Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94904| 題名: | 霍布斯與洛克的神學政治觀 Theological Politics of Hobbes and Locke |
作者: | 鍾立文 Chung, Li Wen |
貢獻者: | 郭承天 鍾立文 Chung, Li Wen |
關鍵詞: | 霍布斯 洛克 神學 聖經 Hobbes Locke Theology Bible |
日期: | 2009 | 上傳時間: | 9-May-2016 | 摘要: | 本文檢閱霍布斯與洛克兩人政治理論的政治與宗教背景，以幫助理解他們的政治理論與神學教義之間的相互影響。在當時的智識脈絡中，兩人各自擁有對於自然狀態和自然法的不同看法。對於自然法的看法與盟約神學結合，影響到兩位的盟約論或契約論。本文的核心則是這些神學議題如何影響他們對於主權者或是政府的看法。最後，討論兩人所密切關懷的宗教容忍議題，以及往後學者所延伸出的現代性議題。\r\n 身為一位虔誠的安立甘宗教徒，霍布斯使用《聖經》以及神學教義來補充並闡明其政治理論。他使用該隱的《聖經》例子說明自然狀態的意義。霍布斯的自然法理論繼承唯意志論傳統，而非唯理智論傳統。這說明他的自然狀態與自然法都與希臘哲學的自然概念大相逕庭。此外，唯意志論也說明自然權利出自於上帝的命令，即自然法。唯意志論和盟約論神學一起塑造出霍布斯的主權者概念。因為主權者具有政治的身體，所以他是人世間的中保，也是國家意志的代表。霍布斯強調得救唯一所需的是相信耶穌是基督，但是他也強調基督的王國不在此世。主權者必須同時作為國家與教會的元首，以避免因神學爭執所引發對於和平與秩序的威脅。\r\n 身為一個清教徒，洛克結合他的信仰發展出一種為人民主權和革命權利辯護的政治理論。這造就了他獨特的神學政治觀。首先，他藉由基督教神學家的自然法理論說明人的天(神)賦政治權利。而且為了避免唯意志論和唯理智論的極端，他採取一種中間路線的托瑪斯主義。第二，洛克的盟約神學和奧體概念強調人民的「同意」。人民同意組成一個「政治的身體」。洛克認為律法和恩典具有同等重要性，相應地，他也主張政治體的法律體現了形塑政治體的契約。最後，洛克的宗教寬容觀念以及政教關係理論也支持著人民的天賦政治權利理論。\r\n 霍布斯與洛克都示範了：如何能夠獨立思考《聖經》，並且以一套神學政治論述來同時實現屬世與屬靈的美好生活。每個人都必須同時面對自己的政治身份，也要思考自己在宗教中的生命意義。當兩者和諧地結合時，一個人才能真正獲得和平與幸福。霍布斯和洛克的神學政治觀值得我們參考與借鏡。 This paper reviews the political and religious background of theory introduced by Thomas Hobbes and Locke, to realize the interplay between their political theory and theological doctrine. They hold distinct viewpoints upon state of nature and natural law in the intellectual context at that time, and the combinations of natural law concepts and covenant theology influenced their covenant theory and contract theory. The focus of this paper is how these theological issues influenced their viewpoints about sovereign or the government. At last, this paper discusses the issue of religious tolerance they both concern closely, and the issue of modernity extended by the successive scholars.\r\n As a devout Anglican, Thomas Hobbes supplements and clarifies his political theory by the Bible and theological doctrine. He cites the story about Cain in the Bible to explain the state of nature. Rather than intellectualism, the theoretical basis of Hobbes’ natural law follows that of conventional voluntarism, which implies that the state of nature and natural law are widely distinct from the concept of nature in Greek philosophy. In addition, voluntarism proposes that natural right comes from the command of God, i.e.,natural law. Voluntarism and covenant theology together constitute Hobbes’ conceptualization of sovereign. Since the sovereign possesses “body politic”, he is the “mediator” of the world and the representative of state will. Hobbes emphasizes the unum necessarium (sole necessity) of salvation is to believe in that “Jesus is the Christ”, but also that “the kingdom of Christ is not of this world.” The sovereign serves as the head both of church and state in order to avoid the threat against peace due to theological controversy.\r\n As a Puritan, Locke intends to develop a political theory apologized by popular sovereignty and right of revolution, which forms his unique viewpoint of theological politics. He firstly illustrates the inborn political right of human beings through the natural law theory, and to avoid the extremes of voluntarism or intellectualism, he adopts the hybrid Thomism with compromise. In addition, the concept of covenant theology and mystical body introduced by Locke emphasizes the “consent” of the people that sets the basis for body politic. Locke considers that the law and grace of the God are equivalently important, accordingly, he suggests that the law of body politic concretizes the contract shaping the body politic as well. Furthermore, the concept of religious tolerance and theory of relationship between religion and politics support the inborn political right of the people.\r\n Hobbes and Locke demonstrate: How to independently reflect on “Bible”, and simultaneously actualize the beautiful life of worldliness and spiritualism by the discourse of theological politics. Everyone has to think of the political identity, and the meaning of life in religions as well. When the two parts combine harmoniously, one can truly gain sense of peace and happiness. The viewpoints of theological politics done by Hobbes and Locke are worth to be referred. |
參考文獻: | 一、 霍布斯與洛克的著作：\r\n\r\nHobbes, Thomas. 1991. “Appendix to Leviathan.” Trans. George Wright. Interpretation 18(3): 349-413.\r\n─────，1992. The Collected Works of Thomas Hobbes. Vol. 2. Ed. Sir William Molesworth. London: Routledge/Thoemmes Press.\r\n─────，1992. The Collected Works of Thomas Hobbes. Vol. 3. Ed. Sir William Molesworth. London: Routledge/Thoemmes Press.\r\nLocke, John. 1955. A Letter Concerning Toleration. New York: The Liberal Arts Press.\r\n─────，1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Peter H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press.\r\n─────，1988. Two Treatises of Government, ed. Peter Laslett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\r\n─────，1999. The Reasonableness of Christianity: As delivered in the Scriptures, ed. John C. Higgins-Biddle. Oxford: Clarendon Press\r\n\r\n\r\n二、中文\r\n\r\n中文聖經啟導本委員會，2005，《中文聖經啟導本》，香港：海天書樓。\r\n吳增定，2003，〈有朽者的不朽：現代政治哲學的歷史意識〉，梁敬東(編)，《現代政治與自然》，上海：人民，頁242-293。\r\n林志穎，1999，〈霍布斯宗教觀之研究〉，《正修學報》，(12)：1-18。\r\n林浩懿，2004，《此世立約與彼世救贖──霍布斯政治思想中的理性與啟示》，台北：政治大學政治研究所碩士論文。\r\n林國榮，2003，〈自然法傳統中的霍布斯〉，梁敬東(編)，《現代政治與自然》，上海：人民，頁1-54。\r\n郭承天，2001，《政教的分立與制衡：從聖經看政教關係》，臺北：中華福音神學院。\r\n─────，2005，〈宗教容忍：政治哲學與神學的對話〉，《人文及社會科學集刊》，17(1)：125-157。\r\n陳思賢，1998，《西洋政治思想史：近代英國篇》，台北：五南。\r\n─────，2004，《西洋政治思想史：中世紀篇》，臺北：五南。\r\n─────，2006，《西洋政治思想史：現代英國篇》，臺北：五南。\r\n湯清，1986，《歷代基督教信條》，香港：基督教文藝出版社。\r\n曾慶豹，2003，〈利維坦與政治神學：一個現代性的批判〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，(5)：219-55。\r\n趙林，2006，〈英國自然神論的興衰〉，趙林(編)，《基督教的合理性》，武漢：武漢大學出版社，頁1-40。\r\n趙敏匡，2005，《《利維坦》的聖經詮釋與政治神學》，桃園：中原大學宗教研究所碩士論文。\r\n錢永祥，2003，〈偉大的界定者：霍布斯絕對主權論的一個新解釋〉，梁敬東(編)，《現代政治與自然》，上海：人民，頁127-168。\r\n蕭保羅，2007，《神學的視野－建構福音派神學方法論》，台北：校園書房。\r\nCalvin(加爾文), John 著，徐慶譽、謝秉德 譯，1985，《基督教要義》，香港：基督教文藝出版社。譯自Institutes of the Christian Religion.\r\nHobbes(霍布斯), Thomas 著，黎思復、黎廷弼 譯，1997，《利維坦》，北京：商務。譯自 Leviathan. London: J.M. Dent and Sons. 1957.\r\n─────，應星、馮克利 譯，2002，《論公民》，貴陽：貴州人民出版社。譯自 De Cive: Philosophical Rudiments Concerning Government and Society. London: Printed by J.G. for R.Royston. 1651.\r\n─────，趙雪綱 譯，2008，《《利維坦》附錄》，北京：華夏。譯自“Appendix to Leviathan.” Trans. George Wright. Interpretation 18(3): 349-413. 1991.\r\nLocke(洛克), John著，關文運 譯，1959，《人類理解論》，北京：商務。譯自An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Peter H. Nidditch. London: George Bell and Sons. 1902.\r\n─────，吳雲貴 譯，1982，《論宗教寬容－致友人的一封信》，北京：商務。譯自A Letter Concerning Toleration. New York: The Liberal Arts Press. 1955.\r\n─────，王愛菊 譯，2006，《基督教的合理性》，武漢：武漢大學出版社。譯自The Reasonableness of Christianity.\r\n─────，楊思派 譯，2007，《政府論》，北京：九州。譯自Two Treatises of Government, ed. Peter Laslett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1988.\r\nMcClelland(麥克里蘭), J. S. 著，彭淮棟 譯，2000，《西洋政治思想史》，臺北：城邦文化。譯自 A History of Western Political Thought. London; New York: Routledge. 1996.\r\nOakeshott(奧克肖特), M. J.著，應星 譯，2003，〈《利維坦》導讀〉，梁敬東(編)，《現代政治與自然》，上海：人民，頁127-168。譯自“Introduction to Leviathan” In Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. Indianapolis: Liberty Press. 1946.\r\nSaint Augustine(聖奧古斯丁)著，吳宗文 譯，2007，《天主之城》，台北：台灣商務。譯自De Civitate Dei. Lipsiae: Caroli Tauchnitii. 1825.\r\nStrauss(施特勞斯), Leo著，申彤 譯，2001，《霍布斯的政治哲學：基礎與起源》，南京：譯林。譯自The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: Its Basis and Its Genesis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1952.\r\n─────，彭剛 譯，2003，《自然權利與歷史》，北京：生活˙讀書˙新知三聯書店。譯自Natural Right and History. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1953.\r\nStrong(史壯), Tracy B. 著，萬毓澤 譯，2007，〈政治性的神聖特質：重新思考霍布斯與施密特〉，張旺山(編)，《政治與社會哲學評論》，臺北：巨流，(22)：頁1-63。譯自 ‘The Sacred Quality of the Political: Reflections on Thomas Hobbes and Carl Schmitt.’\r\nTully(塔利), James著，梅雪芹、石楠、張煒 等譯，2005，《語境中的洛克》，上海：華東師範大學出版社。譯自An Approach to Political Philosophy: Locke in Contexts. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1993.\r\n\r\n三、西文\r\n\r\nAquinas, Thomas. 1990. The Summa Theologica. Trans. Father Laurence Shapcote. Chicago: Encyclopœdia Britannica, Inc.\r\nAshcraft, Richard. 1980. “Revolutionary Politics and Locke`s Two Treatises of Government: Radicalism and Lockean Political Theory.” Political Theory 8(4): 429-86.\r\nAubrey, John. 1999. “The Brief Life: An Abstract of Aubrey’s Notes.” In Human nature The elements of law, natural and politic : part I, Human nature, part II, De corpore politico ; with Three lives, ed. J. C. A. Gaskin. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.\r\nBlumenberg, Hans. 1985. “Political Theology I and II” In The Legitimacy of the Modern Age. Trans. Robert M. Wallace. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.\r\nBobbio, Norberto. 1993. Thomas Hobbes and the Natural Law Tradition. Trans. Daniela Gobetti. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.\r\nBrandon, Eric. 2007. The Coherence of Hobbes’s Leviathan: Civil and Religious Authority Combined. London: Continuum.\r\nBrown, Robert E. 1999. “Edwards, Locke, and the Bible.” The Journal of Religion 79(3): 361-84.\r\nCalvin, John. 1990. Institutes of the Christian Religion. Trans. Henry Beveridge. Chicago: Encyclopœdia Britannica, Inc.\r\nChappell, Vere. 1999. “Introduction.” In Hobbes and Bramhall on Liberty and Necessity, ed. Vere Chappell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ix-xxiii.\r\nColeman, Frank. 1998. “Hobbes`s Iconoclasm.” Political Research Quarterly 51(4): 987-1010.\r\nConnolly, William E. 1988. “Hobbes: The Politics of Divine Containment.” In Political Theory and Modernity. New York: Basil Blackwell, 16-40.\r\nCooke, Paul D. 1996. Hobbes and Christianity: reassessing the Bible in Leviathan. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.\r\nCurley, Edwin. 1996. “Calvin and Hobbes, or, Hobbes as an Orthodox Christian.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 34(2): 257-71.\r\n─────. 2004. “The Covenant with God in Hobbes’s Leviathan” In Leviathan After 350 Years, ed. Tom Sorell & Luc Foisneau. New York: Oxford University Press.\r\n─────. 2007. “Hobbes and the Cause of Religious Toleration.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan, ed. Patricia Springborg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 309-334.\r\nDaly, James. 1979. Sir Robert Filmer and English Political Thought. Toronto, Buffalo and London: University of Toronto Press.\r\nDamrosch, Leopold, Jr. “Hobbes as Reformation Theologian: Implications of the Free-Will Controversy.” Journal of the History of Ideas 40(3): 339-52.\r\nDunn, John. 1969. The Political Thought of John Locke: An Historical Account of the Argument of the ‘Two Treatises of Government‘. London: Cambridge University Press.\r\n─────. 1984. Locke. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.\r\n─────. 1990. “What is Living and What is Dead in the Political Theory of John Locke?” in Interpreting Political Responsibility: Essays 1981-1989. Princeton: Princeton University Press.\r\nFarneti, Roberto. 2007. “Hobbes on Salvation.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan, ed. Patricia Springborg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 291-308.\r\nFarr, James. 1990. “Atomes of Scripture: Hobbes and the Politics of Biblical Interpretation.” In Thomas Hobbes and Political Theory, ed. Mary G. Dietz. Kansas: University Press of Kansas, 172-196.\r\nFilmer, Robert. 1995. “An examination of the political part of Mr. Hobbes his Leviathan” In Leviathan : contemporary responses to the political theory of Thomas Hobbes, ed. G. A. J. Rogers. Bristol, England: Thoemmes Press.\r\nForster, Greg. 2005. John Locke’s Politics of Moral Consensus. New York: Cambridge University Press.\r\nGauthier, David P. 1969. The Logic of Leviathan: the Moral and Political Theory of Thomas Hobbes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.\r\n─────. 1977. “Why Ought One Obey God? : Reflections on Hobbes and Locke.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7(3): 425-46.\r\nGlover, Willis B. 1965. “God and Thomas Hobbes.” In Hobbes Studies, ed. K. C. Brown. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 141-68.\r\nGoldie, Mark. 1983. “John Locke and Anglican Royalism.” Political Studies. 31(1): 61-85.\r\nGonzález, Justo L. 1987. A History of Christian Thought, Revised Edition. Vol. III. Nashville: Abingdon Press.\r\nHalliday, R.J. , Timothy Kenyon & Andrew Reeve. 1983. “Hobbes’s Belief in God” Political Studies (31): 418-33.\r\nHarris, Ian. 1994. “The Politics of Christianity.” In Locke’s Philosophy: Content and Context, ed. G. A. J. Rogers. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 197-215.\r\nHampton, Jean. 1986. Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition. Cambridge; New York : Cambridge University Press.\r\nHobbes, Thomas. 1969. The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic. Ed. Ferdinand Tönnies. London: Frank Cass and Company Limited.\r\n─────. 1990. Behemoth; or, The Long Parliament. Ed. Ferdinand Tönnies. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.\r\n─────. 1991. “Appendix to Leviathan.” Trans. George Wright. Interpretation 18(3): 349-413.\r\n─────. 1992. The Collected Works of Thomas Hobbes. Vol. 2. Ed. Sir William Molesworth. London: Routledge/Thoemmes Press.\r\n─────. 1994. Leviathan. Ed. Edwin Curley. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.\r\nHood, F. C. 1964. The Divine Politics of Thomas Hobbes: An Interpretation of Leviathan. London: Oxford University Press.\r\nHunt, John. 1973. Religious Thought in England From the Reformation to the End of the Last Century. Vol. I. London: Strahan & Co. Rpt. Ams Press.\r\nJohnson, Paul J. 1974. “Hobbes’ Anglican Doctrine of Salvation.” In Thomas Hobbes in His Time, ed. Ralph Ross, Herbert W. Schneider and Theodore Waldman. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press,102-125.\r\nKantorowicz, Ernst Hartwig. 1997. The King`s Two Bodies: a Study in Mediaeval Political Theology. Princeton: Chichester: Princeton University Press.\r\nKlein, William. 1993. “The Ancient Constitution Revisited.” In Political Discourse in Early Modern Britain, ed. Nicholas Phillipson & Quentin Skinner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 23-44.\r\nLaslett, Peter. 1988. “Introduction.” In Two Treatises of Government, ed. Peter Laslett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\r\nLefort , Claude. 1988. “The Permanence of the Theologico-Political?” In Democracy and Political Theory, trans. David Macey. Cambridge: Polity, 213-255.\r\nLessay, Franck. 2004. “Hobbes’s Protestantism” In Leviathan After 350 Years, ed. Tom Sorell & Luc Foisneau. New York: Oxford University Press.\r\n─────. 2007. “Hobbes’s Covenant Theology and Its Political Implications.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan, ed. Patricia Springborg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 243-270.\r\nLewis, Clive Staples. 2001. Mere Christianity. New York: HarperSanFrancisco.\r\nLocke, John. 1955. A Letter Concerning Toleration. New York: The Liberal Arts Press.\r\n─────. 1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Peter H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press.\r\n─────. 1987. A Paraphrase and Notes on the Epistles of St Paul, ed. Arthur W. Wainwright. Oxford: Clarendon Press.\r\n─────. 1988. Two Treatises of Government, ed. Peter Laslett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\r\n─────. 1997. Essays on the Law of Nature. In Locke: Political Essays, ed. Mark Goldie. New York: Cambridge University Press.\r\n─────. 1999. The Reasonableness of Christianity: As delivered in the Scriptures, ed. John C. Higgins-Biddle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.\r\nMalcolm, Noel. 2004. “Leviathan, the Pentateuch, and the Origins of Modern Biblical Criticism” In Leviathan After 350 Years, ed. Tom Sorell & Luc Foisneau. New York: Oxford University Press.\r\nMarshall, John. 1994. John Locke: Resistance, Religion and Responsibility. New York: Cambridge University Press.\r\nMartinich, A. P. 1992. The Two Gods of Leviathan: Thomas Hobbes on Religion and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.\r\n─────. 2004. “The Interpretation of Covenants in Leviathan” In Leviathan After 350 Years, ed. Tom Sorell & Luc Foisneau. New York: Oxford University Press.\r\n─────. 2007. “The Bible and Protestantism in Leviathan.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan, ed. Patricia Springborg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 375-391.\r\nMcClelland, J. S. 1996. A History of Western Political Thought. London; New York: Routledge.\r\nMendle, Michael. 1993. “Parliamentary Sovereignty: A Very English Absolutism.” In Political Discourse in Early Modern Britain, ed. Nicholas Phillipson & Quentin Skinner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 97-119.\r\nMiles, Margaret R. 2005. The World Made Flesh: A History of Christian Thought. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.\r\nMilner, Benjamin. 1988. “Hobbes: On Religion” Political Theory 16(3): 400-25.\r\nMitchell, Joshua. 1993. Not By Reason Alone: Religion, History, and Identity in Early Modern Political Thought. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.\r\nMoore, J. T. 1976. “Locke`s Analysis of Language and the Assent to Scripture.” Journal of the History of Ideas 37(4): 707-14.\r\nMoore, Stanley. 1971. “Hobbes on Obligation, Moral and Political. Part One: Moral Obligation.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 9(1): 43-62.\r\n─────. 1972. “Hobbes on Obligation, Moral and Political. Part Two: Political Obligation.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 10(1): 29-42.\r\nNauta, Lodi. 2002. “Hobbes on Religion and the Church between The Elements of Law and Leviathan: A Dramatic Change of Direction?” Journal of the History of Ideas 63(4): 577-98.\r\nNuovo, Victor. 2003. “Locke’s Christology as A Key to Understanding His Philosophy.” In The Philosophy of John Locke: New Perspectives, ed. Peter R. Anstey. Landon; New York: Routledge, 129-53.\r\nOakley, Francis. 1997. “Locke, Natural Law, and God – Again.” History of Political Thought 18(4): 624-651.\r\nOverhoff, Jürgen. 1997. “The Lutheranism of Thomas Hobbes.” History of Political Thought 18:604-23.\r\nPacchi, Aprigo. 1988. “Hobbes and the Problem of God.” In Perspectives on Thomas Hobbes, ed. G. A. J. Rogers & Alan Ryan. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 171-87.\r\nPalaver, Wolfgang. 1995. “Hobbes and the Katéchon: The Secularization of Sacrificial Christianity.” Contagion: Journal of Violence, Mimesis, and Culture 2: 37–54.\r\nPelikan, Jaroslav. 1984. The Christian Tradition: vol. 4. Reformation of church and dogma(1300-1700). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.\r\nPlacher, William C. 1983. A History of Christian Theology: An Introduction. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.\r\nPocock, J. G. A. 1972. “Time, History and Eschatology in the Thought of Thomas Hobbes.” In Politics, Language, and Time: Essays on Political Thought and History. New York: Atheneum, 148-201.\r\n─────. 1990. “Thomas Hobbes: Atheist or Enthusiast? His Place in A Restoration Debate.” History of Political Thought 11(4): 737-749.\r\n─────. 2003. The Machiavellian Moment : Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.\r\nRabieh, Michael S. 1991. “The Reasonableness of Locke, or the Questionableness of Christianity.” The Journal of Politics 53(4): 933-57.\r\nReik, Miriam M. 1977. The Golden Lands of Thomas Hobbes. Michigan: Wayne State University Press.\r\nSchmitt, Carl. 1991. Glossarium: Aufzeichnungen der Jahre 1947-1951, ed. by Eberhard Freiherr von Medem. Berlin: Dunkler & Humblot.\r\n─────. 1996. The Leviathan in the State Theory of Thomas Hobbes: Meaning and Failure of a Political Symbol. Trans. George Schwab & Erna Hilfstein. London: Greenwood Press.\r\n─────. 2003. The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum. Trans. G. L. Ulmen. New York: Telos Press.\r\nSherlock, Richard. 1982. “The Theology of Leviathan: Hobbes on Religion.” Interpretation 10:43-60.\r\nSkinner, Quentin. 1978. The foundations of modern political thought: vol 2: The Age of Reformation. Cambridge ; New York : Cambridge University Press.\r\nSnyder, David C. 1986. “Faith and Reason in Locke’s Essay.” Journal of the History of Ideas 47(2): 197-213.\r\nSommerville, Johann P. 1992. Thomas Hobbes: Political Ideas in Historical Context. Hampshire: Macmillan Press.\r\n─────. 2007. “Leviathan and Its Anglican Context.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan, ed. Patricia Springborg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 358-374.\r\nState, S. A. 1990. “The Religious and the Secular in the Work of Thomas Hobbes.” In Religion, Secularization and Political Thought: Thomas Hobbes to J. S. Mill, ed. James E. Crimmins. London; New York: Routledge, 17-38.\r\nStrauss, Leo. 1952. The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: Its Basis and Its Genesis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.\r\n─────. 1953. Natural right and history. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.\r\n─────. 1987. History of Political Philosophy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.\r\nSyse, Henrik. 2007. Natural Law, Religion, and Rights: an exploration of the relationship between natural law and natural rights, with special emphasis on the teachings of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. South Bend, Ind. : St. Augustine`s Press.\r\nTaylor, A. E. 1965. “The Ethical Doctrine of Hobbes.” In Hobbes Studies, ed. K. C. Brown, 31-55.\r\nTetlow, Joanne E. 2006. The Theological Context John Locke’s Political Thought. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Politics, Catholic University of America, Washington, DC.\r\nThornton, Helen. 2002. “Cain, Abel and Thomas Hobbes.” History of Political Thought 23(4): 611-33.\r\nTuck, Richard. 1989. Hobbes. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.\r\n─────. 1990. “Hobbes and Locke on Toleration” In Thomas Hobbes and Political Theory, ed. Mary G. Dietz. Kansas: University Press of Kansas.\r\n─────. 1993. “The Civil Religion of Thomas Hobbes.” In Political Discourse in Early Modern Britain, ed. Nicholas Phillipson & Quentin Skinner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 120-138.\r\nTully, James. 1980. A Discourse on Property. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press\r\n─────. 1991. “Locke.” In The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450-1700, ed. J. A. Burns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 615-662.\r\n─────. 1993. An Approach to Political Philosophy: Locke in Contexts. New York: Cambridge University Press.\r\nVoegelin, Eric. 1998. History of Political Ideas: VI. Revolution and the New Science. In The Collected Works of Eric Voegelin, vol. 24, ed. Barry Cooper. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.\r\n─────. 2000. Modernity Without Restraint: The Political Religions; The New Science of Politics; and Science, Politics, and Gnosticism. In The Collected Works of Eric Voegelin, vol. 5, ed. Manfred Henningsen. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.\r\nWainwright, Arthur W. 1987. “Introduction.” In A Paraphrase and Notes on the Epistles of St Paul to the Galatians, 1 and 2 Corinthians, Romans, Ephesians, ed. Arthur W Wainwright. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1-88.\r\nWaldron, Jeremy. 2002. God, Locke, and Equality: Christian Foundations of John Locke`s Political Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.\r\nWarrender, Howard. 1966. The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: His Theory of Obligation. London: Oxford University Press.\r\nWolterstorff, Nicholas. 1994. “Locke’s Philosophy of Religion.” In The Cambridge Companion to Locke, ed. Vere Chappell. New York: Cambridge University Press, 172-98.\r\nWootton, David. 1990. “John Locke: Socinian or Natural Law Theorist?” In Religion, Secularization and Political Thought: Thomas Hobbes to J. S. Mill, ed. James E. Crimmins. London; New York: Routledge, 39-67.\r\nWright, George. 1991. “Introduction to 1668 Appendix to Leviathan.” Interpretation 18(3): 323-347.\r\nYolton, John W. 1985. “The Rationality of Religion.” In Locke: An Introduction. New York: Basil Blackwell, 74-91.\r\n\r\n四、電腦軟體：\r\n\r\n聖經工具. version3 = Almega bibletools library. version 3. 2001. 香港：啓創電腦分析有限公司。 | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 政治學系 95252016 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095252016 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| index.html | 115 B | HTML2 | View/Open |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.