(American Productivity and Quality Center) and Arthur Andersen, 1996, http://www.apqc.com.tw (瀏覽日期:2008年6月30日。)\r\n2.王品集團新聞專區網頁,http://www.wangsteak.com.tw/event_news.htm (瀏覽日期:2008年5月10日。)
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
科技管理研究所
95359016
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095359016
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
index.html115 BHTML2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.